Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,376.
McKay et al. v. Board of Govan School Unit No. 29 et al. - [1968] SCR 589 - 1968-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
While not satisfied that the principle which was first expressed in Williams v. Eady (1893), 10 T.L.R. 41, that a schoolmaster was bound to take such care of his pupils as a careful father would take of his children is [...] 1. That on or about the 12th day of February, A.D. 1963, the defendant, Donald Molesky, was employed by the Defendant, the Board of the Govan School Unit, as a teacher at the William Derby High School and that during the school hours on the said day, the defendant, Donald Molesky was acting in the course of his employment [...] This view, which has often been adopted, was first expressed many years ago by Lord Esher in Williams v. Eady[3], where he said at p. 42:
-
3,377.
Alexanian v. Dolinski - [1968] SCR 473 - 1968-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
1963, Nickerson accepted an offer to purchase from William and Shirley Patriquin. [...] The appellant had entered into a mortgage with William Nickerson as mortgagee on November 28, 1956, in the principal sum of $20,000. [...] By this advertisement, the said William C. Nickerson called for sealed tenders for the sale of the mortgaged premises.
-
3,378.
Hunt et al. v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 323 - 1968-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
In the Williams case, as in the present case, the Court was faced with a situation where the shares could be validly transferred in more than one place. [...] In Williams, the shares were validly transferable on registries in Ontario and in Buffalo, New York, so the problem arose that, for the purposes of provincial succession duty, one, and only one, local situs had [...] The appellant also relied on the decision of the Privy Council in Rex v. Williams (2).
-
3,379.
Paton v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 341 - 1968-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
For instance, when an enactment deals with a right of appeal, the situations affected are future cases only, pending cases are not taken in: Taylor v. The Queen[11]; William v. Irvine[12]; Hyde v. Lindsay[13]; Flemming v. Atkinson[14]; Ville de Jacques-Cartier v. Lamarre[15].
-
3,380.
Poole v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 381 - 1968-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Gerald William Poole Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
3,381.
Byron v. Williams et al. - [1968] SCR 314 - 1968-02-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Torts
Byron v. Williams et al., [1968] SCR 314 Supreme Court of Canada Byron v. Williams et al., [1968] S.C.R. 314 [...] Isobel May Williams and Roger Barry Williams (Defendants) Respondents. [...] The other car, a yellow Vauxhall Cresta model, was owned by Isobel May Williams and then being driven by Roger Barry Williams.
-
3,382.
Canada Trust Company v. Lloyd et al. - [1968] SCR 300 - 1968-02-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
citing Cherry v. Boultbee[6] and Courtnay v. Williams[7]. The contribution which the representatives of the three directors who improperly withdrew the moneys must be the amounts taken by each of them with interest thereon at 5 per cent per annum, not compounded, from December 6, 1921.
-
3,383.
Hind v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 234 - 1968-01-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Thomas William Hind Applicant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. [...] FAUTEUX J.:—Thomas William Hind applies for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which dismissed his application for an extension of time to appeal to that Court from a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment, imposed upon him by His Honour Magistrate Kurata, upon a plea of guilty to a charge of [...] Welch v. The King[2]; Okalta Oils Limited v. The Minister of National Revenue[3]; Chagnon v. Normand[4]; William Cully v. François alias Francis Ferdais[5].
-
3,384.
Klippert v. The Queen - [1967] SCR 822 - 1967-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
1. That Everett George Klippert, mechanic’s helper of Pine Point, Northwest Territories, between the 21st day of December, 1964 and the 6th day of August 1965 at or near the settlement of Pine Point in the Northwest Territories, being a male person, did unlawfully commit an act of gross indecency with William Gordon
-
3,385.
SCR | RCS [1967] - 1967-11-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsNorman Mathews, Q.C., and William S. Cook, for the defendant, appellant. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: McMaster, Steele, McKin-non, MacKenzie & Collins-Williams, Toronto. [...] William Wilkes, who is age fifteen, who was called by the Defence—bring William Wilkes in, if he is here.
-
3,386.
Public Trustee v. Weisbrod and Weisbrod - [1968] SCR 55 - 1967-10-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
William A. Stevenson, for the respondents. On the conclusion of the argument, the following judgment was delivered.
-
3,387.
Henwood v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America - [1967] SCR 720 - 1967-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
One William Clark, an agent for the respondent insurance company, had issued certain policies in connection with the appellant’s family and called at the house on frequent occasions to collect premiums.
-
3,388.
