Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

4,782 result(s)

  • 4,301.

    Blackburn v. McCallum - (1903) 33 SCR 65 - 1903-02-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    "I give and bequeath to William Chisholm, my son, the east half of the south half of lot number 3, in the 8th concession of the township of Mosa.   [...]  I will that my personal property be equally divided between William Chisholm and Hugh Chisholm, my sons.   [...]  He made a will which was duly proved, and by which he devised to two of his sons William and Hugh, his real estate.

  • 4,302.

    McDonald v. McDonald - (1903) 33 SCR 145 - 1903-02-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    William McDonald, Executor of Michael McDonald, Deceased (Defendant)   [...]  (Signed) William Moore. Underneath these receipts was written, "I approve of the above.   [...]  directions as [aforesaid, as she told me, and as I believe, was that she wished that, at her death, the debt or sum of six hundred pounds, so due to her from' the said William Moore, should be cancelled.

  • 4,303.

    SCR | RCS (1903) vol 32 - 1903-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    APPELLANT ; *Nov. 19, 20, AND 1902 WILLIAM 0. FARQUHARSON ..RESPONDENT. *Feb. 20.   [...]  Solicitors for the respondent : Barrington 4.Fullerton WILLIAM BROWN (PLAINTIFF).   [...]  VOL. XXXII.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.. 123 WILLIAM PRICE (DEFEND .INT)... ......

  • 4,304.

    Power v. Griffin et al. - (1902) 33 SCR 39 - 1902-12-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Intellectual property

    Judson M. Griffin and William E. Brinkerhoff (Plaintiffs) Respondents

  • 4,305.

    Sault Ste. Marie Pulp and Paper Co. v. Myers - (1902) 33 SCR 23 - 1902-12-12

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    Harry Myers an infant under the age of twenty-one years by John William Myers his father and next friend and the said John William Myers (Plaintiffs) Respondents.

  • 4,306.

    The King v. Chappelle / The King v. Carmack / The King v. Tweed - (1902) 32 SCR 586 - 1902-11-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Mines and minerals

    William Chappelle (Suppliant) Respondent His Majesty The King (Respondent)   [...]  SEDGEWICK J.—One William Chappelle, one George W. Carmack and James Tweed and Charles Woog, each filed a petition of right in the Exchequer Court to obtain the relief therein asked.   [...]  This grant does not convey to the said William Chappelle any surface rights in the said claim, or any right of ownership in the soil covered by the said claim; and the said grant shall lapse and be forfeited unless the claim is continuously and in good faith worked by the said William Chappelle, or his associates.

  • 4,307.

    Colonist Printing & Publishing Co. v. Dunsmuir - (1902) 32 SCR 679 - 1902-11-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    In a written agreement, dated the 5th of September, 1892, entered into between William Harrington Ellis and Albert George Sargison, therein termed "Ellis & Co." of the one part, and James Dunsmuir, of the same place, therein termed "The Promoter" of the other part, respecting the incorporation of "The Colonist Printing   [...]  "4. The number of trustees who shall manage the concerns of the company for the first three months shall be five, and their names are William Harrington Ellis, Albert George Sargison, James Dunsmuir, Cuyler A. Holland and Sydney Aspland, and in the election and appointment of directors the company shall be governed by the

  • 4,308.

    Oppenheimer v. Brackman & Ker Milling Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 699 - 1902-11-17

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    Oriental Inland Steam Navigation Company v. Briggs[1] ; Cole v. Sumner[2] ; Magann v. Auger[3] ; Skillings v. Royal Insurance Company[4] ; Falck v. Williams[5].   [...]  There is no doubt, as Sir William Anson says in his book on contracts, 5th ed. p. 298,

  • 4,309.

    Trusts and Guarantee Co. v. Hart - (1902) 32 SCR 553 - 1902-11-08

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    That evidence, moreover, is fully corroborated by witnesses Widdifield, Yerex, German, Pine, Slater and Williams, and the amount given was not an unreasonable one, under the circumstances.

  • 4,310.

    Hartley et al. v. Matson et al. - (1902) 32 SCR 575 - 1902-11-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    We refer to Hurtubise v. Desmarteau ([1]); Williams v. Irvine ([2]); Taylor v. The Queen ([3]); and the cases collected in Hyde v. Lindsay ([4]).

  • 4,311.

    Ross v. The King - (1902) 32 SCR 532 - 1902-10-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Customs and excise

    James Ross and William Mackenzie(Suppliants) Appellants And His Majesty The King (Respondent)

  • 4,312.

