Bulletins

      OF CANADA                                             DU CANADA   

             BULLETIN  OF                                          BULLETIN DES

             PROCEEDINGS                                          PROCÉDURES

September 3, 20041310 - 1333                                                         le 3 septembre 2004

CONTENTS                                                     TABLE DES MATIÈRES

Zoe Childs, et al.

Barry D. Laushway

Laushway Law Office

v. (30472)

Desmond Desormeaux, et al. (Ont.)

Helmut R. Brodmann

Bell Baker

FILING DATE: 16.8.2004

Monique Marie Turenne

G. Greg Brodsky, Q.C.

Brodsky & Company

v. (30478)

The Minister of Justice, et al. (Man.)

David G. Frayer, Q.C.

Attorney General of Canada

FILING DATE: 23.8.2004

Dévelopements de Normandie Inc.

Emil Vidrascu

Lavery, de Billy

c. (30476)

André Delorme (Qc)

Patrick Choquette

Prévost, Auclair, Fortin et D’Aoust

DATE DE PRODUCTION: 24.8.2004

David James Sneddon, et al.

John N. Laxton, Q.C.

Laxton & Company

v. (30487)

British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, et al. (B.C.)

D.W. Yule

Guild, Yule & Company

FILING DATE: 24.8.2004

Her Majesty the Queen

John S. McInnes

Attorney General of Ontario

v. (30480)

S.J.D. (Ont.)

Gregory Lafontaine

Lafontaine & Associate

FILING DATE: 25.8.2004

John Beazley, et al.

Michael P. Ragona, Q.C.

Alexander, Holburn, Beaudin & Lang

v. (30484)

Natalia Spehar, an infant by her Guardian Ad Litem, Ann Spehar (B.C.)

Michael J. Slater, Q.C.

Slater Vecchio

FILING DATE: 25.8.2004

Timothy Lincoln

Colin D. Bryson

Blois Nickerson Bryson

v. (30482)

Bay Ferries Ltd. (FC)

John K. Mitchell, Q.C.

Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales

FILING DATE: 26.8.2004

Daniel Martin Younger

Martin D. Glazer

v. (30483)

Her Majesty the Queen (Man.)

Richard A. Saull

Attorney General of Manitoba

FILING DATE: 26.8.2004

AUGUST 30, 2004 / LE 30 AOÛT 2004

CORAM:  Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

Les juges Major, Binnie et Fish

Great Pacific Management Co. Ltd.

v. (30301)

Guy J. Collette, Sector Financial Services Ltd. and Sector Securities Inc., Multimetro Mortgage Corporation and Ken Megale (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Civil Procedure - Actions - Class actions - Class proceedings - Certification -  Common issues - Preferable procedure - Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50 s. 4 -  Commercial law - Contracts - Agency - mandate - Torts - Negligence - Appellate court reversing lower court dismissal of application for certification of class action - Can there be any obligation at law arising per se from the relationship of investment broker and client other than the obligation of any agent to carry out the instructions of its principal - Does any implied warranty of fitness or quality arise from the sale of an investment product by an investment broker, either under the law of contract or under the law of tort.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

John Susin

v. (30366)

Howard Swartz (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Torts - Negligence - Damages - Mechanics’ Liens - Estoppel - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the Respondent’s submissions as to the validity of the lien claims - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the fact that estoppel by conduct or estoppel by convention had been established - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the fact that there was an abuse of power by the Respondent solicitor by arguing that any of the liens were valid, and adjudged accordingly, in the judgment negotiated by the Respondent were invalid - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the fact that the improper withdrawal of funds from the special account by the bank led to default on the project and the filing of liens - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the fact that the plaintiffs had met the test required in law to establish damages after negligence was proven - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in making no order to grant compensation for unauthorized use of retainer money - Whether the Court of Appeal or the trial judge erred in overlooking or excusing the fact that the Respondent solicitor was a privy of QDL or the plaintiffs in the consent judgment negotiated by him on February 16, 1982?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Kenneth Hugo Wenzel, Kenneth H. Wenzel Oilfield Consulting Inc., KW Downhole Tools Inc.

