Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,226.
Grand Trunk Pacific Coast Steamship Co. v. Victoria-Vancouver Stevedoring Co. - (1918) 57 SCR 124 - 1918-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Held, that Scott, at the time he was injured, was performing labour embraced in the agreement. [...] It was also alleged that the stevedoring agreement had been terminated before Scott was injured. [...] The agreement must therefore be deemed to have been in force when Scott was injured.
-
2,227.
SCR | RCS (1918) vol 56 - 1918-06-25
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScarf v. Jardine 7 App. Cas. 345 Scott v. Scott [1913] A.C. 417 280 Scown v. Herald Publishing Co.... 38 D.L.R. 43 Searle v. Laverick . [...] Seaward v. Paterson(3), at pages 554 et seq.; Scott v. Scott(4), at page 457. [...] H. J. Scott, K.C. for the appellant. Chrysler K.C. for the respondent.
-
2,228.
National Benefit Life and Property Assurance Co. v. McCoy - (1918) 57 SCR 29 - 1918-06-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
W. L. Scott for the appellant. A. E. Honeywell, for the respondent. [...] The case of Western Assurance Company v. Doull[1], was strongly relied upon by Mr. Scott for the company as a binding authority in this case. [...] Mr. Scott strenuously contended that under the condition where subsequent insurance was effected
-
2,229.
Komnick System Sandstone Brick Machinery Co. v. B.C. Pressed Brick Co - (1918) 56 SCR 539 - 1918-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
H. J. Scott, K.C. for the appellant. Chrysler K.C. for the respondent.
-
2,230.
Union Natural Gas Co. v. Chatham Gas Co. - (1918) 56 SCR 253 - 1918-03-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Seaward v. Paterson[24], at pages 554 et seq.; Scott v. Scott[25], at page 457.
-
2,231.
Acton Tanning Co. v. Toronto Suburban Rway. Co. - (1918) 56 SCR 196 - 1918-03-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellants. The president had no authority to bind the company by the agreement.
-
2,232.
SCR | RCS (1918) vol 55 - 1918-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsMr. Justice Scott reports that the general increase of crime, which is the usual accompaniment of such a condition, is not traceable till about early February and so continued until the investigation. [...] The most pitiable thing in this case is the respondent's story of all he ever did to put a stop to this carnival of vice that Mr. Justice Scott's report sets forth as existent. [...] H. J. Scott K.C. and W. A. Chisholm for the appel- lant. James Lawson for the respondent.
-
2,233.
Calgary (City) v. Canadian Western Natural Gas Co. - (1917) 56 SCR 117 - 1917-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Two of the learned judges of the Appellate Division, Stuart and Scott JJ., based their judgment that the Dingman franchise must be held to extend to the extensions of the city's area solely upon the construction placed by them upon an agreement made in January, 1911, between the city and the Calgary Natural Gas Co.,
-
2,234.
Geall v. Dominion Creosoting Co. / Salter v. Dominion Creosoting Co. - (1917) 55 SCR 587 - 1917-10-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
In Latham v. Johnson[17], Hamilton L.J. states a rule which he says is as old as Scott v. Shepherd[18], namely, that a person who, in neglect of ordinary care, places or leaves his property in a condition which may be dangerous to another may be answerable for the resulting injury, even though but for the intervening act of
-
2,235.
Bulletin Co. v Sheppard - (1917) 55 SCR 454 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Mr. Justice Scott reports that the general increase of crime, which is the usual accompaniment of such a condition, is not traceable till about early February and so continued until the investigation. [...] The most pitiable thing in this case is the respondent's story of all he ever did to put a stop to this carnival of vice that Mr. Justice Scott's report sets forth as existent. [...] I put aside the alleged libels on the plaintiff in connection with matters dealt with by the report made by Mr. Justice Scott, who had held a judicial investigation into the manner in which the "social evil" had been dealt with by the city council and the police of Edmonton.
-
2,236.
Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. v. Calgary (City) - (1917) 55 SCR 103 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Mr. Justice Scott in In re Canadian Pacific Railway Co. and Town of Macleod[5], where, at p. 197, he says:—
-
2,237.
Town of Oakville v. Cranston - (1917) 55 SCR 630 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
H.J. Scott K.C. and W.A. Chisholm for the appellant. James Lawson for the respondent.
-
2,238.
Franco-Canadian Mortgage Co. v. Greig - (1917) 55 SCR 395 - 1917-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
DUFF J.—I concur in the opinion upon which Mr. Justice Scott and Mr. Justice Stuart proceeded, that if Cassels professing to act on behalf of the respondents (plaintiffs) did enter into an agreement with the appellants (defendants) which both parties intended to be and which in fact was an agreement to purchase the land in
-
2,239.
