Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
601.
Lecomte v. O'Grady - (1918) 57 SCR 563 - 1918-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W. L. Scott for the motion referred to St. John Lumber Co. v. Roy[3]; Jones v. Tucker[4].
-
602.
Toronto Railway Co. v. Fleming - (1913) 47 SCR 612 - 1913-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
In the circumstances of the case the principle laid down in Scott v. London and St. Katherine Docks Co.[4] should apply.
-
603.
Ostrom v. Sills - (1898) 28 SCR 485 - 1898-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
At one time there was an occasional accession of water from an overflow, in times of freshet, of a pond situate on the corner of Albert and Scott Streets some distance to the north and west of the corner of King and Mill Streets, but this was cut off about the year 1890, by a drain constructed by the municipality.
-
604.
Shoolbred v. Union Fire Ins. Co. - (1887) 14 SCR 624 - 1887-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
Solicitors for respondents Scott & Walmsley: Bain, Laidlaw & Co. Solicitors for respondents the creditors: Foster, Clarke & Bowes.
-
605.
Michaud v. Quebec (Attorney General) - [1996] 3 SCR 3 - 1996-09-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitor General of Canada v. Royal Commission of Inquiry (Health Records in Ontario), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 494; Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326; R. v. Wholesale Travel Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154; R. v. [...] 48 For instance, the Crown's obligation of disclosure under Stinchcombe remains subject to the "informers privilege" at common law: see Solicitor General of Canada v. Royal Commission of Inquiry (Health Records in Ontario), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 494, at pp. 535-36; Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60, at p. 93; R. v. Scott, [...] The crucial need for protecting the identity of informers was recently stressed in Scott, supra, at p. 994, per Cory J.:
-
606.
Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak - 2014 SCC 8 - [2014] 1 SCR 126 - 2014-01-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
David W. Scott, Q.C., Patricia D. S. Jackson and Crawford Smith, for the intervener the Advocates’ Society.
-
607.
Dorbern Investments v. Provincial Bank - [1981] 1 SCR 459 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
APPEAL from a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal[1], upholding the judgment of the Ontario Divisional Court reversing the decision of Scott J. Appeal dismissed.
-
608.
Hunt v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 73 - 1979-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: John E. Hall, Vancouver.
-
609.
Foundation of Canada Engineering Corp. Ltd. v. Canadian Indemnity Co. et al. - [1978] 1 SCR 84 - 1977-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
R.J. Scott and M.T. Green, for the plaintiff, appellant. G. Jewers, Q.C., and K.D. Klein, for the defendants, respondents.
-
610.
Minister of National Revenue v. Sissons - [1969] SCR 507 - 1969-03-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
cumstances takes on the character of a business, it is no longer an investment although all the mortgages are held to maturity: Scott v. Minister of National Revenue[6], Minister of National Revenue v. MacInnes[7].
-
611.
London (City) et al. v. St. Thomas (City) et al. - [1958] SCR 249 - 1958-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitor for the respondents: W. Scott McKay,St. Thomas. [1] [1957] O.R. 37, 7 D.L.R. (2d) 140 (sub nom.
-
612.
K.V.P. Co. Ltd. v. McKie et al. - [1949] SCR 698 - 1949-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsPublic utilities
C.F. Scott, contra. [1] [1928] S.C.R. 72. [2] (1916) 52 Can. S.C.R. 185.
-
613.
Lew v. Lee - [1924] SCR 612 - 1924-11-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Denison and Scott's House of Lords' Appeal Practice, 95, 199; Macqueen's House of Lords' Practice, pp. 241 et seq.
-
614.
Canadian Westing-House Co. v. Can. Pac. Ry. Co. - [1925] SCR 579 - 1924-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Solicitors for the appellant: Gibson, Levy, Scott & Inch. Solicitors for the respondent: MacMurchy & Spence.
-
615.
Abell v. The Corporation of the County of York - (1920) 61 SCR 345 - 1920-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
H.J. Scott, K.C. for the appellant. Lennox for the respondent. THE CHIEF JUSTICE:—The contest in this case is as to the right of the now appellant to maintain a raceway in connection with his mill property under the surface of a highway called Pine Street in the village of Woodbridge.
