Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

2,511 result(s)

  • 2,476.

    SCR | RCS (1884) vol 8 - 1884-02-25

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    It is true that in answer to Stratton's affidavit, S. S. Peck states : The said by-law was drawn by Mr. W. H. Scott, the county solicitor, to the best of my recollection and belief, and after being read a   [...]  OF PETER- BOROUGH. Solicitors for respondent : Scott and Edwards. (>7'wynne, J. 1883 CONTROVERTED ELECTION OF THE WEST *Mar. 20,30.

  • 2,477.

    SCR | RCS (1884) vol 7 - 1884-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    extend to the road leading from that sixthly mentioned in the 9th sec. of the said ordinance, to • Scott's bridge, including the said bridge, and to the main road running along the north bank of the river St. Charles , from Scott's bridge aforesaid, to the bridge over the said river, commonly called the red bridge, or   [...]  Mr. Scott in reply If the allegation in the petition as to damages_ resulting to plaintiff from the loss of the services of her son as servant is not sufficient, I pray for leave to amend the petition accordingly.   [...]  Solicitors for appellant : Robinson, O'Brien 8r Scott. Solicitor for respondent : Duncan Dougall. 1881 DONALD IvICDONALD APPELLANT ; W.., •Nov . 8, AND 1882 dOS1;PH N. LA.NE et al ......... .... ........

  • 2,478.

    McCrae v. White - (1883) 9 SCR 22 - 1883-06-19

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Bankruptcy and insolvency

    [2] 3 Scott, 236. [3] Ex. p. Witham Re Berry, 22 Ch. D. 292. [4] 15 Grant 283.

  • 2,479.

    Smith v. Goldie - (1883) 9 SCR 46 - 1883-06-19

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Intellectual property

    [35] 8 Scott, N.R. 449. [36] 3 C.B. 97. [37] 8 C.B. 679. [38] 2 Jurist, N.S. 1083.

  • 2,480.

    Grand Junction Railway Co. v. Corporation of the County of Peterborough - (1883) 8 SCR 76 - 1883-01-11

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Municipal law

    The said by-law was drawn by Mr. W.H. Scott, the county solicitor, to the best of my recollection and belief, and after being read a   [...]  Solicitors for respondent: Scott and Edwards. [1] P. 33. [2] 83 Ill. 348.

  • 2,481.

    Monaghan v. Horn - (1882) 7 SCR 409 - 1882-06-22

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Maritime law

    Mr. Scott for appellant:— The question raised by the demurrer, and on this appeal is: 1st, whether the appellant could sue for the death of her son and consequent loss of service independently of Lord Campbell’s Act; and 2nd, if she had a right to sue, whether the Maritime Court of Ontario has jurisdiction to entertain a   [...]  Mr. Scott in reply: If the allegation in the petition as to damages resulting to plaintiff from the loss of the services of her son as servant is not sufficient, I pray for leave to amend the petition accordingly.   [...]  Solicitors for appellant: Robinson, O’Brien & Scott. Solicitor for respondent: Duncan Dougall.

  • 2,482.

    SCR | RCS (1882) vol 6 - 1882-05-13

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Savery v. Rex . 5 H. L. C. 627 Sharpley v. The South & E. Coast Co. . 2 Ch. D. Singleton v. Tomlinson 3 App. Slim v. Croucher 2 Giff. 37 Small v. Atwood . 1 Younge 491 Smith v. Gunteyman . 3 Tiff. 655 Smyth v. Smyth . . 8 Ch. D. 561 Startup v. Macdonald . 7 Scott N. R. 280 St. John v. The Amer.   [...]  (2) 7 Scott N. R. 280. (3) 11 M. &W.817. VOL. VI.] SUPREME COURT OF CAXADA. 691 . and which was followed, that is as a consequence of 1879 the blow, by exfoliation of the bone of the skull, 3,-100Rii and also to some degree' by inflammation of the brain.

  • 2,483.

    Dominion Telegraph Company. v. Silver - (1882) 10 SCR 238 - 1882-03-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    In Scott & Janrigan's law of Telegraphs[36], it is said: A side from the statutory and common law duty of good faith in the transmission of messages for the public, there is another sense in which telegraph companies may become responsible for mala fides and malicious use of its functions.   [...]  [39] 8 Scott, 471. [40] Brown v. Smith 13 C.B. 596; Odgers on Slander and Libel, p. 78, and cases there cited.

  • 2,484.

    Anchor Marine Insurance Co. v. Corbett - (1882) 9 SCR 73 - 1882-03-08

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    That is entirely consistent with the case of Scott v. Avery in the House of Lords[15].   [...]  That case was followed in Scott v. Corporation of Liverpool[16], where the surveyor was to determine the amount payable, and until he had made that determination there was no sum which could be sued for.   [...]  Whether the case of Scott v. Avery[17] is to be considered as determining that such a condition precedent is valid as regards all questions, those of liability as well as of amount of damage, or whether it is only binding as to the amount of debt or damage, and is illegal as tending to oust the jurisdiction of the courts

  • 2,485.

    SCR | RCS (1882) vol 5 - 1882-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    N. C. 755 307 Heyland v. Scott . . 19 U. C. C. P. 165 390 xii TABLE OF CASES CITED. NAME OF CASE. Holderness v. Shackles Hodgson v. Hooper 3 E. & E. 149 Hooper v. Stevens .   [...]  Mason v. Scott . . Mayor of Ludlow v. Charlton Mayor of Kidderminster v. Hard- wicke Merchants' Bank v. State Bank Merchants' Bank v. Bostwick .   [...]  VOL. V.] SUPRE1IE COURT OP CANADA. 209 Mason v. Scott (1), Jervis y. Berridge (2), Harris v. 1881 G. W. R. (3), re Delaware (4).

