This Bulletin is published at the direction of the Registrar and is for general information only. It is not to be used as evidence of its content, which, if required, should be proved by Certificate of the Registrar under the Seal of the Court. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, no responsibility is assumed for errors or omissions. |
|
Ce Bulletin, publié sous l'autorité du registraire, ne vise qu'à fournir des renseignements d'ordre général. Il ne peut servir de preuve de son contenu. Celle‐ci s'établit par un certificat du registraire donné sous le sceau de la Cour. Rien n'est négligé pour assurer l'exactitude du contenu, mais la Cour décline toute responsabilité pour les erreurs ou omissions. |
|
|
|
Subscriptions may be had at $200 per year, payable in advance, in accordance with the Court tariff. During Court sessions it is usually issued weekly. |
|
Le prix de l'abonnement, fixé dans le tarif de la Cour, est de 200 $ l'an, payable d'avance. Le Bulletin paraît en principe toutes les semaines pendant les sessions de la Cour. |
|
|
|
The Bulletin, being a factual report of recorded proceedings, is produced in the language of record. Where a judgment has been rendered, requests for copies should be made to the Registrar, with a remittance of $10 for each set of reasons. All remittances should be made payable to the Receiver General for Canada. |
|
Le Bulletin rassemble les procédures devant la Cour dans la langue du dossier. Quand un arrêt est rendu, on peut se procurer les motifs de jugement en adressant sa demande au registraire, accompagnée de 10 $ par exemplaire. Le paiement doit être fait à l'ordre du Receveur général du Canada. |
|
|
|
CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIÈRES
Applications for leave to appeal filed
Applications for leave submitted to Court since last issue
Oral hearing ordered
Oral hearing on applications for leave
Judgments on applications for leave
Motions
Notices of appeal filed since last issue
Notices of intervention filed since last issue
Notices of discontinuance filed since last issue
Appeals heard since last issue and disposition
Pronouncements of appeals reserved
Rehearing
Headnotes of recent judgments
Weekly agenda
Summaries of the cases
Cumulative Index ‐ Leave
Cumulative Index ‐ Appeals
Appeals inscribed ‐ Session beginning
Notices to the Profession and Press Release
Deadlines: Motions before the Court
Deadlines: Appeals
Judgments reported in S.C.R. |
331 - 333
334 - 341
-
-
342 - 347
348 - 352
353
-
-
354 - 357
-
-
-
358
-
359 - 367
368 - 369
-
-
370
371
372 |
Demandes d'autorisation d'appel déposées
Demandes soumises à la Cour depuis la dernière parution
Audience ordonnée
Audience sur les demandes d'autorisation
Jugements rendus sur les demandes d'autorisation
Requêtes
Avis d'appel déposés depuis la dernière parution
Avis d'intervention déposés depuis la dernière parution
Avis de désistement déposés depuis la dernière parution
Appels entendus depuis la dernière parution et résultat
Jugements rendus sur les appels en délibéré
Nouvelle audition
Sommaires des arrêts récents
Ordre du jour de la semaine
Résumés des affaires
Index cumulatif ‐ Autorisations
Index cumulatif ‐ Appels
Appels inscrits ‐ Session commençant le
Avis aux avocats et communiqué de presse
Délais: Requêtes devant la Cour
Délais: Appels
Jugements publiés au R.C.S. |
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FILED |
|
DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION D'APPEL DÉPOSÉES |
James T. Allard et al.
C.F. Willms
Russell & DuMoulin
v. (26467)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge et al. (B.C.)
D.R. Bennett
Bull, Housser & Tupper
FILING DATE 6.2.1998
Seloame David Chapman
Richard J. Handlon
Pitblado & Hoskin
v. (26468)
Shirley Kathleen Webster et al. (Man.)
Norm Cuddy
Wolch, Pinx, Tapper, Scurfield
FILING DATE 6.2.1998
Sandra E. Gernhart
Richard W. Pound, Q.C.
Stikeman, Elliott
v. (26469)
Her Majesty The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
Roger Leclaire
Dept. of Justice
FILING DATE 6.2.1998
Ion Chiselita
Sid M. Tarrabain
Tarrabain & Co.
v. (26471)
Her Majesty The Queen (Alta.)
D. Tomljanovic
A.G. of Canada
FILING DATE 10.2.1998
Susan Samadi
David Schermbrucker
v. (26472)
Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)
Christine Bartlett-Hughes
A.G. of Ontario
FILING DATE 10.2.1998
Stuart Reid MacDonald
Terry Hutcheon
Demiantschuk Milley & Burke
v. (26474)
Candice Louise MacDonald (Alta.)
Lois M. Sparling
FILING DATE 12.2.1998
Valérie Starret
Michael E. Heller
Heller Gottlieb & Foldiak
c. (26475)
Yvon Blondeau (Qué.)
Benoît Perras
Paquette Trudeau
DATE DE PRODUCTION 13.2.1998
Stéphane Quenneville
Michel Lachance
c. (26476)
Directeur de la protection de la jeunesse et al. (Qué.)
Jean Tremblay
Guy & Gilbert
DATE DE PRODUCTION 13.2.1998
Maurice Quenneville
Michel Lachance
c. (26477)
Directeur de la protection de la jeunesse et al. (Qué.)
Jean Tremblay
Guy & Gilbert
DATE DE PRODUCTION 13.2.1998
George Donald Ferland
A. Clayton Rice
Ouellette Rice
v. (26478)
Her Majesty The Queen (Alta.)
Roxane Stanners
Dept. of Justice
FILING DATE 13.2.1998
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
Peter G. Voith
Davis & Co.
v. (26479)
N.D. Lea & Associates Ltd. (B.C.)
L. Neil Matheson
Harper Grey Easton
FILING DATE 13.2.1998
Verna Friday
Bruce Clark
v. (26460)
The Bear Island Foundation et al. (Ont.)
W. Ross Murray
Borden & Elliot
FILING DATE 2.2.1998
65302 British Columbia Ltd.
Kim Hansen
Thorsteinssons
v. (26352)
Her Majesty The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.)
Max Weder
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FILING DATE 2.2.1998
Jean-Claude Poulin et al.
Gabriel Lapointe
Lapointe, Schachter, Champagne, Talbot
c. (26407)
Me Jean-Guy Gilbert et al. (Qué.)
Guy Godreau
Pouliot, L’Écuyer
DATE DE PRODUCTION 2.2.1998
Bac Dinh Pham et al.
Kenneth R. Steinberg
Steinberg & Co.
v. (26459)
Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.)
S. David Frankel, Q.C.
Dept. of Justice
FILING DATE 30.1.1998
R.G.F., a young person
M. Naeem Rauf
v. (26461)
Her Majesty The Queen (Alta.)
Jack Watson
A.G. of Alberta
FILING DATE 3.2.1998
H. (W.W.)
John L. MacDougall, Q.C.
MacLeod, MacDougall, Crane & Parkman
v. (26464)
Her Majesty The Queen (P.E.I.)
Darrell E. Coombs
Crown Attorney’s Office
FILING DATE 5.2.1998
Her Majesty The Queen
Alexander Budlovsky
Min. of the A.G.
v. (26462)
Ronald Neil Scott (B.C.)
Bruce H. Ralston
FILING DATE 3.2.1998
Vincent Wong et al.
Gary L. Bainbridge
Woloshyn Mattison
v. (26465)
Her Majesty The Queen (Sask.)
Myra J. Yuzak
Deputy Attorney General
FILING DATE 5.2.1998
Co-Operators General Insurance Co.
Stephen M. Malach, Q.C.
Malach & Fidler
v. (26466)
Abdul Bapoo (Ont.)
Terrence J. Collier
Dutton, Brock, MacIntyre & Collier
FILING DATE 5.2.1998
478649 Ontario Ltd., carrying on business as Green Acre Estates
Wayne Paul Cipollone
v. (26458)
William Corcoran et al. (Ont.)
Clive Elkin
Lang Michener Lawrence & Shaw
FILING DATE 30.1.1998
Nanaimo Regional General Hospital
Victor Leginsky
v. (26463)
Elvena Joyce Heinrichs et al. (F.C.A.)(B.C.)
Allan H. McLean
Schroeder & Co.
FILING DATE 3.2.1998
Western Surety Co. et al.
William B. Richards
Clark, Drummie & Co.
v. (26470)
Sobeys Inc. et al. (N.B.)
Charles LeBlond
Stewart, McKelvey, Stirling, Scales
FILING DATE 9.2.1998
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE SUBMITTED TO COURT SINCE LAST ISSUE
|
|
DEMANDES SOUMISES À LA COUR DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION |
FEBRUARY 20, 1998 / LE 20 FÉVRIER 1998
CORAM: Chief Justice Lamer and McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. /
Le juge en chef Lamer et les juges McLachlin et Iacobucci
(c. 26326)
-et-
Le Gardien du Centre de prévention de Montréal
-et-
La Procureure Générale du Canada (Crim.)(Qué.)
ET ENTRE:
Salvatore Cazzetta
c.