-
616.
Franco-Canadian Mortgage Co. v. Greig - (1917) 55 SCR 395 - 1917-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
DUFF J.—I concur in the opinion upon which Mr. Justice Scott and Mr. Justice Stuart proceeded, that if Cassels professing to act on behalf of the respondents (plaintiffs) did enter into an agreement with the appellants (defendants) which both parties intended to be and which in fact was an agreement to purchase the land in
-
617.
Baldocchi v. Spada - (1907) 38 SCR 577 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Sir William Scott said over a hundred years ago, in the case of The “Odin”[1].
-
618.
Turner v. Cowan et al. - (1903) 34 SCR 160 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
Solicitors for the respondents: Lemaistre & Scott. [1] 9 B. C. Rep. 301.
-
619.
Zwicker v. Zwicker - (1899) 29 SCR 527 - 1899-06-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The following cases may be selected from a greater number as controverting any such proposition: Doe d. Garnons v. Knight[18]; Exton v. Scott[19]; Fletcher v. Fletcher[20]; Xenos v. Wickham[21]; Hall v. Palmer[22]; Moore v. Hazelton[23].
-
620.
Roberts v. Hawkins - (1898) 29 SCR 218 - 1898-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
and renders them liable; Ross v. Langlois ([12]); Corner v. Byrd ([13]); Evans v. Monette ([14]); Dupont v. Quebec Steamship Co. ([15]) Great Western Railway Co. of Canada v. Braid ([16]); Scott v. The London and St. Katharine Docks Co. ([17]); Smith v. Baker & Sons ([18]); Meux v. Great Eastern Railway Co. ([19]).
-
621.
Williams v. Balfour - (1890) 18 SCR 472 - 1890-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
S. H. Blake Q. C. and Wilson for the appellants referred to Nichols v. Watson ([1]); Clarkson v. Scott ([2]); Real Estate Loan Company v. Molesworth ([3]); Gandy v. Gandy ([4]).
-
622.
A.I. Enterprises Ltd. v. Bram Enterprises Ltd. - 2014 SCC 12 - [2014] 1 SCR 177 - 2014-01-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
”, in Todd L. Archibald and Randall Scott Echlin, eds., Annual Review of Civil Litigation, 2010. [...] Richard J. Scott, Q.C., for the appellants. Charles A. LeBlond, Q.C., and Marie‑France Major, for the respondents.
-
623.
Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc. - 2011 SCC 27 - [2011] 2 SCR 387 - 2011-05-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Gill, Kelly, and R. Scott Jolliffe. Fox on Canadian Law of Trade‑marks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed. [...] Scott Miller, Sharon Griffin and Heather Gallant, for the respondent.
-
624.
R.W.D.S.U., Local 558 v. Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd. - 2002 SCC 8 - [2002] 1 SCR 156 - 2002-01-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
David Sherriff-Scott, for the intervener Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA). [...] Solicitors for the intervener Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA): Borden Elliot Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
625.
R. v. P. (M.B.) - [1994] 1 SCR 555 - 1994-04-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
[1970] 2 C.C.C. 273; Thatcher v. The Queen, [1986] 2 W.W.R. 97, aff'd on other grounds, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 652; R. v. Karens, [1986] B.C.J. No. 2165 (QL); Protection de la jeunesse ‑‑ 449, [1990] R.J.Q. 2367; R. v. Scott (1984), 79 Cr. App. R. 49; R. v. Pilcher (1974), 60 Cr. App. R. 1; R. v. Dossi (1918), 13 Cr. App. R. 158. [...] A similar approach was advanced by the English Court of Appeal in R. v. Scott (1984), 79 Cr. App. R. 49, in which the court overturned the rule laid down in R. v. Pilcher (1974), 60 Cr. App. R. 1, and concluded that the reopening will depend on the discretion of the trial judge and what could reasonably have been foreseen