Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
701.
Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. Diplock - (1916) 53 SCR 376 - 1916-05-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
. It is the law involved in the well known squib case Scott v. Shepherd[10], that should be our guide herein subject to the qualifications to be found as the result of later development of the law resting upon the principle laid down in that case.
-
702.
Shawinigan Hydro-Electric Co. v. Shawinigan Water and Power Co. - (1910) 43 SCR 650 - 1910-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Coté v. The James Richardson Co.[29], at page 49; Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son[30].
-
703.
Pearson v. Carpenter - (1904) 35 SCR 380 - 1904-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
I adopt the language of Lord Justice Lindley in Scott v. Brown[13] at p. 728.
-
704.
Miller v. Robertson - (1904) 35 SCR 80 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
The rule stated by Page-Wood, V. C., in Talbot v. Hope Scott[19] is that the court cannot interfere with a legal title of any description unless there be some equity by which it can affect the conscience of the defendant.
-
705.
Brigham v. Banque Jacques-Cartier - (1900) 30 SCR 429 - 1900-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Cokshott v Bennett ([25]) Jackson v. Lomas ([26]); Eastabrook v. Scott ([27]); Jackman v. Mitchell ([28]); Mare v. Sandford ([29]).
-
706.
Trent Valley Woollen Manufacturing Co. v. Oelrichs & Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 682 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
The additional authorities referred to by the respondents, Bartlett v. Pentland[10]; Pearson v. Scott[11]; Bayliffe v. Butterworth[12]; Pollock v. Stables[13]; Greaves v. Legg[14]; Addison on Contracts[15]; are all to the same effect.
-
707.
McLean v. Garland - (1885) 13 SCR 366 - 1885-06-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Solicitors for Respondent: Walker and Scott. [1] 10 Ont. App. R. 405.
-
708.
McCrae v. White - (1883) 9 SCR 22 - 1883-06-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
[2] 3 Scott, 236. [3] Ex. p. Witham Re Berry, 22 Ch. D. 292. [4] 15 Grant 283.
-
709.
R. v. Terry - [1996] 2 SCR 207 - 1996-05-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Evidence
Robert Scott Terry Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
-
710.
R. v. K. (B.) - [1995] 4 SCR 186 - 1995-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
R. Peter MacKinnon, Q.C., and E. Scott Hopley, for the appellant. Graeme G. Mitchell and Sandra Folkins, for the respondent.
-
711.
R. v. Lachance - [1990] 2 SCR 1490 - 1990-11-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Jeff Casey and Scott Hutchison, for the respondent. //Sopinka J.//
-
712.
Cardinal et al. v. The Queen - [1982] 1 SCR 508 - 1982-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Statutes
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Alain Dubuc, for the intervener Federation of Saskatchewan Indians.
-
713.
Welbridge Holdings Ltd. v. Greater Winnipeg - [1971] SCR 957 - 1970-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
A. S. Dewar, Q.C., and R. J. Scott, for the defendant, respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
714.
Miller v. Decker - [1957] SCR 624 - 1957-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
They seem to have very little recollection as to what happened there but on returning Decker drove along Scott Road at 75 to 80 miles per hour passing other traffic until a railway crossing was reached.
-
715.
Orpen v. Roberts - [1925] SCR 364 - 1925-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellant. Robertson K.C. and Barlow for the respondent Roberts.
-
716.
Wolfe v. The King / Powers v. The King - (1921) 63 SCR 141 - 1921-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
See Scott v. London and St. Katherine Dock Co.[2]. McLean v. Rhodes Curry & Co.[3].
-
717.
Samuel v. Black Lake Asbestos and Chrome Co. - (1921) 62 SCR 472 - 1921-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
H.J. Scott K.C. and R.S. Cassels K.C. for the respondents referred to British Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Underground Electric Railways Co.[4]
-
718.
Re Great Northern Construction Co. / Ross v. Ross - (1916) 53 SCR 128 - 1916-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
G. G. Stuart K.C. for the motion, cited Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. The Department of Agriculture of Ontario[3] ; Coté v. The James Richardson Co.[4]; Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son[5].
-
719.
Dodge v. The King - (1906) 38 SCR 149 - 1906-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
“G”—Scott or Saml. Chipman (Nov.27th, 1902) 1 20.00 “H”—Fanning lot (Dec. 30th, 1902)
-
720.
North British Canadian Investment Co. v. School Trustees of St. John District, No. 16, N.W.T. - (1904) 35 SCR 461 - 1904-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
We rely upon the authorities cited by the judges of the court below on the reference and the remarks of Mr. Justice Scott In re Kerr ([11]).
-
721.
Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Scott v. Bould[24] . The provisions of this law were not complied with.
-
722.
Hanson et al. v. Village of Grand'mère - (1902) 33 SCR 50 - 1902-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
See also Stokes v. County of Scott ([19]). But is the language of section 27 of the Quebec statute really ambiguous ?
-
723.
The Queen v. S.S. "Troop" - (1899) 29 SCR 662 - 1899-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
We refer also to Hespeler v. Shaw[12]; In re Trepanier[13]; The Queen v. Ambrose and Winslow[14]; The Queen v. Coulson[15]; The Queen v. Scott[16]; and Royal Insurance Co. v. Duffus[17].
-
724.
The Queen v. Woodburn - (1898) 29 SCR 112 - 1898-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Glengarry Election Case[10]; Re Oliver & Scott's Arbitration[11]. Hon. Charles Fitzpatrick Q.C. (Solicitor General of Canada), and Newcombe Q.C (Deputy of the Minister of Justice), contra.
-
725.
Murray v. Jenkins - (1898) 28 SCR 565 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
The statute of frauds cannot be relied upon by the appellant, as it has not been pleaded; Filby v. Hounsell[11], and cases there cited; Commins v. Scott[12], at page 16.