Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
1,001.
Regent Taxi & Transport Co. v. La Congrégation des Petits Frères de Marie - [1929] SCR 650 - 1929-11-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Allen v. Flood[54]. An interesting observation upon the juridical basis of the two notable decisions of the House of Lords above cited, from the point of view of the civilian, may be found in Gérard’s work “Les Torts ou Délits Civils en Droit Anglais,” at pp. 426 et seq.
-
1,002.
SCR | RCS [1929] - 1929-11-04
Canada Supreme Court ReportsTABLE OF CASES CITED NAME OF CASE Abbott v. Fraser Aberdeen Railway Co. v. Blakie Brothers..1 MacQueen 461 Abley v. Dale Adams & Westlake Co. v. E. T. Wright Ltd Admiralty Commissioners v. SS. "Amerika"[1917] A.C. 38 — v. SS. Volute Allard v. Frison Allcard v. Skinner Allen v. Flood American and The Syria, The Amiot v. [...] Motion granted with costs. 1928 RUSSELL McKENZIE AND ALLEN Mc- APPELLANTS; *J e12. [...] Allen v. Flood (3). An interesting observation upon the juridical basis of the two notable decisions of the House of Lords above cited, from the point of view of the civilian, may be found in Gérard's work " Les Torts ou Délits Civils en Droit Anglais," at pp. 426 et seq.
-
1,003.
Mortgage Corporation of Nova Scotia v. Allen - [1930] SCR 16 - 1929-09-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Mortgage Corporation of Nova Scotia v. Allen, , [1930] SCR 16 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Mortgage Corporation of Nova Scotia v. Allen, [1930] S.C.R. 16 Date: 1929-09-26 [...] Ambrose Allen (Defendant) Respondent. 1929: May 27; 1929: September 26.
-
1,004.
Thompson v. Fraser Companies Ltd. - [1930] SCR 109 - 1929-06-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
entrance of Scoodewabscook Creek or River to the Westward, the said Cedar being the Upper or Northwesterly boundary of a Tract of Land granted to Colonel Isaac Allen and Associates, thence running (by the magnetic needle) South forty-five degrees West, One hundred and fifty-two Chains (of four Poles each) or until it meets
-
1,005.
SCR | RCS [1928] - 1928-11-13
Canada Supreme Court ReportsTABLE OF CASES CITED NAME OF CASE A. B. v. C. D Allen v. McTavish 2 Ont. A.R. 278 Allen v. The King Allison v. Frisby American Securities Corp, Ltd. v. Woldson... [...] Solicitor for the respondent: John Allen. (1) [1914] A.C. 545. (3) [1927] S.C.R. 442. [...] CASES • Allen v. R. (44 Can. S.C.R. 331) ref.. 553 See CRIMINeL Lew 5.
-
1,006.
International Timber Co. v. Field - [1928] SCR 564 - 1928-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Rex v. Robertson & Hackett Sawmills Ltd. (38 B.C. Rep. 222) and Compton v. Allen Thrasher Lumber Co. (39 B.C. Rep. 70), so far as they are inconsistent herewith, overruled. [...] ent with this judgment it must be overruled, as must also Compton v. Allen Thrasher Lumber Co. (1).
-
1,007.
Stein v. The King - [1928] SCR 553 - 1928-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Canadian Encyclopedic Digest, Ont. Ed., vol. 4, pp. 405, 406-7; Makin v. Att. Gen. for New South Wales, [1894] A.C. 57, at p. 70; Ibrahim v. R., [1914] A.C. 599, at p. 616; Allen v. R., 44 Can. S.C.R. 331; Gouin v. R., [1926] S.C.R. 539; R. v. Christie, [1914] A.C. 545, referred to. [...] This Court had, in the Allen Case[8], already taken the same view of the effect of the former section 1019 of the Criminal Code and, since the substitution for it in 1923 of s. 1014 (2) in its present form, the statement of the law made in the earlier case (Allen v. The King8) was reaffirmed in Gouin v. The King[9]. [...] Solicitor for the respondent: John Allen. [1] 37 Man. R. 367; [1928] 2 W.W.R. 346.
-
1,008.
McKenzie v. Huybers - [1929] SCR 38 - 1928-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Russell Mckenzie and Allen McKenzie Appellants; and William Huybers and The Sheriff of The County of Halifax Respondents.
-
1,009.
Brunet v. The King - [1928] SCR 375 - 1928-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The impropriety of introducing the evidence given by a witness on a previous occasion by stating it to the accused and asking him if he remembers hearing it, is pointed out in Allen v. The King[13].
-
1,010.
Brooks v. The King - [1927] SCR 633 - 1927-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Misdirection in a material matter having been shown, the onus was upon the Crown to satisfy the court that the jury, charged as it should have been, could not, as reasonable men, have done otherwise than find the appellant guilty (Gouin v. The King, [1926] S.C.R. 539, at p. 543; Allen v. The King, 44 Can. S.C.R. 331, at p. [...] Gouin v. The King[2]; Allen v. The King[3]; Makin v. Att. Gen. for New South Wales[4].
-
1,011.
SCR | RCS [1927] - 1927-11-02
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAdmiralty Commissioners v. SS. Volute Allan & Company v. Kieffer Allen v. The King.. [...] The case falls clearly within the decision of this Court in Allen v. The King (1). [...] Allen v. The King (44 Can. S.C.R. 331) ref 437, 633 See CRIMINAL LAW 5, 10.
-
1,012.
