CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIÈRES
Applications for leave to appeal 818 - 821Demandes d'autorisation d'appel
filed déposées
Applications for leave submitted 822 - 828 Demandes soumises à la Cour depuis la
to Court since last issue dernière parution
Oral hearing ordered - Audience ordonnée
Oral hearing on applications for - Audience sur les demandes d'autorisation
leave
Judgments on applications for 829 Jugements rendus sur les demandes
leave d'autorisation
Motions 830 - 831 Requêtes
Notices of appeal filed since last - Avis d'appel déposés depuis la dernière
issue parution
Notices of intervention filed since - Avis d'intervention déposés depuis la
last issue dernière parution
Notices of discontinuance filed since 832 Avis de désistement déposés depuis la
last issue dernière parution
Appeals heard since last issue and 833 Appels entendus depuis la dernière
disposition parution et résultat
Pronouncements of appeals reserved - Jugements rendus sur les appels en
délibéré
Headnotes of recent judgments - Sommaires des arrêts récents
Weekly agenda 834 Ordre du jour de la semaine
Summaries of the cases - Résumés des affaires
Cumulative Index ‑ Leave - Index cumulatif ‑ Autorisations
Cumulative Index ‑ Appeals - Index cumulatif ‑ Appels
Appeals inscribed ‑ Session - Appels inscrits ‑ Session
beginning commençant le
Notices to the Profession and - Avis aux avocats et communiqué
Press Release de presse
Deadlines: Motions before the Court 835 Délais: Requêtes devant la Cour
Deadlines: Appeals 836 Délais: Appels
Judgments reported in S.C.R. 837 Jugements publiés au R.C.S.
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FILED |
DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION D'APPEL DÉPOSÉES |
John Stevens
Bruce Clark
v. (24675)
The Stoney Band et al. (Alta.)
Brian P. Rurka, Walsh Wilkins
Robert J. Normey, A.G. of Alberta
FILING DATE 3.4.1995
Bruce Clark
v. (24676)
Her Majesty The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
John Edmond
Attorney General of Canada
FILING DATE 3.4.1995
Gayle Hennick
v. (24699)
Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
Roger Leclaire
Attorney General of Canada
FILING DATE 20.4.1995
Dell Holdings Limited
Bryan Finlay, Q.C.
J. Gregory Richards
Weir & Foulds
v. (24695)
Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority (Ont.)
John D. Brownlie, Q.C.
Susan J. Heakes
Blake, Cassels & Graydon
FILING DATE 3.5.1995
Salvatore Liotta et al.
James C. Morton
Steinberg, Olyan
v. (24697)
Dale Emery et al. (Ont.)
David Liblong
Smith, Lyons, Torrance, Stevenson & Mayer
FILING DATE 4.5.1995
Cheticamp Fish Co-Operative Limited et al.
Joel Fichaud, Q.C.
Douglas Caldwell, Q.C.
Patterson Kitz
v. (24700)
Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada (N.S.)
Michael J. Wood
John J. Ashley
Burchell, MacAdam & Hayman
FILING DATE 5.5.1995
Solange Dubeau
c. (24701)
Gestion Jean-Paul Rickner Limitée (Qué.)
Jimmy Vallée
DATE DE PRODUCTION 8.5.1995
TSCO of Canada Ltd., anciennement connue sous le nom de La Compagnie Singer du Canada Ltée
Danièle Mayrand, Michel Benoit
Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast, s.e.n.c.
c. (24611)
Robert Châteauneuf (Qué.)
Marcel Rivest
Rivest, Schmidt, Moreau, Desautels & Tardif
DATE DE PRODUCTION 4.5.1995
Newfoundland Telephone Company Limited
James R. Chalker
Chalker, Green & Rowe
v. (24705)
Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
Jean-Pierre Blais
C.R.T.C.
FILING DATE 4.5.1995
Jean-Paul Bossé, and those Additional Plaintiffs listed in the Amended Appendix "A" to the Fresh-as-Amended Statement of Claim
L.A. Vandor, Q.C.
Vandor & Company
v. (24702)
The Mastercraft Group Inc. et al. (Ont.)
Bruce Smith
Smith, Lyons, Torrance, Stevenson & Mayer
FILING DATE 5.5.1995
Rodrigue Girard
c. (24704)
Marius Moisan (Qué.)
Philippe Leboeuf
Savard Nadeau
DATE DE PRODUCTION 5.5.1995
Corporation d'Assurance de personne La Laurentienne et al.
