Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
326.
R. v. Ling - 2002 SCC 74 - [2002] 3 SCR 814 - 2002-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Taxation
Scott K. Fenton, for the intervener the Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario). [...] Solicitor for the intervener the Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario): Scott K. Fenton, Toronto.
-
327.
Baxter Travenol Laboratories v. Cutter (Canada) - [1983] 2 SCR 388 - 1983-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Liberty Ornamental Iron Ltd. v. B. Fertleman & Sons Ltd., [1977] 1 F.C. 584; Powel v. Follet (1747), 1 Dick. 116; M'Neil v. Garratt (1841), Cr. & Ph. 98; Gooch v. Marshall (1860), 8 W.R. 410; Rattray v. Bishop (1818), 3 Madd. 220; Robinson v. Elton (1835), 4 L.J.Ch. 197; Gooseman v. Dann (1840), 10 Sim. 517; Scott [...] The following cases are cited: Powel v. Follet (1747), 1 Dick. 116; M'Neil v. Garratt (1841), Cr. & Ph. 98; Gooch v. Marshall (1860), 8 W.R. 410; see also Rattray v. Bishop (1818), 3 Madd. 220; Robinson v. Elton (1835), 4 L.J. Ch. 197; Gooseman v. Dann (1840), 10 Sim. 517; Scott v. Becher (1817), 4 Price 346 at p. 352.
-
328.
Little and Wolski v. R. - [1976] 1 SCR 20 - 1974-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
[Brodie v. The King, [1936] S.C.R. 188, applied; Trainer v. The King (1906), 4 C.L.R. 26, distinguished; R. v. Carswell (1916), 26 C.C.C. 288; R. v. Cassils (1932), 57 C.C.C. 366; R. v. Scott, [1970] 3 C.C.C. 109; R. v. Meloche, [1970] 1 C.C.C. (2d) 187; R. v. Sheppard (1949), 95 C.C.C. 298; R. v. Pelletier, [1970] 3 C.C.C. [...] He applied such cases as R. v. Carswell[4]; R. v. Cassils[5]; and R. v. Scott[6], all decisions of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta, which support the proposition that if A is named as owner of property alleged to have been stolen the Crown cannot succeed if it is established in evidence that B is in
-
329.
Van Alstyne v. Ruck et al. - [1957] SCR 142 - 1957-01-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Lindsey D. Ruck, Edmond E. Gowett, Thomas P. Compeau and John H. Scott (Plaintiffs) Respondents. [...] By deed dated August 10,1946 Turcotte conveyed lot 3 to one Isabelle Connor, and by deed dated July 11, 1949 she conveyed this lot to the respondents Gowett, Scott and Compeau; the descriptions of the lands conveyed in these two deeds are identical and read as follows:
-
330.
Boykowych and Gadziala v. Boykowych - [1955] SCR 151 - 1955-01-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Scott v. Fernie Lumber Co. 11 B.C.R. 91 at 96 approved in Spencer v. Field [1939] S.C.R. 36 at 42. [...] I think the principle to be applied is that referred to by Duff J. (as he then was) in Scott v. Fernie Lumber Co.[16] at p. 96 where, referring to the long standing rule
-
331.
Commissioner of Patents v. Winthrop Chemical Co. Inc. - [1948] SCR 46 - 1948-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Cuthbert Scott and W. R. Mereditsh for the appellant. Christopher Robinson for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the Appellant: Ewart, Scott, Kelley & Howard. Solicitors for the Respondent: Smart & Biggar.
-
332.
Dominion Cotton Mills Co. v. Trecothic Marsh Commissioners - (1905) 37 SCR 79 - 1905-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Attorney-General v. Scott[7]; Couture v. Bouchard[8]; Danaher v. Peters[9]; St. James Election Case[10]; The Queen v. Justices of County of London[11]. [...] The appellants were within their rights when they applied within the six months, and if the judge chose to keep the case before him after that period, either one day, or several days, or several weeks, or several months, the appellants should not suffer for it, as was held in the Attorney-General v. Scott (1):
-
333.
Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz - 2022 SCC 29 - 2022-07-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Perell, Paul M. “A Survey of Abuse of Process”, in Todd L. Archibald and Randall Scott Echlin, eds., Annual Review of Civil Litigation 2007. [...] [36] The primary focus is the integrity of courts’ adjudicative functions, and less on the interests of parties: C.U.P.E., at para. 43; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659, at p. 1667; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at p. 1007. [...] 167, at paras. 49‐50; O’Connor, at paras. 60‐64; R. v. Babos, 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 309, at para. 31; Regan, at para. 49; Behn, at para. 39; United States of America v. Cobb, 2001 SCC 19, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 587, at paras. 36‐40; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at p. 1007; R. v. Power, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 601, at p. 616).