v. (30316)

Dreco Energy Services Ltd., Vector Oil Tool Ltd. (Alta.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Commercial Law - Contracts - Remedies - Injunctions - Interpretation of contract provisions - Restrictive covenants - Whether it is the court’s function to define the rights and obligations of contracting parties by severing the overly-broad portions of severance provisions contained in restrictive covenants, and enforcing what is left - What is the standard of proof required of the Plaintiff for the first branch of the tripartite test for an interlocutory injunction.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Trojan Technologies Inc.

v. (30235)

Suntec Environmental Inc. (FC)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law – Summary judgment – Property law – Patents – Summary judgment given in patents claim where experts evidence in conflict – Motions judge finding no serious issues of credibility arising but preferring evidence of one expert – Court of Appeal setting aside summary judgment, concluding motions judge repeatedly called upon to make determinations based upon assessment of credibility of expert witnesses such that serious issues of credibility did arise and matter should have been sent on to trial – Whether need to clarify contradictory decisions from  Federal Court concerning the availability of summary judgment under Rule 216 of Federal Court Rules, 1998, particularly where only contest between expert witnesses.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM:  Bastarache, LeBel, Deschamps JJ.

Les juges Bastarache, LeBel et Deschamps

Christopher Pickering

v. (30414)

Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Crim.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal law - Evidence - Credibility - Similar fact evidence - Sentencing - Whether the lower courts failed to consider whether the evidence spoke to the credibility of witnesses or complainants at the time of the alleged offences - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in its treatment of and characterization of certain evidence as similar fact evidence - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining what constitutes credibility - Whether the Court of Appeal properly distinguished credibility and admissibility - Whether the Court of Appeal considered the credibility of each witness individually by evaluating all aspects of the evidence - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge had carefully assessed the complainants’ evidence - Whether the lower courts inappropriately classified the complaints as ‘recovery memory’ rather than applying the doctrine of laches - Whether the Court of Appeal considered the consistency of the three complainants’ testimony on issues where collusion was less likely - Whether the Court of Appeal considered the appropriate test for the application of a conditional sentence - Whether, when sentencing for  historical crimes, it is appropriate to consider the accused’s conduct since the commission of the crimes  - Whether the lower courts erred in failing to consider whether incarceration of aged persons for historical crimes has individual or general deterrent value.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ernst Zundel

v. (30360)

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Solicitor General of Canada (FC)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Immigration Law - Security certificate - Right to appeal interlocutory order - Whether there is there any right to appeal interlocutory orders pursuant to s. 27(1)(c) of the Federal Court Act, in a security certificate review mandated pursuant to ss. 76-83 of IRPA.  If so, what is the scope of the right and is there any limitation to that right - Whether the most basic freedoms accorded to persons in Canada are trumped by “national security” -  Immigration and Refugee Protection Act , S.C. 2001, c. 27 .

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (30178)

Sharon Lorraine Zwicker (N.S.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  - Fundamental rights - Self-incrimination -Whether admission into evidence of the Respondent’s statement compelled pursuant to the Motor Vehicles Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 293 would breach her rights under s. 7  of the Charter  -Whether the mere possibility of the imposition of a period of imprisonment in default of payment of a fine constitutes a real or imminent deprivation of liberty so as to infringe s.7  of the Charter  - Does the decision of the Supreme Court in R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417 apply in a regulatory context where factors relating to the existence of coercion, potential abuse of power and the existence of an adversarial relationship differ significantly from those found in R. v. White - Does the fact that a Charter  remedy is sought without a challenge to the constitutionality of legislation or regulations permit a Court to dismiss consideration of the application of s.1  of the Charter  - If it is possible for a Court, pursuant to s.24(1)  of the Charter , to structure a remedy which would obviate any possibility of a breach of Charter  rights while permitting a determination of the case on the merits, is the granting of a remedy which precludes a determination of the case on the merit appropriate and just in the circumstances.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Andrew Pinkerton and Laura Pinkerton

v. (30431)