La Ministre de la Justice du Canada
-et-
Les États-Unis d’Amérique
-et-
Le gardien du Centre de prévention de Montréal (Crim.)(Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Droit criminel - Charte canadienne des droits et libertés - Extradition - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle erré en décidant que l’ordonnance d’extradition respectait l’article 6 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans les circonstances où l’État requérant a agi à la demande et avec la collaboration du Canada dans le cadre d’un projet policier visant des Canadiens se trouvant au Canada, et suivant lequel l’État requérant proposerait son territoire comme situs d’une partie du crime, exigerait des suspects que des actes manifestes s’y commettent et les poursuivrait en justice, à la suite d’une extradition? - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle erré en considérant que la ministre de la Justice n’avait pas manifestement erré en décidant que l’extradition du demandeur ne portait pas atteinte aux principes de justice fondamentale, eu égard aux éléments apparents au dossier démontrant que le situs de la poursuite avait été décidé en fonction notamment du caractère plus avantageux pour les policiers et la poursuite de la loi américaine?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 11 mars 1997 Cour supérieure du Québec (Gomery j.c.s.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Argument constitutionnel du demandeur rejeté; requête en extradition des États-Unis d’Amérique accueillie; incarcération du demandeur ordonnéeLe 21 octobre 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Michaud j.c.q., Mailhot et Proulx jj.c.a.) |
|
Appel rejeté |
|
|
|
Le 21 octobre 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Michaud j.c.Q., Mailhot et Proulx jj.c.a.) |
|
Demande de contrôle judiciaire du demandeur relative à la décision prise par la Ministre de la Justice le 20 juin 1997 rejetée |
|
|
|
Le 19 novembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Demande d’autorisation d’appel déposée |
|
|
|
v. (26267)
Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Criminal law.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 11, 1996 Ontario Court (Provincial Division) (Lampkin P.C.J.) |
|
Conviction: contempt of court |
|
|
|
September 22, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Abella, Charron JJ.A., Campbell J. [ad hoc]) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
October 1, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
Canada Post Corporation
v. (26357)
Canadian Union of Postal Workers (Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Labour law - Collective agreement - Standard of review applicable to the decision of an arbitrator who construes documents referred to in a collective agreement that are established and promulgated by an independent third party - Application of the patently unreasonable standard of review - Filing of affidavits during a judicial review proceeding to establish testimony given during arbitration proceedings.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 30, 1991 (K. Burkett) |
|
|
|
|
|
Grievance allowedJune 30, 1993 Ontario Court, Divisional Court (McMurtry, Carruthers and Then JJ.) |
|
Application for judicial review allowed, arbitration award quashed |
|
|
|
October 3, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Osborne, Rosenberg and Goudge JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal allowed |
|
|
|
December 2, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
James Alistair French
v. (26368)
Pamela A. Chapman and Ryder Whitaker Wright (Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Labour law - Barristers and solicitors - Duty of fair representation - The nature and scope of the duties owed by a union’s solicitor to an individual grievor - Whether the ordinary civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain actions by individual grievors against the solicitor retained by the union to act in the grievance - Whether a common law right to a remedy for a breach of the duty of fair representation is available if an adjudicative mechanism to deal with allegations is contained in the provisions of an applicable labour relations act.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
November 18, 1996 Ontario Court (General Division) (Brockenshire J.) |
|
Motion for summary judgment allowed, action dismissed |
|
|
|
October 8, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Abella, Rosenberg and Moldaver JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
December 4, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
CORAM: L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and Bastarache JJ. /
Les juges L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier et Bastarache
Syndicat des travailleurs(euses) des Épiciers Unis Métro-Richelieu (CSN) et Réjean Fleury, Gérard Arseneau, Richard Rodrigue, Michel Vézina, Jean-Pierre Couillard, Robert Girouard
c. (26230)
E. Chèvrefils & Fils Inc. et als (Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Procédure - Procédure civile - Outrage au tribunal - Appel - Appel d’un jugement interlocutoire - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en concluant que les demandeurs n’ont pas le droit d’en appeler d’un jugement interlocutoire rendu par la Cour supérieure qui rejette leur véritable conclusion, à savoir l’arrêt des procédures, au motif qu’il ne s’agit pas d’un jugement final? - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en déclarant que le jugement rejetant la requête en irrecevabilité peut être remédié par le jugement final? - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en concluant que les fins de la justice ne requièrent pas que la permission d’appel soit accordée, alors que les demandeurs allèguent une violation de leurs droits fondamentaux prévus aux art. 11a) de la Charte canadienne et 28.1 de la Charte québécoise des droits et libertés, L.R.Q., ch. C-12?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 22 mai 1997 Cour supérieure du Québec (Tannenbaum j.c.s.) |
|
Requête en irrecevabilité des demandeurs à l’encontre d’une requête des intimés en outrage au tribunal rejetée |
|
|
|
Le 13 juin 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Nuss j.c.a.) |
|
Requête pour permission d’en appeler d’un jugement interlocutoire rejetée |
|
|
|
Le 26 septembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Demande d’autorisation d’appel déposée |
|
|
|
Le 1er octobre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Requête en prorogation de délai déposée |
|
|
|
Le Procureur général du Québec
c. (26232)
Yolande Dupont (Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Législation - Interprétation - Saisie - Prescription - Requête de l’intimée en opposition aux saisies-exécution mobilières et en mains tierces accueillie - Appel du demandeur rejeté - La prescription de trois ans prévue à l’article 36 de la Loi sur la Sécurité du revenu, L.R.Q., c. S.3.1.1, entrée en vigueur en 1989, est-elle applicable à une dette exigible en vertu de la loi qu’elle a remplacée, la Loi sur l’aide sociale, L.R.Q., c. A-16, qui ne prévoyait aucun délai de prescription pour le recouvrement de sommes obtenues de mauvaise foi ou par fraude?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 1er novembre 1995 Cour supérieure du Québec (Pelletier J.C.S.) |
|
Requête de l’intimée en opposition aux saisies-exécution mobilières et en mains tierces accueillie |
|
|
|
Le 2 juillet 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Michaud J.C.Q., Dussault et Chamberland JJ.C.A.) |
|
Appel du demandeur rejeté |
|
|
|
Le 29 septembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Demande d’autorisation d’appel déposée |
|
|
|
Yves Monette
c. (26322)
Marcel Poissant (Qué.)
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Procédure - Droit municipal - Procédure civile - Preuve - Procès - Élection - Contestation - Manoeuvre frauduleuse - Appel - Le juge de première instance a-t-il rencontré les exigences législatives édictées à l’article 292 du Code de procédure civile, L.R.Q., c. C-25, à l’égard du pouvoir d’intervention du tribunal dans le cadre d’un procès?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 11 mars 1997 Cour supérieure du Québec (Crête j.c.s.) |
|
Requête de l’intimé en annulation d’élection accueillie en partie; élection du demandeur annulée |
|
|
|
Le 30 septembre 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Dussault, Otis et Robert jj.c.a.) |
|
Requête en réouverture d’enquête et appel du demandeur rejetés |
|
|
|
Le 28 novembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Demande d’autorisation d’appel déposée |
|
|
|
Le 4 décembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada (Bastarache j.) |
|
Demande en sursis d’exécution rejetée |
|
|
|
Alexander Henri Legault
v. (26354)
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Qué.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Immigration - Administrative law - Criminal law - Evidence - Whether the adjudicator erred in finding, on the basis of the warrant for arrest and indictment from the United States of America, that he had reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant had committed outside Canada certain acts or omissions which constituted offences under the laws of the United States of America within the meaning of subparagraph 19(1) c. 1(ii) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-2, as amended.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 10, 1993 Immigration and Refugee Board Adjudication Division (Fortier, adjudicator)
January 17, 1995 Federal Court, Trial Division (McGillis J.) |
|
Conditional deportation order issued for the Applicant
Applicant’s application for judicial review of adjudicator’s decision allowed; decision quashed and matter remitted for rehearing and redetermination before a different adjudicator |
|
|
|
October 1, 1997 Federal Court of Appeal (Marceau, MacGuigan and Desjardins JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; application for judicial review dismissed |
|
|
|
December 1, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
|
|
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ. /
Les juges Cory, Major et Binnie
Christopher Arthur Wayne Rafuse
v. (26307)
Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(N.S.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Criminal law - Aiding, abetting or compelling prostitution - Living partly on the avails of prostitution - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the law in relation to living partly on the avails of prostitution - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the law in relation to the necessity for confirmatory evidence in sustaining a conviction for allegations made by a person of unsavoury character - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of s. 686(1)(b)(iii) - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the law in relation to unsafe and unreasonable verdicts.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
April 22, 1997 Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Nathanson J.) |
|
Conviction: aiding, abetting or compelling prostitution; living partly off the avails of prostitution |
|
|
|
September 16, 1997 Nova Scotia Court of Appeal (Freeman, Pugsley, Bateman JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
November 13, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
Paul Devon McCarthy
v. (26344)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Criminal law - Evidence - Eyewitness identification evidence - Expert opinion evidence - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the defence expert who sought to testify as to the frailties of eyewitness identification was properly not permitted to testify .
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
January 31, 1995 Ontario Court (General Division) (Wein J.) |
|
Conviction: aggravated assault, robbery, weapons offences |
|
|
|
July 31, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Finlayson, Labrosse and Austin JJ.A.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Appeal dismissedNovember 28, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal and motion for the extension of time filed |
|
|
|
C.M. Malhotra
v. (26310)
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (Ont.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Procedural law - Did lower courts err in striking out statement of claim and dismissing Applicant’s action in wrongful dismissal.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
August 22, 1996 Ontario Court (General Division) (Lax J.) |
|
Respondent’s motion for order striking out and dismissing the Applicant’s action granted |
|
|
|
September 22, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Osborne, Laskin and Goudge JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
November 14, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
v. (26370)
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company of Canada, now known as Wellington General Insurance Company, Continental Insurance Company, and INA Insurance Company of Canada (Sask.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Commercial law - Insurance - All risks insurance policy covering many buildings of varying ages and physical conditions - No exclusion for faulty design, materials or workmanship - Hidden, progressive damage occurring over a span of time beginning before the policy period - Loss first became apparent during the policy period - Whether the damage continued into the policy period - Whether the “loss” occured during policy period - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying the principle that exclusion clauses should be construed narrowly and coverage broadly - Whether the doctrine of reasonable expectations should be incorporated into the law of Canada - What does the term “but this exclusion shall not apply to damage resulting therefrom” mean in the context of progressive damage?
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
April 21, 1995 Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan (Wimmer J.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applicant entitled to recover from Respondent the cost of repairing, replacing, constructing or reconstructing the damaged propertyOctober 10, 1997 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (Vancise, Sherstibitoff and Jackson JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal allowed |
|
|
|
December 8, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
JUDGMENTS ON APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE |
|
JUGEMENTS RENDUS SUR LES DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION |
FEBRUARY 26, 1998 / LE 26 FÉVRIER 1998
26273 TSAWWASSEN INDIAN BAND, CHIEF SHARON BOWCOTT, COUNCILLOR KIMBERLY BAIRD, COUNCILLOR MARVIN JOE, COUNCILLOR CANDY ADAMS, COUNCILLOR TAMMY WILLIAMS - v. - CORPORATION OF DELTA AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (B.C.)