-
334.
Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General) - 2005 SCC 73 - [2005] 3 SCR 530 - 2005-12-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
47; Spooner Oils Ltd. v. Turner Valley Gas Conservation Board, [1933] S.C.R. 629; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, 2002 SCC 42; Scott v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (1992), 95 D.L.R. (4th) 706; Abbott v. Minister for Lands, [1895] A.C. 425; Massey‑Ferguson Finance Co. [...] This analytical approach was used by, inter alia, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Scott v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (1992), 95 D.L.R. (4th) 706, at p. 727. [...] or any class of them at the date of the repeal of a statute to take advantage of the repealed statute is not a right accrued (see also Abbott v. Minister for Lands, [1895] A.C. 425, at p. 431; Attorney General of Quebec, at p. 743; Massey‑Ferguson Finance Co. of Canada v. Kluz, [1974] S.C.R. 474; Scott, at pp. 727‑28).
-
335.
Syndicat des employés de production du Québec v. CLRB - [1984] 2 SCR 412 - 1984-11-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Labour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Louis LeBel, for the Canada Labour Relations Board. [...] In oral argument Mr. Scott, one of the Board's counsel, indicated that he was quite aware of the [...] In my view, and I say so with respect, Mr. Scott was invoking a difference of degree but not of kind, and the Board still exercised a power which was not conferred on it by the Act. This power resembles that exercised by the Board in Teamsters Union, Local 938 v. Massicotte, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 710, by authorizing an employee
-
336.
Leamy v. The King - (1916) 54 SCR 143 - 1916-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Aylen K.C. for the appellants cited Maclaren v. Attorney-General for Quebec[2]; McBean v. Carlisle[3]; Hurdman v. Thompson[4]; Attorney-General for Quebec v. Scott[5], at page 615; Watkinson v. McCoy[6]; McPheters v. Moose River Log-Driving Co.[7]; Perry v. [...] Chrysler K.C. for the respondent cited Attorney-General for British Columbia v. Attorney-General for Canada[12]; The Queen v. Moss[13], at page 328; Attorney-General for Quebec v. Scott[14], at page 612; Tanguay v. Canadian Electric Light Co.[15]; "B.N.A. Act, 1867," sec. 108, item 5, Sch. 3; and referred to "Documents [...] Scott, an engineer of respondent, in 1889, says:— Q.—It shews Leamy's Lake?
-
337.
R. v. Cawthorne - 2016 SCC 32 - [2016] 1 SCR 983 - 2016-07-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Scott, Ian. “Law, Policy, and the Role of the Attorney General: Constancy and Change in the 1980s” (1989), 39 U.T.L.J. 109. [...] It is only when the considerations underlying a prosecution are partisan — that is, when a prosecutor acts not for the public good, but “for the good of the government of the day” — that a court’s intervention is warranted: Sterling and Mackay, at p. 179, citing I. Scott, “Law, Policy, and the Role of the Attorney General:
-
338.
R. v. Godoy - [1999] 1 SCR 311 - 1999-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott C. Hutchison and Erika Chozik, for the respondent. Bernard Laprade and Carole Sheppard, for the intervener. [...] Solicitor for the respondent: Scott C. Hutchison, Toronto. Solicitor for the intervener: S. Ronald Fainstein, Ottawa.
-
339.
Fontaine v. British Columbia (Official Administrator) - [1998] 1 SCR 424 - 1998-03-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Referred to: National Trust Co. v. Wong Aviation Ltd., [1969] S.C.R. 481; Gauthier & Co. v. The King, [1945] S.C.R. 143; Scott v. London and St. Katherine Docks Co. (1865), 3 H. & C. 596, 159 E.R. 665; Jackson v. Millar, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 225; Hellenius v. Lees, [1972] S.C.R. 165; Toneguzzo‑Norvell (Guardian ad litem [...] In Scott v. London and St. Katherine Docks Co. (1865), 3 H. & C. 596, 159 E.R. 665, at p. 596 and p. 667, respectively, Erle C.J. defined what has since become known as res ipsa loquitur in the following terms:
-
340.
Sinclair v. Quebec (Attorney General) - [1992] 1 SCR 579 - 1992-02-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Stephen A. Scott and Victoria Percival‑Hilton, for the intervener Alliance Quebec. [...] Solicitor for the intervener Alliance Quebec: Stephen A. Scott, Montréal.
