Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

1,094 result(s)

  • 951.

    Polushie v. Zacklynski - (1906) 37 SCR 177 - 1906-02-21

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    If I had been in his place (Scott J.) my findings would have been of a similar character.   [...]  The study I have given to the evidence convinces me that the trial judge, Scott, J., was right in his conclusion that these Galician peasants

  • 952.

    Dominion Cotton Mills Co. v. Trecothic Marsh Commissioners - (1905) 37 SCR 79 - 1905-12-22

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    Attorney-General v. Scott[7]; Couture v. Bouchard[8]; Danaher v. Peters[9]; St. James Election Case[10]; The Queen v. Justices of County of London[11].   [...]  The appellants were within their rights when they applied within the six months, and if the judge chose to keep the case before him after that period, either one day, or several days, or several weeks, or several months, the appellants should not suffer for it, as was held in the Attorney-General v. Scott (1):

  • 953.

    Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Eggleston - (1905) 36 SCR 641 - 1905-11-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Transportation

    APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of the North-West Territories affirming the decision of Mr. Justice Scott, at the trial, which maintained the plaintiffs' action with costs.

  • 954.

    Wentworth Election Case (Sealey v. Smith) - (1905) 36 SCR 497 - 1905-10-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Elections

    The statute which enacted that "every conveyance" in a particular form should be valid would not cure a defective title; Ward v. Scott[15]; Whidborne v. Ecclesiastical Commissioners[16]; Forbes v. Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England[17].

  • 955.

    McVity v. Tranouth - (1905) 36 SCR 455 - 1905-06-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellants cited Murray v. East India Co.[2]

  • 956.

    Hulbert v. Peterson - (1905) 36 SCR 324 - 1905-06-02

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Priorities and hypothecs

    The case was tried before Sifton C.J. who gave judgment for the plaintiff and this judgment was affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of the Territories, Scott J. dissenting.

  • 957.

    Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Hainer - (1905) 36 SCR 180 - 1905-05-02

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    This doctrine is of course well recognized in such cases as Gorris v. Scott[13]; Buxton v. North Eastern Railway Co.[14]; Vanderkar v. The Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad Co.[15].

  • 958.

    Pearson v. Carpenter - (1904) 35 SCR 380 - 1904-12-14

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Agency

    I adopt the language of Lord Justice Lindley in Scott v. Brown[13] at p. 728.

  • 959.

    Coote v. Borland - (1904) 35 SCR 282 - 1904-11-21

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    I would refer to Washburn on Real Property (6 ed.), 2316-2321; Hunt on Boundaries and Fences (5 ed.), 220-1; Loomis v. Jackson,[8]; Glass v. Hulbers[9]; Plant v. Bourne[10]; Shore v. Wilson[11]; Cowen v. Truefitt[12]; Hutchins v. Scott[13].   [...]  In that view the case was one for the application of the maxim falsa demontratio non norel, and the conclusion was supported by such cases as Blague v. Gold[17]; Shore v. Wilson[18]; Miller v. Travers[19]; Hutchins v. Scott[20] ; and Doed.

  • 960.

    North British Canadian Investment Co. v. School Trustees of St. John District, No. 16, N.W.T. - (1904) 35 SCR 461 - 1904-11-21

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    We rely upon the authorities cited by the judges of the court below on the reference and the remarks of Mr. Justice Scott In re Kerr ([11]).

  • 961.

    Sandon Water Works & Light Co. v. Byron N. White Co. - (1904) 35 SCR 309 - 1904-11-21

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    [20] 8 Scott. N. R. 384. [21] 11 U. C. Q. B. 246. [22] 9 Ch. App. 221.

  • 962.

    The King v. The "Kitty D." - (1904) 34 SCR 673 - 1904-05-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Fishery

    "It has been well said by Judge Black of the Quebec Admiralty Court that 'statements as to time and distance in maritime cases are probably more or less erroneous.' And Sir Wm. Scott when dealing with the evidence of estimated distances at sea in the case of the 'Twee Gebroeders'[1] at page 163 says: 'An exact measurement   [...]  For, as Sir William Scott afterwards said[3] on page 338: 'It is scarcely necessary to observe that a claim of territory is of a most sacred nature.

  • 963.