CORAM: The Chief Justice and McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.
The application for extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Indians - Municipal Law - Constitutional Law - Division of Powers - Law of Obligations - Reasonable Notice - Cessation of fire protection services by a municipal corporation to an Indian reserve located within its municipal boundaries - Whether there is a common law duty to provide services terminable upon reasonable notice - Whether duty extinguished or modified by the Indian Self Government Enabling Act, S.B.C. 1990, c. 52 - Whether extinguishment or modification is ultra vires a provincial legislature - Whether cessation of services was a constitutionally impermissible attempt to control or limit development on the Applicant’s reserve and void for improper purpose.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
September 24, 1998 Supreme Court of British Columbia (Vickers J.) |
|
Petition for judicial review dismissed |
|
|
|
August 6, 1997 Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Cumming, Hollinrake and Braidwood JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal allowed in part |
|
|
|
October 27, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Applications for leave to appeal and extension of time filed |
|
|
|
26302 RANJIT SINGH CHEEMA - v. - REGINA (Crim.)(B.C.)
CORAM: The Chief Justice and McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Criminal law - Sentencing - Conditional sentence - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the principles of general deterrence and denunciation precluded the imposition of a conditional sentence and in imposing a sentence of imprisonment.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 19, 1996 British Columbia Supreme Court (Dohm A.C.J.B.C.) |
|
Conviction: possession of a handgun for a purpose dangerous to the public peace; Sentence: 6 months imprisonment |
|
|
|
October 31, 1997 Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Lambert, Newbury, Proudfoot JJ.A.) |
|
Sentence appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
December 1, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
26252 JEAN DUBOIS - c. - SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE (Crim.)(Qué.)
CORAM: Le Juge en chef et les juges McLachlin et Iacobucci
La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
NATURE DE LA CAUSE
Législation - Interprétation - Saisie - Prescription - Requête de l’intimée en opposition aux saisies-exécution mobilières et en mains tierces accueillie - Appel du demandeur rejeté - La prescription de trois ans prévue à l’article 36 de la Loi sur la Sécurité du revenu, L.R.Q., c. S.3.1.1, entrée en vigueur en 1989, est-elle applicable à une dette exigible en vertu de la loi qu’elle a remplacée, la Loi sur l’aide sociale, L.R.Q., c. A-16, qui ne prévoyait aucun délai de prescription pour le recouvrement de sommes obtenues de mauvaise foi ou par fraude?
HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL
Le 1er novembre 1995 Cour supérieure du Québec (Pelletier J.C.S.) |
|
Requête de l’intimée en opposition aux saisies-exécution mobilières et en mains tierces accueillie |
|
|
|
Le 2 juillet 1997 Cour d’appel du Québec (Michaud J.C.Q., Dussault et Chamberland JJ.C.A.) |
|
Appel du demandeur rejeté |
|
|
|
Le 29 septembre 1997 Cour suprême du Canada |
|
Demande d’autorisation d’appel déposée |
|
|
|
26289 A.C. VAN DER MEULEN - v. - THE VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD OF MANITOBA (Man.)
CORAM: The Chief Justice and McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Statutes - Interpretation - Veterinary Medical Act, R.S.M. 1987, c.V30, s.18 - Administrative law - Law of professions - Veterinary medicine - Whether participation in a surgical procedure is tantamount to performance of a surgical operation - Whether suturing is assisting in surgery and not performing a surgical operation.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
June 5, 1996 Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba (Dureault J.) |
|
Applicant’s appeal of a conviction of unprofessional conduct dismissed |
|
|
|
September 4, 1997 Court of Appeal of Manitoba (Scott C.J.M., Philp and Kroft [dissenting] JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
November 3, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
26026 ADOLPH BETKER v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Ont.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Criminal law - Trial - Procedure - Juries - Jury selection - Whether the trial judge erred in dismissing the Applicant’s application to challenge prospective jurors for cause based on potential bias against the Applicant because he was charged with sexual offences.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 2, 1994 Ontario Court (General Division) (Borkovich J.) |
|
Conviction: indecent assault, gross indecency, incest |
|
|
|
April 22, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (McMurtry C.J.O., Osborne, Moldaver JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal dismissed |
|
|
|
September 12, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada (Cory J.) |
|
Motion for the extension of time granted |
|
|
|
September 29, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
26335 J. PAUL FINGOLD v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (F.C.A.)(Ont.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Taxation - Statutes - Interpretation - Income Tax Act - Proper approach to valuation of shareholder benefits under s. 15(1) of the Income Tax Act - Appellate court reassessment of trial judge’s findings of fact.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
December 22, 1995 Tax Court of Canada (Sobier J.) |
|
Appeals from tax assessments allowed, matter referred back to Minister for reassessment |
|
|
|
September 26, 1997 Federal Court of Appeal (Strayer, Stone, MacGuigan JJ.A.) |
|
Appeal allowed, judgment of Tax Court set aside |
|
|
|
November 24, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
26367 NANCY BROHMAN AND WAYNE BROHMAN v. GINUS RAYMOND JONKMAN, TRACEY LEE JONKMAN AND J.W. CONSTRUCTION (BROCKVILLE) LTD. (Ont.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Property law - Contracts - Real property - Fraudulent misrepresentation - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the Applicants were required to prove fraud - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the evidence did not support the trial judge’s conclusion that the Respondents had acted fraudulently - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the trial judge’s assessment of the credibility of witnesses.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
February 24, 1995 Ontario Court (General Division) (Cosgrove J.) |
|
Damages of $32,894.42 for fraudulent misrepresentation found against the personal Respondents |
|
|
|
October 8, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario (Robins, Doherty and Laskin JJ.A.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Appeal allowed; action dismissedDecember 5, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
26336 RICARDO JOSE SACA v. YORK UNIVERSITY (Ont.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Administrative law - Judicial review - Colleges & Universities - Whether the Divisional Court applied the appropriate standard of review - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the Applicant’s motion for leave to appeal.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
June 26, 1997
Ontario Court (General Division) (Divisional Court)
(Hartt, McRae, Matlow JJ.A.)
Applicant’s application for judicial review dismissed
September 22, 1997
Court of Appeal for Ontario
(Brooke, Carthy, Moldaver JJ.A.)
Applicant’s motion for leave to appeal dismissed
November 20, 1997
Supreme Court of Canada
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
26297 449136 ONTARIO INC., CARRYING ON BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF THE ALBION TAVERN, MARILYN DYCK AND GEORGE ARTHUR SANFORD v. JOHN HENRY CLARKE (Ont.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Binnie JJ.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Torts - Motor vehicles - Negligence - Taverners’ liability - Procedural law - Limitation of actions - Prescription - Respondent consuming large quantity of alcohol at Applicants’ tavern - Respondent then operating motor vehicle and having accident - Respondent severely injured - Respondent filing statement of claim five years after date of accident - Whether two year limitation period in Highway Traffic Act or six year limitation period in Limitation Act applies.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
February 14, 1996 Ontario Court (General Division) Macdonald J. |
|
Order determining limitation period of six years applicable |
|
|
|
September 11, 1997 Court of Appeal for Ontario McMurtry, Robins and McKinlay, JJ.A. |
|
Appeal dismissed with costs |
|
|
|
November 7, 1997 Supreme Court of Canada |
|
Application for leave to appeal filed |
|
|
|
25959 VICTOR BRIAN OLSON v. THE LAW SOCIETY OF MANITOBA (Man.)
CORAM: Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.
The motion to adduce new evidence is dismissed and the application for reconsideration is dismissed with costs.
La requête pour déposer d'autres éléments de preuve est rejetée et la demande de réexamen est rejetée avec dépens.
25437 STEPHEN WILLIAM KENNETH FEGOL AND ALBERT ROY FEGOL v. THE MANITOBA AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CORPORATION AND N.M. TILLEY REALTY LTD. v. STEPHEN WILLIAM KENNETH FEGOL AND STEPHEN WILLIAM KENNETH FEGOL v. N.M. TILLEY REALTY LTD. (Man.)
CORAM: Cory, Major and Bastarache JJ.
The application for reconsideration is dismissed.
La demande de réexamen est rejetée.
MOTIONS |
|
REQUÊTES
|
20.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion to extend the time in which to file the respondent’s factum
Attorney General of Ontario
v. (25838)
M. and H. (Ont.)
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire d’un intimé
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
I have before me three motions:
1) motion on behalf of the respondent M. for an order removing H.’s counsel from the record or in the alternative for directions to define H.’s counsel role and for an order permitting M. equal time to respond to the arguments by H. and the Attorney General for Ontario;
2) motion on behalf of the respondent H. for additional time for oral submissions (1 hour in total); and
3) motion on behalf of the respondent H. for an order extending the time to serve and file the factum to January 15, 1998.
On the first motion, I would dismiss the motion to remove H.’s counsel from the record. I would adjourn the alternative motion for directions to the hearing of the appeal, when the Court may determine what time, if any, is required to respond to the arguments of H.
I would grant the second and third motions. In granting the second motion, however, I would wish to emphasize that the submissions should be confined to those matters in dispute and that the Court reserves the right to curtail argument should it not prove helpful.
20.2.1998
Before / Devant: LE JUGE McLACHLIN
Motion to strike out
Pierre Poliquin et al.
v. (26451)
Perron-Malenfant (Qué.)
Requête en radiation
DISMISSED / REJETÉE
24.2.1998
Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR
Motion to extend the time in which to file the applicant’s reply
Ranjit Singh Cheema
v. (26302)
Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.)
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer la réplique du requérant
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time extended to December 22, 1997.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR
Motion to extend the time in which to file the respondent’s factum
John Campbell and Salvatore Shirose
v. (25780)
Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)
Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire de l’intimée
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE Time extended to February 23, 1998.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Procureur général du Québec
Attorney General of Ontario
IN/DANS: Her Majesty The Queen
v. (25435)
Sidney Walwyn Wells (B.C.)