-
341.
Dowson v. R. - [1983] 2 SCR 144 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Ross Wells, for the intervener. The judgment of the Court was delivered by [...] Solicitors for the intervener: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
342.
McKenzie et al. v. Hiscock et al. - [1967] SCR 781 - 1967-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Contract
Meduk v. Soja, [1958] S.C.R. 167; British American Oil Co. Ltd. v. Kos, [1964] S.C.R. 167; Halldorson v. Holizki, [1919] 1 W.W.R. 472, affirmed [1919] 3 W.W.R. 86, applied; Scott and Sheppard v. Miller, [1922] 1 W.W.R. 1083, referred to. [...] In Scott and Sheppard v. Miller[6], the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan left open the question whether a husband could be held liable in damages for failure to perform an agreement by him to sell the homestead when his wife refused to consent to the sale; but the reasoning of Lamont J., with whom Haultain C.J.S. agreed,
-
343.
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Handler - [1937] SCR 127 - 1937-02-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
W. B. Scott K.C. and J. F. Chisholm for the appellant. Brooke Claxton and N. L. Rappaport for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: MacDougall, Macfarlane, Scott & Hugessen.
-
344.
Fuller v. Garneau - (1921) 61 SCR 450 - 1921-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
APPEAL from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Scott J.[2] and dismissing the appellant's action. [...] The appellant is entitled to be paid his costs of the appeals to the Appellate Division and to this court; and the costs of the motion before Mr. Justice Scott should be costs in the cause to the plaintiff in any event thereof.
-
345.
McKelvey v. Le Roi Mining Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 664 - 1902-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Gray v. Richford (2 Can. S. C. R. 431); and Scott v. Phoenix Assurance Company (Stu. K. B. 354), followed. [...] See also, in the Privy Council, the case of Scott v. The Phoenix Assurance Company[5].
-
346.
Davis v. Kerr - (1890) 17 SCR 235 - 1890-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
I need only refer on this and other points arising on the case, to the authorities cited in Miller v. Demeule ([25]) * and to Gagnon v Sylva ([26]); Venner v. Lortie ([27]) : Demolombe ([28]); Laurent ([29]); Sirey ([30]); Sirey ([31]); Urquhart v. Scott ([32]); Payne v. Scott ([33]).
-
347.
Confederation Life Association v. Miller - (1887) 14 SCR 330 - 1887-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
That a new trial will not be granted in such a case, see McDermott v. Ireson[13], following Scott v. Scott[14]; Fawcett v. Mothersell[15]; The Queen v. McIlroy[16]; Murray v. Canada Central[17].
-
348.
World Bank Group v. Wallace - 2016 SCC 15 - [2016] 1 SCR 207 - 2016-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsAlan J. Lenczner, Q.C., Scott Rollwagen and Chris Kinnear‑Hunter, for the appellant. [...] Scott K. Fenton and Lynda E. Morgan, for the respondent Kevin Wallace. [...] Scott C. Hutchison and Samuel Walker, for the intervener the Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario).
-
349.
Reference re Senate Reform - 2014 SCC 32 - [2014] 1 SCR 704 - 2014-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott, Stephen A. “Pussycat, Pussycat or Patriation and the New Constitutional Amendment Processes” (1982), 20 U.W.O. L. Rev. 247. [...] D. Spencer Campbell, Q.C., Rosemary S. Scott, Q.C., and Jonathan M. Coady, for the intervener the Attorney General of Prince Edward Island. [...] The determination of its scope and of the effects of its interaction with other provisions of Part V presents significant conceptual difficulties, leading Professor Scott to term it the “Rubik’s Cube” of Part V: S. A. Scott, “Pussycat, Pussycat or Patriation and the New Constitutional Amendment Processes” (1982), 20 U.W.O.
-
350.
Boma Manufacturing Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce - [1996] 3 SCR 727 - 1996-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
Scott, Stephen A. “The Bank is Always Right: Section 165(3) of the Bills of Exchange Act and its Curious Parliamentary History” (1973), 19 McGill L.J. 78. [...] 71. At this point, it should be noted that this section has attracted considerable commentary; see, for example, Professor Sheilah Martin's article “Section 165(3) of the Bills of Exchange Act ” (1985), 11 C.B.L.J. 23, and Professor Stephen A. Scott's article “The Bank is Always Right: Section 165(3) of the Bills of [...] 73. Professor Scott goes so far as to state that s. 165(3) "must be summarily repealed", as "[i]ts continued presence on the Canadian statute book is completely unjustified" (p. 97).