Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,651.
Kilby et al. v. Meyers et al. - [1965] SCR 24 - 1964-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
The difficulty of such an insertion by order of the Court is that the Court must be able to say as a matter of necessary implication that there was an omission and what the omission was: Crook v. Hill[8], per Sir William James, L.J., at p. 315.
-
1,652.
Fallis and Deacon v. United Fuel Investments - [1963] SCR 397 - 1963-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
These cases are: Theis v. Spokane Falls Gaslight Co.[8]; William B. Riker & Son Co. v. United Drug Co.[9]; In re Paine[10]; In re Doe Run Lead Co.[11]; In re Security Finance Co., Rouda v. Crocker[12].
-
1,653.
Board of Education for Toronto v. Higgs et al. - [1960] SCR 174 - 1959-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Higgs by his next friend, John Cecil Lowings, and Helen Higgs (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
1,654.
Curran v. Minister of National Revenue - [1959] SCR 850 - 1959-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
I have been unable to secure any assistance from the other cases referred to by Mr. Stikeman including Van Den Berghs Ltd. v. Clark7, a decision of the House of Lords, and the judgment of Williams J. in the High Court of Australia in Bennett v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation8.
-
1,655.
Rosen v. Anglin - [1957] SCR 755 - 1957-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
that the question to be tried shall be whether at the time of the seizure by the said bailiff William Tice the plaintiffs were entitled to seize, the goods and chattels seized in priority to the defendant, and whether the said mortgages to the plaintiffs were in priority to the mortgage of the defendant on the goods and
-
1,656.
Tombill Gold Mines Ltd. v. Hamilton et al. - [1956] SCR 858 - 1956-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Robert M.P. Hamilton, Philip D.P. Hamilton, William S. Hargraft, The General Engineering Company Limited and Geco Mines Limited (No Personal Liability) (Defendants) Respondents.
-
1,657.
The Queen v. Kravenia - [1955] SCR 615 - 1955-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
CARTWRIGHT J. (dissenting):—On May 31, 1954, the respondent and one William Tomilin were convicted, after trial before Whittaker J. and a jury, of conspiring to commit an indictable offence, namely to sell a drug, to wit diacetyl-morphine hydrochloride (heroin) to one Smith, without a licence or other lawful authority.
-
1,658.
Deglman v. Guaranty Trust Co. of Canada and Constantineau - [1954] SCR 725 - 1954-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
At pages 490 and 491 Sir William Meredith C.J.O., who delivered the unanimous judgment of the Court, said:—
-
1,659.
World Marine and General Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Leger - [1952] 2 SCR 3 - 1951-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
86 Prince William St. Saint John, N.B. (It was explained that "cCc" are the initials of another company, not a fire insurance company).
-
1,660.
Kirby v. Kalyniak - [1948] SCR 544 - 1948-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
APPEAL from the decision of the Court of Appeal for Manitoba 1, reversing (McPherson C.J.M. dissenting in part) the judgment of the trial judge, Williams C.J. K.B., and awarding plaintiff the full amount of the damages assessed.
-
1,661.
MacDonald v. The King - [1947] SCR 90 - 1946-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
At the first trial, the appellant had been charged with and tried together with Benedetto Zanelli, Samuel Mancuso, Edwin MacDonald and William M. Baskett.
-
1,662.
McNichol v. Grandy - [1931] SCR 696 - 1931-10-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Solicitors for the appellant: Aikins, Loftus, Aikins, Williams & MacAulay.
-
1,663.
Brewster Transport Co. v. Rocky Mountain Tours & Transport Co. - [1931] SCR 336 - 1930-12-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Rocky Mountain Tours and Transport Company, Limited, Rocky Mountain Royal Blue Line Motor Tours Limited, James I. Mcleod, William Warren, and C. E. Sibbald (Defendants) Respondents
-
1,664.
Knight Sugar Co. v. Webster - [1930] SCR 518 - 1930-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William B. Webster (Defendant) Respondent 1929: October 2; 1930: February 4.
-
1,665.
Robert Crean & Co. v. Dobbs & Co. - [1930] SCR 307 - 1930-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
On this ground alone the registration of the respondent’s mark should be refused, for, as Vaughan-Williams L.J., said in Bowden Wire, Limited v. Bowden Brake Co., Limited[9]:
-
1,666.
MacKenzie v. Grand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co. - [1926] SCR 178 - 1925-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
John William Mackenzie (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Company (Defendant) Respondent.
-
1,667.
Jamieson v. Edmonton (City) - (1916) 54 SCR 443 - 1916-12-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
In the case of Maguire v. Liverpool Corporation[4], Vaughan-Williams L.J. asserts the same general rule as do Farwell and Kennedy L.JJ. in the Bingley Case3, and treats the immunity of the authority in respect to the non-repair of highways as an exception due to the particular history of the highways.
-
1,668.
McKee v. Philip - (1916) 55 SCR 286 - 1916-10-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
William Philip (Defendant) Respondent. 1916: October 17; 1916: October 30.
-
1,669.
Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
On the whole, I adopt the reasoning and conclusions of Chief Justice Sir William Meredith and would dismiss the appeal.
-
1,670.
The King v. Trudel - (1914) 49 SCR 501 - 1914-03-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
The law of Canada as regards the principles upon which compensation for land taken was to be awarded was the same as the law of England, and it has been explained in numerous cases— nowhere with greater precision than in the case of In re Lucas and Chesterfield Gas and Water Board[2], where Lord Justices Vaughan Williams
-
1,671.
Cunard v. The King - (1910) 43 SCR 88 - 1910-02-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
William Samuel Cunard and Others (Defendants) Appellants; and His Majesty The King (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
1,672.
Goold v. Gillies - (1908) 40 SCR 437 - 1908-06-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
Solicitor for the respondent: William S. Gray. [1] 55 Ind. 205. [2] 12 Ont. App. R. 50; 13 Can. S.C.R. 1.
-
1,673.
Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Upon the authority of Duckett v. Williams[42], and Venner v. The Sun Life Insurance Company[43], I would think that under this clause alone the company were not obliged to tender or pay into court premiums that were forfeited by an express stipulation of the contract, any more than if the forfeiture were decreed by a
-
1,674.
The Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co. v. McNevin - (1902) 32 SCR 194 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Badenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Association[11]; Williams v. United States Mutual Accident Association[12].
-
1,675.
Donohoe v. Hull - (1895) 24 SCR 683 - 1895-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Even supposing, said Vaughan Williams J., that the plaintiff had taken the proper steps to set aside the settlement as void, and had succeeded in doing so, even then Brown could never have been placed in the position of being obliged to pay over the money to Vyse ; the settlement would still be valid and subsisting between