    Wood v. LeBlanc - (1904) 34 SCR 627 - 1904-05-04

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    See Cunard v. Irvine[10]; Doe d. Baxter v. Baxter[11]; Ferrier v. Moodie[12]; Dundas v. Johnston[13]; Davis v. Henderson[14]; Mulholland v. Conklin[15]; Heyland v. Scott[16]; Harris v. Mudie[17].

  • 964.

    Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al. - (1904) 34 SCR 603 - 1904-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al., (1904) 34 SCR 603   [...]  Attorney General and City of Hull v. Scott, (1904) 34 SCR 603 Date: 1904-04-27   [...]  JANET LOUISA SCOTT AND OTHERS (DEFENDANTS) Respondents. 1904: March 30; 1904: April 27

  • 965.

    City of Hull v. Scott and Walters - (1904) 34 SCR 617 - 1904-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    City of Hull v. Scott and Walters, (1904) 34 SCR 617 Supreme Court of Canada   [...]  City of Hull v. Scott and Walters, (1904) 34 SCR 617 Date: 1904-04-27   [...]  JANET LOUISA SCOTT AND OTHERS (DEFENDANTS). And MORLEY P. WALTERS AND OTHERS (MIS EN CAUSE)

  • 966.

    Maddison v. Emmerson - (1904) 34 SCR 533 - 1904-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    Doe d Ponsford v Vernon[29]; Smith v. Morrow[30]; Murray v. Duff[31]; Scott v. Henderson[32]; Smyth v. McDonald[33].   [...]  It first arose incidentally in Nova Scotia in 1843, in the case of Scott v. Henderson[42].   [...]  And in Scott v. Nixon[59], Sugden, L.C. compelled an unwilling purchaser to take a title depending upon parol evidence of possession under the statute.

  • 967.

    Miller v. Robertson - (1904) 35 SCR 80 - 1904-04-27

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Courts

    The rule stated by Page-Wood, V. C., in Talbot v. Hope Scott[19] is that the court cannot interfere with a legal title of any description unless there be some equity by which it can affect the conscience of the defendant.

  • 968.

    Attorney General for Manitoba v. Attorney General for Canada - (1904) 34 SCR 287 - 1904-02-16

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    See Thompson v. Prince[37], where, though overruled in Keller v. Brickey[38], Mr. Justice Scott adhered to his opinion given in the former case.

  • 969.

    Payson v. Hubert - (1904) 34 SCR 400 - 1904-02-16

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    Solicitor for the respondent: F. B. Scott. [1] 36 N. S. Rep. 211. [2] 12 Q. B. D. 271.

  • 970.

    Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al. - (1903) 34 SCR 282 - 1903-12-11

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al., (1903) 34 SCR 282   [...]  Attorney General for Quebec and the City of Hull v. Scott, (1903) 34 SCR 282   [...]  JANET LOUISA SCOTT AND OTHERS Respondent. 1903: Dec 11 PRESENT :—Sir Elzéar Taschereau C.J. and Sedgewick, Girouard,Nesbitt and Killam JJ.

  • 971.

    Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    Scott v. Bould[24] . The provisions of this law were not complied with.

  • 972.

    Turner v. Cowan et al. - (1903) 34 SCR 160 - 1903-11-30

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    Solicitors for the respondents: Lemaistre & Scott. [1] 9 B. C. Rep. 301.

  • 973.

    City of Ottawa v. Canada Atlantic Railway / City of Ottawa v. Montreal & Ottawa Railway Co. - (1903) 33 SCR 376 - 1903-05-05

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Transportation

    Solicitors for the respondents M. & O. Ry. Co.: Scott, Scott, Curle & Gleeson.

  • 974.

    St. Laurent v. Mercier - (1903) 33 SCR 314 - 1903-04-29

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Mines and minerals

    Reference is made to Osborne v. Morgan ([6]); Williams v. Morgan ([7]); Scott v. Henderson ([8]); and to Williams on Real Property, (18th ed.) p. 540.

  • 975.

    Gosselin v. The King - (1903) 33 SCR 255 - 1903-04-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Criminal law

    And in Scott v. The Commonwealth ([22]), a similar letter voluntarily surrendered by a wife from a husband was excluded on the ground that its disclosure was a violation of those confidential relations between husband and wife which the law protected.