Bulletins

      OF CANADA                                             DU CANADA   

             BULLETIN  OF                                          BULLETIN DES

             PROCEEDINGS                                          PROCÉDURES

August 13, 2004 1231-1255                                                                 Le 13 août 2004

CONTENTS                                                     TABLE DES MATIÈRES

James Henderson

James Henderson

v. (30150)

Allstate Insurance Company of Canada (Ont.)

Ian Kirby

Gilbert, Wright and Kirby

FILING DATE: 29.7.2004

Kurton Edwards, et al.

Timothy E. Breen

Fleming, Breen

v. (30441)

Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)

Carol A.R. Brewer

Attorney General of Ontario

FILING DATE: 28.7.2004

Robert Nadir

Michael Davies

v. (30442)

Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)

Crown Law Office Criminal

FILING DATE: 29.7.2004

Greenpeace Canada, et al.

A. Cameron Ward

A. Cameron Ward & Company

v. (30443)

Clint Verchere, et al. (B.C.)

J. Miriam Gropper, Q.C.

Black, Gropper & Company

FILING DATE: 30.7.2004

Dynatec Corporation, et al.

Norman A. Keith

Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP

v. (30444)

Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)

Victoria A. Kondo

Attorney General of Ontario

FILING DATE: 03.8.2004

AUGUST 3, 2004 / LE 3 AOÛT 2004

CORAM:  Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

Les juges Major, Binnie et Fish

Matthew Benjamin Barsoum a.k.a. Michael Paul Barsoum

v. (30358)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal Law - Procedural Law - Appeal - Barristers and Solicitors - To what extent must actual conflict be demonstrated when a conflict of interest is asserted for the first time on appeal, and when the alleged conflict relates to a lawyer prosecuting his or her former client?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Shane Tyrone Ferras

v. (30211)

United States of America, Her Majesty the Queen, Martin Cauchon, Minister of Justice (Crim.) (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter  - Criminal - Criminal Law - Extradition -  Whether ss. 32(1)(a) and 33 of the Extradition Act , S.C. 1999, c. 18 , constituted reasonable limits on the right under s. 6 of the Charter of a Canadian citizen to remain in Canada - Whether ss. 32(1)(a) and 33 of the Extradition Act   violate s. 7  of the Charter  by permitting extradition of a Canadian citizen on the basis of otherwise inadmissible evidence while precluding any assessment of the reliability of the evidence.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Leroy Latty and Lynval Wright

v. (30295)

The United States of America and The Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada (Crim.) (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter  - Criminal - Criminal Law - Extradition - Whether ss. 32 and 33 of the Extradition Act , S.C. 1999, c. 18  violate s. 7  of the Charter  - Whether Minister of Justice properly exercised his discretion in ordering surrender to United States of America.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Jeffrey David Booth, Daniel Roderick Booth

v. (30325)

British Columbia Life and Casualty Company (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Commercial law - Insurance - Policy of insurance - Accidental death and dismemberment policy -Exclusion clause - Interpretation - Whether Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of “self-inflicted injury” contained in an exclusion clause.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Esam Iskandar and Pinnacle Developments Limited

v. (30303)

United Gulf Developments Limited and Navid Saberi (N.S.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Property Law - Real property - Specific performance - Whether there are conflicting lower court decisions regarding the test for specific performance in land actions - Whether the burden of proof for summary judgment in a specific performance context is unsettled - Whether a plea of specific performance may lead to a de facto injunction, tying up commercially valuable lands indefinitely

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

City of Toronto

v. (30270)

Zari K. Banihashem‑Bakhtiari, Pedrum Sodouri and Pejman Sodouri, Axes Investments Inc., Alfredo De Gasperis, Tandem Group International Inc., Tandem Group Management Inc., Tandem International Inc., Tandem International Investment Co., Tandem Investments Ltd., Paul Reid, Van Forbell, Merv Doctorow, John Broderick, Robert Macht, John Naughton and Intertec Security & Investigation Limited (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Civil procedure - Standard of review - Re-apportionment of liability by Court of Appeal - Costs - Counsel agreed to a contingency fee - Counsel incurred carrying costs - A premium was awarded over the award of costs to compensate for the carrying costs - Did this Court’s decision in Housen v. Nikolaisen supercede its decisions in Ingles v. Tutkalus Construction and in Sparks v. Thompson - If not, what is the appropriate test for appellate review of the apportionment of liability among tortfeasors - Can an appellate court advert to a test for appellate review and then effectively retry apportionment of liability - Can premium be included in an order for party and party costs?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM: Bastarache, LeBel and Deschamps JJ.

