Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,901.
Travers v. Casey - (1904) 34 SCR 419 - 1904-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Cole v. Wade[19]; Holliday v. Overton[20]; Williams v. [Page 423] Pinckney[21]; Jarman's 12th rule, vol. 2, (5 ed.) 841; Ex parte Dawes[22], per Esher M.R. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William Pugsley. Solicitor for the respondents: John L. Carleton.
-
1,902.
Attorney General for Manitoba v. Attorney General for Canada - (1904) 34 SCR 287 - 1904-02-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
We cite also Williams on Real Property (19 ed.) 171; Washburn Real Property, (ed. 1902) vol. ii. secs. 1441—2, 1150, 1501; Aberdeen Town Council v. Aberdeen University[31].
-
1,903.
Confederation Life Association v. Borden - (1904) 34 SCR 338 - 1904-02-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
previously employed; and I find the matter stated in these terms: That the parties totally failed to communicate the said circumstances, or either of them, or the existence of any balance on the agency accounts then standing against the said George Hickes, to the pursuer or to the said Henry William Hickes; and, on the
-
1,904.
Hosking v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 244 - 1903-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
I extract from the evidence of William Thompson, the general superintendent and general manager of the mine : [...] A. Total $5,000, divided as follows : Elizabeth Jane Hosking (widow), $3,000 ; William John Hosking (son), $1,150 ; Stanley Hosking (son), $850.
-
1,905.
Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Smith v. Baker[15], at page 362, per Herschell L. J. ; Grant v. Acadia Coal Co. [16] ; Murphy v. Philips[17]; Clarke v. Holmes[18] , per Cockburn C. J. ; Williams v.
-
1,906.
Manitoba Assurance Co. v. Whitla / Whitla v. Royal Insurance Co. - (1903) 34 SCR 191 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
And in McCance v. London & North Western Railway Co. ([41]), Williams J. in delivering the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber says:
-
1,907.
Price v. Ordway / Veilleux v. Ordway - (1903) 34 SCR 145 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
WILLIAM PRICE (INTERVENANT) Appellant; And OSCAR WILLIAM ORDWAY (PLAINTIFF CONTESTING) [...] OSCAR WILLIAM ORDWAY (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1903: Oct 13; 1903: Oct 14; 1903: Nov 30
-
1,908.
Thompson v. Coulter - (1903) 34 SCR 261 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William Thompson and Adam Pinch, executors of the last will and testament of John David Thewes, Deceased (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
1,909.
Turner v. Cowan et al. - (1903) 34 SCR 160 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
William Cowan, Thomas Downs and Charles Holton (Defendants) Respondents. [...] William Cowan 800 Charles Holten 100 T. Downs 664 and some months after, at a meeting of the Company, it was moved by J. S. Lawson, seconded by C. Holten, that the Company purchase the assets and good—will, and assume the "liabilities of the Cowan Holten Downs Company, for the sum of eight thousand one hundred and [...] Memorandum of agreement made the 27th day of July, A.D. 1899, between William Cowan, Thomas Downs and Charles Holten, carrying on business in partnership under the firm name of the Cowan Holten Downs Company, hereinafter called the parties of the first part, and
-
1,910.
District of North Vancouver v. Tracy - (1903) 34 SCR 132 - 1903-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Solicitors for the appellant: McPhillips & Williams. Solicitors for the respondent: Davis, Marshall & Macneill.
-
1,911.
Doberer v. Megaw - (1903) 34 SCR 125 - 1903-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
William Riggs Megaw Respondent. 1903: October 20, 21; 1903: November 10.
-
1,912.
In re Representation of P.E.I. in the House of Commons - (1903) 33 SCR 594 - 1903-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Mr. Williams: And more so for the interpretation of the constitution. [...] Mr. Williams: I have nothing except the opinion given by members of the bar. [...] Mr. Williams: Well my Lord I will read Vansittart for your Lordship.
-
1,913.
Williams v. Stephenson - (1903) 33 SCR 323 - 1903-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Williams v. Stephenson, (1903) 33 SCR 323 Supreme Court of Canada Williams v. Stephenson, (1903) 33 S.C.R. 323 [...] James A. Williams (Defendant) Appellant; and John W. Stephenson (Plaintiff) Respondent. [...] J. A. WILLIAMS. J. W. STEPHENSON. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of
-
1,914.
