Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
776.
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd. - [1985] 1 SCR 295 - 1985-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Blackstone, Sir William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book 4, (Lewis ed.), Philadelphia, Rees Welsh & Co., 1900. [...] William Henkel, Q.C., and Inge Freund, for the appellant. Jim J. Boyle and William S. Klym, for the respondent.
-
777.
Janiak v. Ippolito - [1985] 1 SCR 146 - 1985-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Morris, Q.C., Rhona Waxman and Kim Carpenter‑Gunn, for the respondent.
-
778.
Scotsburn Co-Op. Services v. W.T. Goodwin Ltd. - [1985] 1 SCR 54 - 1985-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Bank, Ltd. (1935), 51 Ll. L. Rep. 147, referred to; Starr Manufacturing Co. v. Spike (1893), 40 N.S.R. 626; Keewatin Electric & Diesels Ltd. v. Durall Ltd., [1976] W.W.D. 119; William A. Flemming Ltd. v. Fisher (1978), 29 N.S.R. (2d) 338; Gelhorne Motors Ltd. v. Yee & Wilcox (1969), 71 W.W.R. 526, distinguished.] [...] 40 N.S.R. 626 (N.S.S.C.); Keewatin Electric & Diesels Ltd. v. Durall Ltd., [1976] W.W.D. 119 (Man. Q.B.); William A. Flemming Ltd. v. Fisher (1978), 29 N.S.R. (2d) 338 (N.S.S.C.T.D.); Gelhorne Motors Ltd. v. Yee and Wilcox (1969), 71 W.W.R. 526 (Man. C.A.) None of these cases deals with the doctrine of estoppel.
-
779.
Aetna Financial Services v. Feigelman - [1985] 1 SCR 2 - 1985-01-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Kerr, William W. Kerr on Injunctions, 6th ed., London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1927. [...] Solicitor for the respondents: William P. Ripley, Winnipeg.
-
780.
Lyons v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 633 - 1984-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
Trespass is largely the subject of civil law rather than criminal law (see Glanville Williams, Textbook of Criminal Law (1978), p. 894).
-
781.
Duhamel v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 555 - 1984-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
People v. Williams, 322 N.E. 2d 461 (1975); People v. Gray, 222 N.W. 2d 515 (1974); People v. Mann, 280 N.W. 2d 577 (1979); R. v. Bellisimo (1980), 4 W.C.B. 453; R. v. Kienapple, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729; Gushue v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 798, referred to. [...] They have not yet been put within the reach of the doctrine by most of the common law jurisdictions that have extended issue estoppel to criminal law (save the States of Illinois in People v. Williams, 322 N.E. 2d 461 (1975), and Michigan, in People v. Gray, 222 N.W. 2d 515 (1974), and People v. Mann, 280 N.W. 2d 577
-
782.
Guerin v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 335 - 1984-11-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
William Guerin, a Councillor, said copies of the proposal were not given to them; he did not recall any mention of $25,000 per year for rental; he described it as a vague general presentation with reference to fifteen-year periods. [...] William Guerin said the council members were "flabbergasted" to learn about the fifteen-year terms. [...] Solicitor for the intervener: William T. Badcock, Ottawa. _ The Chief Justice took no part in the judgment.
-
783.
Perka v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 232 - 1984-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Criminal law
Statutes
William Francis Perka, Paul Oscar Nelson, William Terry Hines and Stephen Earl Johnson Appellants; [...] (see, e.g., Glanville Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part (2nd ed. 1961), esp. at pp. 738-39). [...] The case of Southwark London Borough Council v. Williams, [1971] Ch. 734 (C.A.), affords an appropriate illustration.
-
784.
Ogg-Moss v. R. - [1984] 2 SCR 173 - 1984-09-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William Ogg-Moss (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent.
-
785.
Phoenix Assurance v. Bird Construction - [1984] 2 SCR 199 - 1984-09-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
While it is difficult if not impossible to assign to each of the three words “request,” “privity” and “consent” a meaning which will not to some extent overlap that of either of the others, after carefully reading all the authorities cited I accept as settled law the view enunciated in Graham v. Williams, 8 O.R. 478; 9 O.R.
-
786.
Skogman v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 93 - 1984-07-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Prerogative writs
See Williams J. in Hodgkinson v. Fernie (1857), 3 C.B. (N.S.) 189. During this same epoch, there developed a parallel procedure by way of application to a court of general jurisdiction for the judicial control of non-statutory tribunals and emanations of the state which did not have the attributes of an inferior court.
