Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,201.
Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. Horner - (1921) 61 SCR 547 - 1921-02-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Scott v. The London and St. Katherine Docks Co.[2]; Flannery v. Waterford and Limerick Rly. Co.[3]. [...] In Scott v. London and St. Katherine Docks Co.[9], Erle C.J. said at p. 601:— [...] Palles C.B. followed Scott v. London & St Katherine Docks Co.[12], and, at p. 39 said:—
-
2,202.
Killoran v. Monticello State Bank - (1921) 61 SCR 528 - 1921-02-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
W. L. Scott for the appellant. A. B. Hogg for the respondent. IDINGTON J.—The appellant signed what are in due form two ordinary promissory notes for $700 each That was followed on each of the same sheets of paper at the respective heads of which each of said promissory notes had been written and signed by appellant, by an [...] MIGNAULT J.—I have duly considered all that Mr. Scott said in his very able argument for the appellant and in the memorandum which he has since filed.
-
2,203.
Fuller v. Garneau - (1921) 61 SCR 450 - 1921-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
APPEAL from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Scott J.[2] and dismissing the appellant's action. [...] The appellant is entitled to be paid his costs of the appeals to the Appellate Division and to this court; and the costs of the motion before Mr. Justice Scott should be costs in the cause to the plaintiff in any event thereof.
-
2,204.
Abell v. The Corporation of the County of York - (1920) 61 SCR 345 - 1920-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
H.J. Scott, K.C. for the appellant. Lennox for the respondent. THE CHIEF JUSTICE:—The contest in this case is as to the right of the now appellant to maintain a raceway in connection with his mill property under the surface of a highway called Pine Street in the village of Woodbridge.
-
2,205.
Lavin v. Geffen - (1920) 60 SCR 660 - 1920-11-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division,[1] reversing the judgment of the trial judge, Scott J., who had dismissed the respondent's action and ordering a new trial.
-
2,206.
SCR | RCS (1920) vol 60 - 1920-11-23
Canada Supreme Court ReportsJackson v. Scott (1). Indeed it would seem to be altogether probable that what was intended by the learned Chief Justice of British. [...] WATT & SCOTT, LIMITED, (PLAIN-APPELLANT 1920 TIFF) f *Mar. 9, 10. *May 4. [...] WATT AND SCOTT, LTD. An order was made for the consolidation, so called, of THE vbr„ the two actions after issues had been joined.
-
2,207.
Magdall v. The King - (1920) 61 SCR 88 - 1920-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
W. L. Scott for the respondent. THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—This was an appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta which, on an equal division of opinion, refused to quash a conviction against the appellant prisoner under section 212 of the Criminal Code for having, under promise of marriage, [...] After hearing Mr. O'Connor, counsel for the appellant, on the question of corroboration, we were unanimously of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence of corroboration, and Mr. Scott was not called on to reply on that point.
-
2,208.
Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company v. Canadian Car and Foundry Co. - (1920) 61 SCR 78 - 1920-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Scott & Co.[2], whom the Court of Appeal refused to hold liable for damages. [...] In the absence of a Canadian statutory provision corresponding to s. 33 of the "Patents and Designs Act," 1907, (Imp.) 7 Ed. VII., c. 29, the fact that the defendant was an innocent infringer does not entitle it to relief from liability for the damages sustained by the plaintiffs—(Nobels Explosive Co. v. Jones, Scott &.
-
2,209.
Watt and Scott v. City of Montreal - (1920) 60 SCR 523 - 1920-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Watt and Scott v. City of Montreal, , (1920) 60 SCR 523 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Watt and Scott v. City of Montreal, (1920) 60 S.C.R. 523 Date: 1920-05-04 [...] La compagnie Watt & Scott porte les deux poursuites en appel devant cette cour.
-
2,210.
Davidson v. Sharpe - (1920) 60 SCR 72 - 1920-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Jackson v. Scott[15]. Indeed it would seem to be altogether probable that what was intended by the learned Chief Justice of British Columbia was that personal judgment against the defendant should issue forthwith upon the amount due being ascertained and certified and should be enforceable as to the debt and interest during
-
2,211.
SCR | RCS (1920) vol 59 - 1920-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsVOL. LIX.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 63 Tilley K.C. for the appellant. 1919 H. J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. [...] On the whole I think the weight of argument favours the view of the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Scott. [...] GRANT V. SCOTT. 227 BROKER—Principal and agent—Stock broker—Dealing in margins—Failure to Cover—Sale by broker.]
-
2,212.
C. & E. Townsites Ltd. v. Wetaskiwin (City) - (1919) 59 SCR 578 - 1919-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
IDINGTON J. (dissenting).—The respondent got judgment at the trial before Mr. Justice Scott for taxes alleged to be due by appellant by virtue of assessments made for the years 1916 and 1917 and that has been maintained by the Appellate Division for Alberta from which this appeal is made. [...] As put by Mr. Justice Scott:— An inspection of the rolls shews that the practice followed by the assessor was that where a number of lots of the defendant in the same locality were entered the name "Townsite Trustees" would be entered in the owner column opposite the first one only.
