Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
526.
Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local 979 v. Brink's Canada - [1983] 1 SCR 382 - 1983-04-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
R.J. Scott, Q.C. and W.D. Hamilton, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
527.
Canada Security Assurance Co. v. Joynt - [1967] SCR 110 - 1966-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Insurance
R. Rees Brock and Richard J. Scott, for the defendant, appellant. James A. Griffin and Harold A. Dietrich, for the plaintiff, respondent.
-
528.
Meyer v. Capital Trust Corp. Ltd. - [1948] SCR 329 - 1948-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
W.E. Haughton K.C. and Charles F. Scott for different groups of beneficiaries, respondents.
-
529.
R. v. Schneider - 2022 SCC 34 - 2022-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Gray, 2021 QCCA 882; R. v. Foreman (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 489; R. v. Osmar, 2007 ONCA 50, 84 O.R. (3d) 321; R. v. Lo, 2020 ONCA 622, 152 O.R. (3d) 609; R. v. Scott, 2013 MBCA 7, 288 Man. R. (2d) 188; R. v. Handy, 2002 SCC 56, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; R. v. Robertson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 918; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37; R. v. [...] However, party admissions can constitute more than words; the common law has held party admissions to include, inter alia, silence, actions, and demeanour (see, e.g., R. v. Scott, 2013 MBCA 7, 288 Man. R. (2d) 188; see also Lederman, Fuerst and Stewart, at ¶¶6.470-6.512; Vauclair and Desjardins, at p. 911).
-
530.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society - 2012 SCC 45 - [2012] 2 SCR 524 - 2012-09-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Scott, Kenneth E. “Standing in the Supreme Court — A Functional Analysis” (1973), 86 Harv. [...] As Professor K. E. Scott once put it, “[t]he idle and whimsical plaintiff, a dilettante who litigates for a lark, is a specter which haunts the legal literature, not the courtroom”: “Standing in the Supreme Court — A Functional Analysis” (1973), 86 Harv.
-
531.
Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Boutiques Cliquot Ltée - 2006 SCC 23 - [2006] 1 SCR 824 - 2006-06-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Gill, Kelly, and R. Scott Jolliffe. Fox on Canadian Law of Trade-marks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed. [...] Scott Jolliffe and Kevin Sartorio, for the intervener. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
532.
Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc. - 2005 SCC 65 - [2005] 3 SCR 302 - 2005-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Intellectual property
Torts
Gill, A. Kelly, and R. Scott Jolliffe. Fox on Canadian Law of Trade-marks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed. [...] Jolliffe, R. Scott. “The Common Law Doctrine of Passing Off”, in Gordon F. Henderson, ed., Trade-Marks Law of Canada.
-
533.
Free World Trust v. Électro Santé Inc. - 2000 SCC 66 - [2000] 2 SCR 1024 - 2000-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Scott, David W. “The Record of Proceedings in the Patent Office in Canada & Foreign Countries as Evidence in Infringement & Validity Contests” (1985-86), 2 C.I.P.R. 160. [...] There is some nourishment for this proposition in commentary by other experienced practitioners (e.g., D. W. Scott, “The Record of Proceedings in the Patent Office in Canada & Foreign Countries as Evidence in Infringement & Validity Contests” (1985-86), 2 C.I.P.R. 160).
-
534.
Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli - [1992] 1 SCR 711 - 1992-03-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
Immigration
Division No. 19, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 653; Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425; R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hosenball, [1977] 3 All E.R. 452; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; Ross v. Kent Inst. [...] On the general need to protect the confidentiality of police sources, particularly in the context of drug-related cases: see R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at pp. 994-95.
-
535.
Fletcher v. Manitoba Public Insurance Co. - [1990] 3 SCR 191 - 1990-11-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Civil procedure
Insurance
Torts
I.L.R. 8319; Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Excel Cleaning Service, [1954] S.C.R. 169; Consolidated‑Bathurst Export Ltd. v. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insurance Co., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 888; Scott v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1445; Jacuzzi Canada Ltd. v. A. Mantella & Sons Ltd. (1988), 31 C.P.C. (2d) 195. [...] In Scott v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1445, La Forest J. approved of the approach to the interpretation of insurance contracts set out in Consolidated-Bathurst and stressed that the words employed should be given their ordinary meaning, "such as the average policy holder of ordinary intelligence, as
-
536.
Re Residential Tenancies Act - [1981] 1 SCR 714 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Mary Hogan, for the intervener Federation of Metro Tenants Association et al. [...] Solicitors for the Federation of Metro Tenants Association et al.: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
537.
Arnott v. College of Physicians - [1954] SCR 538 - 1954-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Dr. A. C. Scott, Victoria. Miss Margaret Martin, Librarian, Medical Centre Library. [...] Of those named, Dr. W. H. Setka, Dr. C. H. Stapleford, Dr. G. P. Peterson, Dr. D. P. Miller, Dr. F. D. Mott, Dr. C T. Wolan and Dr. A. C. Scott, are all members of the respondent College.
-
538.
Pew v. Zinck et al - [1953] 1 SCR 285 - 1953-02-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
In Adam v. Scott[39], where a sale by a mortgagee under a power of sale contained in the instrument was attacked on the ground that it had been made at an undervalue and that the mortgagor desired to redeem, Wood V.C. said that, assuming the allegations made for the plaintiff were all true, the plaintiff was bound to have [...] Kay J. referred to what had been said by Lord Cottenham in Jones v. Matthie[43] and by Vice-Chancellor Wood in Adams v. Scott[44] and said that if the mortgagee exercised the power of sale bona fide for the purpose of realizing the debt without corruption or collusion with the purchaser, the Court would not interfere even
-
539.
Ontario Bank v. McAllister - (1910) 43 SCR 338 - 1910-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
Great Eastern Railway Co.20 But Lord Watson certainly understood him to use it as equivalent to what might be derived by reasonable implication from the language of the Act to which the company owed its constitution; and Lord Selborne himself, to judge from his language in Murray v. Scott[21] could have meant nothing more. [...] Scott v. Brown, Docring, McNab & Co.[30] By section 76(2) of the present “Bank Act” (section 64 of the Act of 1890) it is enacted that
-
540.
Wheeler v. Gibbs - (1879) 3 SCR 374 - 1879-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
This notice is the first and only intimation the respondent has of the appeal—the previous steps by the appellant are ex parte; until this notice is given, as respects the respondent, as was said by Erle, C. J., in Scott v. Durant[2], "there has been no completed appeal," and it is only when so completed that "the appeal [...] Scott v. Burnham[9], cited by the appellant, does not seem to me to have any application to this case; nor does Chowdry v. Mullick[10].
-
541.
McCarron v. McGreevy - (1886) 13 SCR 378 - 1886-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Rly. Gas. ([2]); Scott v. Liverpool ([3]). Irvine Q.C. for respondent.
-
542.
Weatherall v. Canada (Attorney General) - [1993] 2 SCR 872 - 1993-08-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Solicitors for the intervener the Minority Advocacy and Rights Council: Scott & Aylen, Toronto.
-
543.
Woolaston v. Minister of Manpower and Immigration - [1973] SCR 102 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsImmigration
Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: S.F. Froomkin, Ottawa.
-
544.
Wood v. M.N.R. - [1969] SCR 330 - 1969-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
In Scott v. Minister of National Revenue[4], Judson J., after reviewing a line of cases in the Exchequer Court dealing with this problem, in some of which it was held that the taxpayer was engaged in investment, and in others in a scheme for profit-making, said at p. 225:
-
545.
McVity v. Tranouth - (1905) 36 SCR 455 - 1905-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellants cited Murray v. East India Co.[2]
-
546.
Hyde v. Lindsay - (1899) 29 SCR 595 - 1899-06-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
We are therefore of opinion that the appeal should be allowed with costs before all the courts and that this action be referred to William L. Scott, Esquire, one of the masters of the High Court of Justice of Ontario, at Ottawa, to take an account of the amount reasonably and properly paid or incurred by appellant as such
-
547.
Williams v. Leonard & Sons - (1896) 26 SCR 406 - 1896-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
In the case of Leask v. Scott[17], it was held that the endorsee of a bill of lading who took the same in satisfaction of a prior debt was a bonâ fide transferee for value.
-
548.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Customs and Excise - [1981] 2 SCR 139 - 1981-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
H. Lorne Morphy, Q.C., and Charles F. Scott, for the appellant. Eric Bowie, Q.C., and Deen C. Olsen, for the respondent.
-
549.
Lamarre v. Perrault - [1956] SCR 534 - 1956-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
The appeal was heard by Chief Justice Scott, sitting as Judge in Bankruptcy, and in the result he taxed the bill at $8,000, of which he held the claimant was entitled to be paid $1,875 by preference.
-
550.
In re Order No. 448 of Board of Railway Commissioners, Regarding Railway Freight Rates in Canada - [1930] SCR 288 - 1929-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Cuthbert Scott for the Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. Lamont J.—This is an application on behalf of the Canadian National Railways for an order extending the time for applying for leave to appeal, and for leave to appeal to this Court from the Order of the Board of Railway Commissioners for Canada, known as “General Order No.