André Blanchet
Jolin Fournier Morisset
c. (24703)
Ville de Québec et al. (Qué.)
Estelle Alain
Alain, Tardif & Associés
DATE DE PRODUCTION 5.5.1995
St. Mary's General Hospital and the Sisters of St. Joseph of the Diocese of Hamilton
Daniel J. Rosenkrantz
Sullivan, Festeryga, Lawlor & Arrell
v (24706)
A. Tony Fiorelli et al. (Ont.)
Edward W. Claxton
Shuh Cline & Grossman
FILING DATE 5.5.1995
Daniel Francis Viola
Peter Bruce Gunn
Gunn & Prithipaul
v. (24694)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)
Paul Moreau
Attorney General for Alberta
FILING DATE 1.5.1995
Salvatore Gramaglia
v. (24707)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)
FILING DATE 4.5.1995
Dr. Hachmi Hammami
Devon B. Carbol
v. (24708)
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (B.C.)
Douglas H. Clarke
FILING DATE 5.5.1995
Dr. V.I. Fabrikant
v. (24677)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Que.)
M. Denis
Attorney General of Quebec
FILING DATE 24.4.1995
Roger Moses George
David M. Rosenberg
Rosenberg & Rosenberg
v. (24709)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.)
Robert A. Mulligan
Attorney General of British Columbia
FILING DATE 8.5.1995
Kathryn Haughton
B.H. Bresner
Tess DiPonio
Borden & Elliot
v. (24710)
Stewart W. Parker et al. (Ont.)
Lawrence A. Pick
Bennett Best Burn
FILING DATE 8.5.1995
The Ministry of Labour for the Province of Ontario, Employment Standards Branch
Brian G. Morgan
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
v. (24711)
Zittrer, Siblin & Associates Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Limited (Ont.)
Leo Klug
Minden, Gross, Grafstein & Greenstein
FILING DATE 8.5.1995
Jack E. Ukrainetz
Anil K. Kapoor
v. (24714)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.)
Karen Janke
Attorney General of Canada
FILING DATE 10.5.1995
Her Majesty The Queen
Michael J. Lema
Attorney General of Canada
v. (24713)
Royal Bank of Canada (Alta.)
Ray C. Rutman
Milner Fenerty
FILING DATE 9.5.1995
Eric McDougall Williams
Jack A. King
Thompson Dorfman Sweatman
v. (24712)
Beverley Downey-Waterbury (Man.)
G. Patrick S. Riley
Taylor McCaffrey
FILING DATE 9.5.1995
Steven Paul Fountain
Clayton C. Ruby
John Norris
Ruby & Edwardh
v. (24716)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)
Susan L. Reid
Min. of the Attorney General
FILING DATE 10.5.1995
Carole L. Barrons
v. (24717)
Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
Franco Calabrese
FILING DATE 11.5.1995
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE SUBMITTED TO COURT SINCE LAST ISSUE |
DEMANDES SOUMISES À LA COUR DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION |
MAY 5, 1995 / LE 5 MAI 1995
CORAM: CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER AND GONTHIER AND IACOBUCCI JJ. /
LE JUGE EN CHEF LAMER ET LES JUGES GONTHIER ET IACOBUCCI
Anna-Marie Nagel
v. (24609)
Carry Hunter (Alta.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Torts - Trespass - Application of Provincial Offences Procedure Act - Statutes - Interpretation -Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that an innocent person upon the land of another without notice was a trespasser - Whether the Court of Appeal is in error to hold the arrest in the circumstances justified because it impacts on lawful protest and communication and will be a serious infringement of ss. 2(a) and (b) of the Charter.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
October 20, 1993 Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Egbert J.) |
Respondent liable for wrongful arrest and damages assessed at $500.00 |
January 19, 1995 Court of Appeal of Alberta (Hetherington, Foisy and McFadyen JJ.A.) |
Appeal allowed |
March 15, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
CORAM: LA FOREST, CORY AND MAJOR JJ. /
LES JUGES LA FOREST, CORY ET MAJOR
Irene Marie Lewis
v. (24514)
Minister of Education for British Columbia
and
Board of School Trustees of School District No. 41 (Burnaby) (B.C.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Civil liberties - Equality rights - Discrimination on basis of age - Mandatory retirement - Remedies - Applicant's forced retirement under School Act, s. 147, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 375 [now repealed], constituting age discrimination contrary to Charter - Court of Appeal finding proportionality between s. 147 and its objectives - Whether legislated mandatory retirement of elementary public school teachers is justified under s. 1 of the Charter? -Whether damages, reinstatement or both are appropriate remedy where an individual's employment has been unconstitutionally terminated? - Whether a public school board is government for the purposes of the Charter?
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
March 31, 1992 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Lander J., in Chambers) |
Ruling on Amended Petition filed by Applicant: S. 147 of the School Act was not saved by s. 1 of the Charter |
June 30, 1992 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Lander J., in Chambers) |
Finding of liability on damages |
January 31, 1995 Court of Appeal for British Columbia (McEachern C.J.B.C., Carrothers and Hollinrake JJ.A.) |
Appeal allowed; Petition dismissed |
April 03, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
Wahid Khalil Baroud
v. (24610)
The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
and Solicitor General of Canada
and Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Immigration - Administrative law - Prerogative writs - Procedural law - Jurisdiction - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in not determining the constitutional validity of the Applicant's detention under s.40.1 of the Immigration Act - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of the rights guaranteed under s. 10 of the Charter and in its analysis of the judicial discretion to refuse to hear an application for habeas corpus in light of s. 1 of the Charter.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
September 12, 1994 Ontario Court (General Division) (Whealy J.) |
Application for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. |
January 13, 1995 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Houlden, McKinlay and Carthy JJ.A.) |
Appeal dismissed |
March 14, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
CORAM: L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ, SOPINKA AND McLACHLIN JJ. /
LES JUGES L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ, SOPINKA ET McLACHLIN
A.M.
v. (24612)
Clive Ryan and Dr. Kathleen Parfitt (B.C.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Torts - Procedural law - Civil procedure - Evidence - Assessment - Damages - Privilege - Applicant bringing action for damages alleged to have occurred because of sexual abuse - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the Applicant had failed to claim privilege with respect to the Respondent Dr. Parfitt's records - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to find that counselling records arising from therapy for sexual assault are protected by privilege.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
June 4, 1993 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Bolton Master) |
Order pursuant to Rule 26(11) of the Supreme Court Rules: Respondent Parfitt ordered to produce copy of records relating to the Applicant |
June 25, 1993 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Vickers J.) |
Appeal dismissed |
October 21, 1994 Court of Appeal for British Columbia (MacFarlane, Southin and Taylor JJ.A.) |
Appeal dismissed |
March 17, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
Douglas Clayton Casselman, Atlas Copco Canada Inc. and
General Electric Vehicle Management Inc., now known as
General Electric Capital Canada Leasing Inc.
v. (24613)
Ion Serban (B.C.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Procedural law - Actions - Trial - Damages - Adjournment - Whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding the Court had jurisdiction to order the Applicants make advance payments on damages as a term of an adjournment.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
October 6, 1993 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Wong J.) |
Order on pre-trial that Applicants pay the Respondent amounts as an advance on damages for past wage loss; assessment of damages adjourned |
January 20, 1995 Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Macfarlane, Cumming and Finch JJ.A.) |
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
March 17, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
CORAM: CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER AND L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ AND GONTHIER JJ. /
LE JUGE EN CHEF LAMER ET LES JUGES L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ ET GONTHIER
Gloria Augustus
v. (24607)
The Montreal Urban Community and Allan Gosset
and
Orberth Griffin (Que.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Civil Code - Torts - Vicarious liability - Damages - Assessment - Action for compensatory and exemplary damages filed by mother and father of the victim killed by a policeman in course of his duty - Employer's liability - Right of parenthood - Solatium doloris - Exemplary damages - Sections 1053 and 1056 of the Civil Code of Lower Canada - Sections 1 and 49 of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, R.S.Q., c. C-12 - Whether the majority of the Court of Appeal of Quebec erred in their application of principles and evaluation relating to the different heads of damages.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
July 20, 1990 Superior Court of Quebec (Guthrie, J.S.C.) |
Action for compensatory and exemplary damages allowed in part |
January 15, 1995 Court of Appeal of Quebec (Vallerand, Fish [dissenting] and Deschamps, JJ.C.A.) |
Applicant's appeal allowed in part Respondent Gosset's appeal allowed |
