Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
726.
MacKenzie v. Building & Loan Association - (1898) 28 SCR 407 - 1898-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Scott Q.C. and Allan Cassels for the respondents. McKenzie acquired the fee as assignee of the equity of redemption and thus enlarged the estate for the benefit of the mortgagee.
-
727.
Clarkson v. Ryan - (1890) 17 SCR 251 - 1890-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Aylesworth for the respondent cited Allan v. The Great Western Railway Co.[6]; Scott v. The Great Western Railway Co.[7]
-
728.
Western Assurance Co. v. Doull - (1886) 12 SCR 446 - 1886-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Billington v. Provincial Ins. Co.[1]; Scott v. McGrath[2]. Greer had no authority to settle this loss, and therefore the waiver amounts to nothing.
-
729.
Jones v. Tuck - (1884) 11 SCR 197 - 1884-06-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
Thomas R. Jones, Robert T. A. Scott, and Norman Robertson (Plaintiffs)
-
730.
Rickaby v. Bell - (1878) 2 SCR 560 - 1878-06-04
Supreme Court Judgments[7] 7 Scott N. C. 730. [8] 4 L. T. N. S. 9.
-
731.
Ontario (Attorney General) v. G - 2020 SCC 38 - [2020] 3 SCR 629 - 2020-11-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; Reference re Anti‐Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373; Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 4, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 13; Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417; R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933; Ferguson v. Regional Mental Health Care St. Thomas, 2010 ONCA 810, 271 O.A.C. 104; Kassa (Re), 2019 [...] As was said by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline more than a century ago, “[t]o remit the maintenance of constitutional right to the region of judicial discretion is to shift the foundations of freedom from the rock to the sand” (Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417 (H.L.), at p. 477).
-
732.
R. v. Brunelle - 2024 SCC 3 - 2024-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
1 S.C.R. 128; R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; R.L. Crain Inc. v. Couture (1983), 6 D.L.R. (4th) 478; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 1101; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659; R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28; R. [...] In fact, breaches of the fairness of an accused’s trial are often inseparable from and in addition to prejudice to the integrity of the justice system (O’Connor, at para. 64; see also R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at p. 1007).
-
733.
R. v. Power - [1994] 1 SCR 601 - 1994-04-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Criminal law
(2d) 410; R. v. Young (1984), 40 C.R. (3d) 289; R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657; R. v. Mack, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; Vézeau v. The Queen, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 277; R. v. Banas and Haverkamp (1982), 65 C.C.C. (2d) 224; R. v. [...] This was reiterated in R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, per Cory J. See also R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880.
-
734.
R. v. L. (D.O.) - [1993] 4 SCR 419 - 1993-11-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the intervener the Attorney General for Ontario. [...] Helper J.A. (Scott C.J.M. concurring) Helper J.A. noted the impossibility of enumerating an exhaustive list of the principles of fundamental justice and the importance of maintaining a balance between the accommodation of changing values and the protection of the rights of accused persons.
-
735.
Sport Maska Inc. v. Zittrer - [1988] 1 SCR 564 - 1988-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
21 K.B. 471; Zodiak International Productions Inc. v. Polish People's Republic, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 529; Collins v. Collins (1858), 26 Beav. 306, 53 E.R. 916; Scott v. Corporation of Liverpool (1858), 3 De G. & J. 334, 44 E.R. 1297; Bos v. Helsham (1866), L.R. 2 Ex. 72; Re Hopper (1867), L.R. 2 Q.B. 367; Re [...] 51. This criterion was also used in the following cases: Scott v. Corporation of Liverpool (1858), 3 De G. & J. 334, 44 E.R. 1297 (Chelmsford L.C., at p. 1310); Bos v. Helsham (1866), L.R. 2 Ex. 72 (Kelly C.B., at pp. 78‑79); Re Hopper (1867), L.R. 2 Q.B. 367 (Cockburn C.J., at pp. 372‑73, and Blackburn J., at pp.
-
736.
R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd. - [1986] 2 SCR 713 - 1986-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Reinhold Endres and Alison Scott, for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia. [...] Can you confirm that, Mr. Scott? MR. SCOTT [Defence Counsel]: Well, I can confirm that the owners may be.
-
737.
R. v. Braich - 2002 SCC 27 - [2002] 1 SCR 903 - 2002-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
W. J. Scott Bell, for the appellant. Richard C. C. Peck, Q.C., and Nikos Harris, for the respondent Ajmer Braich.
-
738.
Ref. re Remuneration of Judges of Prov. Court of PEI; Ref. re Independence & Impartiality of Judges of Prov. Court of PEI; R. v. Campbell; R. v. Ekmecic; R. v. Wickman; Manitoba Prov. Judges Assn. v. Manitoba (Min. of Justice) - [1998] 1 SCR 3 - 1998-02-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
D. O. Sabey, Q.C., and Scott H. D. Bower, for the intervener the Alberta Provincial Judges’ Association.
-
739.
R. v. Jobin - [1995] 2 SCR 78 - 1995-04-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
Criminal law
Michal Fairburn and Scott Hutchison, for the intervener the Attorney General for Ontario.
-
740.
Costello and Dickhoff v. City of Calgary - [1983] 1 SCR 14 - 1983-01-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Solicitor for the respondent: B.E. Scott, Calgary.
-
741.
Nash v. Nash - [1975] 2 SCR 507 - 1974-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent: Hughes, Laishley, Mullen, Touhey & Sigouin, Ottawa.
-
742.
Minister of National Revenue v. Consolidated Holding Co. - [1974] SCR 419 - 1971-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the respondent: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.
-
743.
Phillips et al. v. Samilo et al. - [1972] SCR 201 - 1971-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Solicitors for the defendants, appellants, Victoria Phillips and Kenneth Meredith: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.
-
744.
British Columbia Electric Railway Company Limited v. The Minister of National Revenue - [1958] SCR 133 - 1958-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
As the quotation shows, this was not intended as an exhaustive definition, as pointed out by Scott L.J. in Bean v. Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries, Ltd.7, but as a useful guide.
-
745.
Francis v. The Queen - [1956] SCR 618 - 1956-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
A peace treaty in its primary and legitimate meaning is a treaty concluding a war, "an agreement"—in the words of Sir William Scott in the Eliza Ann and others 7—"to waive all discussion concerning the respective rights to the parties and to bury in oblivion all the original causes of the war."
-
746.
Rathie v. Montreal Trust Co. - [1953] 2 SCR 204 - 1953-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
M. M. Grosman, Q.C. and C. F. Scott for appellant. A. S. Gregory for the respondents.
-
747.
Bonnie v. Aero Tool Works Ltd. - [1952] 1 SCR 495 - 1952-02-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
& Scott (Southgate) Ltd. v. Oxlade[14]; Bennett, Walden & Co. v. Wood[15]; Spottiswoode v. Doreen Appliances Ltd.[16]; McLean v. Ellio[17]; Chambers v. Smart[18]; Gladstone v. Catena[19].
-
748.
Knight Sugar Co. v. Webster - [1930] SCR 518 - 1930-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
(Re Scott and Alvarez's Contract (1)). Appeal allowed with costs. [1] (1929) 24 Alta.
-
749.
The Custodian v. Passavant - [1928] SCR 242 - 1928-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil law
transaction where there were not mutual accounts.” Story on Equity, 3rd Ed., pp. 33, 40, 191; Scott v. Surman[7]; and there are many later authorities.
-
750.
Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
But there are, no doubt, other authorities in which the contrary has been held, e.g., Scott v. Key[16]; Woods v. Woods[17]; Longmore v. Elcum[18].