Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,926.
Oppenheimer v. Brackman & Ker Milling Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 699 - 1902-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Oriental Inland Steam Navigation Company v. Briggs[1] ; Cole v. Sumner[2] ; Magann v. Auger[3] ; Skillings v. Royal Insurance Company[4] ; Falck v. Williams[5]. [...] There is no doubt, as Sir William Anson says in his book on contracts, 5th ed. p. 298,
-
1,927.
Trusts and Guarantee Co. v. Hart - (1902) 32 SCR 553 - 1902-11-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
That evidence, moreover, is fully corroborated by witnesses Widdifield, Yerex, German, Pine, Slater and Williams, and the amount given was not an unreasonable one, under the circumstances.
-
1,928.
Hartley et al. v. Matson et al. - (1902) 32 SCR 575 - 1902-11-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
We refer to Hurtubise v. Desmarteau ([1]); Williams v. Irvine ([2]); Taylor v. The Queen ([3]); and the cases collected in Hyde v. Lindsay ([4]).
-
1,929.
Ross v. The King - (1902) 32 SCR 532 - 1902-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
James Ross and William Mackenzie(Suppliants) Appellants And His Majesty The King (Respondent)
-
1,930.
Western Bank of Canada v. McGill - (1902) 32 SCR 581 - 1902-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Dora Stuart Leslie McGill, Administratrix of the Estate of the Late William McGill, (Defendant) Respondent. [...] Williams v. Bayley[1]. I concur in the conclusion reached by a majority of the Court of Appeal.
-
1,931.
Renaud v. Lamothe - (1902) 32 SCR 357 - 1902-05-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
This Act was in force in the Province of Quebec in 1789, the date of the will and bequest in favour of the testator's natural son, William Plenderleath, and has not been repealed. [...] It seems evident, therefore, that the alleged incapacity of, William Plenderleath Christie if it existed, had been removed by the effect of the general capacitating law existing in the province long anterior to 1835, the time of the opening of the substitution for his benefit, and enabled him to receive the bequest as any
-
1,932.
Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Upon the authority of Duckett v. Williams[42], and Venner v. The Sun Life Insurance Company[43], I would think that under this clause alone the company were not obliged to tender or pay into court premiums that were forfeited by an express stipulation of the contract, any more than if the forfeiture were decreed by a
-
1,933.
Collins Bay Rafting and Forwarding Co. v. New York and Ottawa Rway. Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 216 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The New York and Ottawa Railway Company and William Lesslie (Plaintiffs) Respondents. [...] William Lesslie is merely a stake-holder between the parties and has no substantial interest in the appeal. [...] The time having expired for the completion of the work according to the condition of the New York and Ottawa Railway Co., they notified William Lesslie and
-
1,934.
The Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co. v. McNevin - (1902) 32 SCR 194 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Badenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Association[11]; Williams v. United States Mutual Accident Association[12].
-
1,935.
The Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York v. Mowat - (1902) 32 SCR 147 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William Mowat and Another (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1902: March 11, 12, 13; 1902: May 6. [...] MILLS J.—In this case, William Mowat, the plaintiff, was a banker, residing in the city of Stratford, in the province of Ontario, and the company are a corporation under the laws of the state of New York, that carried on the business of life insurance in the province of Ontario.
-
1,936.
Toronto Railway Company v. Balfour - (1902) 32 SCR 239 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
See O’Donohoe v. Beatty[4]; Williams v. Leonard & Sons[5]; Price v. Fraser[6].
-
1,937.
Price v. Talon - (1902) 32 SCR 123 - 1902-03-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
WILLIAM PRICE (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And DAMASETALON, ès-qual (PLATNTIFF)
-
1,938.
Hawley v. Wright - (1902) 32 SCR 40 - 1902-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William H. Hawley, Administrator of the Estate of Murdoch L. Hawley, Deceased (Plaintiff)
-
1,939.
Skinner v. Farquharson - (1902) 32 SCR 58 - 1902-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William O. Farquharson Respondent In Re Estate of John Farquharson, Deceased. [...] The special attendant William Rogers says that during all that time he was constantly with the deceased, dressing him in the morning, giving him his meals, walking about with him, putting him to bed at night, and going in to look at him at night.
-
1,940.
Brown v. Moore - (1902) 32 SCR 93 - 1902-02-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
William Brown (Plaintiff) Appellant And John R. Moore (Defendant)
-
1,941.
Price v. Fraser - (1901) 31 SCR 505 - 1901-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM PRICE et al. (DEFENDANTS) Appellants; And ALEXANDER FRASER, et al.(PLAINTIFFS)
-
1,942.
Taylor v. Robertson - (1901) 31 SCR 615 - 1901-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
We also refer generally to Hebb v. Pun Pong ([18]); Lee v. Everest ([19]); Boyle v. Busby ([20]); Smith v. Broadbent & Co. ([21]); Ford v. Williams ([22]); Rascorlla v. Thomas ([23]); Lampleigh v. Braithwait ([24]); Snow v. Hix ([25]). [...] See also Ford v. Williams ([95]). As regards the alleged "express indemnity", the court below say that the evidence is conflicting and that in view of the conclusion they have reached upon the implied indemnity
-
1,943.
Milburn v. Wilson - (1901) 31 SCR 481 - 1901-11-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William Arthur Wilson (Plaintiff) and The Highway Advertising Company of Canada (Defendant) Respondents.
-
1,944.
Sinclair v. Preston - (1901) 31 SCR 408 - 1901-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William R. Sinclair and James Flanagan (Plaintiffs) Appellants And [...] William A. Preston and W. J. Musson (Defendants) Respondent. 1901: June 3; 1901: Oct 29.
-
1,945.
Wilson et al. v. Windsor Foundry Co. - (1901) 31 SCR 381 - 1901-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The plaintiffs (appellants), carried on business at Montreal under the style of "A. R. Williams & Co.," and brought the action against the respondent for the price of an engine, ordered by respondents in writing, and other machinery supplied in connection with repairs to the foundry, amounting in all, according to the
-
1,946.
Consumers Cordage Co. v. Connolly - (1901) 31 SCR 244 - 1901-03-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
We need not trouble for the present at least, about these imaginary cases, and we may treat them as the legendary English one of Everett v. Williams, where, in 1725, the highwayman, in a disguised declaration, was suing his companion to account for his share in the plunder.
-
1,947.
Bell v. Vipond et al. - (1901) 31 SCR 175 - 1901-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
WILLIAM BELL (PLAINTIFF) Appellant; And GEORGE VIPOND, et al (DEFENDANTS)
-
1,948.
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Guthrie - (1901) 31 SCR 155 - 1901-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
The said parties of the first part grant to the said party of the second part and to the tenants and occupiers of the said lands hereby granted a right at all times to use in common with the owners, tenants and occupiers of the land of the said late Charles McGeorge the land described in the deed from William Dickson to
-
1,949.
Kent v. Ellis - (1900) 31 SCR 110 - 1900-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
This court will not interfere with a decision such as is now appealed from as it is upon a mere question of procedure; Dawson v. Union Bank[13]; Gladwin v. Cummings[14]; Ferrier v. Trépannier[15]; Scammell v. James[16]; Williams v. Leonard & Sons[17].
-
1,950.
Sunlife Assurance Co. v. Elliott - (1900) 31 SCR 91 - 1900-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Sir William Grant in Kidney v Coussmaker[12] referring to this case, said that as that bill had charged insolvency at the time of the execution of the voluntary settlement, and no proof was given of any debt in existence at that time,