McKenzie et al. v. Hiscock et al. - [1967] SCR 781 - 1967-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Contract
P.1 was not an offer to sell but rather an indication of a willingness to negotiate or an invitation to the appellants to submit an offer to buy; he found the case to be indistinguishable from the judgment of the full Court of the North-West Provinces in Blackstock v. Williams.[2]
-
3,389.
N.R. Whittall v. Minister of National Revenue - [1968] SCR 413 - 1967-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
(a) Both William Innes and Peace River Natural Gas Co. applied to the Province of British Columbia for a permit to prospect for petroleum and natural gas in a certain area of northern British Columbia. [...] (a) a 41⁄2% interest in a block of 10,000 acres of land carved out of Permit 22 and consolidated with the block of land mentioned in paragraph (b) subject to the 10% carried interest in favour of William Innes (which had been assigned to the Wilson Syndicate);
-
3,390.
Binus v. The Queen - [1967] SCR 594 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In stating the first question I am using the terms “inadvertent negligence” and “advertent negligence” in the sense in which they were employed by all members of this Court in O’Grady v. Sparling[6], adopting the phraseology used in Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law, 17th ed., p. 34, and in Glanville Williams’ Criminal Law,
-
3,391.
Bolduc and Bird v. The Queen - [1967] SCR 677 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William Lloyd Bolduc and David Bird Appellants; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
3,392.
Brown & Root Ltd. v. Chimo Shipping Ltd. - [1967] SCR 642 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Transportation
Mr. William Nye, the appellant’s agent in Newfoundland, had not been notified by Mr. Gordon Lindsay that there was any necessity to reduce the weight of the crane before loading and he says that when he asked the ship’s master, Captain Anderson, about the capacity of the ship’s derrick he told him that there would be no
-
3,393.
Eadie v. Brantford (Township) - [1967] SCR 573 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
William Eadie (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Corporation of the Township of Brantford (Defendant) Respondent. [...] Confirming the writer’s telephone conversation with your Mr. Biggar today, we will undertake to pay to the Corporation of the Township of Brantford the sum of $800.00 severance fee upon the completion of the sale from William Eadie to John Patrick Gibbons and Hilda May Gibbons of part of Blocks 1 and 2 in the Kerr Tract [...] “The Conveyance William Eadie to John Gibbons, being part of blocks 1 and 2, Kerr Tract, be approved for registration, provided a daylight corner at the junction of Highway #53 and Forced Road be included in the 17’ strip of land being dedicated to the Township of Brantford.”
-
3,394.
Harris v. Toronto Transit Commission et al. - [1967] SCR 460 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
well to mention the decision in Lehnert v. Stein[1], where Mr. Justice Cartwright, speaking for the majority of this Court, at p. 44, adopted the following comments on the defence of volenti non fit injuria, which were made by Mr. Glanville Williams in his work on Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (1951) at p. 308:
-
3,395.
Poole v. The Queen - [1967] SCR 554 - 1967-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Gerald William Poole Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
3,396.
Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Haley - [1967] SCR 437 - 1967-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Mr. William Alton Reid, parts and service manager at Maclin Motors, a Ford dealership in Calgary where most of the repairs were made while the respondent was using the trucks in question and who knew the trucks, testified for the appellant.
-
3,397.
Randall v. Minister of National Revenue - [1967] SCR 484 - 1967-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
HALL J.:—The appellant and his brothers William and John for many years prior to 1957 were engaged in the business of managing horse racing activities at a number of race tracks in British Columbia at which pari-mutuel wagering was authorized.
-
3,398.
Reference Re: Steven Murray Truscott - [1967] SCR 309 - 1967-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Dr, Charles William Elliott Dauby is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Queen’s University, and the Consultant in Dermatology for the three federal penitentiaries at Kingston, Collins Bay and Joyceville. [...] William Wilkes, who is age fifteen, who was called by the Defence—bring William Wilkes in, if he is here. [...] And William McKay, he wasn’t sworn, a child age ten, said he saw Steve leave with Lynne and return alone and he asked Steve where Lynne was.
-
3,399.
Millican et al. v. Tiffin Holdings Ltd. - [1967] SCR 183 - 1967-01-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
G.W. Harold Millican, Thomas William Snowdon, and Howard Cook, carrying on business under the firm name and style of Millican, Snowdon & Cook and the said Millican, Snowdon & Cook (Defendants) Appellants;
-
3,400.
Minister of National Revenue v. Dworkin Furs (Pembroke) Ltd. et al. - [1967] SCR 223 - 1967-01-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
In the case of Alpine Drywall & Decorating Limited, the shareholding situation was that one William Jager owned 50 per cent of the issued shares and Clarence Wagenaar the other 50 per cent.