Attorney General of Canada (FC)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Evidence -  Reconsideration - Employment Insurance benefits - Volunteer work - Reliability of facts underpinning search warrant - Whether the Applicants meet the “new facts” test for reconsideration of an Umpire’s decision - Whether the Applicants meet the test of due diligence in the submission of new facts - Whether the Federal Court of Appeal made any reviewable errors.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 / LE 2 SEPTEMBRE 2004

30297                    Robert H. Nelson, Founder President of Public Defenders for himself and as representative of all those also improperly denied benefits v. Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Right Honourable Paul Martin (FC) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, Number 04‑T‑9, dated April 14, 2004, is quashed for want of jurisdiction.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour fédérale du Canada, Section de première instance, numéro 04‑T‑9, daté du 14 avril 2004, est cassée vue l'absence de juridiction.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Did lower court err in disposition of case?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30315                    Robert H. Nelson, Founder President of Public Defenders for himself and as representative of all those also improperly denied benefits v. Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Right Honourable Paul Martin (FC) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, Number 04‑T‑12, dated April 28, 2004, is quashed for want of jurisdiction.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour fédérale du Canada, Section de première instance, numéro 04‑T‑12, daté du 28 avril 2004, est cassée vue l'absence de juridiction.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Did lower court err in disposition of case?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30259                    Doug Collins v. Attorney General of British Columbia (B.C.) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA030510, dated February 13, 2004, is dismissed.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel de la Colombie‑Britannique (Vancouver), numéro CA030510, daté du 13 février 2004, est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  - Civil rights - Human rights - Procedural law - Standing - Mootness - Whether executor and beneficiary can continue her deceased husband’s constitutional challenge - Whether the lower court decisions are in error on the issue of mootness regarding the constitutional challenge to the enabling legislation of section 7, subsection 1(b) of the Human Rights Code, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 210.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30267                    The Rose Corporation, Toronto Film Studios Inc., Bluefield Development Inc., 1450755 Ontario Inc., and 1450756 Ontario Onc. v. American Home Assurance Company (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C40059, dated February 6, 2004, is dismissed with costs.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario, numéro C40059, daté du 6 février 2004, est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Property law - Real property - Commercial law - Insurance - Does the absence of an equitable interest in premises negate the ability of a purchaser under binding agreement of purchase and sale to be an “owner” under a policy of insurance, pending closing of the transaction?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30333                    Cadnet Productions Inc. A Canadian Incorporated Company, William Robert Bell v. Her Majesty the Queen (FC) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A‑5‑03, dated February 27, 2004, is dismissed with costs.

La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel fédérale, numéro A‑5‑03, daté du 27 février 2004, est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter  (civil) - Torts - Taxation - Evidence - Crown - Torts by and against Crown - Tort of Misfeasance in Public Office - Negligence - Assessment - Whether the lower courts erred in its findings on the issue of misfeasance in a public office? - Whether the Respondent was negligent in its attempts to recover an overpayment of employment insurance benefits?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30245                    Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3373 v. Queen's County Residential Services Inc. (P.E.I.) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island, Appeal Division, Number S1‑AD‑0997, dated January 28, 2004, is dismissed.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour suprême de l'Île‑du‑Prince‑Édouard, Cour d'appel, numéro S1‑AD‑0997, daté du 28 janvier 2004, est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Administrative law - Judicial review - Standard of review - Arbitration - Arbitrability under collective agreement - Time limitation for referring a grievance to arbitration - Whether the majority of the Court of Appeal erred in applying a correctness standard rather than the standard of patent unreasonableness?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

30371                    Gregory Scott Hennick v. Children's Aid Society of Cape Breton (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave)

Coram:                    Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Number CA 205158, dated March 31, 2004, is dismissed.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel de l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel de la Nouvelle‑Écosse, numéro CA 205158, daté du 31 mars 2004, est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Family law - Procedure - Whether an individual has the right to choose whom ever he chooses to represent him in a court of law? - Whether the Applicant had arguable issues for the Court of Appeal is leave to appeal was granted? - Whether the Applicant has the right to challenge the change of legislation concerning Civil Procedure Rule 5.17(2)ii.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

16.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Time extended to October 29, 2004.

