Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
426.
Canada (Attorney general) v. Public service alliance of canada - [1993] 1 SCR 941 - 1993-03-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Labour law
Solicitors for the respondent: Raven, Jewitt & Allen, Ottawa.
-
427.
Gagnon et al. v. Foundation Maritime Ltd. - [1961] SCR 435 - 1961-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
It is no more than Allen v. Flood14 over again with the added element of a statute which prevented a justification of the conduct complained of.
-
428.
Midcon Oil & Gas Limited v. New British Dominion Oil Company Limited and Thomas L. Brook - [1958] SCR 314 - 1958-02-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Trust
Solicitors for the defendant, respondent: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews & Wood, Calgary.
-
429.
Duchaine v. Matamajaw Salmon Club - (1919) 58 SCR 223 - 1919-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsFishery
[14] 12 Allen (Mass.) 459, at p. 461. [15] 5 Bing. N.C. 694.
-
430.
Brunet v. The King - (1918) 57 SCR 83 - 1918-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen C.J., with whom Weldon and Fraser JJ. concurred, said at 164: I think the word "absence" in this section does not necessarily mean actual absence from the place or room where the trial is held; but would apply to a case where the justices had, for some cause, become incapable of sitting and taking part in the
-
431.
Bergklint v. Western Canada Power Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 39 - 1914-06-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
But this passage was construed in Allen v. The New Gas Company[15] (by the Court of Exchequer, Bramwell, Amphlett and Huddleston, BB., at p. 256), as laying down the rule that the owner must provide all that is necessary
-
432.
Williams v. Raleigh (Township) - (1892) 21 SCR 103 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
[10] 3 Allen (Mass.) 408. [11] 32 U.C.Q.B. 332. [12] 19 U.C.Q.B. 473.
-
433.
Ray v. The Annual Conference of New Brunswick - (1881) 6 SCR 308 - 1881-04-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Quant à l'interprétation du mot "surplus" comme n'étant pas suffisant dans le cas actuel pour transmettre les propriétés immobilières, j'adopte le raisonnement de l'honorable juge en chef Allen, établissant bien clairement, suivant moi, que la disposition est tout à fait insuffisante pour produire cet effet.
-
434.
R. v. Calnen - 2019 SCC 6 - [2019] 1 SCR 301 - 2019-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; R. v. White, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72; R. v. Smith, 2016 ONCA 25, 333 C.C.C. (3d) 534; R. v. Allen, 2009 ABCA 341, 324 D.L.R. (4th) 580; R. v. Arcangioli, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 129; R. v. Jackson, 2016 ONCA 736, 33 C.R. (7th) 130; R. v. Angelis, 2013 ONCA 70, 296 [...] That there may be a range of potential inferences does not render the after-the-fact conduct null: see R. v. Allen, 2009 ABCA 341, 324 D.L.R. (4th) 580, at para. 68.
-
435.
Blencoe v. British Columbia (Human Rights Commission) - 2000 SCC 44 - [2000] 2 SCR 307 - 2000-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
1199; R. v. Jewitt, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 128; R. v. Power, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 601; R. v. Young (1984), 40 C.R. (3d) 289; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659; Allen v. Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons, Ltd., [1968] 1 All E.R. 543; R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771. [...] 132 As expressed by Salmon L.J. in Allen v. Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons, Ltd., [1968] 1 All E.R. 543 (C.A.), at p. 561, “it should not be too difficult to recognise inordinate delay when it occurs”.
-
436.
R. v. Mabior - 2012 SCC 47 - [2012] 2 SCR 584 - 2012-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane, 2010. Boily, Marie‑Claude, et al.
-
437.
R. v. Buhay - 2003 SCC 30 - [2003] 1 SCR 631 - 2003-06-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Mervyn Allen Buhay Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
-
438.
Dukart v. Corporation of the District of Surrey - [1978] 2 SCR 1039 - 1978-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
It is at least helpful in appreciating the nature and effect of a notice on title originating either under ss. 149 or 209 to consider the remarks of Allen J.A. in Re Zeller’s Limited, supra, (at p. 26):
-
439.
Hebert v. The Queen - [1955] SCR 120 - 1954-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
This case is quite distinguishable from Allen v. The King 14, where counsel for the Crown sought, through cross-examination, to place in evidence that given by a witness at the preliminary who was not called at the trial.
-
440.
The King v. Dominion Building Corp. Ltd. - [1935] SCR 338 - 1935-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
On September 30, 1925, Forgie wrote the Deputy Minister of Railways and Canals that he had agreed with J. Allen Ross, President of Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company Limited, to assign to him the property and the benefits of the lease and asked for changes in the lease as requested by Ross.
-
441.
The Security Export Co. v. Hetherington - [1923] SCR 539 - 1923-12-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsPrerogative writs
This test was adopted by Allen C.J. in The Queen v. Simpson[5] at page 474.
-
442.
The "A.L. Smith" and "Chinook" v. Ontario Gravel Freighting Co. - (1915) 51 SCR 39 - 1915-02-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Captain Allen, of the “Smith,” explains that the steering apparatus of the “Chinook”
-
443.
Weidman v. Shragge - (1912) 46 SCR 1 - 1912-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The doctrine of Allen v. Flood[14] might also help in conceivable circumstances to lend an appearance of legality to that which would thwart the operation of this Act and in such cases may have to be discarded.
-
444.
Maddison v. Emmerson - (1904) 34 SCR 533 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Allen J. delivered the judgment of the court After stating the facts of the case, and the plaintiff's contention. that the Crown could not make a grant without office found, he proceeded as follows:
-
445.
Gosselin v. The King - (1903) 33 SCR 255 - 1903-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
And, in Barbat v. Allen ([2]), Pollock C. B. says : I must at the same time state that the history of a clause in a statute is certainly no ground for its interpretation in a court of law and I would guard myself against being considered as resorting to any such means.
-
446.
Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v. J.J. - 2018 SCC 19 - [2018] 1 SCR 587 - 2018-05-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsLinden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 10th ed.
-
447.
Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada - 2003 SCC 45 - [2003] 2 SCR 259 - 2003-09-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Price, Allen Chickite and Lloyd Chickite, suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Wewaikai Indian Band
-
448.
B.C.G.E.U. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) - [1988] 2 SCR 214 - 1988-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
Jowitt, William Allen, 1st Earl. Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law, 2nd ed., vol. 1.
-
449.
Towne Cinema Theatres Ltd. v. The Queen - [1985] 1 SCR 494 - 1985-05-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
Michael G. Allen, for the respondent. The reasons of Dickson C.J. and Lamer and Le Dain JJ. were delivered by
-
450.
John v. R. - [1971] SCR 781 - 1970-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The proper application of that paragraph of the Code had been determined in this Court in a series of cases from Allen v. The King[15] to Colpitts v. The Queen[16] and, in the latter decision at p. 755, the words of the judgment in Brooks v. The King[17] are adopted: