Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
376.
R. v. Furtney - [1991] 3 SCR 89 - 1991-09-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Philip Furtney, Scott Furtney, Diane Roy, Hugh Chamney and Diamond Bingo Inc. (62394) Appellants [...] Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. I. G. Whitehall, Q.C., and Kimberly Prost, for the intervener the Attorney General of Canada.
-
377.
Senstad v. Makus - [1978] 2 SCR 44 - 1977-09-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
In Choma v. Chmelyk[3], which arose out of an agreement for sale of land to which the wife had not consented, Scott J. (as he then was) held that s. 3 of the Act made the agreement null and void only in so far as it affected the wife’s dower interest. [...] This amendment confirmed as law the view expressed by Scott J. in Choma.
-
378.
The Brotherhoods of Railway Employees et al. v. The New York Central Railroad Company and the Canadian Pacific Railway Company and Canadian National Railway Company - [1958] SCR 519 - 1958-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
C. F. H. Carson, Q.C., and C. Scott, Q.C., for the respondent. C. F. H. Carson, Q.C., and J. G. W. MacDougall, for Canadian National Railway Company, intervenant. [...] Solicitors for the respondent : Aylen, Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitor for Canadian National Railway Company, intervenant; J. W. G. MacDougall, Montreal.
-
379.
In re Prohibitory Liquor Laws - (1895) 24 SCR 170 - 1895-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Then, if the provinces claim also a field of legislation as to that, we say it has already been taken up with the Scott Act. [...] Except for the decision of the Judicial Committee in Russell v. The Queen[77] (the Scott Act case), much might be said to favour the view that the right of the [...] It has passed the Scott Act. It has prescribed the method by which in Canada prohibition may be secured and is not any local enactment purporting to change that method or otherwise secure the desired end, for the time being inoperative, overridden by the expression of the controlling legislative will.
-
380.
Hy and Zel's Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General); Paul Magder Furs Ltd. v. Ontario (Attorney General) - [1993] 3 SCR 675 - 1993-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Scott, Kenneth E. "Standing in the Supreme Court -‑ A Functional Analysis" (1973), 86 Harv. [...] According to Professor Scott, "it was a decision whether to decide" (K. E. Scott, "Standing in the Supreme Court ‑- A Functional Analysis" (1973), 86 Harv.
-
381.
Peter v. Beblow - [1993] 1 SCR 980 - 1993-03-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Trust
Scott, Austin Wakeman. The Law of Trusts, vol. 5, 4th ed. By Austin Wakeman Scott and William Franklin Fratcher. [...] In Scott, The Law of Trusts, vol. 5 (4th ed. 1989), at p. 304, the following definition appears:
-
382.
Amchem Products Incorporated v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) - [1993] 1 SCR 897 - 1993-03-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
International law
Prerogative writs
So it is for connecting factors in this sense that the court must first look; and these will include not only factors affecting convenience or expense (such as availability of witnesses), but also other factors such as the law governing the relevant transaction (as to which see Crédit Chimique v. James Scott Engineering [...] The law in England has evolved by reworking a passage from the reasons of Scott J. in St. Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath & Chaves), Ltd., [1936] 1 K.B. 382, which contained two conditions. [...] The same test evolved for anti-suit injunctions and stays, based on the judgment of Scott L.J. in St. Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath & Chaves), Ltd., supra.
-
383.
Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
The evidence for the defence of Jas. Scott shows that Adam built his house and barn on the lot in ‘47 or ‘48; that the crops were taken to the west half until he had his own barn built; that he had often heard Jas. Gray say the E. ½ was “our Adam’s;” that Adam did statute labor of lot. [...] Now, as to Adam’s possesion, William Gray says Adam was in possession from ‘45 to ‘60; this was before he had built on the lot, for Mr. Scott says, Adam built his house and barn in ‘47 or ‘48. [...] James Scott proves that Adam built his house and barn on the east half in 1847 or 1848—he was then married.
-
384.
Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. Wall - 2018 SCC 26 - [2018] 1 SCR 750 - 2018-05-31
Supreme Court Judgments(Vaughn Lee — Chairman and Elders James Scott Lang and Joe Gurney) and [...] Elders James Scott Lang and Joe Gurney) and Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses Appellants
-
385.
R. v. Harbottle - [1993] 3 SCR 306 - 1993-09-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
They left her and went to the Scott Mission to get a bag lunch. They then went to the clothing room and got some clothes. [...] The appellant related that while they were returning from the Scott Mission, Ross told him he was going to assault the victim sexually.
-
386.
Fraser-Reid v. Droumtsekas - [1980] 1 SCR 720 - 1979-11-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
1 All E.R. 462; Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates, Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113; Hoskins v. Woodham, [1938] 1 All E.R. 692; Croft v. Prendergast, [1949] O.R. 282; Scott-Polson v. Hope (1958), 14 D.L.R. (2d) 333; Smith v. Melançon, [1976] 4 W.W.R. 9; Schipper v. Levitt & Sons Inc., 207 A. 2d 314 (1965, S.C. of New Jersey); [...] See also, Croft v. Prendergast[6]; Scott‑Polson v. Hope[7]; and Smith v. Melançon[8].
-
387.
Bradburn v. Wentworth Arms Hotel - [1979] 1 SCR 846 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and G.G. Paliare, for the appellants. Claude Thomson, Q.C., and Gavin MacKenzie, for the respondents. [...] Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondents: Campbell, Godfrey & Lewtas, Toronto.
-
388.
Douglas v. Tucker - [1952] 1 SCR 275 - 1951-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Chambers is not open Court: Scott v. Scott 12. It is contempt of Court to publish statements of claims before the case is decided: Chesshire v. Strauss 13 and Bowden v. Russell 14.
-
389.
Wright & Carson v. Brake Service Ltd. - [1926] SCR 434 - 1926-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. Idington J:—This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Maclean, the President of the Exchequer Court, wherein the validity of a patent of invention granted under the Patent Act, R.S.C. 1906, c 69, was in question, and said learned trial judge upon the facts found by him, and his [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Ewart, Scott, Kelley and Kelley. [1] [1925] Ex. C.R. 127.
-
390.
Byers v. McMillan - (1887) 15 SCR 194 - 1887-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Re Mason and Scott ([13]). McNeely v. McWilliams ([14]). STRONG J.—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba, reversing the decision of Mr. Justice Dubuc, before whom the action was tried without a jury, and directing judgment to be entered for the plaintiffs in the action. [...] See also Evans v. Roe ([21]); Abrey v. Crux ([22]); Mason v. Scott ([23]); In this latter case it was held:—
-
391.
Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Scalera - 2000 SCC 24 - [2000] 1 SCR 551 - 2000-05-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Torts
v. Humenick, [1954] 2 D.L.R. 232; Tillander v. Gosselin (1966), 60 D.L.R. (2d) 18, aff’d (1967), 61 D.L.R. (2d) 192; Dahlberg v. Naydiuk (1969), 10 D.L.R. (3d) 319; Ellison v. Rogers (1967), 67 D.L.R. (2d) 21; Reibl v. Hughes, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880; Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 226; Scott v. Shepherd (1773), 2 Black. [...] Interference is direct if it is the immediate consequence of a force set in motion by an act of the defendant: see Scott v. Shepherd (1773), 2 Black. [...] See also Scott v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1445, at p. 1467; Wigle, supra.
-
392.
R. v. Malott - [1998] 1 SCR 123 - 1998-02-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. The judgment of Lamer C.J. and Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. was delivered by [...] Solicitor for the respondent: Scott C. Hutchison, Toronto. * Sopinka J. took no part in the judgment.
-
393.
Reference re Manitoba Language Rights - [1992] 1 SCR 212 - 1992-01-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Stephen A. Scott and Victoria Percival‑Hilton, for Alliance Quebec. The following is the judgment delivered by [...] Solicitor for Alliance Quebec: Stephen A. Scott, Montréal.
-
394.
King v. Low - [1985] 1 SCR 87 - 1985-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
James R. Scott and Teresa Bereznicki‑Korol, for the appellant. B. A. Crane, Q.C., for the respondents. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Associates, Edmonton. Solicitors for the respondents: Boyd & Tancock, Yellowknife.
-
395.
Four B Manufacturing v. United Garmet Workers - [1980] 1 SCR 1031 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Harry Freedman, for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board. [...] Solicitors for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
396.
R. v. Kundeus - [1976] 2 SCR 272 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
649; R. v. Burgess, [1970] 2 O.R. 216; Proud-man v. Dayman (1941), 67 C.L.R. 536; R. v. Prince (1875), L.R. 2 C.C.R. 154; R. v. McLeod (1954), 111 C.C.C. 106; R v. Reynhoudt (1962), 107 C.L.R. 381; R. v. Wallendorf, [1920] S.A.L.R. 383; R. v. Ladue, [1965] 4 C.C.C. 265; R. v. Scott, [1964] 2 C.C.C. 257, referred to.] [...] Such a charge is supportable under s. 24 of the Criminal Code which makes it immaterial whether it was possible or not to commit the intended offence: see 10 Halsbury, 3rd ed., p. 306; R. v. Scott[13].
-
397.
The King v. Quebec Central Ry. Co. - [1940] SCR 246 - 1939-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
Solicitors for the respondent: Ewart, Scott, Kelley, Scott & Howard.
-
398.
MacDonald v. Pier - [1923] SCR 107 - 1922-11-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Under these circumstances the plaintiff comes before this court without offering any assurance, or even alleging, that, if the case be sent back for a new trial, any evidence different from or in addition to that adduced at the original trial before Mr. Justice Scott will be forthcoming. [...] He did not even state that he was instructed that the evidence at the new trial would in any respect differ from that passed upon by Mr. Justice Scott.
-
399.
The North-West Electric C. v. Walsh - (1898) 29 SCR 33 - 1898-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
A misapprehension of the law by the Legislature does not make that the law which it has erroneously, assumed the law to be: Earl of Shrewsbury v. Scott (3) at page 53. [...] The Earl of Shrewsbury v. Scott ([42]). In the second place the by-laws and resolutions are bad because, assuming the proviso to authorize the issue of stock below par, the issue in the present case was not confirmed at any annual or special meeting of the company.
-
400.
R. v. Greffe - [1990] 1 SCR 755 - 1990-04-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Lorne W. Scott, Q.C., and Terrence Semenuk, for the appellant. B. A. MacFarlane, Q.C., and Shelagh R. Creagh, for the respondent. [...] Mr. Scott [Defence Counsel]: My Lord, I admit that statement only for the obvious purpose that that is the basis. [...] Mr. Scott: Very good, I just wanted to put that on the record. Thank you.