Les juges Bastarache, LeBel et Deschamps

Eli Stewart Nicholas

v. (30337)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  - Criminal Law - Right to Counsel - Detention - Exclusion of Evidence - Discoverability - R. v. Stillman - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in concluding that the Applicant was not detained and therefore not entitled to be advised of his right to counsel - Whether  the Court of Appeal erred in law in concluding that the Crown had discharged its burden under s. 24(2) to establish that the evidence obtained as a result of a Charter  violation would otherwise have been discoverable.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec

c. (30355)

Philippe Robaey (Qc)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit administratif - Compétence - Requête en irrecevabilité - Loi sur l’assurance-maladie, L.R.Q. chap. A-29 - Qui de la Cour supérieure ou du Conseil d’arbitrage, institué en vertu de l’art. 54 de la Loi sur l’assurance-maladie, a compétence pour entendre le litige opposant les parties? - Si la Cour confirme la compétence du Conseil d’arbitrage, est-ce que l’arbitre peut, pour fin de rémunération, interpréter les dispositions pertinentes de la Loi sur l’assurance-maladie et de la Loi médicale, L.R.Q. c, M-9, pour appliquer l’art. 3.2 de la règle 3 du préambule général et les articles 1.2 et 1.3 de l’annexe 38 de l’entente intervenue entre le ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux et la Fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec, considérant le permis restrictif de l’intimé? - Si la Cour confirme la compétence de la Cour supérieure, est-ce que la Cour a compétence, pour appliquer aux fins de rémunération d’un professionnel de la santé, l’entente intervenue entre le ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux et la Fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec?

HISTORIQUE DES PROCÉDURES

XTRA CANADA, a Division of Extra, Inc.

v. (30390)

KPMG in its capacity as Interim Receiver and Trustee of the Estate of the TCT Group of Companies, bankrupts, GMAC Commercial Credit Corporation (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Commercial Law - Statutes - Property Law - Bankruptcy - Security interest - Receivership - Creditor and debtor - Conflict of laws - Interpretation - Personal property - Personal Property Security Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.10 - Whether the provisions found in s. 7(1) of the Personal Property Security Act apply in circumstances where the instrument in question is not a financing lease? - Whether there must be a security interest under Ontario law before the choice of law provisions apply?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Turret Realties Inc.

v. (30321)

Kirk Bartosek, by his Litigation Guardian, Janet Williams, Janet Williams, Anne Busk, also known as Anne McFadden, and Paul Busk (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Torts - Insurance - Negligence - Damages - Motor vehicles -  In what circumstances should a Trial Judge recuse himself or herself one learning of the terms of the Mary Carter agreement and the insurance limits of the three Respondents? - What is the extent of a Trial Judge’s discretion to exercise its parens patriae power to allow a Defendant to provide a structured settlement proposal for future care costs, when the Trial Judge concludes that it is in the best interest of the Plaintiff to receive a structured annuity? - Should the Trial Judge have awarded a lump sum for future care costs and an amount for tax gross-up if it results in an over-payment and if no taxes are likely to be paid because of the result of divided liability, when the Trial Judge concluded that a structured settlement would be in the best interests of the Plaintiff and when the Trial Judge had the ability to exercise his parens patriae jurisdiction pursuant to s. 116(1) of the Court of Justice Act, R.S.O. c. C.43 to award periodic payments and a structured settlement for future care costs?  - What is the law in relation to an award for a management fee, where the income earned on a substantial award will be sufficient enough such that the award will not be encroached upon?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Monique Boulet

c. (30304)

Centre hospitalier Pierre Le Gardeur et Marie‑Josée Marceau (Qc)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Législation – Interprétation – Aptitude à consentir aux soins requis par l’état de santé d’un majeur – Refus – Les tribunaux inférieurs ont-ils erré en jugeant que la demanderesse n’était pas apte à donner son consentement à l’égard des soins d’hébergement requis par son état de santé?

