Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
1,076.
SCR | RCS (1909) vol 41 - 1909-05-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsK.C.M.G. " DÉSIRE GIROUARD J. CC SIR LOUIS HENRY DAVIES J., K.C.M.G. " JOHN IDINGTON J. " JAMES MACLENNAN J. " LYMAN POORE DUFF J. " FRANCIS ALEXANDER ANGLIN J. ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA: The Hon. ALLEN BRISTOL AYLESWORTH K.C. SOLICITOR-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA: The Hon. JACQUES BUREAU K.C. [...] xiv TABLE OF CASES CITED. [S.C.R. VOL. XLI. NAME OF CASE. Bermingham v. Sheridan "Bernina," The Berthier, La Commune de, v. Denis .. 27 Can. S.C.R. 147 Bibb v. Allen Biggs v. Mitchell Bischoff's Trustee v. Frank Bloom v. West Boden v. French Booker v. Brook Borthwick v. Evening Post Bourne & Tant v. Salmon & [...] Bibb v. Allen (3) ; Irwin v. Williar(4) ; Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works v. Furness (5) ; Halbronn v. International Horse Agency and Exchange (6) ; Robinson v. Mollett (7) , at pp. 837 and 838; Hartas v. Ribbons (8) ; Chap-man v. Shepherd (9), at p. 237; Van Dusen-Harring-ton Co. v. Morton (10) ; Duncan v. Hill (11) .
-
1,077.
Butler v. Murphy & Co. - (1909) 41 SCR 618 - 1909-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Bibb v. Allen[8]; Irwin v. Williar[9]; Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works v. Furness[10]; Halbronn v. International Horse Agency and Exchange[11]; Robinson v. Mollett[12], at pp. 837 and 838; Hartas v. Ribbons[13]; Chapman v .
-
1,078.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 40 - 1908-10-06
Canada Supreme Court Reports111 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DURING THE PERIOD OF THESE REPORTS. The Right Hon. SIR CHARLES FITZPATRICK C.J., K.C.M.G. DESIRE GIROUARD J. SIR LOUIS HENRY DAVIES J., K.C.M.G. JOHN IDINGTON J. JAMES MACLENNAN J. LYMAN POORE DUFF J. ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA : The Hon. ALLEN BRISTOL AYLESWÔRTH
-
1,079.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 39 - 1908-02-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAllcock v. Hall Allen v. Flood Antrobus v. Smith Armstrong v. Church Society Ashbury Railway Carriage &1 Iron Co. v. Riche Ashby v. White Ashley v. Harrison Attorney-General v. DeWinton . [...] N.C. 468 347 347 343 4 Allen (Mass.) 562 640 W. 660 666 [1907] A.C. 81 44 L.R. 4 Q.B. 693 2 [...] (4) 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. (2) 87 U.S.R. 583. (5) 51 Barb. 263. (3) 96U.S.R. 51, at p. 58.
-
1,080.
Union Investment Co. v. Wells - (1908) 39 SCR 625 - 1908-02-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
[25] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [26] 108 Mass. 497-501. [27] 96 U.S.R. 51. [...] [37] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [38] 51 Barb. 263. [39] 11 M. & W. 374. [...] [63] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [64] 4 Can. L.T. 595. [65] 14 Minn. 77.
-
1,081.
Manitoba Free Press Co. v. Nagy - (1907) 39 SCR 340 - 1907-11-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
See also Chapman v. Pickersgill[22], per Pratt C.J. in answer to the same objection; Langridge v. Levy[23], at page 522, and on appeal[24]; Pasley v. Freeman[25], at page 63, also in 2 Smith's Leading Cases[26], at page 79, per Ashurst J.; Allen v. Flood[27], at page 73; Winsmore v. Greenbank[28], per Willes C.J. at page [...] Case[37] quoted by Cave J. in Allen v. Flood[38], at page 30; Paull v. Halferty[39]; Bruce v. J. M. Smith, Limited[40] Barrett v. Associated Newspapers[41]; Bowen v. Hall[42], per Brett L.J. at pages 337 and 338.
-
1,082.
Andrews v. Calori - (1907) 38 SCR 588 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Allen v. Bennett[77]; Western v. Russel[78] ; Warner v. Willington[79] ; Baumann v. James[80] ; Studds v. Watson[81] ; Oliver v. Hunting[82].