Requête en autorisation d’intervention
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
La requête autorisant l’intervention est accordée. L’intervenant (Procureur général du Québec) peut produire un mémoire conjoint (25435 - 25561) n’excédant pas 20 pages et de présenter une plaidoirie orale ne dépassant pas 15 minutes.
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener (A.G. of Ontario) will be allowed to file a factum not to exceed 30 pages and oral argument not to exceed 15 minutes.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Attorney General for Alberta
IN/DANS: Her Majesty The Queen
v. (25435)
Sidney Walwyn Wells (B.C.)
Requête en autorisation d’intervention
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener will be allowed to file a joint factum (25435 - 25561) not to exceed 20 pages.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion to extend the time for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Attorney General of Canada
IN/DANS: Her Majesty The Queen
v. (25435)
Sidney Walwyn Wells (B.C.)
Requête en prorogation du délai pour la demande d'autorisation et demande d'autorisation d'intervention
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener will be allowed to file a joint factum (25435 - 25561) not to exceed 25 pages and oral argument not to exceed 20 minutes.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Procureur général du Québec
IN/DANS: Michael Colin Hodgson
v. (25561)
Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)
Requête en autorisation d’intervention
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
La requête autorisant l’intervention est accordée. L’intervenant peut produire un mémoire conjoint (25561 - 25435) n’excédant pas 20 pages et de présenter une plaidoirie orale ne dépassant pas 15 minutes.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Attorney General of British Columbia
Attorney General for Alberta
IN/DANS: Michael Colin Hodgson
v. (25561)
Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)
Requête en autorisation d’intervention
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener (A.G. of B.C.) will be allowed to file a factum not to exceed 20 pages and oral argument not to exceed 15 minutes.
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener (A.G. for Alberta) will be allowed to file a joint factum (25561 - 25435) not to exceed to 20 pages.
25.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion to extend the time for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Attorney General of Canada
IN/DANS: Michael Colin Hodgson
v. (25561)
Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)
Requête en prorogation du délai pour la demande d'autorisation et demande d'autorisation d'intervention
With the consent of the parties.
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener will be allowed to file a joint factum (25561 - 25435) not to exceed 25 pages and oral argument not to exceed 20 minutes.
26.2.1998
Before / Devant: McLACHLIN J.
Motion to extend the time for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene
BY/PAR: Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops
IN/DANS: Children’s Foundation
v. (26013)
Patrick Allan Bazley (B.C.)
Requête en prorogation du délai pour la demande d'autorisation et demande d'autorisation d'intervention
GRANTED / ACCORDÉE
The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The intervener will be allowed to file a factum not to exceed 20 pages and oral argument not to exceed 15 minutes.
NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED SINCE LAST ISSUE |
|
AVIS D’APPEL DÉPOSÉS DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION |
11.2.1998
Her Majesty The Queen
v. (26473)
Joann Kimberley White (B.C.)
AS OF RIGHT
24.2.1998
Glenn Norman Davis
v. (26441)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Nfld.)
AS OF RIGHT
APPEALS HEARD SINCE LAST ISSUE AND DISPOSITION |
|
APPELS ENTENDUS DEPUIS LA DERNIÈRE PARUTION ET RÉSULTAT
|
23.2.1998
CORAM: L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ.
Vancouver Society of Immigrant & Visible Minority Women
v. (25359)
Minister of National Revenue (F.C.A.)(B.C.)
David W. Mossop, for the appellant.
Emilio S. Binavince and Uzma Ihsanullah, for the intervener the Minority Advocacy & Rights Council et al.
W. Laird Hunter and Arthur B.C. Drache, Q.C., for the intervener Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
Roger Leclaire and Johanne D’Auray, for the respondent.
RESERVED / EN DÉLIBÉRÉ
Nature of the case:
Taxation - Whether women are a significant part of the community for the purposes of the four components of charity as enunciated by Lord Macnaghten in The Commissioners for Special Purposes of the Income Tax Act v. John Pemsel, [1891] A.C. 531 - Whether the Society is a charity under a modern test of whether it was providing a public benefit.
Nature de la cause:
Droit fiscal - Les femmes sont-elles une partie importante de la société aux fins des quatre éléments constitutifs d’un organisme de charité, énoncés par lord Macnaghten dans The Commissioners for Special Purposes of the Income Tax c. Pemsel, [1891] A.C. 531? - La Société est-elle un organisme de charité en vertu du critère moderne des fins utiles à l’ensemble de la société?
23.2.1998
CORAM: Le juge en chef Lamer et les juges L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci et Bastarache.
Succession Clément Guillemette et al.
c. (25617)
J.M. Asbestos Inc. (Qué.)
Claire Delisle and Marie-France Bernier, pour l’appelante la Commission d’appel en matière de lésions professionnelles.
Richard Mailhot, pour les appelantes Succession Clément Guillemette et al.
Maurice Cloutier, pour l’intervenante la Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail.
Edward Kravitz, pour l’intervenante la Confédération des syndicats nationaux.
Gérard Dugré, Philippe Casgrain, c.r. et Michel Towner, pour l’intimée.
LE JUGE EN CHEF (oralement) -- Nous sommes tous, pour l’essentiel, d’accord, avec les motifs de M. le juge Forget de la Cour d’appel du Québec.
[translation] THE CHIEF JUSTICE (orally) -- We all essentially agree with the reasons of Forget J.A. of the Quebec Court of Appeal.
En conséquence, le pourvoi est accueilli, le jugement de la Cour d’appel du Québec est infirmée, et la décision rendue par la Commission d’appel en matière de lésions professionnelles est rétablie, le tout avec dépens dans toutes les cours.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal is set aside and the decision rendered by the Commission d’appel en matière de lésions professionnelles is restored, the whole with costs throughout.
24.2.1998
CORAM: Chief Justice Lamer and L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie JJ.
Victor Daniel Williams
v. (25375)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.)
Joseph J. Blazina, for the appellant.
Kent Roach and Noelle Spotton, for the intervener the Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
Steven M. Hinkson and Julian K. Roy, for the intervener the African Canadian Legal Clinic.
Julian N. Falconer and Richard Macklin, for the intervener the Urban Alliance on Race Relations.
James Lockyer, for the intervener the Criminal Lawyers’ Association.
Dirk Ryneveld, Q.C. and George Ivanisko, for the respondent.
Graham Garton, Q.C., for the intervener the A.G. of Canada.
Ian R. Smith, for the intervener the A.G. for Ontario.
RESERVED / EN DÉLIBÉRÉ
Nature of the case:
Criminal law - Trial - Procedure - Juries - Jury selection - Challenge for cause - Whether prospective jurors can be questioned with respect to racial bias against aboriginal persons - R. v. Parks (1993), 84 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (Ont. C.A.)
Nature de la cause:
Droit criminel Procès Procédure Jurys Choix du jury Récusation pour cause Les candidats jurés peuvent-ils être interrogés sur la partialité raciale envers les autochtones? R. c. Parks (1993), 84 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (Ont. C.A.)
25.2.1998
CORAM: Chief Justice Lamer and L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie JJ.
Jeffrey Rose
v. (25448)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)
Keith E. Wright and Ralph B. Steinberg, for the appellant.
Michael Bernstein, for the respondent.
Donna Valgardson and Nancy L. Irving, for the intervener the A.G. of Canada.
Jacques Gauvin, pour l’intervenant le procureur général du Québec.
Alexander Budlovsky, for the intervener the A.G. of British Columbia.
Written submission only (Jack Watson, Q.C.), for the intervener the A.G. of Alberta.
RESERVED / EN DÉLIBÉRÉ
Nature of the case:
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Criminal law - Procedural law - Jury address - Whether ss. 651(3) and 651(4) of the Criminal Code, which require counsel for the accused to address the jury before the Crown if the accused calls evidence, violate ss. 7 and 11 of the Charter - Whether accused entitled to right of reply to Crown's closing address.
Nature de la cause:
Charte canadienne des droits et libertés - Droit criminel - Droit procédural - Exposé au jury - Les paragraphes 651(3) et 651(4) du Code criminel, qui exigent que l’avocat de l’accusé s’adresse au jury avant le ministère public si l’accusé présente une preuve, violent-ils les articles 7 et 11 de la Charte? - L’accusé a-t-il un droit de réplique à l’exposé final du ministère public?
26.2.1998
CORAM: Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ.
Janusz Charemski
v. (26033)
Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)
Clay M. Powell, Q.C. and Gordon D. Cudmore, for the appellant.
Susan G. Ficek, for the respondent.
DISMISSED reasons to follow / REJETÉE motifs à suivre
Nature of the case:
Criminal law - Evidence - Trial - Whether the trial judge erred in holding that there was no evidence which would justify leaving the case to the jury - Did the Court of Appeal err in holding that when evidence is taken as a whole and justifiable inferences (not speculation or suspicions) are drawn from its elements, the balanced favours guilt over innocence - Whether there was evidence of guilt which must be considered by the jury.
Nature de la cause:
Droit criminel Preuve Procès Le juge du procès a-t-il commis une erreur en concluant qu'il n'y avait aucun preuve justifiant que l'affaire soit soumise à l'appréciation du jury? La Cour d'appel a-t-elle commis une erreur en concluant que, lorsque la preuve est prise dans son ensemble et que des inférences justifiables (non de simples spéculations ou soupçons) sont faites à partir des éléments de preuve, la balance penchait du côté de la culpabilité plutôt que de l'innocence? Y avait-il une preuve de culpabilité qui devait être examinée par le jury?
WEEKLY AGENDA |
|
ORDRE DU JOUR DE LA SEMAINE
|
AGENDA for the week beginning March 2, 1998.
ORDRE DU JOUR pour la semaine commençant le 2 mars 1998.
Date of Hearing/ Case Number and Name/
Date d'audition Numéro et nom de la cause
02/03/98 Motions - Requêtes
NOTE:
This agenda is subject to change. Hearing dates should be confirmed with Process Registry staff at (613) 996-8666.