Sankey v. The King - [1927] SCR 436 - 1927-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The Court (reversing judgment of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia [1927] 2 W.W.R. 265) quashed a conviction for murder and granted a new trial, on the ground that the unsworn testimony of a child ten years old was improperly received (Allen v. The King 44 Can. S.C.R. 331 cited), there being no material before the [...] The case falls clearly within the decision of this Court in Allen v. The King[2].
-
1,013.
Higgins v. Comox Logging & Ry. Co. - [1927] SCR 359 - 1927-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
I may refer to the evidence given by one of the appellants' witnesses, whose testimony impressed the learned trial judge, Allen Brady.
-
1,014.
SCR | RCS [1926] - 1926-12-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsHeld, that the judgment of the Court of Appeal did not conflict with the judgment in the Allen Case, and the application was dismissed. [...] The question I think is whether that court should have held otherwise upon the proper interpretation and application of the decision in Allen v. The King (1). [...] CASES Allen v. The King (44 Can. S.C.R 331) "L'Autorite" Ltee ref 492 S.C.R. 340) foll 576 See 3.
-
1,015.
Debortoli v. The King - [1926] SCR 492 - 1926-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Held, that the judgment of the Court of Appeal did not conflict with the judgment in the Allen Case, and the application was dismissed. [...] In Allen v. The King[3] a witness had testified at the preliminary investigation who was not produced at the trial, and the requirements for the admission of his deposition under s. 999 of the Criminal Code were not established. [...] The question I think is whether that court should have held otherwise upon the proper interpretation and application of the decision in Allen v. The King[4].
-
1,016.
Gouin v. The King - [1926] SCR 539 - 1926-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
But, as was said by Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. in Allen v. The King[11]: [...] In the Allen’s Case11, all the judges below had found that there was ample evidence that the prisoner killed Captain Elliston and, as would appear from the report, all the judges of this court concurred in that opinion.
-
1,017.
SCR | RCS [1924] - 1924-11-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsTABLE OF CASES CITED NAME OF CASE Admiralty Commissioners v. Page Allen v Kemble Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants v.{[1910] A.C. 87 Osborne. [...] Cooper v. Earl of Waldegrave (1) ; Allen v. Kemble (2) ; Gibbs v. Fremont (3) ; In re Commercial Bank of South Australia (4) ; The Queen v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (5) ; Fergusson v. Fyffe (6) . [...] The case at bar is distinguishable from Blackburn Bobbin Co. v. T. W. Allen & Sons Ltd. (1), relied on by Mr. Bennett.
-
1,018.
Vancouver Milling and Grain Co. v. C.C. Ranch Co. - [1924] SCR 671 - 1924-11-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
The case at bar is distinguishable from Blackburn Bobbin Co. v. T. W. Allen & Sons Ltd.[15], relied on by Mr. Bennett.
-
1,019.
Livesley v. Horst Co. - [1924] SCR 605 - 1924-11-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Cooper v. Earl of Waldegrave[7]; Allen v. Kemble[8]; Gibbs v. Fremont[9]; In re Commercial Bank of South Australia[10]; The Queen v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.[11]; Fergusson v. Fyffe[12].
-
1,020.
SCR | RCS [1923] - 1923-12-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsTABLE OF CASES CITED. NAME OF CASE Abouloff v. Oppenheimer Ackroyd v. Smithies Admiralty Commissioners v. S.S. Volute Allen v. Callow Alleyn v. Barthe Antoine v. Goudal . [...] This test was adopted by Allen C.J. in The Queen v. Simpson (5) at page 474. [...] Lafleur K.C. and Van Allen for the appellants. Johnstone K.C. and Parlee K.C. (Geo. F. Macdonnell with them) for the respondents.
-
1,021.
The Security Export Co. v. Hetherington - [1923] SCR 539 - 1923-12-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsPrerogative writs
This test was adopted by Allen C.J. in The Queen v. Simpson[5] at page 474.
-
1,022.
SCR | RCS (1923) vol 64 - 1923-01-01
Canada Supreme Court Reports76 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. VOL. LXIV. 1922 N. ALLEN (D EFENDANT) APPELLANT [ *May 8, 9. [...] He found among the assets Allen's promissory note; and as Mr. Allen is now living in British Columbia he is sued before the courts of this province by the bank examiner for the payment of this note. [...] But that is only a dictum by a single judge which is dissented from in Allen v. Murphy (5).
-
1,023.
Henderson v. Fraser - [1923] SCR 23 - 1922-11-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
In re A. F. Bryan[1] ; Russel v. Dickson[2] ; Hooley v. Hatton[3] ; Moggridge v. Thackwell[4] ; Allen v. Callow[5] ; Barclay v. Wainwright[6] ; Bell v. Park[7].
-
1,024.
Guardian Realty Co. v. John Stark & Co. - (1922) 64 SCR 207 - 1922-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
The only authority to the contrary which is cited is Lewis v. Stephenson[9].’ But that is only a dictum by a single judge which is dissented from in Allen v. Murphy[10]. [...] To the same effect is a decision of the Irish Court of Appeal in Allen v. Murphy[18], and a long series of American decisions. [...] But this dictum has been dissented from in Allen v. Murphy[39]. In view of those authorities, I am of opinion that John Stark & Company properly exercised their option.
-
1,025.
Allen v. Hay - (1922) 64 SCR 76 - 1922-05-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
Allen v. Hay, (1922) 64 SCR 76 Supreme Court of Canada Allen v. Hay, 64 S.C.R. 76 [...] N. Allen (Defendant) Appellant; and C. P. Hay (Plaintiff) Respondent. [...] He found among the assets Allen's promissory note; and as Mr. Allen is now living in British Columbia he is sued before the courts of this province by the bank examiner for the payment of this note.