Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
4,401.
Taylor v. Cummings - (1897) 27 SCR 589 - 1897-06-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The claim of the plaintiff for an account against William Cummings & Son and the People's Bank, with a view of making them pay over to the creditors the moneys received by them under the deed on account of the assignor's indebtedness to them, is absolutely untenable under English law, in an action to declare a deed void
-
4,402.
Banque d'Hochelaga v. Waterhouse Engine Works Co. - (1897) 27 SCR 406 - 1897-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
On the 20th of November ¡ 1884 Mrs. Kelly, by a notarial deed of that date, sold and ceded this property to Francis Kelly and William Copping.
-
4,403.
Lambe v. Armstrong - (1897) 27 SCR 309 - 1897-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, ès qualité (PETITIONER FOR FOLLE ENCHERE) Appellant;
-
4,404.
May v. Logie - (1897) 27 SCR 443 - 1897-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Q. And that those persons you have named were the only survivors of William Pidgen? [...] When William Pidgen died in 1878 the law of Ontario on the subject of the descent of real property was regulated by the Act of 1852, and under that Act, William Pidgen having died without issue, his heir at law was his father, if living. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: William Mortimer Clark & Gray. [1] 23 Ont. App. R. 785.
-
4,405.
Temple v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia - (1897) 27 SCR 355 - 1897-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
William A. Temple and Others (Defendants) Appellants And The Attorney General of Nova Scotia and Robert D. Evans (Plaintiffs)
-
4,406.
Marquette Election Case (Re) - (1897) 27 SCR 219 - 1897-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
William G. King (Petitioner) Appellants And William J. Roche (Respondent)
-
4,407.
West Prince Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 241 - 1897-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
William Sharp Larkin (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: February 18, 19; 1897: March 24. [...] That the said respondent had a knowledge thereof and consented and was accessory thereto, and paid or promised to pay or repay the said William Callaghan therefor. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William S. Stewart. Solicitor for the respondent: Arthur Peters.
-
4,408.
Winnipeg Election Case / Macdonald Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 201 - 1897-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Edwy William Snider (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: Feb 17; 1897: Mar 24.
-
4,409.
Adams v. McBeath - (1897) 27 SCR 13 - 1897-01-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
George Kirsop when he heard of Adams' illness went up to his house with one William McDonald on Tuesday the 10th November. [...] I would like to know how your brother William is getting on and what he is doing for a living. [...] I would like to know how your brother William is getting on and also to have his address.
-
4,410.
Martin v. Sampson - (1897) 26 SCR 707 - 1897-01-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
William Sampson and H.R. Angus (Defendants) Respondents. 1897: January 15, 25.
-
4,411.
SCR | RCS (1897) vol 26 - 1897-01-25
Canada Supreme Court ReportsR. 162 -- v. Petrie 4 E. & B. 737 --- v. Williams • . 39 U. C. Q. B. 397. [...] 96 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XXVI. 1896 THE WILLIAM HAMILTON MANU- *Feb.26. [...] Wade Retroactive Laws, p. 218 ; Williams V. Irvine (4); Couture v. Bouchard (5).
-
4,412.
Farwell v. Jameson - (1896) 26 SCR 588 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
It appears that the London and Canadian Loan Co. were in possession of the premises as mortgagees, or as assignees; that they had sanctioned the putting up in the premises a notice that the premises were to let and to apply to William Parsons, agent.
-
4,413.
McLaughlin v. McLellan - (1896) 26 SCR 646 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Budge McLaughlin, Pineo McLaughlin, and William A. Austin (executor of a deceased son of the testator) contested the admission of the will to probate upon three grounds, viz.:—
-
4,414.
Niagara District Fruit Growers Stock Co. v. Walker - (1896) 26 SCR 629 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
But I do think that the contract of suretyship is, as expressed by Lord Westbury in Williams v. Bayley12, one which “should be based upon the free and voluntary agency of the individual who enters into it.”
-
4,415.
Turcotte v. Dansereau - (1896) 26 SCR 578 - 1896-11-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
[19] Williams v. Twine 22 Can. S. C. R. 108.
-
4,416.
News Printing Co. of Toronto v. Macrae - (1896) 26 SCR 695 - 1896-10-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Upon the application of the above named defendants, upon hearing read the affidavit of William Henry Irving, the affidavit of Hubert H. Macrae and the exhibits therein referred to, and the defendants’ counsel undertaking to get the appeal down for the October sittings of the Supreme Court if the rules or practice of the
-
4,417.
In Re Provincial Fisheries - (1896) 26 SCR 444 - 1896-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
All that can be said is to draw your Lordships' attention to the well known rule in the construction of statutes, which was put strongly by Sir William Richards when he said that when the legislature changed their phraseology it was to be assumed they changed it intentionally, and for some reason, whatever the reason was,
-
4,418.
Carter v. Long & Bisby - (1896) 26 SCR 430 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
The $201, the unexpended balance of the advances made by the respondents, was of course a sum of trust money; that it was a balance of the last remittance appears from the evidence of William T. Smith, who proves that when the Smiths proposed to draw it out of the bank in order to return it to the respondents, the bank
-
4,419.
Conger v. Kennedy - (1896) 26 SCR 397 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
On the 11th of December, 1889, at Napanee, in the province of Ontario, William Cox Allan was married to Janet C. Conger, then a widow. [...] At the time of the marriage William Cox Allan was domiciled in the North-West Territories, having his residence at Macleod, in those territories.
-
4,420.
Purdom v. Pavey & Company - (1896) 26 SCR 412 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
This action was brought by Pavey & Company on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of McKay & Davidson, and it was by their statement of claim alleged that the firm of McKay & Davidson was composed of William L. Mackay and Ebenezer Davidson; that they carried on business as merchants in Ontario, and on
-
4,421.
Richards v. Bank of Nova Scotia - (1896) 26 SCR 381 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William Richards (Defendant) Appellant And The Bank of Nova Scotia (Plaintiff)
-
4,422.
Warner v. Don - (1896) 26 SCR 388 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
It was decided in 1856 by Lord Hatherly when V. C. Sir William Page Wood that if an instrument which conveys an interest in land conveys also machinery
-
4,423.
Williams v. Leonard & Sons - (1896) 26 SCR 406 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Williams v. Leonard & Sons, (1896) 26 SCR 406 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Williams v. Leonard & Sons, (1896) 26 S.C.R. 406 Date: 1896-06-06 A.R. Williams (Plaintiff) Appellant; [...] By his statement of claim the appellant asserted a double title, claiming first under a purchase from one William Yates, a manufacturer carrying on business under the name of the “London Machine Tool Company,” and, secondly, under a chattel mortgage which the appellant alleged to have been duly registered, and under which
-
4,424.
Carroll v. Provincial Natural Gas & Fuel Co. of Ontario - (1896) 26 SCR 181 - 1896-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Samuel S. Carroll and William E. Carroll (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and
-
4,425.
Crawford v. Brody - (1896) 26 SCR 345 - 1896-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Clark v. Clark[3]; Fisher v. Anderson[4]; Williams on Executors[5]; Jarmyn on Wills[6]; Gordon v. Gordon[7]; Bathurst v. Errington[8]; Rhodes v. Rhodes[9]. [...] To James William the sum of 25 pounds. After the aforesaid claims are paid, lot number five in the third concession falls into the hands of Adam Nixon.