-
1,083.
Lafferty v. Lincoln - (1907) 38 SCR 620 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
J. A. Allen, for the respondent. The Chief Justice.—The appeal is allowed with costs.
-
1,084.
SCR | RCS (1907) vol 38 - 1907-05-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAbout the 26th September, 1903, Churchill was told by Allen, the agent of the plaintiff bank, that he would have to reduce his account, and the last of Sep-tember or first of October he applied to Allen for a further advance on corn and was informed by Allen that he was instructed not to advance him any more money. [...] Allen v. Bennett (1) ; Western v. Rus- ANDREWS sell (2) ; Warner v. Willington (3) ; Baumann v. CA o . [...] J. A. Allen, for the respondent. THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—The appeal is allowed with costs.
-
1,085.
Bank of Montreal v. The King - (1907) 38 SCR 258 - 1907-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
In 1871, Mr. Justice Allen, speaking for the Court of Appeals of New York, in the National Park Bank v. Ninth National Bank[22], reviewed the whole jurisprudence:
-
1,086.
The Union Bank of Halifax v. Spinney - (1906) 38 SCR 187 - 1906-12-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
About the 26th September, 1903, Churchill was told by Allen, the agent of the plaintiff bank, that he would have to reduce his account, and the last of September or first of October he applied to Allen for a further advance on corn and was informed by Allen that he was instructed not to advance him any more money. [...] Allen, relying on this promise paid the draft. At this time Churchill owed the bank a large sum and there was a large shortage in the corn which, however, was not known to the bank. [...] On the same day that he induced Allen to pay the draft for $5,487.47, Churchill immediately went to Stoneman, one of his indorsers and told him how he
-
1,087.
SCR | RCS (1906) vol 37 - 1906-11-22
Canada Supreme Court ReportsGIROUARD J. << SIR LOUIS HENRY DAVIES J., K.C.M.G. WALLACE NESBITT J. JOHN IDINGTON J. JAMES MACLENNAN J. LYMAN POORE DUFF, J. ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA The Hon. CHARLES FITZPATRICK, K.C. ALLEN BRISTOL AYLESWORTH, K.C. SOLICITOR-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA : The Hon. RODOLPHE LEMIEUX, K.C. [...] S.V. '93, 1, 29 537 Allen v. McPherson 1 H. L. Cas. 191 116 Ames -& Co. v. Sutherland f 9 Ont. L.R. 631; 11 Ont.} 694 L.R. 417 Andreas v. Canadian Pacific l 2 West. [...] In Allen y. McPherson (1) all the distinguished jurists who there delivered judgments, but especially Lord Lyndhurst, at page 209, and Lord Campbell, at page 233, expressed themselves in terms which leave no doubt that the ecclesiastical courts formerly could and the Court of Probate can now admit part of an instrument to
-
1,088.
Leahy v. Town of North Sydney - (1906) 37 SCR 464 - 1906-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
117, 123, 132, 133; North London Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Board of Works[28]; Galloway v. Mayor of London[29]; Kennet and Avon Navigation Co. v. Witherington[30], per Martin, B.; Jones v. Stanstead, Shefford and Chambly Railroad Co.[31]; Mayer on Compensation (1903), pp. 56, 67; Brown & Allen on Compensation, 384.
-
1,089.
British & Foreign Bible Society v. Tupper - (1905) 37 SCR 100 - 1905-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
In Allen v. McPherson[12] all the distinguished jurists who there delivered judgments, but especially Lord Lyndhurst, at page 209, and Lord Campbell, at page 233, expressed themselves in terms which leave no doubt that the ecclesiastical courts formerly could and the Court of Probate can now admit part of an instrument to
-
1,090.
SCR | RCS (1905) vol 36 - 1905-11-29
Canada Supreme Court ReportsBourque v. Lupien Boynton v. Boyd Brandao v. Barnett Breakey r. Carter Bridnort Election Petition Bright, ex parte Brown v. Bamford v. Leclerc r. Waterous Engine 1 Works Co I Browne r. Hare Busfield, in re Butterfield v. Western Railroad 1 10 Allen (Mass.) 532 Corporation Buxton v. North-Eastern Ry. Co.. [...] In Allen v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (6), the court was composed of Lord Esher M. R. and Lindley and Bowen L. JJ. It was a case where the accident happened upon a bridge upon which two tramway lines coalesced and the plaintiff when endeavouring to cross the road looked only in one direction and not in the direction [...] (2) 10 Allen ( Mass.) 532. (4) 97 Mich. 240, at page 244. (5) 57 N. J. L. 149, at page 153.