-
2,213.
Rawlings and Ball v. Galibert - (1919) 59 SCR 611 - 1919-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
Ibid, note (e): Ville de Maisonneuve v. Chartier[9]; Hamilton v. Perry[10]; Hébert v. Poirier[11]; Banque d'Hochelaga v. Macduff[12]; Scott v. Turnbull[13].
-
2,214.
Grant v. Scott - (1919) 59 SCR 227 - 1919-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Grant v. Scott, , (1919) 59 SCR 227 Supreme Court of Canada Grant v. Scott, (1919) 59 S.C.R. 227 [...] Leonard Scott (Plaintiff). Respondent. 1919: November 6; 1919: November 10. [...] The fact that the payee, Scott, when he placed the note in the hands of the Royal Bank for collection, also indorsed the note, and he did so under the signature of the appellant, does not take the case out of the operation of section 131, and I cannot follow the argument of the appellant when he says that the respondent was
-
2,215.
McBratney v. McBratney - (1919) 59 SCR 550 - 1919-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
The second of these views was adopted by the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Scott, the first prevailing with Mr. Justice Stuart who presided at the hearing of the application and Mr. Justice McCarthy and Mr. Justice Simmons in the Appellate Division. [...] On the whole I think the weight of argument favours the view of the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Scott.
-
2,216.
Canadian Pacific Rway. Co., v. Albin Idington J - (1919) 59 SCR 151 - 1919-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The English cases respecting compensation for loss of business are not applicable in Canada owing to the difference between our “Railway Act” and the Acts on which those decisions were founded.
-
2,217.
The Town of Cobalt v. The Temiskaming Telephone Company - (1919) 59 SCR 62 - 1919-06-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. IDINGTON J.—The question raised herein is whether or not respondent, which is a telephone company incorporated under and by virtue of the Ontario “Companies Act,” has, under the circumstances I am about to refer to, the right to maintain on the public highways of appellant, which is a
-
2,218.
SCR | RCS (1919) vol 58 - 1919-05-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIn this order the Chief Commissioner, Sir Henry L. Drayton K.C. and the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. D'Arcy Scott, concurred, while Mr. Commissioner S. J. McLean dissented. [...] In the course of events attendant upon the said several assignments, one Scott Barlow, who had become one of the said several assignees, as trustee for respondent company, registered a caveat on the 5th of June, 1913. [...] In May, 1913, Phillips, being indebted to Boulter Waugh and Company, Limited (now represented by the respondent), assigned his interest in the agreement for sale to the said company, which immediately transferred its interest to its credit manager, Mr. Scott Barlow, in trust for the company.
-
2,219.
Union Bank of Canada v. Phillips and Boulter Waugh Ltd. - (1919) 58 SCR 385 - 1919-03-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
In the course of events attendant upon the said several assignments, one Scott Barlow, who had become one of the said several assignees, as trustee for respondent company, registered a caveat on the 5th of June, 1913. [...] obtained from Phillips a mortgage upon the said lands and having had, when doing so, knowledge of the said caveat filed by Scott Barlow, the appellant is held by the court below to have committed a fraud and thereby is deprived of its rights as such mortgagee. [...] In May, 1913, Phillips, being indebted to Boulter Waugh and Company, Limited (now represented by the respondent), assigned his interest in the agreement for sale to the said company, which immediately transferred its interest to its credit manager, Mr. Scott Barlow, in trust for the company.
-
2,220.
Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Department of Public Works of Ontario - (1919) 58 SCR 189 - 1919-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
In this order the Chief Commissioner, Sir Henry L. Drayton K.C. and the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. D'Arcy Scott, concurred, while Mr. Commissioner S. J. McLean dissented.
-
2,221.
SCR | RCS (1919) vol 57 - 1919-02-04
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe agreement must therefore be deemed to have been in force when Scott was injured. [...] Solicitors for the respondents, executors : Stewart & Scott. (1) [1912] A.C. 407. [...] W. L. Scott for the motion referred to St. John Lumber Co. v. Roy (1); Jones v. Tucker (2).
-
2,222.
Lecomte v. O'Grady - (1918) 57 SCR 563 - 1918-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W. L. Scott for the motion referred to St. John Lumber Co. v. Roy[3]; Jones v. Tucker[4].
-
2,223.
Merchants Bank of Canada v. Hagman - (1918) 59 SCR 662 - 1918-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
W. L. Scott for the respondent. [1] 13 Alfa. L.R. 293; [1918] 2 W.W.R. 377.
-
2,224.
Stowe v. The Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. - (1918) 59 SCR 665 - 1918-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], reversing the judgment of Scott J. at the trial and dismissing the appellant's (plaintiff's) action.
-
2,225.
Cameron v. Church of Christ, Scientist - (1918) 57 SCR 298 - 1918-10-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Solicitors for the respondents, executors: Stewart & Scott. [1] 40 Ont. L.R. 567 sub nom.