Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,351.
Tottrup v. Patterson et al. - [1970] SCR 318 - 1969-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Guy Patterson and Bruce D. Patterson, Executors of the Estate of Frank Clinton Ottewell, deceased, and William J. Ottewell, Ella Hamilton, Arthur Ottewell, Jennie Smith, George Ottewell, Sylvia Carruthers, Alberta Ottewell, Linda Milligan, John Devereux Respondents. [...] Solicitors for the respondents, William J. Ottewell, Arthur Ottewell, Sylvia Carruthers, Alberta Ottewell and Linda Milligan: Lavallée, Feehan & Remesz, Edmonton.
-
3,352.
Draper v. Jacklyn et al. - [1970] SCR 92 - 1969-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Torts
In Gray v. LaFleche[3], Williams C.J.K.B., said at p. 349, when considering whether the plaintiff’s injured member should be exhibited to the jury when in a jury trial: [...] My brother Spence has made reference to the judgment of Williams C.J.K.B., in Gray v. La‑Fleche[14], and to the cases there cited. [...] In that case Chief Justice Williams held that where a plaintiff in a malpractice suit is claiming damages for bodily injuries, he is not entitled to show to the jury injured parts of the body which are not normally exposed, provided however that in the discretion of the trial judge such parts of the body may be exhibited in
-
3,353.
R. v. Whitfield - [1970] SCR 46 - 1969-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Pollock C.B., Williams J., Crowder J., Willes J. and Bramwell B., were all of the same opinion:
-
3,354.
SCR | RCS [1969] - 1969-06-30
Canada Supreme Court ReportsMax Moscovich, Q.C., William B. Gill, Q.C., and I. Mi-chael Robison, for the plaintiffs, appellants. [...] Solicitors for the defendent, appellant: Weiler, Weiler & Maloney, Fort William. [...] Solicitor for the plaintiffs, respondents: Alfred A. Petrone, Fort William. 19 [1954] S.C.R. 707.
-
3,355.
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Babudro / Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Sdraulig - [1969] SCR 698 - 1969-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Torts
The constable then sighted past the north‑west corner of the box car standing on track No. 4 at a distance which he found to be 47 feet east of Clavet Street, and determined that his view line crossed the north rail of track No. 1 at a point 117 feet east of the east side of Clavet Street William E. Mercer, a professional [...] Solicitors for the defendent, appellant: Weiler, Weiler & Maloney, Fort William. [...] Solicitor for the plaintiffs, respondents: Alfred A. Petrone, Fort William.
-
3,356.
King v. University of Saskatchewan - [1969] SCR 678 - 1969-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPrerogative writs
Buckley, Chambers, Douglas, DuWors, Katz, Langley, Ludwig, McMurray, Mann, Nind, Pepper, Rempel, D. C. Williams (I omit those not voting).
-
3,357.
Lotholz v. Charlton et al. - [1969] SCR 692 - 1969-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Roald Charlton, Anita Kuropatwa, Walter Gene Lazzer, and Gloria Moyer, Executors of the Estate of Emily Charlton, deceased, and William Charlton (Defendants and Plaintiffs by Counterclaim) Respondents. [...] Shirley Charlton, a minor, by her next friend William Charlton and William Charlton (Plaintiffs) Respondents. [...] William Roald Charlton, Anita Kuropatwa, Walter Gene Lazzer, and Gloria Moyer, Executors of the Estate of Emily Charlton, deceased, and William Charlton (Defendants) Respondents;
-
3,358.
Eid v. Dumas / Hatherly v. Dumas - [1969] SCR 668 - 1969-05-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
I think it proper to point out also that in the same case the majority of the Court adopted the following passages from Mr. Glanville Williams’ work Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (1951), at p. 308:
-
3,359.
General Truck Drivers Union, Local 938, et al. v. Hoar Transport Co. Ltd. - [1969] SCR 634 - 1969-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
General Truck Drivers Union, Local 938, Paul C. Weiler, Stanley T. Bullock and F. William Murray (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
3,360.
Radio Corporation of America v. Hazeltine Corporation et al. - [1969] SCR 533 - 1969-03-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Douglas S. Johnson, Q.C., and William M. Thorn, for the respondents.
-
3,361.
Roman v. Crighton - [1969] SCR 573 - 1969-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
On August 4, 1955, the plaintiff Crighton instituted an action, in which he had as his co‑plaintiff The Toronto General Trusts Corporation in its capacity of executor of the Estate of the late William Ray Featherstone, deceased, against the defendant Roman.