HISTORIQUE DES PROCÉDURES

AUGUST 9, 2004 / LE 9 AOÛT 2004

CORAM:  Major, Binnie and Fish JJ.

Les juges Major, Binnie et Fish

Allen Brian Fehr

v. (30192)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal Law (Non Charter) - Evidence - Successive wiretaps - Standing - Four successive authorizations granted to intercept private communications as part of a narcotics investigation - Applicant a named target in last two authorizations - Applicant denied disclosure of materials supporting first two authorizations - Evidence gathered under last two authorizations admitted at trial - Whether Court of Appeal erred in failing to decide issue of the applicant’s standing to seek disclosure - Whether disclosure issue was discretionary or one of constitutional entitlement - Whether test for disclosure is a materiality test or one of clear irrelevance - Whether Court of Appeal mis-characterized the importance of the disclosure sought?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Eugenio Pugliese

v. (30200)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter  - Criminal Law - Right to trial within a reasonable time  - Criminal Law (Non Charter) - Evidence - Successive wiretaps - Whether Court of Appeal erred in application of test to determine investigative necessity for authorization to intercept private communications - Whether Court of Appeal erred in characterizing  disclosure issue as one vesting a discretion on the trial judge and involving the task of keeping the case within legal limits - Whether Court of Appeal misapplied standard for disclosure - Whether an accused’s right to be tried within a reasonable period of time extends only to the commencement of trial and not to the conclusion of trial.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Deborah Louise Point

v. (30367)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Alta.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal Law - Murder - Manslaughter - Intoxication - Mens Rea - Whether the burden on the accused to adduce sufficient evidence to raise a defence such as intoxication to refute intent might displace the onus on the Crown to prove intent for murder.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Dwane Park

v. (30273)

Zealandia B.P.O. Elks Inc., Duane Kidd, Kirk Kidd, Jordan Brown, Don Sparks, Grant Demers, Frank Belanger, Steve Hanley and Don Hanley (Sask.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Torts - Negligence - Liability of host - Whether the liability of hosts of a recreational or sporting activity is an exception to the general rules of negligence, and as such, are they entitled to special status - Under what circumstances is a plaintiff a rescuer of property and owed a duty of care by a defendant?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM: Bastarache, LeBel and Deschamps JJ.

Les juges Bastarache, LeBel et Deschamps

Carlo Montemurro

v. (30341)

Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  - Criminal law - Unreasonable search and seizure - Exclusion of evidence -  Interception of private communications - Wiretap Authorization - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the trial judge’s conclusion that there  was an absence of reasonable and probable grounds to support the granting of the authorization  to intercept private communications - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the trial judge’s conclusion that the high standard of investigative necessity had not been satisfied - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that, if the Applicant’s rights under  section 8  of the Charter  had been breached, the evidence was nonetheless admissible -  Criminal Code,  R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 186 

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Phillip Ofume and Maureen Ofume

v. (30289)

CIBC Mortgage Corporation, a body corporate (N.S.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural Law - Civil procedure - Appeal - Extension of time - Whether Court of Appeal erred in dismissing motion for extension of time to file appeal.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

April 26, 2004

Supreme Court of Canada                                  

Motion to extend time and Application for leave to appeal filed

Phillip Ofume and Maureen Ofume

v. (30300)

CIBC Mortgage Corporation, a body corporate (N.S.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural Law - Civil procedure - Summary judgment - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing appeal.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ernst & Young, Nicolas Beaudin, Alain Roberge, Richard Epstein, Daniel Garant, Jean‑Pierre Huard and Patrice Beaudin

v. 30237

Fraser Milner Casgrain, s.e.n.c. and Fraser Milner Casgrain, LLP (Que.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law – Pre-trial procedure – Examination on discovery – Implied undertaking – Whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the respondents did not breach their implied undertaking of confidentiality – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that the judgment appealed from did not fulfil the criteria set out by art. 29 and 511 C.C.P.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Franco Maistri

c. (30361)