-
787.
James Richardson & Sons v. M.N.R. - [1984] 1 SCR 614 - 1984-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
William C. Kushneryk and Robert F. Peters, for the appellant. Wilfrid Lefebvre, Q.C., Brian Meronek and Brian Hay, for the respondent. [...] William Anderson, for the intervener the Attorney General for New Brunswick.
-
788.
Stubart Investments Ltd. v. The Queen - [1984] 1 SCR 536 - 1984-06-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
William Hobson, Q.C., Jagg Gill, and Susan Van der Hout, for the respondent.
-
789.
Reference re: Ownership of the Bed of the Strait of Georgia and Related Areas - [1984] 1 SCR 388 - 1984-05-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] At page 141, lord Coke also cites the opinion of Sir William Staunford from his text Les Plees del Coron, written in 1557:
-
790.
Brown v. Baugh et al. - [1984] 1 SCR 192 - 1984-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Vern R. Baugh and Allan Williams, Attorney General on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia Respondents. [...] Richard H. Vogel, Q.C., for the respondent Williams. The judgment of Dickson, Beetz, Mclntyre and Chouinard JJ. was delivered by [...] Solicitor for the respondent Williams: The Ministry of the Attorney General for the Province of British Columbia, Victoria.
-
791.
Droste v. R. - [1984] 1 SCR 208 - 1984-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Professor Glanville Williams Criminal Law, The General Part (2nd ed.), at p. 126, describes the operation of this concept as follows: [...] The authors of Smith and Hogan Criminal Law, supra, at pp. 60-61 present Professor Williams’ critique of the doctrine as applied to murder, and their response, as follows: [...] Williams regards the doctrine of transferred malice as a “rather arbitrary exception to normal principles”.
-
792.
The Queen v. Ancio - [1984] 1 SCR 225 - 1984-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
An early venture into this field is found in The Case of Duels (1615), 2 St. Tr. 1033, which involved proceedings against one William Priest for sending a written challenge to duel and one Richard Wright for carrying it and a stick that was to be the measure of the length of the weapons to be employed. [...] As noted by Glanville Williams, Criminal Law; The General Part (2nd ed., 1961), part 207, p. 642, in discussing attempts:
-
793.
Messier v. Delage - [1983] 2 SCR 401 - 1983-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
The extent of this development was recently recognized by the Court of Appeal, per Turgeon J.A. In Williams v. Black (C.A. Mtl. No. 500-09-000061-762, August 31, 1978) he quoted the remarks of the trial judge, who referred to the very passage cited above from the judgment in Harding, and added:
-
794.
Ogg-Moss v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 171 - 1983-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
William Elford Ogg-Moss Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
795.
A.G. (Can.) v. Can. Nat. Transportation, Ltd. - [1983] 2 SCR 206 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., and Nolan D. Steed, for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta.
-
796.
Bisaillon v. Keable - [1983] 2 SCR 60 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
Evidence
William J. Atkinson and Louis Crête, for the mis en cause. [page 64] [...] William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] Solicitors for the mis en cause: William J. Atkinson, Quebec City; Marie-Claude Lévesque, Montreal; Boissonneault, Roy & Poulin, Montreal.
-
797.
Morris v. The Queen - [1983] 2 SCR 190 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Proof of the motive for a crime is generally admitted as circumstantial evidence: in his Textbook of Criminal Law, Glanville Williams writes at p. 56:
-
798.
R. v. Wetmore - [1983] 2 SCR 284 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta.
-
799.
Ontario Nurses' Association v. Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit - [1983] 2 SCR 6 - 1983-09-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Dr. D.J. Baum, C.G. Riggs, Esq., and William Walsh, Esq. and between [...] M.G. Picher, Esq., John C. Murray, Esq., and William Walsh, Esq. File No.: 16486.
-
800.
Lilly v. The Queen - [1983] 1 SCR 794 - 1983-06-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William Robert Lilly Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. [...] LAMER J.—William Robert Lilly, a licensed real estate broker, was convicted by a Saskatoon jury of theft of $26,759.58, monies that had been deposited in trust with Lilly Agencies Ltd. with respect to various real estate transactions. [...] That he, the said William Robert Lilly, between the 1st day of October, A.D. 1977, and the 2nd day of March, A.D. 1978, at the City of Saskatoon, in the Province of Saskatchewan, did steal approximately Twenty Six Thousand, Seven Hundred and Fifty Nine Dollars and Fifty Eight Cents ($26,759.58), more or less, being sums