Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
4,276.
Maddison v. Emmerson - (1904) 34 SCR 533 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Sir William Young, the Chief Justice, and Dodd and Wilkins JJ. each delivered reasoned judgments on the point, and, so far as colonial judgments can settle any law, this question was supposed to be finally determined, and the decision of Smyth v. McDonald (3) has been accepted in that province as the law ever since. [...] In Williams & Yates "Law of Ejectment" (1894), at p. 7, I find: The Crown may recover possession of lands by an information of intrusion exhibited by the Attorney General
-
4,277.
Midland Navigation Co. v. Dominion Elevator Co. - (1904) 34 SCR 578 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
in the charter with a cargo of grain from the elevators in Fort William. [...] “Loading at Fort William” can therefore have one and only one meaning and that is loading at the elevators at Fort William. [...] The ship arrived at the port of Fort William on the afternoon of the 3rd December.
-
4,278.
Miller v. Robertson - (1904) 35 SCR 80 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
I will sell at public auction in front of the Telegraph Office in Bathurst, on Saturday, January 27th, at eleven o'clock a.m., the water lot owned by the late William End fronting on Water Street, in five lots forty feet each in breadth.
-
4,279.
Township of East Hawkesbury v. Township of Lochiel - (1904) 34 SCR 513 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
In the latter year, William Fortune, D.P.S., assisted by son, Joseph Fortune, laid out the balance of this township and partially subdivided it. [...] A witness, William McKenzie; examined at the trial, told of seeing there three posts about forty-five years before the trial took place. [...] It is upon these later surveys, and not upon those of William Fortune in 1798, that the finding of the road allowance between Hawkesbury and its gore and the gore of Lochiel is based.
-
4,280.
Peoples Bank of Halifax v. Estey - (1904) 34 SCR 429 - 1904-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
In Henderson & Co. v. Williams[16], the present Lord Chancellor, [Page 440]
-
4,281.
Travers v. Casey - (1904) 34 SCR 419 - 1904-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Cole v. Wade[19]; Holliday v. Overton[20]; Williams v. [Page 423] Pinckney[21]; Jarman's 12th rule, vol. 2, (5 ed.) 841; Ex parte Dawes[22], per Esher M.R. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William Pugsley. Solicitor for the respondents: John L. Carleton.
-
4,282.
Attorney General for Manitoba v. Attorney General for Canada - (1904) 34 SCR 287 - 1904-02-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
We cite also Williams on Real Property (19 ed.) 171; Washburn Real Property, (ed. 1902) vol. ii. secs. 1441—2, 1150, 1501; Aberdeen Town Council v. Aberdeen University[31].
-
4,283.
Confederation Life Association v. Borden - (1904) 34 SCR 338 - 1904-02-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
previously employed; and I find the matter stated in these terms: That the parties totally failed to communicate the said circumstances, or either of them, or the existence of any balance on the agency accounts then standing against the said George Hickes, to the pursuer or to the said Henry William Hickes; and, on the
-
4,284.
Hosking v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 244 - 1903-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
I extract from the evidence of William Thompson, the general superintendent and general manager of the mine : [...] A. Total $5,000, divided as follows : Elizabeth Jane Hosking (widow), $3,000 ; William John Hosking (son), $1,150 ; Stanley Hosking (son), $850.
-
4,285.
Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Smith v. Baker[15], at page 362, per Herschell L. J. ; Grant v. Acadia Coal Co. [16] ; Murphy v. Philips[17]; Clarke v. Holmes[18] , per Cockburn C. J. ; Williams v.
-
4,286.
Manitoba Assurance Co. v. Whitla / Whitla v. Royal Insurance Co. - (1903) 34 SCR 191 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
And in McCance v. London & North Western Railway Co. ([41]), Williams J. in delivering the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber says:
-
4,287.
Price v. Ordway / Veilleux v. Ordway - (1903) 34 SCR 145 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
WILLIAM PRICE (INTERVENANT) Appellant; And OSCAR WILLIAM ORDWAY (PLAINTIFF CONTESTING) [...] OSCAR WILLIAM ORDWAY (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1903: Oct 13; 1903: Oct 14; 1903: Nov 30
-
4,288.