Jean‑Marc Trottier et Corporation professionnelle des notaires du Québec (Qc)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Procédure - Requête introductive d’instance - Prescription - Impossibilité d’agir - Articles 2904 et 2925 du Code civil du Québec - Article 75.1 du Code de procédure civile - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle erré en droit dans son interprétation des dispositions de l’article 2904 du Code civil du Québec en matière d’impossibilité d’agir? - Est-ce que le demandeur était, en l’espèce, effectivement dans l’impossibilité d’agir? - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle erré en droit dans son interprétation des dispositions de l’article 75.1 du Code de procédure civile?

HISTORIQUE DES PROCÉDURES

27.7.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion for exemption from the Rules

Le ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration 

c. (30025)

Léon Mugesera, et autres (CF)

Requête pour être exempté des règles

GRANTED WITHOUT COSTS / ACCORDÉE SANS DÉPENS

Vu la requête de l’appelant, le ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration, en vertu du par. 8(1) des Règles de la Cour suprême du Canada, pour qu’elle accepte, tel quel, le mémoire de l’appelant, déposé au greffe, le 14 juin 2004;

Vu les observations écrites déposées par les parties;

La requête est accueillie, sans frais.

27.7.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

GRANTED IN PART / ACCORDÉE EN PARTIE 

À LA SUITE DE LA DEMANDE des intimés visant à obtenir une dispense d’observation des règles en vertu du paragraphe 8(1) des Règles de la Cour suprême du Canada;

ET APRÈS AVOIR LU la documentation déposée;

L’ORDONNANCE SUIVANTE EST RENDUE:

1.         La requête est accueillie en partie;

2.         Les intimés pourront utiliser la police Times New Roman 12 points, utiliser le simple interlignage dans l’élaboration d’un sommaire ou compte rendu de conclusions des instances inférieures ou dans toute autre énumération, et utiliser, dans la citation de sources, un retrait de 0,2 cm par la droite seulement;

3.         La demande pour être exempté des frais de production de la présente requête est refusée.

27.7.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion pursuant to Rule 32(2) to file additional material

Kingsley M. Lughas

v. (30274)

The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation (Man.)

Requête pour déposer des documents

supplémentaires conformément au règle 32(2)

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

27.7.2004

Before / Devant : BASTARACHE J.

Motion for a stay of proceedings

Ernst Zundel

v. (30360)

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, et al. (FC)

Requête en suspension des procédures

DISMISSED WITH COSTS / REJETÉE AVEC DÉPENS

UPON APPLICATION by the applicant for a stay of proceedings and for an order consolidating this application for leave with the application for leave from the Court of Appeal of Ontario in file number 30427;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The application is dismissed with costs. There is no valid  reason in this case for departing from the practice of this Court to require that a motion for stay be filed in the Court of Appeal appealed from (Esmail v. Petro-Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 3).

The motion for consolidating the appeal from a decision of the Federal Court with the appeal of a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal is denied. The choice made by the applicant to institute parallel proceedings should not be reversed at this point by way of recourse to rule 47 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada.

28.7.2004

Before / Devant : BASTARACHE J.

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the application for leave

David John Sharpe

v. (30406)

Yvette Jacqueline Kirk (formerly Yvette Jacqueline Sharpe) (Man.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer la demande d'autorisation

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

UPON APPLICATION by the applicant for an order extending the time to serve and file an application for leave to appeal to June 22, 2004;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The application for an order extending the time to serve and file an application for leave to appeal to June 22, 2004, is granted.

The respondent has 30 days from this order to serve and file her response to the application for leave to appeal.

4.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the respondent’s factum

Daryl Milland Clark

v. (29976)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (Crim.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer le mémoire de l’intimée

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Time extended to September 17, 2004.

04.8.2004

Before / Devant : LEBEL J.

Motion for leave to intervene

BY / PAR :             Attorney General of Ontario

IN / DANS :           Daryl Milland Clark

v. (29976)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (Crim.)