-
1,091.
SCR | RCS (1905) vol 35 - 1905-10-26
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAlaska Packers Assoc. v. Spencer Alker v. Rhoads Allcard v. Skinner Allen v. Flood . [...] Sweeny v. Old Colony & Newport Railroad Co. . f 10 Allen (Mass.) 368 . [...] It must be conti-nous, adverse and exclusive during the whole period (1) 5 Allen (N. B.) 121.
-
1,092.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Hainer - (1905) 36 SCR 180 - 1905-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
In Allen v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co.[46], the court was composed of Lord Esher M.R. and Lindley and Bowen L.JJ. It was a case where the accident happened upon a bridge upon which two tramway lines coalesced and the plaintiff when endeavouring to cross the road looked only in one direction and not in the direction [...] [53] 10 Allen (Mass.) 532. [54] 84 Pa. St. 226. [55] 97 Mich. 240, at page 244.
-
1,093.
Sievert v. Brookfield - (1905) 35 SCR 494 - 1905-01-31
Supreme Court Judgments[59] 10 Allen (Mass.) 368. [60] 10 M. & W. 546. [61] [1891] 1 Q. B. 730.
-
1,094.
Canada Woollen Mills v. Traplin - (1904) 35 SCR 424 - 1904-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The case of Allen v. New Gas Company[17] cited in support of a contrary doctrine is not, I venture to say, authority for that doctrine. [...] In 1876 two other cases came before the courts, the first being Allen v. The New Gas Company[33], and the judgment of the court composed of Bramwell, Amphlett and Huddleston BB., was read by Huddleston B., and he points out at page 254 what is necessary to be proved in order to make out a master liable to common law; he [...] Chief Justice would have held no liability existed at common law, but in the view of the expression of opinion of Huddleston B. in Allen v. The New Gas Co.[65], above cited, to which the attention of the learned judge had not been drawn, I should have doubted whether the plaintiff satisfied the full onus cast upon him.
-
1,095.
Calloway v. Stobart Sons and Co - (1904) 35 SCR 301 - 1904-12-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
2 9 Allen, 350. 3 65 N. Y 574. 4 68 p,a. St. 42. 5 7 Times L. R. 132.
-
1,096.
Spencer v. Alaska Packers Association - (1904) 35 SCR 362 - 1904-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Stephen Allen Spencer (Defendant) Appellant; and The Alaska Packers Association (Plaintiffs) Respondent. [...] Now before discussing the case of Allen v. Flood[5], and what was decided therein, there are two observations of a general character which I wish to make, and one is to repeat what I have very often said before, that every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved, or assumed to be proved, since the
-
1,097.
Victoria-Montreal Fire Insurance Co. v. Home Insurance Co. Of New York - (1904) 35 SCR 208 - 1904-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
J. E. Martin K.C. and Howard for the appellants, referred to Prevost v. The Scottish Union and National; Ins. Co. ([1]) and cases there cited; Cornell v. The Liverpool and London Fire and Life Ins. Co. ([2]); Allen v. The Merchants Marine Ins. Co. ([3]); Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. v. The Agricultural Savings
-
1,098.
SCR | RCS (1904) vol 34 - 1904-05-11
Canada Supreme Court Reports[1891] 1 Q. B. 444 . 231 Anchor Marine Ins. Co. v. Allen 13 Q. L. R. 4 6 Anderson v. Anderson . [...] I adopt the language of Allen J. in Sedgewick J. Weber v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co. (1). [...] (3) 4 Allen (Mass.) 217. (6) 37 Maine 137. (4) 6 Cush. (Mass.) 342.
-
1,099.
Maddison v. Emmerson - (1904) 34 SCR 533 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Allen J. delivered the judgment of the court After stating the facts of the case, and the plaintiff's contention. that the Crown could not make a grant without office found, he proceeded as follows:
-
1,100.
Miller v. Robertson - (1904) 35 SCR 80 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
[11] 5 Allen (N. B.) 121. [12] 150 U. S. R., 597. [13] 4 Can. S. C. R. 609.