    Western Bank of Canada v. McGill - (1902) 32 SCR 581 - 1902-10-07

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Dora Stuart Leslie McGill, Administratrix of the Estate of the Late William McGill, (Defendant) Respondent.   [...]  Williams v. Bayley[1]. I concur in the conclusion reached by a majority of the Court of Appeal.

  • 4,313.

    Renaud v. Lamothe - (1902) 32 SCR 357 - 1902-05-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    This Act was in force in the Province of Quebec in 1789, the date of the will and bequest in favour of the testator's natural son, William Plenderleath, and has not been repealed.   [...]  It seems evident, therefore, that the alleged incapacity of, William Plenderleath Christie if it existed, had been removed by the effect of the general capacitating law existing in the province long anterior to 1835, the time of the opening of the substitution for his benefit, and enabled him to receive the bequest as any

  • 4,314.

    Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Upon the authority of Duckett v. Williams[42], and Venner v. The Sun Life Insurance Company[43], I would think that under this clause alone the company were not obliged to tender or pay into court premiums that were forfeited by an express stipulation of the contract, any more than if the forfeiture were decreed by a

  • 4,315.

    Collins Bay Rafting and Forwarding Co. v. New York and Ottawa Rway. Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 216 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    The New York and Ottawa Railway Company and William Lesslie (Plaintiffs) Respondents.   [...]  William Lesslie is merely a stake-holder between the parties and has no substantial interest in the appeal.   [...]  The time having expired for the completion of the work according to the condition of the New York and Ottawa Railway Co., they notified William Lesslie and

  • 4,316.

    The Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co. v. McNevin - (1902) 32 SCR 194 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    Badenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Association[11]; Williams v. United States Mutual Accident Association[12].

  • 4,317.

    The Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York v. Mowat - (1902) 32 SCR 147 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    William Mowat and Another (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1902: March 11, 12, 13; 1902: May 6.   [...]  MILLS J.—In this case, William Mowat, the plaintiff, was a banker, residing in the city of Stratford, in the province of Ontario, and the company are a corporation under the laws of the state of New York, that carried on the business of life insurance in the province of Ontario.

  • 4,318.

    Toronto Railway Company v. Balfour - (1902) 32 SCR 239 - 1902-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    See O’Donohoe v. Beatty[4]; Williams v. Leonard & Sons[5]; Price v. Fraser[6].

  • 4,319.

    Price v. Talon - (1902) 32 SCR 123 - 1902-03-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Labour law

    WILLIAM PRICE (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And DAMASETALON, ès-qual (PLATNTIFF)

  • 4,320.

    Hawley v. Wright - (1902) 32 SCR 40 - 1902-02-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    William H. Hawley, Administrator of the Estate of Murdoch L. Hawley, Deceased (Plaintiff)

  • 4,321.

    Skinner v. Farquharson - (1902) 32 SCR 58 - 1902-02-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    William O. Farquharson Respondent In Re Estate of John Farquharson, Deceased.   [...]  The special attendant William Rogers says that during all that time he was constantly with the deceased, dressing him in the morning, giving him his meals, walking about with him, putting him to bed at night, and going in to look at him at night.

  • 4,322.

    Brown v. Moore - (1902) 32 SCR 93 - 1902-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    William Brown (Plaintiff) Appellant And John R. Moore (Defendant)

  • 4,323.

    SCR | RCS (1902) vol 31 - 1902-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    • Foley v. East Flamborough Folkard v. Metropolitan Railway Co. Ford v. Lacy v. Williams .   [...]  Ker v. Williams . Kerby v. Ross. • Kerr v. Davis . Kidney v. Coussmaker . .   [...]  Ker v. Williams (1) ; United Telephone Co. v. Tasker (2) ; Lancaster v. Moss (3).

  • 4,324.

    Price v. Fraser - (1901) 31 SCR 505 - 1901-11-16

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil procedure

    WILLIAM PRICE et al. (DEFENDANTS) Appellants; And ALEXANDER FRASER, et al.(PLAINTIFFS)

  • 4,325.

    Taylor v. Robertson - (1901) 31 SCR 615 - 1901-11-16

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Professional law

    We also refer generally to Hebb v. Pun Pong ([18]); Lee v. Everest ([19]); Boyle v. Busby ([20]); Smith v. Broadbent & Co. ([21]); Ford v. Williams ([22]); Rascorlla v. Thomas ([23]); Lampleigh v. Braithwait ([24]); Snow v. Hix ([25]).   [...]  See also Ford v. Williams ([95]). As regards the alleged "express indemnity", the court below say that the evidence is conflicting and that in view of the conclusion they have reached upon the implied indemnity