Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

2,511 result(s)

  • 2,501.

    Rickaby v. Bell - (1878) 2 SCR 560 - 1878-06-04

    Supreme Court Judgments

    [7] 7 Scott N. C. 730. [8] 4 L. T. N. S. 9.

  • 2,502.

    Gore District Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Samo - (1878) 2 SCR 411 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Rose v. Scott[32]; chattel mortgage, held good in part and bad in part.

  • 2,503.

    Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    The evidence for the defence of Jas. Scott shows that Adam built his house and barn on the lot in ‘47 or ‘48; that the crops were taken to the west half until he had his own barn built; that he had often heard Jas. Gray say the E. ½ was “our Adam’s;” that Adam did statute labor of lot.   [...]  Now, as to Adam’s possesion, William Gray says Adam was in possession from ‘45 to ‘60; this was before he had built on the lot, for Mr. Scott says, Adam built his house and barn in ‘47 or ‘48.   [...]  James Scott proves that Adam built his house and barn on the east half in 1847 or 1848—he was then married.

  • 2,504.

    Hastings Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Shannon - (1878) 2 SCR 394 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    from, or in any manner vary or qualify, the written contract, Goss v. Lord Nugent[3]; Woolam v. Hearn[4]; Forsyth v. Boyle[5]; Mason v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.[6]; Mason v. Scott[7]; Jones v. Victoria Graving Dock Company[8]; Direct U. S. Cable Company v. Anglo American Telegraph Co.[9]; Shannon v. The Gore Ins. Co.[10]

  • 2,505.

    Scott v. The Queen - (1878) 2 SCR 349 - 1878-04-25

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Evidence

    Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349 Supreme Court of Canada James Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349   [...]  JAMES SCOTT Appellant; AND THE QUEEN Respondent. 1878: Jan 26: April 25   [...]  “James Scott. On Conviction of Stealing a Valuable Security. “Case reserved for the Court of Queen’s Bench sitting “in Appeal and Error.

  • 2,506.

    Bickford v. Grand Junction Railway Co. - (1878) 1 SCR 696 - 1878-01-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Transportation

    Scott v. Colburn[16]; Anglo-Australian Ass. Co. v. British Prov. Ass. Co.[17]; In re Electric Telegraph Co. of Ireland; Troup’s case[18].   [...]  Ashbury Carriage Co. v. Riche[79]; Re Patent File Company[80]; Scott v. Colbourn[81]; McCormack v. Perry[82]; Pennock v. Coe[83]; Dunham v. Railway[84]; Galveston Railway Co. v. Cowdry[85]; Australian Steamship Co. v. Mounsay[86].

  • 2,507.

    SCR | RCS (1878) vol 1 - 1878-01-28

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    L. R. 5 H. L. 64 616 Evans v. Williams. . 2 Dr. & Sm. 324 80 Exton v. Scott . 6 Sim. 31 . 574 F. Family Endowment Society, In re.   [...]  The learned counsel also relied upon the following authorities : Muirhead y. McDougall, et al (1) Mackechnie v. Mac-kechnie (2) ; Exton v. Scott (3) ; Muir v. Dunnett (4) ; Childers v. Childers (5) ;.   [...]  Scott v. Colburn (1) ; Anglo-Australian Ass. Co. v. British Prov. Ass. Co. (2) ; In re Electric Telegraph Co. of Ireland ; Troup's case (3).

  • 2,508.

    Chesley v. Murdoch - (1877) 2 SCR 48 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    [15] Per Tindal, C.J., in Everett v. Mills, 4 Scott, N. C. 531. [16] Potter's Dwarris Statutes 201.   [...]  [17] Potter's Dwarris, p. 214, citing The King v. Hale, Cro. Car. 330; 3 Lev. 82; The King v. The Mayor of Liverpool, 1 A. & E. 176; and Hine v. Reynolds, 2 Scott, N. C., 419.

  • 2,509.

    Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Taxation

    Mr. James Bethune, Q.C, and Mr. W.H. Scott, Q.C, for Respondent: The proceeding in this case is one against a public officer who is not an agent of the municipality, but an independent officer, acting under the authority of sections 93 and 106 of c. 36, 32 Vict.   [...]  Attorneys for Respondent: Scott & Edwards. [1] See case as reported in 25 U.C.C.P., 169, and in 26 U.C.C.P., 323.

  • 2,510.

    Trust and Loan Co. v. Ruttan - (1877) 1 SCR 564 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Muirhead v. McDougall, et al[20]; Mackechnie v. Mackechnie[21]; Exton v. Scott[22]; Muir v. Dunnett[23]; Childers v. Childers[24]; McFarlane v. Andes Insurance Company[25]; Doe Spafford v. Brown et al[26]; Thompson v. Leach[27]; Thompson v. Leach[28]; Butler & Baker’s case[29]; Doe Garnons v. Knight[30]; Xenos v.

  • 2,511.

    Kelly v. Sulivan - (1877) 1 SCR 3 - 1877-01-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Courts

    Reference made also to: In re Montgomery and Moore ([20]); Duquet v. Greene ([21]); Corporation of the United Counties of Northumberland and Durham v. Town of Cobourg ([22]); Hibbert v. Scott ([23]) ; Thorpe v. Cole ([24]).