16.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the respondent’s response

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (30349)

Thomas Turcotte (B.C.) (Crim.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer la réponse de l'intimé

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Time extended to July 19, 2004.

17.8.2004

Before / Devant : MAJOR J.

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the factum, affidavit and book of authorities of the intervener the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association and to present oral argument

Biolyse Pharma Corporation

v. (29823)

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al. (FC)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les mémoire, affidavit et recueil de sources de l’intervenante l’Association canadienne du médicament générique, et pour présenter une plaidoirie

GRANTED IN PART / ACCORDÉE EN PARTIE

UPON APPLICATION by the intervener, Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association, for an order extending the time to serve and file its factum, affidavit and book of authorities to August 20, 2004 and for an order permitting the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association to present oral argument at the hearing of this appeal.

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The motion to extend the time to serve and file the factum, affidavit and book of   authorities of the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association to August 20, 2004 is granted.

2) The request to present oral argument is dismissed.

3) Costs of this application are awarded to the respondents to be paid by the intervener  Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association.

20.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to withdraw as solicitor for the respondent (Daniel Paquin)

Ville de Montréal

c. (29413)

2952-1366 Québec Inc. (Qc)

Requête visant à cesser de représenter l’intimée (Daniel Paquin)

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

25.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to reimburse the security deposit

Maurice Chevrette

c. (21697)

Paul Émile Lapointe, et al. (Qc)

Requête en vue d’obtenir le remboursement du cautionnement

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    The motion for the reimbursement of the $500 security deposit is granted.

25.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to adduce new evidence

Muhammad Qureshi

v. (29938)

Her Majesty the Queen (Que.) (Crim.)

Requête visant à produire de nouveaux éléments de preuve

DISMISSED / REJETÉE

25.8.2004

Before / Devant : DESCHAMPS J.

Motions for leave to intervene

BY/PAR:                Ligue des droits de la personne de B’nai Birth Canada, PAGE RWANDA et Canadian Centre for International Justice,

Congrès juif canadien, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law - International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC) and Human Rights Watch (HRW)

IN/DANS:              Le ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration

c. (30025)

Léon Mugesera, et al. (CF)

Requêtes en autorisation d'intervention

GRANTED / ACCORDÉES

UPON APPLICATIONS by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, Page Rwanda, the Canadian Centre for International Justice and the Canadian Jewish Congress, the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law - International Human Rights Clinic and Human Rights Watch, for leave to intervene in the above appeal;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The motion for leave to intervene of the applicants, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, Page Rwanda, the Canadian Centre for International Justice, is granted and the applicants shall be entitled to serve and file a joint factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.

The motion for leave to intervene of the applicants, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law - International Human Rights Clinic and Human Rights Watch, is granted and the applicants shall be entitled to serve and file a joint factum not to exceed 20 pages.

The requests to present oral argument are deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners.

The interveners shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.

Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondents any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their intervention.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

The appellant is granted leave to file a single 20 pages reply factum within 20 days of the service of the interveners factum.

La demande d’autorisation d’intervenir présentée par la Ligue des droits de la personne de B’nai Brith Canada, Page Rwanda, Canadian Centre for International Justice est accordée; les requérantes auront le droit de signifier et déposer un mémoire conjoint de 20 pages.

La demande d’autorisation d’intervenir présentée par le Congrès juif canadien, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law - International Human Rights Clinic et Human Rights Watch est accordée; les requérantes auront le droit de signifier et déposer un mémoire conjoint de 20 pages.

Les demandes visant à présenter une plaidoirie seront examinées après la réception et l’examen de l’argumentation écrite des parties et des intervenants.

Les intervenants n’auront pas le droit de produire d’autres éléments de preuve ni d’ajouter quoi que ce soit au dossier des parties.

Conformément au par. 59(1)(a) des Règles de la Cour suprême du Canada, les intervenants paieront à l’appelant et aux intimés tous débours supplémentaires résultant de leur intervention.

