Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,526.
Grace v. Kuebler and Brunner - (1917) 56 SCR 1 - 1917-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
In merely making their payments, they were not persons subsequently dealing with it to whom registration in the interval would be notice; Gilleland v. Wadsworth[11]; Williams v. Sorrell[12].
-
3,527.
Rosborough v. Trustees of St. Andrew's Church - (1917) 55 SCR 360 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
See also Smith's Equity Jurisprudence in the chapter on Election at page 137 and following pages, and Williams on Executors, 10th ed., page 1030.
-
3,528.
North-West Theatre Co. v. MacKinnon - (1916) 52 SCR 588 - 1916-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
A casual consideration of the reference thereto in Williams on Executors (10 ed.) page 1389, especially note (m), seems to indicate that the executor would not, unless entering and holding possession, incur personal liability.
-
3,529.
Bell v. Grand Trunk Rway. Co. - (1913) 48 SCR 561 - 1913-12-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Although as a general rule where a plaintiff relies upon the breach by the defendant of a statutory provision which imposes a duty, but contains an exception, he must allege and shew that the defendant is not within the exception, Spieres v. Parker[12], at page 145; Williams v. The East India Co.[13]; Dwarris on Statutes
-
3,530.
Newberry v. Langan - (1912) 47 SCR 114 - 1912-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
John F. Langan, William B. Ryan and Harry P. Simpson (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
3,531.
Toronto Ry. Co. v. Toms - (1911) 44 SCR 268 - 1911-04-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Toms (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1911: March 23; 1911: April 3.
-
3,532.
The King v. St. Catharines Hydraulic Co. - (1910) 43 SCR 595 - 1910-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
See Lewis v. Stephenson[1]; Nudell v. Williams[2]; Sears v. City of St. John[3].
-
3,533.
In re Richard - (1907) 38 SCR 394 - 1907-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
We held in the case of Williams v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.[3], that no appeal would lie to us from a refusal of a single judge to give leave to appeal.
-
3,534.
Hewson v. Ontario Power Co. - (1905) 36 SCR 596 - 1905-10-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Hewson (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Ontario Power Company of Niagara Falls (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,535.
King's (N.S.) Election Case (Parker v. Borden) - (1905) 36 SCR 520 - 1905-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
William F. Parker (Petitioner) Appellant And Sir Frederick W. Borden (Respondent)
-
3,536.
Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Smith v. Baker[15], at page 362, per Herschell L. J. ; Grant v. Acadia Coal Co. [16] ; Murphy v. Philips[17]; Clarke v. Holmes[18] , per Cockburn C. J. ; Williams v.
-
3,537.
Asbestos & Asbestic Co. v. Durand - (1900) 30 SCR 285 - 1900-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
It appears from the evidence of "Williams the superintendent of the mine, that the daily average use was about four boxes and that the course of business was that a person specially entrusted with the duty would, in the morning and again at noon, carry two of the boxes from the magazine to the hoisting engine room, were
-
3,538.
Murray v. Jenkins - (1898) 28 SCR 565 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
We contend that the memorandum in writing is insufficient under the statute of frauds; Williams v. Jordan[10]; Agnew, Statute of Frauds, p. 258.
-
3,539.
In re Central Bank of Canada - (1897) 28 SCR 192 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
the present Chief Justice, Sir William Meredith, then solicitor of the liquidators in the liquidation matter; that it was revised by the learned Chancellor, and so revised was introduced into Parliament and passed, and that the Master in Ordinary, before whom the proceedings in liquidation were conducted, had urged the
-
3,540.
Winnipeg Election Case / Macdonald Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 201 - 1897-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Edwy William Snider (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: Feb 17; 1897: Mar 24.
-
3,541.
Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association v. Bradt - (1895) 25 SCR 154 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Application of B. Barnes of the Township of West Williams to the Dominion Grange, Mutual Fire Insurance Association, for insurance against loss or damage by fire or lightning to the amount of $1,500 for four years from the 13th January, 1891, on the following property:
-
3,542.
Fairchild v. Ferguson - (1892) 21 SCR 484 - 1892-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
In Lindus v. Bradwell ([27]) a bill had been drawn on William Bradwell, and it was accepted by his wife in her own name, "Mary Bradwell."
-
3,543.
Quirt v. The Queen - (1891) 19 SCR 510 - 1891-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Reg. v. Williams[17]; The Queen v. Guinness[18]. [Page 514] The mention of lands held in trust for the Indians does not exclude other trusts.
-
3,544.
Clarkson v. Ryan - (1890) 17 SCR 251 - 1890-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William Ryan (Plaintiff).Respondent. 1890: January 21; 1890: June 12.
-
3,545.
Fairbanks v. Barlow - (1887) 14 SCR 217 - 1887-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
The respondents are the South Eastern Railway Company, William Farwell, Wm. C. Van Home, and Warmen R. Blodgett in their quality as trustees of the bondholders of the South Eastern Railway who were defendants with Barlow, and the intervenant, James O'Halloran, a judgment creditor of Barlow.
-
3,546.
Létourneux v. Danserau - (1886) 12 SCR 307 - 1886-05-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
" WILLIAM F. BROWN. (True copy.) HUBERT, HONEY & GENDRON, P.S. C
-
3,547.
Town of Portland v. Griffiths - (1885) 11 SCR 333 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
So in the General Steam Navigation Co. v. Morrison[21] Williams J. asks:
-
3,548.
Jones v. Tuck - (1884) 11 SCR 197 - 1884-06-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
William H. Tuck (Defendant) Respondent 1884: Feb'y. 28; 1884: June 23.
-
3,549.
Queddy River Driving Boom Co. v. Davidson - (1883) 10 SCR 222 - 1883-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsWilliam Davidson Respondent 1883: Feb'y. 26, 27; 1883: May 1. Present—Sir W. J. Ritchie, C.J., and Strong, Fournier, Henry, Taschereau and Gwynne, JJ.
-
3,550.
Scott v. The Queen - (1878) 2 SCR 349 - 1878-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Present—Sir William Buell Richards, C.J., and Ritchie, Strong, Taschereau, Fournier and Henry, J. J.