January 19, 1995 Court of Appeal of Quebec (Vallerand, Fish [dissenting] and Deschamps, JJ.C.A.) |
Correction of reasons for judgment by Deschamps J.A. |
March 14, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
Evangelos Exarhos
c. (24608)
Banque de Nouvelle-Écosse (Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Responsabilité civile - Banques et opérations bancaires - Prêt - Dommages-intérêts - Évaluation -Preuve - Marge de crédit - Bris de contrat - Tribunaux de première instance et d'appel concluant que l'intimée avait abusé de ses droits - Quantum des dommages - La Cour d'appel a-t-elle erré en décidant que le premier juge ne pouvait tenir compte du rapport sur lequel s'appuyait le demandeur pour sa réclamation de perte de profits, en l'absence du témoignage de l'auteur du rapport? - En analysant de nouveau la preuve faite à cet égard, la Cour d'appel a-t-elle erré en concluant que le demandeur exploitait son entreprise à perte pendant la période concernée et que le dossier ne contenait aucune autre preuve quant à l'existence d'une perte de profits? - La Cour d'appel a-t-elle erré en révisant la conclusion du premier juge relative aux dommages accordés pour la disparition de biens saisis?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 3 juin 1991 Cour supérieure du Québec (Mayrand j.c.s.) |
Action principale en recouvrement du solde de prêts consentis accueillie pour la somme de 48 320,69$; demande reconventionnelle en dommages-intérêts accueillie en partie pour la somme de 139 293$ |
Le 16 janvier 1995 Cour d'appel du Québec (Mailhot, Tourigny et Brossard jj.c.a.) |
Appel de l'intimée accueilli en partie: condamnation de 139 293$ réduite à la somme de 59 262$ |
Le 15 mars 1995 Cour suprême du Canada |
Demande d'autorisation d'appel déposée |
Aline Goyette
c. (24659)
Marcel Laporte et Richard Laporte (Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Code civil - Droit des biens - Titres de propriété - Biens immeubles - Offre d'achat signée par la demanderesse - Action des intimés en dommages-intérêts par suite du refus de la demanderesse de signer l'acte de vente devant notaire accueillie - Appel de la demanderesse rejetée - Des dommages-intérêts peuvent-ils être accordés pour les gains perdus? - Quelle est la conséquence du dol dont la demanderesse se dit victime? L'action des intimés est-elle prescrite?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 11 février 1993 Cour du Québec (Chambre civile) (Pothier J.C.Q.) |
Action des intimés en dommages-intérêts accueillie |
Le 6 février 1995 Cour d'appel du Québec (Rothman, Baudouin et Otis, JJ.C.A.) |
Requête des intimés en rejet d'un appel dilatoire, frivole et abusif accueillie; appel rejeté avec dépens |
Le 7 avril 1995 Cour suprême du Canada |
Demande d'autorisation d'appel et demande de sursis déposées |
MAY 9, 1995 / LE 9 MAI 1995
CORAM: CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER AND L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ AND GONTHIER JJ. /
LE JUGE EN CHEF LAMER ET LES JUGES L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ ET GONTHIER
H.A.
v. (24534)
M.T. (Que.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Procedural law - Family law - Contempt of court - Maintenance - Standard of proof applicable in contempt proceedings - Applicant held in contempt of Court and condemned to four months in prison for failure to obey a divorce judgment which ordered him to pay child support, a lump sum and a compensatory allowance - Did the trial judge and the Court of Appeal err in relying on findings of Applicant's ability to pay before the divorce judge before whom they were proved on the balance of probabilities, instead of requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt?
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
May 7, 1992 Superior Court of Quebec (Zerbisias J.) |
Applicant held in contempt of Court and condemned to four months in prison |
January 17, 1995 Court of Appeal of Quebec (Beauregard, Brossard and Delisle JJ.A.) |
Appeal dismissed |
February 6, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada (Sopinka J.) |
Application under s. 65.1 of the Act for an order of interim release of the Applicant granted |
March 15, 1995 Supreme Court of Canada |
Application for leave to appeal filed |
JUDGMENTS ON APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE |
JUGEMENTS RENDUS SUR LES DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION |
MAY 11, 1995 / LE 11 MAI 1995
24541THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS - v. - MICHEL PICHER AND VIA RAIL CANADA INC. (Que.)
CORAM: The Chief Justice and Gonthier and Iacobucci JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Labour law - Labour relations - Arbitration - Administrative law - Jurisdiction - Judicial review -Statutes - Interpretation - Enforcement of a letter of agreement governing the operation of conventional passenger trains with only one engineer in the locomotive - Whether the arbitration can proceed before a determination is made by Transport Canada with respect to Via Rail's proposal - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the arbitrator did not exceed his jurisdiction in proceeding to hear the dispute between the parties.