SCR | RCS (1917) vol 54 - 1917-02-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsVOL. LIV.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 89 Leighton McCarthy K.C. contra cited Robinson, 1916 Little & Co. v. Scott & Son. (1) . [...] A.—No. Scott, an engineer of respondent, in 1889, says:— Q.—It shews Leamy's Lake? [...] N.S. 189, at p. 193; (2) Hob. 315, at p. 322. 2 Scott 276. (4) 9 Rep. 95a.
-
2,240.
Hamilton v. The King - (1917) 54 SCR 331 - 1917-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
N.S. 189, at p. 193; 2 Scott 276. [15] 9 Rep. 95a. 14 2 Bing. N.S. 189, at p. 193; 2 Scott 276.
-
2,241.
Glen Falls Insurance Company v. Adams - (1916) 54 SCR 88 - 1916-12-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W.L. Scott for the motion referred to Bennett v. Havelock Electric Light Co.[1]; Stephens v. Gerth[2]; Bain v. Anderson & Co.[3] [...] Leighton McCarthy K.C. contra cited Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son.[4]
-
2,242.
Leamy v. The King - (1916) 54 SCR 143 - 1916-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Aylen K.C. for the appellants cited Maclaren v. Attorney-General for Quebec[2]; McBean v. Carlisle[3]; Hurdman v. Thompson[4]; Attorney-General for Quebec v. Scott[5], at page 615; Watkinson v. McCoy[6]; McPheters v. Moose River Log-Driving Co.[7]; Perry v. [...] Chrysler K.C. for the respondent cited Attorney-General for British Columbia v. Attorney-General for Canada[12]; The Queen v. Moss[13], at page 328; Attorney-General for Quebec v. Scott[14], at page 612; Tanguay v. Canadian Electric Light Co.[15]; "B.N.A. Act, 1867," sec. 108, item 5, Sch. 3; and referred to "Documents [...] Scott, an engineer of respondent, in 1889, says:— Q.—It shews Leamy's Lake?
-
2,243.
Canadian Northwestern Railway Co. v. Moore - (1916) 53 SCR 519 - 1916-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
ANGLIN. J.—I agree with the view of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta, stated by Mr. Justice Scott, that the provisions of section 10 of the Alberta "Evidence Act" were violated on the arbitration under review.
-
2,244.
SCR | RCS (1916) vol 53 - 1916-06-24
Canada Supreme Court ReportsCORNELIUS SCOTT AND MAR-1 *March 3. RESPONDENTS. GARET SCOTT (DEFENDANTS) . . [...] The plaintiff asked by his declaration that the property held by the defendant's wife, Mrs. Margaret Scott, had always been the property of the husband, Cornelius Scott. [...] W. L. Scott for the appellants referred to Letourneux y. The King(1).
-
2,245.
Piggot v. The King - (1916) 53 SCR 626 - 1916-06-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
W. L. Scott for the appellants referred to Letourneux v. The King[1] [...] I cannot put the construction Mr. Scott asks us to put on the word "construction" in the preceding subsection, and get out of the difficulty that way.
-
2,246.
Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. Diplock - (1916) 53 SCR 376 - 1916-05-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
. It is the law involved in the well known squib case Scott v. Shepherd[10], that should be our guide herein subject to the qualifications to be found as the result of later development of the law resting upon the principle laid down in that case.
-
2,247.
Attorney-General For Canada v. Giroux - (1916) 53 SCR 172 - 1916-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
Duncan Scott. Deputy Superintendent-General of Indian Affairs There is nothing in the case to explain what was done pursuant to this order, and when, if anything ever was done. [...] Duncan Scott, Deputy Superintendent-General of Indian Affairs. Surrender by the Band of Montagnais Indians for whom was set apart the Reserve of the Township of Ouiatchouan, in the Province of Quebec, to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, of their lands in the Indian Reserve there, as described below, to be sold for their benefit.
-
2,248.
Bateman v. Scott - (1916) 53 SCR 145 - 1916-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Bateman v. Scott, (1916) 53 SCR 145 Supreme Court of Canada Bateman v. Scott, (1916) 53 S.C.R. 145 [...] Cornelius Scott and Margaret Scott (Defendants) Respondents. 1916: February 1; 1916: March 3. [...] The plaintiff asked by his declaration that the property held by the defendant’s wife, Mrs. Margaret Scott, had always been the property of the husband, Cornelius Scott.
-
2,249.
Re Great Northern Construction Co. / Ross v. Ross - (1916) 53 SCR 128 - 1916-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
G. G. Stuart K.C. for the motion, cited Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. The Department of Agriculture of Ontario[3] ; Coté v. The James Richardson Co.[4]; Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son[5].
-
2,250.
SCR | RCS (1916) vol 52 - 1916-02-21
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIn Scott v. Brown (3) , at page 728, Lindley L.J. said :— Ex turpi causâ non oritur actio. [...] 478 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. LII. 1916 Mr. Scott: Yes, we have no complaint as to the amount. [...] Mr. Scott: Yes, nothing turns on the question of the parties; I represent them all.