Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
301.
Duke v. Andler - [1932] SCR 734 - 1932-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
(Sgd.) JOHN J. ALLEN, Judge. The defendants refused to execute a conveyance, as ordered by this judgment, and a conveyance was executed in their name by George E. Gross, County Clerk and Commissioner of the Superior Court, pursuant to the terms of the judgment.
-
302.
Thompson v. Fraser Companies Ltd. - [1930] SCR 109 - 1929-06-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
entrance of Scoodewabscook Creek or River to the Westward, the said Cedar being the Upper or Northwesterly boundary of a Tract of Land granted to Colonel Isaac Allen and Associates, thence running (by the magnetic needle) South forty-five degrees West, One hundred and fifty-two Chains (of four Poles each) or until it meets
-
303.
Victoria-Montreal Fire Insurance Co. v. Home Insurance Co. Of New York - (1904) 35 SCR 208 - 1904-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
J. E. Martin K.C. and Howard for the appellants, referred to Prevost v. The Scottish Union and National; Ins. Co. ([1]) and cases there cited; Cornell v. The Liverpool and London Fire and Life Ins. Co. ([2]); Allen v. The Merchants Marine Ins. Co. ([3]); Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. v. The Agricultural Savings
-
304.
Renaud v. Lamothe - (1902) 32 SCR 357 - 1902-05-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Marsden ([13]); Allen v Jackson ([14]) ; Sutton v. Jewks ([15]) ; Stackpole v. Beaumont ([16]).
-
305.
Town of Portland v. Griffiths - (1885) 11 SCR 333 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Chief Justice Allen was of opinion that if plaintiff was entitled to recover the damages were excessive, and I agree with him.
-
306.
Queddy River Driving Boom Co. v. Davidson - (1883) 10 SCR 222 - 1883-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsSolicitors for respondent: Allen Chandler. [1] 45 Vic., ch. 100, N.B.
-
307.
R. v. R.V. - 2019 SCC 41 - [2019] 3 SCR 237 - 2019-07-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Greg J. Allen and Jorie Les, for the intervener the Ending Violence Association of Canada. [...] Solicitors for the intervener the Ending Violence Association of Canada: Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel, Vancouver.
-
308.
R. v. Robinson - [1996] 1 SCR 683 - 1996-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
& P.E.I.R. 13; R. v. Allen (1994), 120 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 188; R. v. Neaves (1992), 75 C.C.C. (3d) 201; R. v. Korzepa (1991), 64 C.C.C. (3d) 489; R. v. Cormier (1993), 86 C.C.C. (3d) 163; R. v. Larose (1993), 25 B.C.A.C. 264; R. v. Smoke, [1993] A.J. No. 758 (QL); R. v. Laisa, [1993] N.W.T.R. 199, leave to appeal [...] & P.E.I.R. 13 (C.A.), R. v. Allen (1994), 120 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 188 (C.A.), at p. 197); and Nova Scotia (R. v. Neaves (1992), 75 C.C.C. (3d) 201 (C.A.)).
-
309.
Sport Maska Inc. v. Zittrer - [1988] 1 SCR 564 - 1988-03-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
Pappa v. Rose (1871), L.R. 7 C.P. 32; Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Co. v. Loftus (1872), L.R. 8 C.P. 1; Stevenson v. Watson (1879), 4 C.P.D. 148; Finnegan v. Allen, [1943] 1 K.B. 425; Re Krofchick and Provincial Insurance Co. (1978), 21 O.R. (2d) 805; Pfeil v. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Co. (1986), 19 C.C.L.I. [...] 55. The Court of Appeal applied the same principle in Finnegan v. Allen, [1943] 1 K.B. 425, in deciding the status of an accountant who was required to set the value of certain shares.
-
310.
McSorley v. The Mayor, &c., of St. John - (1882) 6 SCR 531 - 1882-03-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
[16] 1 Allen's R. (Mass.) 101. [17] 16 Gray 297. [18] Sec. 165. [19] Sec. 464. [...] [35] 6 Allen N. B. R. 162.
-
311.