24531RUSSELL ROGERS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEWFOUNDLAND as Represented by the Department of Culture, Recreation and Youth (Nfld.)
CORAM: La Forest, Cory and Major JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Civil rights - Remedies - Statutes - Interpretation - Human Rights - Duty to accommodate - Discrimination under s. 7(1) of the Newfoundland Human Rights Code, R.S.N. 1970, c. 262 - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in ruling that the Respondent had reasonably accommodated the Applicant's physical disability when the Respondent had adduced no evidence of undue hardship.
23529YVON LEFEBVRE c. SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE DU CHEF DE L'ALBERTA (Alta.)
CORAM: Les juges L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka et Gonthier
La requête en réexamen est rejetée avec dépens.
The motion for reconsideration is dismissed with costs.
MOTIONS |
REQUÊTES |
5.5.1995
Before / Devant: CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER
Motion for an order that this appeal is to be deemed not abandoned
William Wayne Dale Stillman
v. (24631)
Her Majesty The Queen (N.B.) |
Requête en déclaration que le présent appel est censé ne pas avoir été abandonné
With the consent of the parties. |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
5.5.1995
Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR
Motion to extend the time in which to file the intervener's factum
Thomas P. Walker et al.
v. (23861)
Government of Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.) |
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire de l'intervenant
With the consent of the parties. |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time to file the factum of the Attorney General of Quebec extended to April 28, 1995.
5.5.1995
Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR
Motion to extend the time in which to file the respondent's factum
Troy Sherwin Montour et al.
v. (24343)
Her Majesty The Queen (N.B.) |
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire de l'intimée
With the consent of the parties. |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time extended to May 1, 1995.
8.5.1995
Before / Devant: SOPINKA J.
Motion to extend the time for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene
National Parole Board
v. (24436)
Ian Ross Mooring (B.C.) |
Requête en prorogation du délai pour la demande d'autorisation et demande d'autorisation d'intervention |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Factum to be filed on or before May 19, 1995 and oral argument is limited to 10 minutes.
8.5.1995
Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR
Motion to extend the time in which to file the appellant's factum
Mark Donald Benner
v. (23811)
Secretary of State of Canada, et al. (B.C.) |
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire de l'appelant
With the consent of the parties. |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time extended to June 30, 1995.
9.5.1995
Before / Devant: CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER
1) Motion for an order that this appeal is to be deemed not abandoned 2) Motion to extend the time in which to file the appellant's factum
Her Majesty The Queen
v. (24263)
N.M. (Ont.) |
1) Requête en déclaration que le présent appel est censé ne pas avoir été abandonné 2) Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire de l'appelante
With the consent of the parties. |
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time to file appellant's factum extended to March 10, 1995.
NOTICES OF DISCONTINUANCE FILED SINCE LAST ISSUE |
AVIS DE DÉSISTEMENT DÉPOSÉS DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION |
5.5.1995
Her Majesty The Queen
v. (24484)
Marwin G. (Crim.)(Ont.)
(appeal)
11.5.1995
Richard Couture
c. (24505)
Sa Majesté La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.)
(appel)
|
|
APPEALS HEARD SINCE LAST ISSUE AND DISPOSITION |
APPELS ENTENDUS DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION ET RÉSULTAT |
5.5.1995
CORAM:Chief Justice Lamer and La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory and Iacobucci JJ.
La Compagnie Minière Québec Cartier
c. (23960)
Les Métallurgistes Unis d'Amérique, Local 6869 (Qué.) |
Claude Larose pour l'appelante.
Laurent Roy pour l'intimé. |
EN DÉLIBÉRÉ / RESERVED
Nature de la cause
Droit du travail - Droit administratif - Arbitrage - Employeur et employé - Relations de travail -Brefs de prérogative - Contrôle judiciaire - Grief. |
Nature of the case
Labour law - Administrative law - Arbitration - Employer and employee - Labour relations - Prerogative writs - Judicial review - Grievance. |
WEEKLY AGENDA |
ORDRE DU JOUR DE LA SEMAINE |
AGENDA for the week beginning May 15, 1995.
ORDRE DU JOUR pour la semaine commençant le 15 mai 1995.
Date of Hearing/ Case Number and Name/
Date d'audition Numéro et nom de la cause
The Court is not sitting this week
La Cour ne siège pas cette semaine
NOTE:
This agenda is subject to change. Hearing dates should be confirmed with Process Registry staff at (613) 996-8666.