Thompson v. Coulter - (1903) 34 SCR 261 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William Thompson and Adam Pinch, executors of the last will and testament of John David Thewes, Deceased (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
4,289.
Turner v. Cowan et al. - (1903) 34 SCR 160 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
William Cowan, Thomas Downs and Charles Holton (Defendants) Respondents. [...] William Cowan 800 Charles Holten 100 T. Downs 664 and some months after, at a meeting of the Company, it was moved by J. S. Lawson, seconded by C. Holten, that the Company purchase the assets and good—will, and assume the "liabilities of the Cowan Holten Downs Company, for the sum of eight thousand one hundred and [...] Memorandum of agreement made the 27th day of July, A.D. 1899, between William Cowan, Thomas Downs and Charles Holten, carrying on business in partnership under the firm name of the Cowan Holten Downs Company, hereinafter called the parties of the first part, and
-
4,290.
District of North Vancouver v. Tracy - (1903) 34 SCR 132 - 1903-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Solicitors for the appellant: McPhillips & Williams. Solicitors for the respondent: Davis, Marshall & Macneill.
-
4,291.
Doberer v. Megaw - (1903) 34 SCR 125 - 1903-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
William Riggs Megaw Respondent. 1903: October 20, 21; 1903: November 10.
-
4,292.
SCR | RCS (1903) vol 33 - 1903-10-06
Canada Supreme Court ReportsReference is made to Osborne v. Morgan (1) ; Williams v. Morgan (2) ; Scott y. Henderson (3) ; and to Williams on Real Property, (18th ed.) p. 540. [...] VOL. XXXIII.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 323 JAMES A. WILLIAMS (DEFENDANT) ... [...] Mr. Williams : I have nothing except the opinion given by members of the bar.
-
4,293.
In re Representation of P.E.I. in the House of Commons - (1903) 33 SCR 594 - 1903-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Mr. Williams: And more so for the interpretation of the constitution. [...] Mr. Williams: I have nothing except the opinion given by members of the bar. [...] Mr. Williams: Well my Lord I will read Vansittart for your Lordship.
-
4,294.
Williams v. Stephenson - (1903) 33 SCR 323 - 1903-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Williams v. Stephenson, (1903) 33 SCR 323 Supreme Court of Canada Williams v. Stephenson, (1903) 33 S.C.R. 323 [...] James A. Williams (Defendant) Appellant; and John W. Stephenson (Plaintiff) Respondent. [...] J. A. WILLIAMS. J. W. STEPHENSON. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of
-
4,295.
In re Representation of Certain Provinces in the House of Commons - (1903) 33 SCR 475 - 1903-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Pugsley K.C, Attorney General for the Province of New Brunswick, and Geo. W. Allen K.C.
-
4,296.
St. Laurent v. Mercier - (1903) 33 SCR 314 - 1903-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
Reference is made to Osborne v. Morgan ([6]); Williams v. Morgan ([7]); Scott v. Henderson ([8]); and to Williams on Real Property, (18th ed.) p. 540.
-
4,297.
North American Life Assurance Co. v. Elson - (1903) 33 SCR 383 - 1903-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
By the terms of the application the contract commenced from the delivery of the policy and the policy was sent by the appellant's letter dated 27th September, 1894, to William McBride at Winnipeg, agent of the appellant, for delivery to Elson in British Columbia.
-
4,298.
Gosselin v. The King - (1903) 33 SCR 255 - 1903-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
see also United States v. Oregon &c. Railroad Co. ([10]) ° though the public history of the times in which a statute was passed may be referred to, according to what Taney C. J. says in Aidridge v. Williams ([11]) or what Davis J. .says in United States v. The Union Pacific Railroad Co., ([12]) and Peckam J., Ubi supra.
-
4,299.
Thorne v. Thorne - (1903) 33 SCR 309 - 1903-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William H. Thorne and Others (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1903: April 6, 20. [...] The words deleted may be looked at; Williams on Executors, (9 ed:) vol. 1, p. 485; Shea v. Boschetti[8]; In re Harrison[9]; and they [...] THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—This case involves the construction of the will of one William Thorne who died at Toronto in 1868.
-
4,300.
Green v. Miller - (1903) 33 SCR 193 - 1903-03-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
the agency of Lord William Nevill, at 27 Charles street, St. James' Square, has been closed by the directors.