  • 2,486.

    Grand Trunk Railway v. Fitzgerald - (1881) 5 SCR 204 - 1881-06-11

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Mason v. Scott[3], Jervis v. Berridge[4], Harris v. G.W.R.[5], re Delaware[6].

  • 2,487.

    London Life Insurance Co. v. Wright - (1881) 5 SCR 466 - 1881-02-12

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Mr. Scott for respondent: If it was necessary that an amendment should be made in the pleadings by adding the equitable replication, the courts in term had ample power to make such amendment[8], and the Court of Appeal has similar powers[9].

  • 2,488.

    Ryan v. Ryan - (1881) 5 SCR 387 - 1881-02-12

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    The following cases all bear on this branch of the argument:—Perry v. Henderson[2]; Quincey v. Caniff[3]; Silverthorn v. Teal[4]; Heyland v. Scott[5]; Ellis v. Crawford[6]; Moore v. Doherty[7]; Allen v. England[8], quoted in Keffer v. Keffer[9].

  • 2,489.

    The Queen v. Belleau - (1881) 7 SCR 53 - 1881-02-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    should extend to the road leading from that sixthly mentioned in the 9th sec. of the said ordinance, to Scott's bridge, including the said bridge, and to the main road running along the north bank of the river St. Charles, from Scott's bridge aforesaid, to the bridge over the said river, commonly called the red bridge, or

  • 2,490.

    SCR | RCS (1881) vol 4 - 1881-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    ~. Mackey, ex parte 2 M. D. & D. 136 , Malcolm v. Scott . • 3 Hare 52 Martin v. Hunter . 1 Wheaton 304 .   [...]  I do not think I met him again until the meeting at Scott, in the Town Hall.   [...]  He carne to my house on the Sunday following the Scott meeting. I think it was on the next morning after the Scott meeting.

  • 2,491.

    Wheler v. Gibbs - (1880) 4 SCR 430 - 1880-06-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Elections

    I do not think I met him again until the meeting at Scott, in the Town Hall.   [...]  He came to my house on the Sunday following the Scott meeting. I think it was on the next morning after the Scott meeting.

  • 2,492.

    McConaghy v. Denmark - (1880) 4 SCR 609 - 1880-04-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    Mr. Henry J. Scott for respondent: Mr. Justice Armour, who tried the case, found all the issues for the plaintiff.

  • 2,493.

    SCR | RCS (1880) vol 3 - 1880-04-13

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    • 517 Scott v. Burnham 3 Ch. Cham. R. 399 • 405 Scott v. Durant 13 C. B. N.S. 214 . . 380 Severn v. The Queen . 2 Can. S. C. R. 70 . . 509 Sherman v. Madison Mut. Ins. Co. 5 Benn.   [...]  & G., at page 80; and per (3) Per Tindal, C. J., in Everett Maule, J., in Borodaile v. v. Wells, 2 Scott N. C. 531.   [...]  Scott y. Burnham (2), cited by the appellant, does not seem to me to have any application to this case; nor does Chowdry y. Mullick (3).

  • 2,494.

    O'Brien v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 529 - 1880-03-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Cy. of Bruce[5]; Elliott v. Roy. Ex. Ins. Co.[6]; Stodhart v. Lee[7]; Sharp v. San Paolo Ry.[8]; Scott v. Liverpool[9]; Clarke v. Watson[10]; Ranger v. Great Western Ry. Co.[11]; Roberts v. Bury[12].

  • 2,495.

    Chevrier v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 1 - 1880-03-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil procedure

    that a judgment had been rendered in this case, no evidence has been brought by the other side, for the sham register, being a book, made up out of the office of the Prothonotary, by a person having no authority to keep a register, can have no more probative effect than if they had fyled a copy of Scott's Waverly Novels.

  • 2,496.

    Wheeler v. Gibbs - (1879) 3 SCR 374 - 1879-12-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    This notice is the first and only intimation the respondent has of the appeal—the previous steps by the appellant are ex parte; until this notice is given, as respects the respondent, as was said by Erle, C. J., in Scott v. Durant[2], "there has been no completed appeal," and it is only when so completed that "the appeal   [...]  Scott v. Burnham[9], cited by the appellant, does not seem to me to have any application to this case; nor does Chowdry v. Mullick[10].

  • 2,497.

    Moore v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Hartford - (1879) 6 SCR 634 - 1879-12-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    [11] 7 Scott N.R. 280. [12] 11 M. & W. 817. [13] The case will be found reported in 6 App. Cases 644.

  • 2,498.

    Clark v. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co. - (1879) 4 SCR 192 - 1879-12-12

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    In Malcolm v. Scott[24], the Vice Chancellor says: The of case Burn v. Carvallio was relied on as an authority in the plaintiff's favor.

  • 2,499.

    Lawless v. Sullivan - (1879) 3 SCR 117 - 1879-04-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Taxation

    [17] Per Tindal, C. J., in Everett v. Wells, 2 Scott N. C. 531.

  • 2,500.

    SCR | RCS (1879) vol 2 - 1879-04-15

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Solicitor for Appellant : Solicitor for Respondents : (1) Per Tindal, C.J., in v. Mills, 4 Scott, N. C. 531.   [...]  " JAMES SCOTT. j " Case reserved for the Court of Queen's Bench sitting " in Appeal and Error.   [...]  Rose v. Scott (2) ; chattel mortgage, held good in part and bad in part.