Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
851.
Beatty v. Neelon - (1886) 13 SCR 1 - 1886-11-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
Kelner v. Baxter[3]; Scott v. Lord Ebury[4]; Willmott v. Barber[5]. If the company should sue the action would be because they had not received property worth $9,500, and the shareholders guilty of the deceit would participate in the benefits of the action.
-
852.
R. v. Stone - [1999] 2 SCR 290 - 1999-05-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Criminal law
LaFave, Wayne R. and Austin W. Scott. Substantive Criminal Law, vol. 1. [...] L.C., at p. 406, per Lord Denning, at p. 413, and per Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest, at p. 416, and see Halsbury’s Laws of England (4th ed. 1990), vol. 11(1), at para. 6; the United States: see State v. Hinkle, 489 S.E.2d 257 (W. Va. 1996), and see W. LaFave and A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law (1986), vol. 1, at p. 545: [...] Solicitors for Bert Thomas Stone: Singleton Urquhart Scott, Vancouver.
-
853.
R. v. Jarvis - 2019 SCC 10 - [2019] 1 SCR 488 - 2019-02-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
LaFave, Wayne R. and Austin W. Scott, Jr. Substantive Criminal Law, vol. 1, 2nd ed. [...] The broad aim of criminal law is to prevent harm to society: W. R. LaFave and A. W. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law (2nd ed. 1986), vol. 1, at p. 17; A. W. Mewett and M. Manning, Mewett & Manning on Criminal Law (2nd ed. 1985), at p. 14, cited with approval in R. v. Chartrand, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 864, at p. 881.
-
854.
Plourde v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp. - 2009 SCC 54 - [2009] 3 SCR 465 - 2009-11-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Caya v. 1641‑9749 Québec Inc., D.T.E. 85T‑242, SOQUIJ AZ‑85147051; Bérubé v. Groupe Samson Inc., D.T.E. 85T‑932, SOQUIJ AZ‑85147126; Ouellette v. Restaurants Scott Québec Ltée, D.T.E. 88T‑546, SOQUIJ AZ‑88147062; Entreprises Bérou inc. v. Arsenault, [1991] T.T. 312; Silva v. Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal [...] The decision of Judge Lesage has been followed consistently in Quebec in workplace closure situations (see, e.g., Caya v. 1641‑9749 Québec Inc., D.T.E. 85T‑242, SOQUIJ AZ-85147051 (Lab. Ct.); Bérubé v. Groupe Samson Inc., D.T.E. 85T-932, SOQUIJ AZ-85147126 (Lab. Ct.); Ouellette v. Restaurants Scott Québec Ltée, D.T.E.
-
855.
Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Lukács - 2018 SCC 2 - [2018] 1 SCR 6 - 2018-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAPPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal (Webb, Scott and de Montigny JJ.A.), 2016 FCA 220, 408 D.L.R. (4th) 760, [2016] F.C.J. No. 971 (QL), 2016 CarswellNat 4268 (WL Can.), setting aside a decision of the Canadian Transportation Agency, No. 425‑C‑A‑2014, November 25, 2014, dismissing a complaint for
-
856.
Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc. - 2017 SCC 41 - [2017] 1 SCR 1099 - 2017-07-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
David C. Nahwegahbow and Scott Robertson, for the appellant. Douglas E. Crowther, Q.C., Joshua A. Jantzi and Aaron Stephenson, for the respondent Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
-
857.
Nelson (City) v. Mowatt - 2017 SCC 8 - [2017] 1 SCR 138 - 2017-02-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsRyan D. W. Dalziel, A. Scott McW. Boucher and Daniel R. Bennett, Q.C., for the appellant.
-
858.
R. v. Tessling - 2004 SCC 67 - [2004] 3 SCR 432 - 2004-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the intervener the Attorney General of Ontario.
-
859.
Committee for the Equal Treatment of Asbestos Minority Shareholders v. Ontario (Securities Commission) - 2001 SCC 37 - [2001] 2 SCR 132 - 2001-06-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Securities
David W. Scott, Q.C., Barry H. Bresner and Ira Nishisato, for the appellant.
-
860.
R. v. Shropshire - [1995] 4 SCR 227 - 1995-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
C.A.); R. v. Mitchell (1987), 39 C.C.C. (3d) 141 (N.S.C.A.); R. v. Young (1993), 78 C.C.C. (3d) 538 (N.S.C.A.); R. v. Able (1993), 65 O.A.C. 37 (C.A.); R. v. Ly (1992), 72 C.C.C. (3d) 57 (Man. C.A.), per Twaddle J.A. (Scott C.J.M. concurring), at p. 61: "Parliament's purpose in adding a minimum period of parole
-
861.