IL EST EN OUTRE ORDONNÉ:

L’appelant est accordé le droit de signifier et de déposer un mémoire en réplique d’au plus de 20 pages au plus tard 20 jours de la signification des mémoires des intervenants.

25.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion by the appellant to file lengthy factum

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (30063)

Stephen Frederick Marshall, et al. (N.S.)

Requête visant le dépôt d’un long mémoire par l’appelant

GRANTED IN PART / ACCORDÉE EN PARTIE

UPON APPLICATION by the appellant for an order permitting the filing of a lengthy factum, namely 75 pages;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1)                     The motion is granted in part.  The appellant shall be permitted to serve and file a factum not exceeding 60 pages in length.

2)                                           The respondent shall be permitted to serve and file a factum not exceeding 60 pages in length.

25.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the appellant’s factum and book of authorities

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (30113)

Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, et al. (Ont.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les mémoire et recueil de sources de l’appelante

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Time to serve and file the factum extended to August 16, 2004. Time to serve and file the book of authorities extended to August 18, 2004.

26.8.2004

Before / Devant : DESCHAMPS J.

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the respondent’s record, factum and book of authorities and to present oral argument at the hearing of the appeal

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (29965)

Lynn Fice (Ont.) (Crim.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les dossier, mémoire et recueil de sources de l’intimée et pour présenter une plaidoirie lors de l’audition de l’appel

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

UPON APPLICATION by the respondent for an order extending the time to serve and file its factum, record and book of authorities to August 10, 2004, and for an order permitting the respondent to present oral argument at the hearing of this appeal.

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

26.8.2004

Before / Devant : DESCHAMPS J.

Motion for leave to intervene

BY/PAR:                Fédération des producteurs de bois du Québec et Fédération canadienne des propriétaires de boisés

IN/DANS:              Raynald Grenier

c. (30194)

Sa Majesté la Reine (CF)

Requête en autorisation d'intervention

DISMISSED / REJETÉE

À LA SUITE DE LA DEMANDE de la Fédération des producteurs de bois du Québec et la Fédération canadienne des propriétaires de boisés visant à obtenir l’autorisation d’intervenir dans la demande d’autorisation d’appel susmentionné;

ET APRÈS AVOIR LU la documentation déposée;

L’ORDONNANCE SUIVANTE EST RENDUE;

La demande d’autorisation d’intervenir présentée par  la Fédération des producteurs de bois du Québec et la Fédération canadienne des propriétaires de boisés est rejetée (Balvir Singh Multani c. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, et al.(30322) (22 juin 2004); ING Canada Inc. c. Aegon Canada Inc., et al (30170) (29 mars 2004); Les Constructions du Saint-Laurent Ltée c. Aluminerie Alouette Inc. (30056) (22 janvier 2004) et R. c. Krystopher Krymowski, et al. (29865) (23 septembre 2003)) sans préjudice du droit de la demanderesse de demander l’autorisation d’intervenir à l’appel, si l’autorisation d’appel est accordée.

26.8.2004

Francisco Batista Pires

v. (30151)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.)

(By leave and As of Right)

26.8.2004

Martin Jacques Dionne

v. (30488)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.)

(As of Right)

27.8.2004

Mikisew Cree First Nation

v. (30246)

Sheila Copps, Minister of Canadian Heritage (FC)

23.8.2004

BY/PAR:                Procureur général du Québec

IN/DANS:              Her Majesty the Queen

  v. (30063)

Stephen Frederick Marshal, et al.

23.8.2004

BY/PAR:                Procureur général du Québec

IN/DANS:              Her Majesty the Queen

  v. (30005)

Joshua Bernard

1.09.2004

Director, Income Maintenance Branch, Ministery of Community and Social Services, et al.

v. (29294)

Sandra Falkiner, et al. (Ont.)

(Appeal)

                                                         SUPREME COURT OF CANADA SCHEDULE

                                                             CALENDRIER DE LA COUR SUPREME

                                                                                                                  - 2004 -    

             10/06/04

                                                                                                          - 2005 -