Cet ordre du jour est sujet à modification. Les dates d'audience devraient être confirmées auprès du personnel du greffe au (613) 996-8666.
DEADLINES: MOTIONS
|
DÉLAIS: REQUÊTES
|
BEFORE THE COURT:
Pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the following deadlines must be met before a motion before the Court can be heard: |
DEVANT LA COUR:
Conformément à l'article 23.1 des Règles de la Cour suprême du Canada, les délais suivants doivent être respectés pour qu'une requête soit entendue par la Cour : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motion day : June 5, 1995
Service : May 15, 1995 Filing : May 22, 1995 Respondent : May 29, 1995 |
Audience du : 5 juin 1995
Signification : 15 mai 1995 Dépot : 22 mai 1995 Intimé : 29 mai 1995
|
Motion day : October 2, 1995
Service : September 11, 1995 Filing : September 18, 1995 Respondent : September 25, 1995
|
Audience du : 2 octobre 1995
Signification : 11 septembre 1995 Dépot : 18 septembre 1995 Intimé : 25 septembre 1995
|
Motion day : November 6, 1995
Service : October 16, 1995 Filing : October 23, 1995 Respondent : October 30, 1995
|
Audience du : 6 novembre 1995
Signification : 16 octobre 1995 Dépot : 23 octobre 1995 Intimé : 30 octobre 1995 |
|
|
DEADLINES: APPEALS
|
DÉLAIS: APPELS |
The next session of the Supreme Court of Canada commences on October 2, 1995.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court Act and Rules, the following requirements for filing must be complied with before an appeal will be inscribed and set down for hearing:
Case on appeal must be filed within three months of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Appellant's factum must be filed within five months of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Respondent's factum must be filed within eight weeks of the date of service of the appellant's factum.
Intervener's factum must be filed within two weeks of the date of service of the respondent's factum.
The Registrar shall inscribe the appeal for hearing upon the filing of the respondent's factum or after the expiry of the time for filing the respondent's factum
The Registrar shall enter on a list all appeals inscribed for hearing at the October 1995 Session on Augst 8, 1995.
|
La prochaine session de la Cour suprême du Canada débute le 2 octobre 1995.
Conformément à la Loi sur la Cour suprême et aux Règles, il faut se conformer aux exigences suivantes avant qu'un appel puisse être inscrit pour audition:
Le dossier d'appel doit être déposé dans les trois mois du dépôt de l'avis d'appel.
Le mémoire de l'appelant doit être déposé dans les cinq mois du dépôt de l'avis d'appel.
Le mémoire de l'intimé doit être déposé dans les huit semaines suivant la signification de celui de l'appelant.
Le mémoire de l'intervenant doit être déposé dans les deux semaines suivant la signification de celui de l'intimé.
Le registraire inscrit l'appel pour audition après le dépôt du mémoire de l'intimé ou à l'expiration du délai de signification du mémoire de l'intimé.
Le 8 août 1995, le registraire met au rôle de la session d’octobre 1995 tous les appels inscrits pour audition. |
SUPREME COURT REPORTS |
RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS DE LA COUR SUPRÊME |
THE STYLES OF CAUSE IN THE PRESENT TABLE ARE THE STANDARDIZED STYLES OF CAUSE (AS EXPRESSED UNDER THE "INDEXED AS" ENTRY IN EACH CASE).
|
LES INTITULÉS UTILISÉS DANS CETTE TABLE SONT LES INTITULÉS NORMALISÉS DE LA RUBRIQUE "RÉPERTORIÉ" DANS CHAQUE ARRÊT.
|
Judgments reported in [1995] 1 S.C.R., Part 3
B. (R.) v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 315
R. v. Blenner-Hassett; R. v. Piluke, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 443
R. v. Halcrow, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 440
R. v. Laporte, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 442
R. v. Simpson, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 449
T. (M.) v. A. (H.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 445
|
Jugements publiés dans [1995] 1 R.C.S., partie 3
B. (R.) c. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 R.C.S. 315
R. c. Blenner-Hassett; R. c. Piluke, [1995] 1 R.C.S. 443
R. c. Halcrow, [1995] 1 R.C.S. 440
R. c. Laporte, [1995] 1 R.C.S. 442
R. c. Simpson, [1995] 1 R.C.S. 449
T. (M.) c. A. (H.), [1995] 1 R.C.S. 445 |