Attorney General of British Columbia v. Canada Trust Co. et al. - [1980] 2 SCR 466 - 1980-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Professor Frank Scott noted in (1934), 12 Can. Bar. Rev. 303, at p. 305, that this restating of the ratio decidendi in the Fairbanks case amounted to a virtual overruling and commented: “Henceforth it appears that the question of what the tax was universally considered to be in 1867 is irrelevant.” In Atlantic Smoke Shops
-
862.
Eady v. Tenderenda - [1975] 2 SCR 599 - 1974-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
The rule is conveniently and authoritatively stated in the judgment of Erle C.J., in Scott v. London & St. Katherine Docks Co. (1865) 3 H. & C. 596 at 601, 159 E.R. 665, where it is said:
-
863.
R. v. Burnshine - [1975] 1 SCR 693 - 1974-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
“Equality before the law” in this sense is frequently invoked to demonstrate that the same law applies to the highest official of Government as to any other ordinary citizen, and in this regard Professor F.R. Scott, in delivering the Plaunt Memorial Lectures on Civil Liberties and Canadian Federalism in 1959, speaking of
-
864.
McKay et al. v. The Queen - [1965] SCR 798 - 1965-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin, McCallum & Scott, Toronto.
-
865.
John M.M. Troup Ltd. et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1962] SCR 487 - 1962-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Priorities and hypothecs
Among the authorities on which the appellants rely in support of this argument are the case of Minneapolis‑Honeywell Regulator Co. Ltd. v. Empire Brass Mfg. Co. Ltd.[8], and the following passage in Scott on Trusts, 2nd ed., vol. 3, pp. 2231 and 2232:
-
866.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Therien - [1960] SCR 265 - 1960-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
JJ.A. Both of these learned judges expressed the view that such a union was by virtue of these statutes of the province an entity distinct from its members or, as expressed by Robertson J.A., adopting what had been said by Scott L.J. in National Union of General and Municipal Workers v. Gillian[9], a perona juridica.
-
867.
The Municipality of the City and County of Saint-John et al. v. Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation et al. - [1958] SCR 263 - 1958-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Taxation
Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation, Terminal Construction Company, Limited and J. A. Jones Construction Company, doing business under the name and style of Fraser-Brace-Terminal Constructors; and Johnson, Drake & Piper International Corporation, and Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corporation, doing business under the name
-
868.
Niles et al. v. Lake - [1947] SCR 291 - 1947-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
In Russell v. Scott[8], it was held that there was a presumption of a resulting trust in favour of an aunt who had opened a joint account with her nephew but, at the death of the aunt, the nephew was allowed to claim the balance of the account, because it was found that the presumption of any resulting trust in favour of
-
869.
Lister v. McAnulty - [1944] SCR 317 - 1944-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Solicitors for the respondent: MacDougall, McFarlane, Scott & Hugessen.
-
870.
Lewis v. Nisbet & Auld Ltd. - [1934] SCR 333 - 1934-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
We were referred to British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott[20], Wood v. Can. Pac. Ry. Co.[21], and other cases in this court and in Ontario in support of the proposition which it was contended was laid down in Walsh v. Whiteley[22], but all these cases will be found, in so far as they concern the question of injuries caused by
-
871.
Gordon v. Hebblewhite - [1927] SCR 29 - 1927-01-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by
-
872.
The Town of Cobalt v. The Temiskaming Telephone Company - (1919) 59 SCR 62 - 1919-06-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. IDINGTON J.—The question raised herein is whether or not respondent, which is a telephone company incorporated under and by virtue of the Ontario “Companies Act,” has, under the circumstances I am about to refer to, the right to maintain on the public highways of appellant, which is a
-
873.
Stone v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1913) 47 SCR 634 - 1913-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Co. v. McDougall[4]; Marney v. Scott[5]; and the jury have found that such duty was not observed in this case.
-
874.
The City of Vancouver v. The Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 1 - 1894-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
See Hardcastle on Statutes[9]; The Queen v. Scott[10]; The Queen v. Morris[11]; Galloway v. Mayor of London[12].
-
875.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Vogel - (1886) 11 SCR 612 - 1886-03-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
The Dominion Act 34 Vic. cap. 43 sec. 5, was passed with the obvious intention of restricting the power of railway companies contracting themselves free from liability for loss however caused, which act the Ontario courts in Scott v. Great Western Ry.[18] and Allan v. Great Western Ry.[19] decided did not apply to railways