Heustis v. N.B. Elect. Power Commiss. - [1979] 2 SCR 768 - 1979-05-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Solicitors for the appellant: Hoyt, Mockler, Allen & Dixon, Fredericton.
-
312.
Highway Properties Ltd. v. Kelly, Douglas and Co. Ltd. - [1971] SCR 562 - 1971-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
# 1403. One of the terms of the lease in Bel-Boys Buildings Ltd. v. Clark[5] was in the nature of such a covenant applicable to a guarantor, and the dissenting judgment of Allen J.A. of the Alberta Appellate Division recognized the enforceability of the guarantee notwithstanding the termination of the obligation to pay
-
313.
Sukloff v. A.H. Rushforth & Co. - [1964] SCR 459 - 1964-04-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Solicitors for the plaintiff, appellant: Allen, Hunter, Campbell & Regan, Toronto.
-
314.
In Re Gage - [1962] SCR 241 - 1962-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Solicitors for the appellants: Hume, Martin & Allen, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondents, Irene G. Griffith, Dianna Gage Tisdall, Gloria Gage Prusac, Carmen Irene Anglin and W. Gage Griffith: Wegenast & Hyndman, Toronto.
-
315.
Sommers and Gray v. The Queen - [1959] SCR 678 - 1959-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The case of The Queen v. Allen[9] shows that the interpretation contended for by the appellants does not obtain in cases where, as in the present. it would, in the result, leave untouched a portion of the mischief aimed at by the enactment.
-
316.
Provincial Treasurer of Manitoba v. Bennett - [1937] SCR 138 - 1937-02-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Solicitor for the appellant: John Allen. Solicitors for the respondents: Sweatman, Fillmore, Riley & Watson.
-
317.
Wu v. The King - [1934] SCR 609 - 1934-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The same principle was laid down in Rex v. Howlett[6]: In that case the prisoner was indicted for wounding John Allen, with a tin can, with intent to murder him.
-
318.
Canadian National Ry. Co. v. Saint John Motor Line Ltd. - [1930] SCR 482 - 1930-05-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Solicitor for the appellant: Thomas J. Allen. Solicitor for the respondent: Hugh H. McLean.
-
319.
Henderson v. Fraser - [1923] SCR 23 - 1922-11-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
In re A. F. Bryan[1] ; Russel v. Dickson[2] ; Hooley v. Hatton[3] ; Moggridge v. Thackwell[4] ; Allen v. Callow[5] ; Barclay v. Wainwright[6] ; Bell v. Park[7].
-
320.
Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
According to many authorities language such as that used by the testator does not create a complete trust in the strict sense; Bond v. Dickinson[11]; Lambe v. Eames10; Mackett v. Mackett[12]; Allen v. Furness[13]; Re Shortreed[14]; Atkinson v. Atkinson[15].
-
321.
Sievert v. Brookfield - (1905) 35 SCR 494 - 1905-01-31
Supreme Court Judgments[59] 10 Allen (Mass.) 368. [60] 10 M. & W. 546. [61] [1891] 1 Q. B. 730.
-
322.
Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Hilliker[10]; Allen v. Merchants Marine Ins. Co.[11]. The policy is void under the Act. McFarlane v. Royal London Friendly Society[12]; Evans v. Bignold[13].
-
323.
D'Amato v. Badger - [1996] 2 SCR 1071 - 1996-08-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Linden, Allen M. Canadian Tort Law, 5th ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1993.
-
324.
Rilling v. The Queen - [1976] 2 SCR 183 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen J.A., in his reasons for judgment for the Appellate Division, stated that he did not think it fair to assume that members of the public who were not showing visible signs of impairment would be harassed.
-
325.
Parkland (County of) v. Stetar et al. - [1975] 2 SCR 884 - 1974-10-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Transportation
The majority in the Appellate Division (Allen and Sinclair JJ.A.) held: (a) that Stetar was 75 per cent at fault and the County of Parkland 25 per cent at fault; (b) that the Stetars and the Woodrows were entitled to recover from the county 25 per cent of any damages awarded to them; (c) as the action of the Poiriers and