Cet ordre du jour est sujet à modification. Les dates d'audience devraient être confirmées auprès du personnel du greffe au (613) 996-8666.
CUMULATIVE INDEX - INDEX CUMULATIF - REQUÊTES
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO EN AUTORISATION DE POURVOI
APPEAL
This index includes applications for leave to appeal standing for judgment at the beginning of 1998 and all the applications for leave to appeal filed or heard in 1998 up to now.
Cet index comprend les requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi en délibéré au début de 1998 et toutes celles produites ou entendues en 1998 jusqu'à maintenant.
*01 Refused/Refusée
*02 Refused with costs/Refusée avec dépens
*03 Granted/Accordée
*04 Granted with costs/Accordée avec dépens
*05 Discontinuance filed/Désistement produit
*A Applications for leave to appeal filed/Requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi produites
*B Submitted to the Court/Soumises à la Cour
*C Oral Hearing/Audience
*D Reserved/En délibéré
Status/ Disposition/
CASE/AFFAIRE Statut Résultat Page
2550-9613 Québec Inc. c. Ville de Val D’Or (Qué.), 26176, *B 185(98)
2903113 Canada Inc. c. Régie des marchés agricoles et alimentaires du
Québec (Qué.), 26256, *A 1868(97)
449136 Ontario Inc. v. Clarke (Ont.), 26297, *02 26.2.98 209(98) 346(98)
478649 Ontario Ltd. v. Corcoran (Ont.), 26458, *A 333(98)
65302 British Columbia Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 26352, *A 332(98)
A & I Investments Ltd. v. The Queen in right of the Province of Ontario
(Ont.), 26395, *A 65(98)
Abrahams v. Scott (B.C.), 26224, *02 19.2.98 147(98) 281(98)
Adbusters Media Foundation v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (B.C.),
26369, *A 1(98)
Air Canada v. Ticketnet Corporation (Ont.), 26421, *A 68(98)
Air Line Pilots Association v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd. (B.C.),
26221, *B 273(98)
Allard v. Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (B.C.), 26467, *A 331(98)
Arditi c. Nolan (Qué.), 25557, *A 1789(96)
Arsenault v. The Queen (Ont.), 26311, *A 2099(97)
Assurance-vie Desjardins c. Sous-ministre du Revenu du Québec (Qué.), 26382,
*A 2(98)
Athwal v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A)(B.C.), 26294, *02
12.2.98 75(98) 221(98)
Aytel Property Management Inc. v. Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region
No. 23 (Ont.), 26121, *A 1621(97)
Bal v. Attorney General for Ontario (Ont.), 26116, *02 12.2.98 77(98) 225(98)
Barrouk v. Crowther (Alta.), 26447, *A 180(98)
Bastings-Allard c. Bastings (Qué.), 26079, *02 8.1.98 2179(97) 20(98)
Bazgan v. The Queen (Alta.), 26457, *A 269(98)
Beaulac v. The Queen (B.C.), 26416, *A 67(98)
Bergeron c. Corps canadien des commissionnaires (Qué.), 26365, *A 1(98)
Bergeron c. Union des agents de sécurité du Québec métallurgistes unis
d’Amérique, local 8922 (Qué.), 26364, *A 1(98)
Best v. Best (Ont.), 26345, *B 271(98)
Betker v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26026, *01 26.2.98 207(98) 344(98)
Black v. Ernst & Young Inc. (N.S.), 24792, *A 1188(95)
Blackburn-Moreault c. Moreault (Qué.), 25776, *A 281(97)
Blanchard c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26268, *01 22.1.98 2229(97) 80(98)
Bluebird Footwear Inc. c. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
of Canada (Qué.), 24386, *A 1764(94)
Board of School Trustees of School District No. 46 (Sunshine Coast) v. Sunshine
Coast Teachers’ Association (B.C.), 26204, *02 12.2.98 12(98) 215(98)
Bradley v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26308, *02 19.2.98 150(98) 286(98)
Brault c. Fontaine (Qué.), 23953, *A 196(94)
Brigis v. St. Lawrence Seaway Authority (Ont.), 26427, *A 145(98)
Brignolio v. Desmarais (Ont.), 25403, *A 1202(96)
British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union v. Government of
the Province of British Columbia (B.C.), 26274, *03 12.2.98 69(98) 216(98)
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. N.D. Lea & Associates Ltd.
(B.C.), 26479, *A 332(98)
Brohman v. Jonkman (Ont.), 26367, *02 26.2.98 208(98) 345(98)
Brouillette c. Société d’agriculture du Comté de Verchères (Qué.), 25791, *A 179(98)
Brown v. Royal Bank of Canada (Alta.), 26283, *B 278(98)
CP. Containers (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.),
26319 5(98) 232(98)
The applications for an extension of time are granted. The applications
for oral hearings are dismissed. An order will go staying the following
orders pending the determination of the appeals in Royal Bank of
Canada v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.) (26316);
Canadian Pacific Limited, et al v. Director of Investigation and Research
(Ont.) (26317).
a) The order granted on February 20, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95F, B55/95G and B55/95H;
b) The order granted on May 21, 1996 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File No. B55/95F; and
c) The order granted on March 19, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95B, B55/95F and B55/95M.
Cain v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26132, *01 8.1.98 2177(97) 18(98)
Canada Post Corporation v. Canadaian Union of Postal Workers (Ont.),
26357, *B 335(98)
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Sovereign Life Insurance Co. (B.C.),
26181, *01 12.2.98 70(98) 212(98)
Canadian Mobile Sign Association v. Corporation of the City of Burlington
(Ont.), 26277, *B 271(98)
Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Addy (Ont.), 26318 5(98) 232(98)
The applications for an extension of time are granted. The applications
for oral hearings are dismissed. An order will go staying the following
orders pending the determination of the appeals in Royal Bank of
Canada v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.) (26316);
Canadian Pacific Limited, et al v. Director of Investigation and Research
(Ont.) (26317).
a) The order granted on February 20, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95F, B55/95G and B55/95H;
b) The order granted on May 21, 1996 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File No. B55/95F; and
c) The order granted on March 19, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95B, B55/95F and B55/95M.
Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.), 26317,
*03 12.2.98 5(98) 214(98)
Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 26363, *A 3(98)
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission v. Pearson
(Alta.), 26286, *03 12.2.98 148(98) 217(98)
Canadian Standards Association v. Campbell (B.C.), 26433, *A 145(98)
Caplan v. Minister of Human Resources Development (F.C.A.)(N.S.), 26381,
*A 2(98)
Cazzetta c. États-Unis d’Amérique (Crim.)(Qué.), 26326, *B 334(98)
Centurami v. Ringer (Ont.), 26328, *A 2175(97)
Chapman v. Webster (Man.), 26468, *A 331(98)
Cheema v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26302, *01 26.2.98 202(98) 342(98)
Cheung v. The Queen (B.C.), 26327, *A 2175(97)
Chiselita v. The Queen (Alta.), 26471, *A 331(98)
Church of Scientology of Toronto v. The Queen (Ont.), 26177, *A 1492(97)
Citizens’ Legal Challenge Inc. v. Attorney General of Ontario (Ont.), 26385,
*A 4(98)
City of Calgary v. Costello (Alta.), 26293, *B 152(98)
City of Surrey v. McIntosh Estates Ltd. (B.C.), 26266, *02 19.2.98 69(98) 280(98)
Cloutier c. Automobiles Gloginor Inc. (Qué.), 26253, *A 1868(97)
Colas c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26269, *B 273(98)
Comité paritaire de l’industrie de l’automobile de la Mauricie c. Gestion
Jean-Guy Roy Inc. (Qué.), 26227, *B 206(98)
Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail c. Caron, Belanger, Ernst
& Young Inc. (Qué.), 26192, *B 186(98)
Commission scolaire Kativik c. Foisy (Qué.), 26390, *A 65(98)
Coombe v. Constitution Insurance Co. of Canada (Ont.), 26348, *B 189(98)
Co-operators General Insurance Co. v. Bapoo (Ont.), 26466, *A 333(98)
Co-operators General Insurance Co. v. Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. (N.S.),
26445, *A 179(98)
Co-operators General Insurance Co. v. Melanson (N.B.), 26271, *B 206(98)
Corporation of the Town of Wasaga Beach v. Sinclair (Ont.), 26102, *02 12.2.98 76(98) 224(98)
Cousins v. The Queen (Crim.)(Nfld.), 26276, *01 8.1.98 2181(97) 22(98)
Couture v. Lamontagne (Sask.), 26419, *A 144(98)
D.E. c. La Reine (Qué.), 26399, *A 144(98)
D’Agostino v. The Queen (Alta.), 26455, *A 201(98)
Dang v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26285, *01 19.2.98 181(98) 283(98)
Daum v. Schroeder (Sask.), 26004, *A 1095(97)
Deloitte & Touche Inc. v. The Queen in right of Canada (Sask.),
26413, *A 67(98)
Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario v. Nesbitt, Burns Ltd. (Ont.),
26422, *A 68(98)
Deschamps c. Procureur général du Canada (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 26154, *02
8.1.98 2180(97) 20(98)
Deschamps Pontiac Buick Ltée c. Monette (Qué.), 26379, *A 4(98)
Deslauriers c. Ordre des arpenteurs-géomètres du Québec (Qué.), 26301, *02
29.1.98 7(98) 156(98)
Dicaire c. Commission de l’assurance-emploi Canada (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 26225, *B 275(98)
Dixon v. Governor in Council (F.C.A)(B.C.), 26234, *02 8.1.98 2231(97) 23(98)
Doherty v. Doherty (N.B.), 26411, *A 67(98)
Donnelly v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26371, *A 1(98)
Dubois c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26252, *01 26.2.98 202(98) 343(98)
E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Co. v. United Tire & Rubber Co. (Ont.),
25545, *A 2143(96)
Easton v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26353, *A 2226(97)
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26259, *02 8.1.98 2232(97) 24(98)
Ellipse Fiction/Ellipse programme c. Cinévidéo Plus Inc. (Qué.), 26258, *A 1869(97)
Ellipse Fiction/Ellipse programme c. International Image Services Inc. (Qué.),
26446, *A 179(98)
Evans v. The Queen (Ont.), 26351, *A 2226(97)
Fédération des médecins résidents du Québec c. Université de Montréal (Qué.),
26163, *B 149(98)
Federation of Women Teachers’ Associations of Ontario v. Ontario Human
Rights Commission (Ont.), 26431, *A 201(98)
Ferland v. The Queen (Alta.), 26478, *A 332(98)
Feuerwerker v. Roodman (Ont.), 26374, *A 1(98)
Filzmaier v. Laurentian Bank of Canada (Ont.), 25372, *A 1154(96)
Fingold v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26335, *02 26.2.98 207(98) 345(98)
Foster v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 25058, *01 29.1.98 15(98) 161(98)
Francoeur c. Ménard (Qué.), 26222, *B 204(98)
Fras v. Jurkojc (Ont.), 26284, *02 12.2.98 14(98) 218(98)
Fraser River Pile & Dredge Ltd. v. Can-Dive Services Ltd. (B.C.), 26415, *A 67(98)
Free World Trust c. Électro Santé Inc. (Qué.), 26406, *A 66(98)
French v. Chapman (Ont.), 26368, *B 336(98)
Friday v. Bear Island Foundation (Ont.), 26460, *A 332(98)
Fritz v. Pimm Investments Ltd. (Ont.), 26349, *02 19.2.98 153(98) 288(98)
Gagné c. Lacelle (Qué.), 25267, *A 627(96)
Gascon v. The Queen (B.C.), 26383, *A 2(98)
Gerling Globale compagnie d’assurances générales c. Services d’hypothèques
Canada-Vie Ltée (Qué.), 26330, *A 2175(97)
Gerling Globale compagnie d’assurances générales c. Coopérative d’habitation
La Frontalière (Qué.), 26331, *A 2176(97)
Gernhart v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26469, *A 331(98)
Gladue v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26300, *B 274(98)
Goel v. Minister of Human Resources Development (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26449, *A 180(98)
Golub v. The Queen (Ont.), 26298, *A 2098(97)
Gray v. The Queen in right of the province of Ontario (Ont.), 26410, *A 66(98)
Grochocki v. Solicitor General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Man.), 26239, *01
29.1.98 7(98) 155(98)
Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada v. Miller (Alta.), 26214, *02 8.1.98 2231(97) 23(98)
Guyatt v. The Queen (B.C.), 26332, *A 2176(97)
H. (W.W.) v. The Queen (P.E.I.), 26464, *A 333(98)
Halifax Insurance Co. v. McMahon (Ont.), 26263, *02 12.2.98 77(98) 226(98)
Hamel c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26288, *B 270(98)
Henderson v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26299, *B 276(98)
Highmark Residences Inc. v. The Queen in right of Ontario (Ont.), 26396, *A 66(98)
Hoque v. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada (N.S.), 26393, *A 65(98)
Immeubles Gaston et Rejeanne Inc. c. Caisse populaire de Notre-Dame de Mont
Carmel (Qué.), 26172, *02 12.2.98 74(98) 219(98)
Immeubles Gaston et Rejeanne Inc. c. Caisse populaire de Notre-Dame de Mont
Carmel (Qué.), 26173, *02 12.2.98 75(98) 220(98)
Intercredit Establishment Vaduz c. Ville de Pincourt (Qué.), 26134, *01
29.1.98 8(98) 157(98)
Investigation Team of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries v. Kaplan (Alta.),
26290, *02 12.2.98 78(98) 226(98)
J.L.-J.E. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26279, *01 8.1.98 2227(97) 19(98)
J.-P.C. c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26269, *B 273(98)
James v. The Queen (Alta.), 26405, *A 269(98)
Johnson v. United States of America (Crim.)(Ont.), 26309, *B 204(98)
Jonasson v. Jonasson (B.C.), 26250, *02 22.1.98 6(98) 80(98)
K.V.N.G.W. v. The Queen (N.S.), 26388, *A 4(98)
Kalin v. City of Calgary (Alta.), 24418, *A 1799(94)
Kelly c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26240, *01 12.2.98 72(98) 219(98)
Kieling v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. (Sask.), 26386, *02 12.2.98 72(98) 211(98)
Klevering v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26436, *A 145(98)
Kubicek v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26334, *B 189(98)
Kwan v. The Queen (Man.), 26408, *A 66(98)
L.C. v. Mills (Crim.)(Alta.), 26358, *03 12.2.98 149(98) 222(98)
L.J.H. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Man.), 26296, *01 29.1.98 9(98) 158(98)
L.K. v. Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa-Carleton (Ont.), 26244, *01 8.1.98 2177(97) 17(98)
Lacquaniti v. Devine (Ont.), 25078, *A 4(96)
Laurendeau c. Université Laval (Qué.), 26453, *A 201(98)
Laurent Brodeur Inc. c. Provureur général du Québec (Qué.), 26158, *02
8.1.98 2180(97) 21(98)
Lawlor v. Oppenheim (Nfld.), 26212, *03 19.2.98 153(98) 289(98)
Legault c. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Qué.),
26354, *B 338(98)
Lemieux c. Gesion Segi Ltéé (Qué.), 26251, *B 205(98)
Leonard v. Houle (Ont.), 26440, *A 179(98)
Lepage v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26320, *03 19.2.98 76(98) 288(98)
Lessard c. Corportion municipale de Courcelles (Qué.), 26275, *A 1960(97)
Lienaux v. Campbell (N.S.), 26171, *02 29.1.98 11(98) 160(98)
London Salvage & Trading Co. v. Sunoco Inc. (Ont.), 26241, *02 29.1.98 16(98) 162(98)
Lovelace v. The Queen (Ont.), 26165, *03 12.2.98 2016(97) 224(98)
Lyons v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.B.), 26312, *B 277(98)
M.A.G. v. The Queen (Ont.), 26255, *A 1868(97)
M.-J.R. c. M.B. (Qué.), 26347, *B 276(98)
M & D Farm Ltd. v. Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corporation (Man.),
26215, *03 12.2.98 71(98) 217(98)
M-Jay Farms Enterprises Ltd. v. Canadian Wheat Board (Man.), 26346, *02
19.2.98 183(98) 284(98)
Macciocchi v. The Queen (Ont.), 26128, *A 1865(97)
MacDonald v. MacDonald (Alta.), 26474, *A 331(98)
MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Council of Haida Nation (B.C.), 26434, *A 201(98)
MacNeil v. MacNeil (B.C.), 26435, *A 145(98)
Madison Developments Ltd. v. Plan Electric Co. (Ont.), 26397, *A 144(98)
Mailhot c. Ville du Lac Etchemin (Qué.), 26207, *B 274(98)
Malhotra v. Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (Ont.), 26310, *B 340(98)
Maljkovich v. Maljkovich (Ont.), 26420, *A 144(98)
Malmberg v. Municipal District of Cardston No. 6 (Alta.), 26402, *A 144(98)
Matthews v. Nowell (Ont.), 26372, *B 272(98)
McCarthy v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26344, *B 339(98)
McMaster v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24569, *A 328(95)
McMichael v. The Queen in right of Ontario (Ont.), 26443, *A 179(98)
McMynn v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 26242/43, *01 29.1.98 10(98) 160(98)
Mendez v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26323, *B 188(98)
Messer v. Messer (Sask.), 26380, *A 4(98)
Michalski v. Olson (Man.), 26432, *A 145(98)
Minister of Economic Development and Tourism v. Municipal Corporation of the
City of Yellowknife (N.W.T.), 26337, *02 19.2.98 183(98) 285(98)
Minister of Forests v. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. (B.C.), 26394, *A 65(98)
Minister of Health and Community Services v. M.L. (N.B.), 26321, *B 13(98)
Monette c. Poissant (Qué.), 26322, *B 337(98)
Montplaisir c. La Reine (Qué.), 26257, *A 1869(97)
Multani v. Multani (Ont.), 26245, *B 278(98)
Muscillo Transport Ltd. v. Bank of Nova Scotia (Ont.), 26295, *02 12.2.98 79(98) 227(98)
Nanaimo Regional General Hospital v. Heinrichs (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 26463, *A 333(98)
Nelson v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26130, *01 29.1.98 10(98) 159(98)
New Investors Committee of Mater’s Mortgages v. Peat Marwick Thorne Inc.
