Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

4,782 result(s)

  • 3,626.

    World Marine and General Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Leger - [1952] 2 SCR 3 - 1951-12-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    86 Prince William St. Saint John, N.B. (It was explained that "cCc" are the initials of another company, not a fire insurance company).

  • 3,627.

    Kirby v. Kalyniak - [1948] SCR 544 - 1948-10-05

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Motor vehicles

    APPEAL from the decision of the Court of Appeal for Manitoba 1, reversing (McPherson C.J.M. dissenting in part) the judgment of the trial judge, Williams C.J. K.B., and awarding plaintiff the full amount of the damages assessed.

  • 3,628.

    MacDonald v. The King - [1947] SCR 90 - 1946-12-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Criminal law

    At the first trial, the appellant had been charged with and tried together with Benedetto Zanelli, Samuel Mancuso, Edwin MacDonald and William M. Baskett.

  • 3,629.

    McNichol v. Grandy - [1931] SCR 696 - 1931-10-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    Solicitors for the appellant: Aikins, Loftus, Aikins, Williams & MacAulay.

  • 3,630.

    Brewster Transport Co. v. Rocky Mountain Tours & Transport Co. - [1931] SCR 336 - 1930-12-23

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    Rocky Mountain Tours and Transport Company, Limited, Rocky Mountain Royal Blue Line Motor Tours Limited, James I. Mcleod, William Warren, and C. E. Sibbald (Defendants) Respondents

  • 3,631.

    Knight Sugar Co. v. Webster - [1930] SCR 518 - 1930-02-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    William B. Webster (Defendant) Respondent 1929: October 2; 1930: February 4.

  • 3,632.

    Robert Crean & Co. v. Dobbs & Co. - [1930] SCR 307 - 1930-02-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Intellectual property

    On this ground alone the registration of the respondent’s mark should be refused, for, as Vaughan-Williams L.J., said in Bowden Wire, Limited v. Bowden Brake Co., Limited[9]:

  • 3,633.

    MacKenzie v. Grand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co. - [1926] SCR 178 - 1925-11-02

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Labour law

    John William Mackenzie (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Company (Defendant) Respondent.

  • 3,634.

    Jamieson v. Edmonton (City) - (1916) 54 SCR 443 - 1916-12-11

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Municipal law

    In the case of Maguire v. Liverpool Corporation[4], Vaughan-Williams L.J. asserts the same general rule as do Farwell and Kennedy L.JJ. in the Bingley Case3, and treats the immunity of the authority in respect to the non-repair of highways as an exception due to the particular history of the highways.

  • 3,635.

    McKee v. Philip - (1916) 55 SCR 286 - 1916-10-30

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    William Philip (Defendant) Respondent. 1916: October 17; 1916: October 30.

  • 3,636.

    Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    On the whole, I adopt the reasoning and conclusions of Chief Justice Sir William Meredith and would dismiss the appeal.

  • 3,637.

    The King v. Trudel - (1914) 49 SCR 501 - 1914-03-02

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Expropriation

    The law of Canada as regards the principles upon which compensation for land taken was to be awarded was the same as the law of England, and it has been explained in numerous cases— nowhere with greater precision than in the case of In re Lucas and Chesterfield Gas and Water Board[2], where Lord Justices Vaughan Williams

  • 3,638.

    Cunard v. The King - (1910) 43 SCR 88 - 1910-02-22

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Expropriation

    William Samuel Cunard and Others (Defendants) Appellants; and His Majesty The King (Plaintiff) Respondent.

  • 3,639.

    Goold v. Gillies - (1908) 40 SCR 437 - 1908-06-16

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    Solicitor for the respondent: William S. Gray. [1] 55 Ind. 205. [2] 12 Ont. App. R. 50; 13 Can. S.C.R. 1.

  • 3,640.

    Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Upon the authority of Duckett v. Williams[42], and Venner v. The Sun Life Insurance Company[43], I would think that under this clause alone the company were not obliged to tender or pay into court premiums that were forfeited by an express stipulation of the contract, any more than if the forfeiture were decreed by a

  • 3,641.

    The Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co. v. McNevin - (1902) 32 SCR 194 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    Badenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Association[11]; Williams v. United States Mutual Accident Association[12].

  • 3,642.

    Donohoe v. Hull - (1895) 24 SCR 683 - 1895-06-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Family law

    Even supposing, said Vaughan Williams J., that the plaintiff had taken the proper steps to set aside the settlement as void, and had succeeded in doing so, even then Brown could never have been placed in the position of being obliged to pay over the money to Vyse ; the settlement would still be valid and subsisting between

  • 3,643.

    Harris v. Robinson - (1892) 21 SCR 390 - 1892-10-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    title had not been registered; and secondly, that there appeared on the registry to be an annuity or rent charge which formed an incumbrance upon the lands having been granted by one Perry in favour of Sir William Campbell when Perry purchased from Campbell as part security for payment of the purchase money on that sale.

  • 3,644.

    Lakefield Lumber and Manufacturing Co. v. Shairp - (1891) 19 SCR 657 - 1891-11-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    State

    William Shairp (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1891: February 4, 5; 1891: November 17.

  • 3,645.

    Lynch v. Seymour - (1888) 15 SCR 341 - 1888-03-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Solicitors for respondent: Clute & Williams. [1] 12 Ont. App. R. 525.

  • 3,646.

    Carvill v. Schofield - (1883) 9 SCR 370 - 1883-06-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Maritime law

    Present.—Sir William J. Ritchie, Knight, C. J., and Strong, Fournier, Henry and Taschereau, JJ.

  • 3,647.

    Holman v. Green - (1881) 6 SCR 707 - 1881-05-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    PRESENT—Sir William J. Ritchie, Kt., C.J., and Strong, Fournier, Henry and Gwynne, JJ.

  • 3,648.

    Mowat v. McFee - (1880) 5 SCR 66 - 1880-06-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Fishery

    William McFee Respondent 1880: May 4, 5; 1880: June 10. Present.—Ritchie, C. J., and Fournier, Henry, Taschereau, and Gwynne, J.J.

  • 3,649.

    Standly v. Perry - (1879) 3 SCR 356 - 1879-05-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Maritime law

    Robert William Standly et al. (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Ebenezer Perry et al.

  • 3,650.

    SCR | RCS [1961] - 1961-10-03

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Williams v. Webb et al, 27 D.L.R. (2d) 465, motion to quash granted and leave to appeal refused, June 5, 1961.   [...]  TABLE OF CASES CITED W—Concluded NAME OF CAGE Webber, Re Welch v. R West Kootenay Power & Light Co. v. Nelson 12 B.C.R. 34 Wightwick's Will Trusts, Re Williams v. Aristocratic Restaurants (1947) Ltd...   [...]  Lumley v. Gye (1853), 2 E. & B. 216; Quinn v. Leathern, [19011 A.C. 495; Lyons v. Wilkins, [1899] 1 Ch. 255, referred to; Williams v. Aristocratic Restaurants (1947) Ltd., [19511 S.C.R. 762, distinguished.