-
3,362.
Cyr and Millier v. The Queen - [1969] SCR 955 - 1969-02-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Wayde Allan Cyr and William Robert Millier Appellants; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
3,363.
Walter et al. v. Attorney General of Alberta et al. - [1969] SCR 383 - 1969-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Max Moscovich, Q.C., William B. Gill, Q.C., and I. Michael Robison, for the plaintiffs, appellants.
-
3,364.
Crampsey et al. v. Deveney - [1969] SCR 267 - 1968-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Capital Trust had managed the property from 1921, the date of William Crampsey’s death, to 1943, the date of the transfer to the four beneficiaries. [...] The former immediately wrote back asking for proof that the grantors were in fact the widow and all the children of William James Crampsey. [...] The purchaser’s solicitor, on April 9, sent in his requisitions, one of which was a requirement of proof that the grantors were the widow and all the children of William James Crampsey, deceased.
-
3,365.
Jones v. Bennett - [1969] SCR 277 - 1968-12-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Andrew Cecil Bennett (Defendant) Respondent. 1968: November 5, 6; 1968: December 11.
-
3,366.
SCR | RCS [1968] - 1968-10-21
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThese are things you are entitled WILLIAMS to take into consideration, et al. [...] The appellant also relied on the decision of the Privy Council in Rex v. Williams (2). [...] William R. Martin, for the appellant. D. H. Christie, Q.C., for the respondents.
-
3,367.
Alberta Board of Industrial Relations et al. v. Stedelbauer Chevrolet Oldsmobile Limited - [1969] SCR 137 - 1968-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
John C. Prowse and William A. Wiese, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
3,368.
Port Arthur Shipbuilding Co. v. Arthurs et al. - [1969] SCR 85 - 1968-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Prerogative writs
This was regretted by Williams J. in Hodgkinson v. Fernie (1857), 3 C.B.N.S. 189, but is now well established.
-
3,369.
Ruch et al. v. Colonial Coach Lines Limited - [1969] SCR 106 - 1968-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Ida Ruch and William Ruch (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Colonial Coach Lines Limited (Defendant) Respondent. [...] By such judgment of the County Court, the plaintiff William Ruch recovered from the defendant the sum of $6,093.85 and the plaintiff Ida Ruch recovered from the defendant the sum of $15,000. [...] The plaintiffs claim from the Defendant damages representing personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Ida Ruch, and out-of-pocket expenses sustained by the Plaintiff, William Ruch.
-
3,370.
DeClercq v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 902 - 1968-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Gerard William DeClercq (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent.
-
3,371.
Stern v. Sheps et al. - [1968] SCR 834 - 1968-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Family law
Williams v. Moody Bible Institute of Chicago[3], cited by Freedman J.A., deals with an agreement in which a wife was not given full disclosure and in fact was misled by her prospective husband as to his assets and financial condition at the time she entered into the pre-nuptial agreement. [...] There well may be a substantial difference between a case such as Williams and a case where it is the husband and not the wife who is attacking the agreement on the ground of failure to disclose and particularly in the case of a husband to a marriage of convenience who knows and agrees in advance that he will not
-
3,372.
Bell et al. v. Smith et al. - [1968] SCR 664 - 1968-05-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
William Samuel Smith and John William Charles Smith (Defendants) Respondents. [...] The vehicle came into contact with one owned by the defendant John William Charles Smith due, to what was alleged by the plaintiffs, to be the negligence of the said defendant Smith.
-
3,373.
John Burrows Limited v. Subsurface Surveys Limited et al. - [1968] SCR 607 - 1968-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
William L. Hoyt, for the plaintiff, appellant. E. Neil McKelvey, Q.C., and J. Ian M. Whitcomb, for the defendants, respondents.
-
3,374.
Saint John Harbour Bridge Authority v. J.M. Driscoll Limited - [1968] SCR 633 - 1968-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
One was a property known as the Thorne wharf, consisting of some 71,000 square feet which had been sold for $1.65 per square foot, the second, a parcel of land on Water and Prince William Streets in downtown Saint John which was sold at $4.11 per square foot, and which, of course, was in no way comparable.
-
3,375.
Daniels v. White - [1968] SCR 517 - 1968-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William R. Martin, for the appellant. D.H. Christie, Q.C., for the respondents.