In re Representation of Certain Provinces in the House of Commons - (1903) 33 SCR 475 - 1903-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Pugsley K.C, Attorney General for the Province of New Brunswick, and Geo. W. Allen K.C.
-
1,915.
St. Laurent v. Mercier - (1903) 33 SCR 314 - 1903-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
Reference is made to Osborne v. Morgan ([6]); Williams v. Morgan ([7]); Scott v. Henderson ([8]); and to Williams on Real Property, (18th ed.) p. 540.
-
1,916.
North American Life Assurance Co. v. Elson - (1903) 33 SCR 383 - 1903-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
By the terms of the application the contract commenced from the delivery of the policy and the policy was sent by the appellant's letter dated 27th September, 1894, to William McBride at Winnipeg, agent of the appellant, for delivery to Elson in British Columbia.
-
1,917.
Gosselin v. The King - (1903) 33 SCR 255 - 1903-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
see also United States v. Oregon &c. Railroad Co. ([10]) ° though the public history of the times in which a statute was passed may be referred to, according to what Taney C. J. says in Aidridge v. Williams ([11]) or what Davis J. .says in United States v. The Union Pacific Railroad Co., ([12]) and Peckam J., Ubi supra.
-
1,918.
Thorne v. Thorne - (1903) 33 SCR 309 - 1903-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William H. Thorne and Others (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1903: April 6, 20. [...] The words deleted may be looked at; Williams on Executors, (9 ed:) vol. 1, p. 485; Shea v. Boschetti[8]; In re Harrison[9]; and they [...] THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—This case involves the construction of the will of one William Thorne who died at Toronto in 1868.
-
1,919.
Green v. Miller - (1903) 33 SCR 193 - 1903-03-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
the agency of Lord William Nevill, at 27 Charles street, St. James' Square, has been closed by the directors.
-
1,920.
Blackburn v. McCallum - (1903) 33 SCR 65 - 1903-02-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
"I give and bequeath to William Chisholm, my son, the east half of the south half of lot number 3, in the 8th concession of the township of Mosa. [...] I will that my personal property be equally divided between William Chisholm and Hugh Chisholm, my sons. [...] He made a will which was duly proved, and by which he devised to two of his sons William and Hugh, his real estate.
-
1,921.
McDonald v. McDonald - (1903) 33 SCR 145 - 1903-02-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William McDonald, Executor of Michael McDonald, Deceased (Defendant) [...] (Signed) William Moore. Underneath these receipts was written, "I approve of the above. [...] directions as [aforesaid, as she told me, and as I believe, was that she wished that, at her death, the debt or sum of six hundred pounds, so due to her from' the said William Moore, should be cancelled.
-
1,922.
Power v. Griffin et al. - (1902) 33 SCR 39 - 1902-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Judson M. Griffin and William E. Brinkerhoff (Plaintiffs) Respondents
-
1,923.
Sault Ste. Marie Pulp and Paper Co. v. Myers - (1902) 33 SCR 23 - 1902-12-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Harry Myers an infant under the age of twenty-one years by John William Myers his father and next friend and the said John William Myers (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
1,924.
The King v. Chappelle / The King v. Carmack / The King v. Tweed - (1902) 32 SCR 586 - 1902-11-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
William Chappelle (Suppliant) Respondent His Majesty The King (Respondent) [...] SEDGEWICK J.—One William Chappelle, one George W. Carmack and James Tweed and Charles Woog, each filed a petition of right in the Exchequer Court to obtain the relief therein asked. [...] This grant does not convey to the said William Chappelle any surface rights in the said claim, or any right of ownership in the soil covered by the said claim; and the said grant shall lapse and be forfeited unless the claim is continuously and in good faith worked by the said William Chappelle, or his associates.
-
1,925.
Colonist Printing & Publishing Co. v. Dunsmuir - (1902) 32 SCR 679 - 1902-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
In a written agreement, dated the 5th of September, 1892, entered into between William Harrington Ellis and Albert George Sargison, therein termed "Ellis & Co." of the one part, and James Dunsmuir, of the same place, therein termed "The Promoter" of the other part, respecting the incorporation of "The Colonist Printing [...] "4. The number of trustees who shall manage the concerns of the company for the first three months shall be five, and their names are William Harrington Ellis, Albert George Sargison, James Dunsmuir, Cuyler A. Holland and Sydney Aspland, and in the election and appointment of directors the company shall be governed by the