Requête en autorisation d'intervention

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

UPON APPLICATION by the Attorney General of Ontario for leave to intervene in the above appeal;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Ontario, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.

The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the intervener.

The intervener shall not be entitled to raise new issues or adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.

Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the intervention.

4.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the factum and book of authorities of the intervener the Attorney General of Quebec

Provincial Court Judges’ Association of New Brunswick, et al.

v. (30006)

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick as represented by the Minister of Justice (N.B.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les mémoire et recueil de sources de l’intervenant le Procureur général du Québec

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Délai prorogé au 30 september 2004.  La requête relative à la plaidoirie orale est prématurée.

8.7.2004 (REVISED / RÉVISÉ 5.8.2004)

Before / Devant : DESCHAMPS J.

Motion for leave to intervene

BY / PAR :             Attorney General of Canada

IN / DANS:            E.B.

v. (29890)

Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia (B.C.)

Requête en autorisation d'intervention

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

UPON APPLICATION by the Attorney General of Canada for leave to intervene in the above appeal;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Canada, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.

The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the intervener.

The intervener shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.

Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their intervention.

5.8.2004

Before / Devant : DESCHAMPS J.

Motion for extension of time and leave to intervene

BY / PAR :             Attorney General of British Columbia

IN / DANS:            E.B.

v. (29890)

Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia (B.C.)

Requête visant à obtenir une prorogation de délai et l’autorisation d'intervenir

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE

UPON APPLICATION by the Attorney General of British Columbia for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene in the above appeal;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The motion for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of British Columbia, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.

The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the intervener.

The intervener shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.

Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the intervention.

5.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Motion to state a constitutional question and to extend the time in which to serve and file the motion to state a constitutional question

The Ontario Judges’ Association, et al.

v. (30148)

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, as Represented by the Chair of Management Board (Ont.)

Requête pour formulation d’une question constitutionnelle et pour prorogation du délai pour signifier et déposer une question constitutionnelle

GRANTED IN PART / ACCORDÉE EN PARTIE

UPON APPLICATION by the appellants for an order extending the time to serve and file the motion to state constitutional questions and for an order stating constitutional questions in the above appeal;

AND HAVING READ the material filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The application for an extension of time is granted and the motion to state constitutional questions is dismissed.

5.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the respondents’ record and factum and motion for exemption from filing fees

Le ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration

c. (30025)

Léon Mugesera, et autres (CF)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les dossier et mémoire des intimés et requête pour obtenir une exemption des frais de production de la requête

À LA SUITE DE LA DEMANDE des intimés visant à obtenir une prorogation de délai de 60 jours pour le dépôt de leur mémoire et de leur dossier d’appel et visant à obtenir une exemption des frais de production de la requête;

ET APRÈS AVOIR LU la documentation déposée;

L’ORDONNANCE SUIVANTE EST RENDUE:

1.         La requête est accueillie en partie;

2.         Le délai du dépôt du mémoire et du dossier d’appel des intimés est prorogé au 16 août 2004;

3.         La demande pour être exempté des frais de production de la présente requête est refusée.

6.8.2004

Before / Devant : THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to serve and file the respondents' responses

Her Majesty the Queen

v. (30364)

James Sauvé, et al. (Ont.) (Crim.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer les réponses des intimés

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE    Time extended to October 15, 2004.

10.8.2004

Jody James Gunning

v. (30161)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.)

10.8.2004

Ronaldo Lising

v. (30240)

Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.)

29.7.2004

BY/PAR:                Attorney General for Saskatchewan

Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador

IN/DANS:              Her Majesty the

  v. (30005)

Joshua Bernard (N.B.)

28.7.2004

BY/PAR:                Attorney General for Saskatchewan

Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador

IN/DANS:              Her Majesty the Queen

  v. (30063)

Stephen Frederick Marshal, et al. (N.S.)

                                                         SUPREME COURT OF CANADA SCHEDULE

                                                             CALENDRIER DE LA COUR SUPREME

                                                                                                                  - 2004 -    

             10/06/04

                                                                                                          - 2005 -