Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

2,511 result(s)

  • 1,601.

    The Custodian v. Passavant - [1928] SCR 242 - 1928-04-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil law

    transaction where there were not mutual accounts.” Story on Equity, 3rd Ed., pp. 33, 40, 191; Scott v. Surman[7]; and there are many later authorities.

  • 1,602.

    Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    But there are, no doubt, other authorities in which the contrary has been held, e.g., Scott v. Key[16]; Woods v. Woods[17]; Longmore v. Elcum[18].

  • 1,603.

    The King v. Trudel - (1914) 49 SCR 501 - 1914-03-02

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Expropriation

    I do not think that such evidence can be taken into consideration in the face of that given by Tessier, Scott and others.

  • 1,604.

    Cunard v. The King - (1910) 43 SCR 88 - 1910-02-22

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Expropriation

    [9] 4 M. & Gr. 995; 5 Scott N.R. 689. [10] 7 Moo. P.C. 77. [11] 9 Can. S.C.R. 239.

  • 1,605.

    City of Hamilton v. Hamilton Distillery Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 239 - 1907-02-19

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    Solicitors for the respondents, Hamilton Brewing Association: J.J. Scott.

  • 1,606.

    Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    See also Lowry v. Bourdieu[21]; Palyart v. Leckie[22]; Paterson v. Powell[23]; Sykes v. Beadon[24]; Begbie v. The Phosphate Sewage Co.[25]; Scott v. Brown[26].

  • 1,607.

    Harris v. Robinson - (1892) 21 SCR 390 - 1892-10-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    As to waiver see Salisbury v. Hatcher[5] and Hoggart v. Scott[6]. Plaintiff was entitled to reasonable notice of rescission.

  • 1,608.

    Barton v. McMillan - (1892) 20 SCR 404 - 1892-04-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Moss Q.C. for the appellants cited James v. Smith[1]; Nobel’s Explosives Co. v. Jones, Scott & Co.[2]

  • 1,609.

    SCR | RCS [1995] vol 4 - 1995-12-21

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Stone, Scott N., and Robert K. Taylor. Testimonial Privileges, 2nd ed.   [...]  Stone, Scott N., and Robert K. Taylor. Testimonial Privileges, 2nd ed.   [...]  Toronto: But- terworths, 1992 577 Stone, Scott N., and Robert K. Taylor.

  • 1,610.

    R. v. Pamajewon - [1996] 2 SCR 821 - 1996-08-22

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. Ivan G. Whitehall, Q.C., and Kimberley Prost, for the intervener the Attorney General of Canada.

  • 1,611.

    Bulletin of March 1, 1996 - 1996-03-01

    Bulletins

    Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. Ivan G. Whitehall, Q.C. and Kimberley Prost, for the intervener the A.G. of Canada.

  • 1,612.

    R. v. Clunas - [1992] 1 SCR 595 - 1992-02-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Criminal law

    Ian Scott Clunas Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Clunas

  • 1,613.

    Adricon Ltée v. East Angus (Town of) - [1978] 1 SCR 1107 - 1977-12-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal
    Municipal law

    Solicitors for the respondent: Desmarais, Scott & Rivard, Sherbrooke.

  • 1,614.

    Jones v. A.G. of New Brunswick - [1975] 2 SCR 182 - 1974-04-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    See Scott, “The British North America (No. 2) Act, 1949” (1950), 8 Univ. of Tor. LJ. 201, at p. 205.

  • 1,615.

    Culina v. Giuliani - [1972] SCR 343 - 1971-10-05

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Trust

    Scott on Trusts, 3rd ed., vol. IV, at p. 2517, says: Where the release is given by the trustee in breach of trust and the obligor is not in the position of a bona fide purchaser, either because he gives no value for the release or because he has notice that the trustee is committing a breach of trust in giving him the

  • 1,616.

    R. v. Bagshaw - [1972] SCR 2 - 1971-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal
    Criminal law

    I must point out that even if the theft from such other unidentified firm had been perpetrated by this appellant he could not have been convicted on the offence as charged as the cans would not have been the property of Canada Packers Limited: Reg. v. Scott[14].

  • 1,617.

    Royal Trust Company v. Ford et al. - [1971] SCR 831 - 1971-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    D.M. Gordon, Q.C., and J. C. Scott-Harston, Q.C., for the plaintiff, appellant.

  • 1,618.

    Kloepfer Wholesale Hardware v. Roy - [1952] 2 SCR 465 - 1952-06-30

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    F.A. Brewin Q.C. and R. Scott for the respondent. The facts of this case make it abundantly clear that the respondent upon the appellant’s announced intention to repudiate the contract, did not elect to treat the contract as at an end, and sue for damages, but did elect to treat the contract as binding and at once invoked

  • 1,619.

    Leduc v. La Banque d'Hochelaga - [1926] SCR 76 - 1925-12-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Financial institutions

    [15] [1837] 4 Scott 50. [16] M.L.R. 3 Q.B. 232. [17] Q.R. 21 K.B. 302.

  • 1,620.

    Riordon Co. v. Danforth Co. - [1923] SCR 319 - 1923-04-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    Duff J.—In the fall of 1921 the appellant company became financially embarrassed; and on the 11th October of the same year the company requested Mr. Scott, an authorized trustee in bankruptcy, to call a meeting of its creditors to enable it to submit a proposal for an extension of credit, the proposal being that credit

  • 1,621.

    Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Department of Public Works of Ontario - (1919) 58 SCR 189 - 1919-02-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    In this order the Chief Commissioner, Sir Henry L. Drayton K.C. and the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. D'Arcy Scott, concurred, while Mr. Commissioner S. J. McLean dissented.

  • 1,622.

    Canadian Northwestern Railway Co. v. Moore - (1916) 53 SCR 519 - 1916-06-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Transportation

    ANGLIN. J.—I agree with the view of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta, stated by Mr. Justice Scott, that the provisions of section 10 of the Alberta "Evidence Act" were violated on the arbitration under review.

  • 1,623.

    Continental Oil Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1916) 52 SCR 605 - 1916-02-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Evidence

    IDINGTON J.—I so entirely agree herein with the opinion of Chief Justice Harvey, concurred in by Mr. Justice Scott in the court of appeal, that perhaps I should say no more than express my adoption thereof.

  • 1,624.

    Peacock v. Wilkinson - (1915) 51 SCR 319 - 1915-03-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Securities

    Solicitors for the respondents: Embury, Scott & Mc-Kinnon. [1] 7 West.

  • 1,625.

    Ville de St. Jean v. Molleur - (1908) 40 SCR 139 - 1908-03-23

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    It has been held (Attorney-General of Quebec v. Scott[20]) that the appellant cannot be prejudiced by the delay of the court in dealing with an application to allow the security."