Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
151.
Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc. - 2012 SCC 67 - [2012] 3 SCR 443 - 2012-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
William A. Amos, Anastasia M. Lintner, Hugh S. Wilkins and R. Graham Phoenix, for the intervener the Friends of the Earth Canada.
-
152.
Opitz v. Wrzesnewskyj - 2012 SCC 55 - [2012] 3 SCR 76 - 2012-10-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Evidence
William W. Shores, Q.C., and Fiona Vance, for the intervener O. Brian Fjeldheim (Chief Electoral Officer of Alberta).
-
153.
A.B. v. Bragg Communications Inc. - 2012 SCC 46 - [2012] 2 SCR 567 - 2012-09-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Written submissions only by William S. Challis and Stephen McCammon, for the intervener the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
-
154.
R. v. Knott - 2012 SCC 42 - [2012] 2 SCR 470 - 2012-07-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Damon William Knott Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent [...] Damon William Knott Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent [...] Solicitor for the appellant Damon William Knott: Anna King, Vancouver.
-
155.
R. v. Vu - 2012 SCC 40 - [2012] 2 SCR 411 - 2012-07-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1769. [...] Hawkins, William. A Treatise of the Pleas of the Crown; Or, A System of the Principal Matters Relating to That Subject, Digested Under Proper Heads, vol. [...] Russell, Sir William Oldnall. A Treatise on Crimes and Misdemeanors, vol.
-
156.
Rogers Communications Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada - 2012 SCC 35 - [2012] 2 SCR 283 - 2012-07-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Intellectual property
right of making available to the public”, in David Vaver and Lionel Bently, eds., Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish. [...] right of making available to the public”, in D. Vaver and L. Bently, eds., Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish (2004), 234, at p. 246).
-
157.
Cinar Corporation v. Robinson - 2012 SCC 25 - [2012] 2 SCR 55 - 2012-05-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Written submissions by William Brock and Cara Cameron, for the applicants/respondents on motion Cinar Corporation and Les Films Cinar Inc.
-
158.
R. v. Maybin - 2012 SCC 24 - [2012] 2 SCR 30 - 2012-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Williams, Glanville. “Finis for Novus Actus?” (1989), 48 Cambridge L.J. 391. [...] Williams, Glanville. Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd ed. London: Stevens & Sons, 1983. [...] Glanville Williams argues that while people are subject to the “causes” of nature, they have control over their actions and a voluntary act starts a new chain of causation, regardless of what has happened before.
-
159.
Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. Banro Corp. - 2012 SCC 18 - [2012] 1 SCR 636 - 2012-04-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Les Éditions Écosociété Inc., Alain Deneault, Delphine Abadie and William Sacher [...] and William Sacher Appellants v. Banro Corporation Respondent and [...] William C. McDowell, Yashoda Ranganathan and William Amos, for the appellants.
-
160.
Fundy Settlement v. Canada - 2012 SCC 14 - [2012] 1 SCR 520 - 2012-04-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Douglas H. Mathew, Matthew G. Williams and Mark A. Barbour, for the appellants.
-
161.
Richard v. Time Inc. - 2012 SCC 8 - [2012] 1 SCR 265 - 2012-02-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil law
William Miller, Director of Promotion Policy for the respondent Time Consumer Marketing Inc., himself testified that “[t]he sweepstakes are used to attract attention to our subscription promotions” (A.R., vol. [...] Indeed, he said he was unable to do so because he was not part of the company’s financial team (testimony of William Miller, at p. 32, lines 2‑4). [...] [William Miller] admitted [that Time Inc.] did [use the advertising scheme at issue over the years].
-
162.
Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. v. Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals - 2011 SCC 59 - [2011] 3 SCR 616 - 2011-12-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Bryan P. Schwartz, William S. Gardner and Todd C. Andres, for the appellant.
-
163.
Crookes v. Newton - 2011 SCC 47 - [2011] 3 SCR 269 - 2011-10-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William C. McDowell, Marguerite F. Ethier and Naomi D. Loewith, for the intervener NetCoalition.
-
164.
Bastien Estate v. Canada - 2011 SCC 38 - [2011] 2 SCR 710 - 2011-07-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Taxation
[23] The Court returned to the purpose of the exemptions in Williams. [...] In both Mitchell and Williams, the Court referred to the purpose of the exemption as protecting property which Indians hold qua Indians: Mitchell, at p. 131; Williams, at p. 887. [...] (v) Applying the Williams Analysis to Mr. Bastien’s Interest Income [43] In my view, the connecting factors identified in Williams are potentially relevant here.
-
165.
Dubé v. Canada - 2011 SCC 39 - [2011] 2 SCR 764 - 2011-07-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Taxation
Williams v. Canada, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 877, could be read as suggesting that it should because, as noted in Bastien, there are some parallels between the unemployment insurance benefits at issue in Williams and the interest income in issue here. [...] [25] In Williams, the entitlement to the benefits in issue was earned through qualifying employment. [...] There is an analogy between the qualifying employment in Williams and the capital invested in this case: in Williams, it was the employment that gave rise to the benefits, and in this case, the capital is what gave rise to the interest.
-
166.
R. v. O'Brien - 2011 SCC 29 - [2011] 2 SCR 485 - 2011-06-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Kenneth W. F. Fiske, Q.C., and William D. Delaney, for the appellant.
-
167.
Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of National Defence) - 2011 SCC 25 - [2011] 2 SCR 306 - 2011-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsAccess to information
Drapeau, Michel William, and Marc‑Aurèle Racicot. Federal Access to Information and Privacy Legislation Annotated 2011.
-
168.
Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society - 2011 SCC 24 - [2011] 2 SCR 261 - 2011-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Trust
In our opinion, Guerin, together with R. v. Taylor and Williams (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 360, ground a general guiding principle for s. 35(1).
-
169.
R. v. Caron - 2011 SCC 5 - [2011] 1 SCR 78 - 2011-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Courts
Holdsworth, Sir William Searle. A History of English Law, vol. IV, 3rd ed.
-
170.
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 SCC 2 - [2011] 1 SCR 19 - 2011-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Harte, William J. “Why Make Justice a Circus? The O.J. Simpson, Dahmer and Kennedy‑Smith Debacles Make the Case Against Cameras in the Courtroom” (1996), 39 Trial Lawyer’s Guide 379.
-
171.
Celgene Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 SCC 1 - [2011] 1 SCR 3 - 2011-01-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Statutes
William Vanveen and Henry S. Brown, Q.C., for the appellant. Christopher Rupar and Jan Brongers, for the respondent.
-
172.
Parrish & Heimbecker Ltd. v. Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food) - 2010 SCC 64 - [2010] 3 SCR 639 - 2010-12-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Matthew G. Williams, for the appellant. Christopher M. Rupar, Alain Préfontaine and Bernard Letarte, for the respondents.
-
173.
Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act - 2010 SCC 61 - [2010] 3 SCR 457 - 2010-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Written submissions only by William J. Sammon, Don Hutchinson and Faye Sonier for the interveners the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.
-
174.
Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2010 SCC 60 - [2010] 3 SCR 379 - 2010-12-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Trust
As expressed by Hudson J. in Canada v. Williams, [1944] S.C.R. 226, . . . at p. 239 . . .
-
175.
R. v. Tran - 2010 SCC 58 - [2010] 3 SCR 350 - 2010-11-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In other words, the accused must have killed because he was provoked and not because the provocation existed (R. v. Faid, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 265, at p. 277, citing Professor G. L. Williams in his Textbook of Criminal Law (1978), at p. 480).