(Ont.), 26179, *02 19.2.98 181(98) 285(98)
Nguyen c. Galbraith (Qué.), 26434, *A 201(98)
Noskey v. The Queen (Alta.), 26022, *A 1121(97)
Nourhaghighi v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26267, *B 335(98)
Olah v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26280, *01 19.2.98 146(98) 282(98)
Olson v. Law Society of Manitoba (Man.), 25959, *02 6.10.97 857(97) 1753(97)
Olson v. Law Society of Manitoba (Man.), 26442, *A 179(98)
Ontario Adult Entertainment Bar Association v. Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto (Ont.), 26325, *02 19.2.98 182(98) 283(98)
Parisé c. Sous-ministre du Revenu du Québec (Qué.), 26072, *02 22.1.98 2230(97) 82(98)
Pearson c. Procureur général du Canada (Qué.), 24929/30/31, *A 1712(95)
Pesic v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26020, *B 1448(97)
Petro Canada Inc. c. T.I.W. Industries Ltd. (Qué.), 26223, *B 275(98)
Pham v. The Queen (B.C.), 26459, *A 332(98)
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada v. Attorney General of the
Province of British Columbia (B.C.), 26260, *02 12.2.98 71(98) 211(98)
Poliquin c. Perron-Malenfant (Qué.), 26451, *A 180(98)
Pomerleau c. Verge (Qué.), 26270, *02 22.1.98 2229(97) 81(98)
Poulin (Gilles) c. Serge Morency et Associés Inc. (Qué.), 26340, *A 3(98)
Poulin (Jean-Claude) c. Gilbert (Qué.), 26407, *A 332(98)
Power Workers’ Union v. Lincoln Hydro Electric Commission (Ont.), 26418, *A 68(98)
Procureur général du Québec c. Dupont (Qué.), 26232, *B 337(98)
Procureur général du Québec c. Raby (Qué.), 26238, *A 1866(97)
Pushpanathan v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Ont.),
25173, *C 210(98)
Quenneville (Maurice) c. Directeur de la protection de la jeunesse (Qué.),
26477, *A 332(98)
Quenneville (Stéphane) c. Directeur de la protection de la jeunesse (Qué.),
26476, *A 331(98)
R. v. Bunn (Man.), 26339, *A 3(97)
R. v. Drake (Crim.)(P.E.I.), 26201, *B 188(98)
R. v. Druken (Crim.)(Nfld.), 26254, *03 12.2.98 73(98) 222(98)
R. v. Foster (Crim.)(Sask.), 25058, *01 29.1.98 161(98) 161(98)
R. c. Grégoire (Crim.)(Qué.), 26226, *03 12.2.98 73(98) 221(98)
R. v. Proulx (Man.), 26376, *A 2(98)
R. v. R. (R.A.) (Man.), 26377, *A 3(98)
R. v. Scott (B.C.), 26462, *A 333(98)
R. v. Sylliboy (Crim.)(N.S.), 21929, *A 1015(90)
R. v. Walsh (Nfld.), 26329, *A 2175(97)
R.G.F. v. The Queen (Alta.), 26461, *A 332(98)
R. in right of Newfoundland v. Wells (Nfld.), 26362, *A 1(98)
Rafuse v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 26307, *B 339(98)
Ricken Leroux Inc. c. Ministre du Revenu du Québec (Crim.)(Qué.), 26287, *B 184(98)
Robert v. The Queen (Ont.), 26120, *A 2096(97)
Robertson v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (B.C.), 26448, *A 180(98)
Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition v. Joint Review Panel (F.C.A.)Alta.),
25618, *A 1958(96)
Rodrigue c. Ville de Québec (Qué.), 26438, *A 179(98)
Roy c. La Reine (Qué.), 26452, *A 201(98)
Royal Bank of Canada v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.),
26315 5(98) 232(98)
The applications for an extension of time are granted. The applications
for oral hearings are dismissed. An order will go staying the following
orders pending the determination of the appeals in Royal Bank of
Canada v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.) (26316);
Canadian Pacific Limited, et al v. Director of Investigation and Research
(Ont.) (26317).
a) The order granted on February 20, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95F, B55/95G and B55/95H;
b) The order granted on May 21, 1996 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File No. B55/95F; and
c) The order granted on March 19, 1997 by Farley J. in Ontario Court
(General Division) Commercial List File Nos. B55/95B, B55/95F and B55/95M.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Director of Investigation and Research (Ont.),
26316, *03 12.2.98 5(98) 214(98)
Royal Bank of Canada v. Sprung Instant Structures Ltd. (Alta.), 26392, *A 65(98)
Saca v. York University (Ont.), 26336, *02 26.2.98 208(98) 346(98)
Samadi v. The Queen (Ont.), 26472, *A 331(98)
Sauve v. Pokorny (Ont.), 26262, *02 29.1.98 12(98) 155(98)
Sawicki v. The Queen (Ont.), 26031, *A 1325(97)
Schafer v. Attorney General of Canada (Ont.), 26246, *01 29.1.98 15(98) 162(98)
Sengmueller v. Wilson (Ont.), 26235, *02 29.1.98 8(98) 157(98)
Service Employees Union, Local 210 v. Sisters of St. Joseph of the Diocese
of London in Ontario (Ont.), 26233, *02 19.2.98 151(98) 287(98)
Sheng v. R. in right of Ontario (Ont.), 26231, *02 8.1.98 2181(97) 22(98)
Shoshana v. Townsgate 1 Ltd. (Ont.), 26412, *A 67(98)
Shynuk v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25758, *01 12.2.98 952(97) 223(98)
Silbernagel v. Canadian Stevedoring Co. (B.C.), 26291, *02 19.2.98 146(98) 280(98)
Sillipp v. The Queen (Alta.), 26409, *A 67(98)
Simanek v. Train (Ont.), 26248, *A 1867(97)
Snake v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25459, *A 1(97)
Standard Life Compagnie d’assurance c. Cyr (Qué.), 26237, *A 1866(97)
Starret c. Blondeau (Qué.), 26475, *A 331(98)
Stuart v. Ernst & Young (B.C.), 25964, *A 905(97)
Sutherland v. The Queen in right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26056, *B 1967(97)
Syndicat canadien de la Fonction publique, section locale 60 c. Ville
d’Edmundston (N.-B.), 26414, *A 66(98)
Syndicat des travailleurs(euses) des épiciers unis Métro-Richelieu (CSN) c. E.
Chevrefils Inc. (Qué.), 26230, *B 336(98)
Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc. c. American Business Information, Inc.
(F.C.A.)(Qué.), 26403, *A 66(98)
Théroux c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26292, *B 184(98)
Thibodeau c. Ville de Sept-Îles (Qué.), 26391, *A 65(98)
Tremblay c. Ville de Québec (Qué.), 26439, *A 179(98)
Tremblay & Compagnie Syndics et Gestionnaires Ltée c. Sous-ministre du
Revenu du Québec (Qué.), 26272, *A 2096(97)
Tsawwassen Indian Band v. Corporation of Delta (B.C.), 26273, *02 26.2.98 203(98) 342(98)
Turgeon c. Ville de Plessisville (Qué.), 26341, *A 2225(97)
Turner v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.B.), 26264, *01 19.2.98 152(98) 287(98)
Union des employés de commerce, local 501, T.U.A.C. c. Arkwright Boston
Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. (Qué.), 26401, *A 144(98)
Unishare Investments Ltd. v. The Queen (Ont.), 26350, *B 277(98)
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 1288P v.
Allsco Building Products Ltd. (N.B.), 26203, *03 12.2.98 2227(97) 213(98)
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1518 v. Kmart Canada Ltd.
(B.C.), 26209, *03 12.2.98 2228(97) 213(98)
University of Saskatchewan v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. of Canada
(Sask.), 26370, *B 340(98)
Vacation Brokers Inc. v. Patterson (Ont.), 26306, *02 29.1.98 14(98) 158(98)
Van der Meulen v. Veterinary Medical Board of Manitoba (Man.), 26289, *02
26.2.98 203(98) 343(98)
Vaughan v. The Queen as represented by the Ontario Criminal Code Review
Board (Ont.), 26342, *A 144(98)
Vidal c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26205, *01 8.1.98 2178(97) 19(98)
Ville de Chambly c. Gagnon (Qué.), 26195, *B 187(98)
Wal-Mart Canada Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America (Ont.), 26355, *A 2226(97)
Warren v. The Queen (N.W.T.), 26216, *A 2225(97)
Washington v. The Queen (Ont.), 26366, *A 201(98)
Weisfeld v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 24334, *A 1595(94)
Westbank First Nation v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (B.C.),
26450, *A 180(98)
Western Surety Co. v. Sobeys Inc. (N.B.), 26470, *A 333(98)
Whitney v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26333, *B 270(98)
Wild v. The Queen (B.C.), 26384, *A 4(98)
Wilder v. Wolch (Man.), 26375, *A 2(98)
Wong v. The Queen (Sask.), 26465, *A 333(98)
Yake v. Law Society of Alberta (Alta.), 26360, *A 144(98)
Zink c. Graybec Immobilier Inc. (Qué.), 26314, *A 2(98)
Zündel v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(B.C.),
26417, *A 68(98)
CUMULATIVE INDEX ‐ APPEALS INDEX CUMULATIF ‐ POURVOIS
This index includes appeals standing for judgment at the beginning of 1998 and all appeals heard in 1998 up to now.
Cet index comprend les pourvois en délibéré au début de 1998 et tous ceux entendus en 1998 jusqu'à maintenant.
*01 dismissed/rejeté
*02 dismissed with costs/rejeté avec dépens
*03 allowed/accueilli
*04 allowed with costs/accueilli avec dépens
*05 discontinuance/désistement
Hearing/ Judgment/
CASE/AFFAIRE Audition Jugement
Page
Adrian v. Zittrer, Biblin and Associates Inc. (Ont.), 24711, 03 22.1.98 1859(97) 96(98)
Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25348 94(98)
Apotex Inc. v. Merck Frosst Canada Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25419 94(98)
BC Gas Utility Ltd. v. Westcoast Energy Inc. (B.C.), 25259 2037(97)
Bekoe v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25615, *01 30.1.98 196(98) 196(98)
Bisson c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25821, *03 19.2.98 196(98) 298(98)
Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Liberty Net
(F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.), 25228 2196(97)
Canderel Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24663, *04 12.2.98 2161(97) 233(98)
Caslake v. The Queen (Crim.)(Man.),25023, 01 22.1.98 2036(97) 96(98)
Charemski v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26033, *01 26.2.98 356(98) 356(98)
Commission d’appel en matière de lésions professionnelles c. J.M. Asbestos Inc.
