Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

1,094 result(s)

  • 1,076.

    The Queen v. Belleau - (1881) 7 SCR 53 - 1881-02-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    should extend to the road leading from that sixthly mentioned in the 9th sec. of the said ordinance, to Scott's bridge, including the said bridge, and to the main road running along the north bank of the river St. Charles, from Scott's bridge aforesaid, to the bridge over the said river, commonly called the red bridge, or

  • 1,077.

    Wheler v. Gibbs - (1880) 4 SCR 430 - 1880-06-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Elections

    I do not think I met him again until the meeting at Scott, in the Town Hall.   [...]  He came to my house on the Sunday following the Scott meeting. I think it was on the next morning after the Scott meeting.

  • 1,078.

    McConaghy v. Denmark - (1880) 4 SCR 609 - 1880-04-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    Mr. Henry J. Scott for respondent: Mr. Justice Armour, who tried the case, found all the issues for the plaintiff.

  • 1,079.

    O'Brien v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 529 - 1880-03-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Cy. of Bruce[5]; Elliott v. Roy. Ex. Ins. Co.[6]; Stodhart v. Lee[7]; Sharp v. San Paolo Ry.[8]; Scott v. Liverpool[9]; Clarke v. Watson[10]; Ranger v. Great Western Ry. Co.[11]; Roberts v. Bury[12].

  • 1,080.

    Chevrier v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 1 - 1880-03-01

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil procedure

    that a judgment had been rendered in this case, no evidence has been brought by the other side, for the sham register, being a book, made up out of the office of the Prothonotary, by a person having no authority to keep a register, can have no more probative effect than if they had fyled a copy of Scott's Waverly Novels.

  • 1,081.

    Wheeler v. Gibbs - (1879) 3 SCR 374 - 1879-12-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    This notice is the first and only intimation the respondent has of the appeal—the previous steps by the appellant are ex parte; until this notice is given, as respects the respondent, as was said by Erle, C. J., in Scott v. Durant[2], "there has been no completed appeal," and it is only when so completed that "the appeal   [...]  Scott v. Burnham[9], cited by the appellant, does not seem to me to have any application to this case; nor does Chowdry v. Mullick[10].

  • 1,082.

    Moore v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Hartford - (1879) 6 SCR 634 - 1879-12-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    [11] 7 Scott N.R. 280. [12] 11 M. & W. 817. [13] The case will be found reported in 6 App. Cases 644.

  • 1,083.

    Clark v. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co. - (1879) 4 SCR 192 - 1879-12-12

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    In Malcolm v. Scott[24], the Vice Chancellor says: The of case Burn v. Carvallio was relied on as an authority in the plaintiff's favor.

  • 1,084.

    Lawless v. Sullivan - (1879) 3 SCR 117 - 1879-04-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Taxation

    [17] Per Tindal, C. J., in Everett v. Wells, 2 Scott N. C. 531.

  • 1,085.

    Rickaby v. Bell - (1878) 2 SCR 560 - 1878-06-04

    Supreme Court Judgments

    [7] 7 Scott N. C. 730. [8] 4 L. T. N. S. 9.

  • 1,086.

    Gore District Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Samo - (1878) 2 SCR 411 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Rose v. Scott[32]; chattel mortgage, held good in part and bad in part.

  • 1,087.

    Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    The evidence for the defence of Jas. Scott shows that Adam built his house and barn on the lot in ‘47 or ‘48; that the crops were taken to the west half until he had his own barn built; that he had often heard Jas. Gray say the E. ½ was “our Adam’s;” that Adam did statute labor of lot.   [...]  Now, as to Adam’s possesion, William Gray says Adam was in possession from ‘45 to ‘60; this was before he had built on the lot, for Mr. Scott says, Adam built his house and barn in ‘47 or ‘48.   [...]  James Scott proves that Adam built his house and barn on the east half in 1847 or 1848—he was then married.

  • 1,088.

    Hastings Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Shannon - (1878) 2 SCR 394 - 1878-06-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    from, or in any manner vary or qualify, the written contract, Goss v. Lord Nugent[3]; Woolam v. Hearn[4]; Forsyth v. Boyle[5]; Mason v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.[6]; Mason v. Scott[7]; Jones v. Victoria Graving Dock Company[8]; Direct U. S. Cable Company v. Anglo American Telegraph Co.[9]; Shannon v. The Gore Ins. Co.[10]

  • 1,089.

    Scott v. The Queen - (1878) 2 SCR 349 - 1878-04-25

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Evidence

    Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349 Supreme Court of Canada James Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349   [...]  JAMES SCOTT Appellant; AND THE QUEEN Respondent. 1878: Jan 26: April 25   [...]  “James Scott. On Conviction of Stealing a Valuable Security. “Case reserved for the Court of Queen’s Bench sitting “in Appeal and Error.

  • 1,090.

    Bickford v. Grand Junction Railway Co. - (1878) 1 SCR 696 - 1878-01-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Transportation

    Scott v. Colburn[16]; Anglo-Australian Ass. Co. v. British Prov. Ass. Co.[17]; In re Electric Telegraph Co. of Ireland; Troup’s case[18].   [...]  Ashbury Carriage Co. v. Riche[79]; Re Patent File Company[80]; Scott v. Colbourn[81]; McCormack v. Perry[82]; Pennock v. Coe[83]; Dunham v. Railway[84]; Galveston Railway Co. v. Cowdry[85]; Australian Steamship Co. v. Mounsay[86].

  • 1,091.

    Chesley v. Murdoch - (1877) 2 SCR 48 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    [15] Per Tindal, C.J., in Everett v. Mills, 4 Scott, N. C. 531. [16] Potter's Dwarris Statutes 201.   [...]  [17] Potter's Dwarris, p. 214, citing The King v. Hale, Cro. Car. 330; 3 Lev. 82; The King v. The Mayor of Liverpool, 1 A. & E. 176; and Hine v. Reynolds, 2 Scott, N. C., 419.

  • 1,092.

    Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Taxation

    Mr. James Bethune, Q.C, and Mr. W.H. Scott, Q.C, for Respondent: The proceeding in this case is one against a public officer who is not an agent of the municipality, but an independent officer, acting under the authority of sections 93 and 106 of c. 36, 32 Vict.   [...]  Attorneys for Respondent: Scott & Edwards. [1] See case as reported in 25 U.C.C.P., 169, and in 26 U.C.C.P., 323.

  • 1,093.

    Trust and Loan Co. v. Ruttan - (1877) 1 SCR 564 - 1877-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Muirhead v. McDougall, et al[20]; Mackechnie v. Mackechnie[21]; Exton v. Scott[22]; Muir v. Dunnett[23]; Childers v. Childers[24]; McFarlane v. Andes Insurance Company[25]; Doe Spafford v. Brown et al[26]; Thompson v. Leach[27]; Thompson v. Leach[28]; Butler & Baker’s case[29]; Doe Garnons v. Knight[30]; Xenos v.

  • 1,094.

    Kelly v. Sulivan - (1877) 1 SCR 3 - 1877-01-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Courts

    Reference made also to: In re Montgomery and Moore ([20]); Duquet v. Greene ([21]); Corporation of the United Counties of Northumberland and Durham v. Town of Cobourg ([22]); Hibbert v. Scott ([23]) ; Thorpe v. Cole ([24]).