25617, *04 23.2.98 354(98) 354(98)
Consolidated Maybrun Mines Ltd. v. The Queen (Ont.), 25326 174(98)
Continental Bank Leasing Corporation v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25532 171(98)
Dixon v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25834, *01 19.2.98 2194(97) 297(98)
Dowling v. City of Halifax (N.S.), 25493, *04 20.1.98 93(98) 169(98)
Éditions Vice Versa Inc. c. Aubry (Qué.), 25579 2195(97)
Gauthier c. Corporation municipale de la ville de Lac Brôme (Qué.), 25022 2162(97)
Hall c. Sous-ministre du revenu du Québec (Qué.), 25369, hearing and
judgment 3.12.97; reasons delivered 12.2.98 234(98) 234(98)
Horne v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25240, *01 23.1.98 169(98) 169(98)
Ikea Ltd. v. The Queen (B.C.), 25674, *02 12.2.98 2161(97) 234(98)
Judges of the Provincial Court of Manitoba v. The Queen in right of the
Province of Manitoba (Man.), 24846 92(98)
Law v. Minister of Human Resources Development (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 25374 93(98)
Lucas v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 25177 1859(97)
Malott v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25613, *01 12.2.98 1857(97) 233(98)
Maracle v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 26034, *01 23.1.98 170(98) 170(98)
McQuaid v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25833, *01 19.2.98 2194(97) 297(98)
Neuman v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Man.), 25565 173(98)
Novopharm Ltd. v. Eli Lilly and Co. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25402 94(98)
Pushpanathan v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Ont.), 25173 1855(97)
R. v. Al Klippert Ltd. (Alta.), 25670 174(98)
R. v. Campbell (Alta.), 24831 92(98)
R. v. Continental Bank of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25521 171(98)
R. v. Poirier (Crim.)(P.E.I.), 25886, *01 22.1.98 95(98) 95(98)
R. West and Associates v. Telecom Leasing Canada (TLC) Ltd. (B.C.), 25193,
*04 12.2.98 1759(97) 233(98)
Reference concerning certain questions relating to the secession of Quebec from
Canada (Ont.), 25506 295(98)
Reference re the remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court
of Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.), 24508 92(98)
Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union v. Battlefords and District
Co-Operative Ltd. (Sask.), 25366 172(98)
Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union v. Canada Safeway Ltd. (Sask.),
25356 172(98)
Robart v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25832, *01 19.2.98 2194(97) 297(98)
Rose v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25448 356(98)
Shalaan v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 26029, *01 28.1.98 173(98) 173(98)
Skinner v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25831, the appeal from the conviction for
the assault of Darren Watts is allowed 19.2.98 2194(97) 297(98)
Smith v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25822, the appeal from conviction for the
assault of Darren Watts is dismissed; the appeal from conviction for the
assault on Rob Gillis is allowed 19.2.98 2194(97) 297(98)
Succession Clément Guillemette c. J.M. Asbestos Inc. (Qué.), 25617, *04 23.2.98 354(98) 354(98)
Thomson Newspapers Co. v. Attoryney General of Canada (Ont.), 25593 1855(97)
Toronto College Park Ltd. v. The Queen (Ont.), 25559, *04 12.2.98 2161(97) 234(98)
Vancouver Society of Immigrant & Visible Minority Women v. Minister of
Revenue (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 25359 354(98)
Vriend v. The Queen in right of Alberta (Alta.), 25285 1992(97)
Williams v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25375 355(98)
DEADLINES: MOTIONS
|
|
DÉLAIS: REQUÊTES
|
BEFORE THE COURT:
Pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the following deadlines must be met before a motion before the Court can be heard: |
|
DEVANT LA COUR:
Conformément à l'article 23.1 des Règles de la Cour suprême du Canada, les délais suivants doivent être respectés pour qu'une requête soit entendue par la Cour :
|
Motion day : March 2, 1998
Service : February 9, 1998 Filing : February 16, 1998 Respondent : February 23, 1998
|
|
Audience du : 2 mars 1998
Signification : 9 février 1998 Dépôt : 16 février 1998 Intimé : 23 février 1998 |
Motion day : May 4, 1998
Service : April 27, 1998 Filing : April 20, 1998 Respondent : April 9, 1998
|
|
Audience du : 4 mai 1998
Signification : 27 avril 1998 Dépôt : 20 avril 1998 Intimé : 9 avril 1998 |
Motion day : June 1, 1998
Service : May 25, 1998 Filing : May 15, 1998 Respondent : May 8, 1998 |
|
Audience du : 1 juin 1998
Signification : 25 mai 1998 Dépôt : 15 mai 1998 Intimé : 8 mai 1998
|
DEADLINES: APPEALS
|
|
DÉLAIS: APPELS |
The Spring Session of the Supreme Court of Canada will commence April 27, 1998.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court Act and Rules, the following requirements for filing must be complied with before an appeal can be inscribed for hearing:
1. Where notice of appeal filed before October 29, 1997:
Case on appeal must be filed within three months of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Appellant's factum must be filed within four months of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Respondent's factum must be filed within eight weeks of the date of service of the appellant's factum.
Intervener's factum must be filed within four weeks of the date of service of the respondent's factum, unless otherwise ordered.
2. Where notice of appeal filed on or after October 29, 1997:
Appellant’s record; appellant’s factum; and appellant’s book(s) of authorities must be filed within four months of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Respondent’s record (if any); respondent’s factum; and respondent’s book(s) of authorities must be filed within eight weeks of the date of service of the appellant's factum.
Intervener's factum and intervener’s book(s) of authorities, if any, must be filed within four weeks of the date of service of the respondent's factum, unless otherwise ordered.
Parties’ condensed book, if required, must be filed on or before the day of hearing of the appeal.
Please consult the Notice to the Profession of October 1997 for further information.
In all cases, the Registrar shall inscribe the appeal for hearing upon the filing of the respondent's factum or after the expiry of the time for filing the respondent's factum.
|
|
La session de printemps de la Cour suprême du Canada commencera le 27 avril 1998.
Conformément à la Loi sur la Cour suprême et aux Règles, il faut se conformer aux exigences suivantes avant qu'un appel puisse être inscrit pour audition:
1. Si l’avis d’appel est déposé avant le 29 octobre 1997:
Le dossier d'appel doit être déposé dans les trois mois du dépôt de l'avis d'appel.
Le mémoire de l'appelant doit être déposé dans les quatre mois du dépôt de l'avis d'appel.
Le mémoire de l'intimé doit être déposé dans les huit semaines suivant la signification de celui de l'appelant.
Le mémoire de l'intervenant doit être déposé dans les quatre semaines suivant la signification de celui de l'intimé.
2. Si l’avis d’appel est déposé le 29 octobre 1997 ou après cette date:
Le dossier de l’appelant, son mémoire et son recueil de jurisprudence et de doctrine doivent être déposés dans les quatre mois de l’avis d’appel.
Le dossier de l’intimé (le cas échéant), son mémoire et son recueil de jurisprudence et de doctrine doivent être déposés dans les huit semaines suivant la signification de ceux de l’appelant.
Le mémoire de l'intervenant et son recueil de jurisprudence et de doctrine, le cas échéant, doivent être déposés dans les quatre semaines suivant la signification de ceux de l'intimé.
Le recueil condensé des parties, le cas échéant, doivent être déposés au plus tard le jour de l’audition de l’appel.
Veuillez consulter l’avis aux avocats du mois d’octobre 1997 pour plus de renseignements.
|
Dans tous les cas, le registraire inscrit l'appel pour audition après le dépôt du mémoire de l'intimé ou à l'expiration du délai de signification du mémoire de l'intimé.SUPREME COURT REPORTS |
|
RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS DE LA COUR SUPRÊME
|
THE STYLES OF CAUSE IN THE PRESENT TABLE ARE THE STANDARDIZED STYLES OF CAUSE (AS EXPRESSED UNDER THE "INDEXED AS" ENTRY IN EACH CASE).
|
|
LES INTITULÉS UTILISÉS DANS CETTE TABLE SONT LES INTITULÉS NORMALISÉS DE LA RUBRIQUE "RÉPERTORIÉ" DANS CHAQUE ARRÊT. |
Judgments reported in [1997] 3 S.C.R. Part 1
Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court (P.E.I.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3
|
|
Jugements publiés dans [1997] 3 R.C.S. Partie 1
Renvoi relatif à la rémunération des juges de la Cour provinciale (Î.-P.-É.), [1997] 3 R.C.S. 3 |
Judgments reported in [1997] 3 S.C.R. Part 2
Benner v. Canada (Secretary of State), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 389
R. v. Belvanis, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341
R. v. Hydro-Québec, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 213
R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320
|
|
Jugements publiés dans [1997] 3 R.C.S. Partie 2
Benner c. Canada (Secrétaire d’État), [1997] 3 R.C.S. 389
R. c. Belvanis, [1997] 3 R.C.S. 341
R. c. Hydro-Québec, [1997] 3 R.C.S. 213
R. c. Lifchus, [1997] 3 R.C.S. 320
|
Judgments reported in [1997] 3 S.C.R. Part 3
Canada (Attorney General) v. Canada (Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 440
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Tobiass, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 391
Peixeiro v. Haberman, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 549
R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484
|
|
Jugements publiés dans [1997] 3 R.C.S. Partie 3
Canada (Procureur général) c. Canada (Commission d’enquête sur le système d’approvisionnement en sang au Canada), [1997] 3 R.C.S. 440
Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration) c. Tobiass, [1997] 3 R.C.S. 391
Peixeiro c. Haberman, [1997] 3 R.C.S. 549
R. c. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 R.C.S. 484 |
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA SCHEDULE
CALENDRIER DE LA COUR SUPREME
REVISED
- 1997 -
OCTOBER - OCTOBRE |
|
NOVEMBER - NOVEMBRE |
|
DECEMBER - DECEMBRE |
||||||||||||||||||
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
M 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
M 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
2 |
M 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
* 12 |
13 |
12 |
H 13 |
14 |
15 |
x 16 |
17 |
18 |
|
9 |
10 |
H 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
|
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
|
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
|
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
H 25 |
H 26 |
27 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29
|
|
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1998 -
JANUARY - JANVIER |
|
FEBRUARY - FÉVRIER |
|
MARCH - MARS |
||||||||||||||||||
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
|
|
|
H 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
M 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
1 |
MV 2 |
V 3 |
V 4 |
V 5 |
V 6 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
|
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
|
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APRIL - AVRIL |
|
MAY - MAI |
|
JUNE - JUIN |
||||||||||||||||||
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
S D |
M L |
T M |
W M |
T J |
F V |
S S |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
M 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
H 10 |
11 |
|
R 3 |
M 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
12 |
H 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
|
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
|
17 |
H 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
|
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
24 |
25
|
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sittings of the court: Séances de la cour: |
|
17 sitting weeks / semaines séances de la cour 78 sitting days / journées séances de la cour 7 motion and conference days / journées requêtes, conférences 3 holidays during sitting days / jours fériés durant les sessions |
|
Motions: Requêtes: |
M |
||
Holidays: Jours fériés: |
H |