Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
826.
Vetrovec v. The Queen - [1982] 1 SCR 811 - 1982-05-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
(1981), 56 C.C.C. (2d) 193; Director of Public Prosecutions v. Kilbourne, [1973] 1 All E.R. 440; Davies v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [1954] I All E.R. 507; R. v. Farler (1837), 8 Car. & P. 106; R. v. Mullins (1848), 3 Cox C.C. 526; Trial of William Davidson and Richard Tidd for High Treason (1820), 33 How. St. [...] In Trial of William Davidson and Richard Tidd for High Treason (1820), 33 How. St. Tr. 1338 Baron Garrow instructed the jury as follows, at p. 1483:
-
827.
Goodman v. Rompkey et al. - [1982] 1 SCR 589 - 1982-05-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
The Honourable William Rompkey and the Attorney General of Canada Respondents.
-
828.
Oxford Pendaflex Canada Ltd. v. Korr Marketing Ltd. et al. - [1982] 1 SCR 494 - 1982-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Roche Products Ltd. v. Berk Pharmaceuticals Ltd., [1973] R.P.C. 473; J.B. Williams Company v. H. Bronnley & Co. Ld. (1909), 26 R.P.C. 765; Birmingham Vinegar Brewery Company v. Powell, [1897] A.C. 710; William Edge & Sons, Limited v. William Niccolls & Sons, Limited, [1911] A.C. 693, applied; Eldon Industries [...] The Roche rule is but a refinement or detailed application of the general requirement for success in a passing-off action as pronounced by Cozens-Hardy M.R. in J.B. Williams Company v. H. Bronnley & Co. Ld. (1909), 26 R.P.C. 765 at p. 771: [...] Lord Gorell spoke to the same effect in William Edge & Sons, Limited v. William Niccolls & Sons, Limited, [1911] A.C. 693 at p. 705:
-
829.
McGuigan v. R. - [1982] 1 SCR 284 - 1982-03-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Thomas William McGuigan (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. [...] DICKSON J.—The appellant, Thomas William McGuigan, and two other persons, were jointly charged that on or about January 7, 1979, at the Village of Angus in the County of Simcoe, they did unlawfully attempt to steal a sum of money from Ik-Soo Kim while armed with an offensive weapon, to wit: a twelve-gauge shot-gun, contrary
-
830.
Royal Trust Co. v. Tucker - [1982] 1 SCR 250 - 1982-02-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
William E. Stavert and James P. Thomson, for the appellant. Georges Audet and Jean-Pierre Bréard, for the respondent.
-
831.
A.G. (Nova Scotia) v. MacIntyre - [1982] 1 SCR 175 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Ferry v. Williams, 41 N.J.L. 332, 336-339 (1879), and in a newspaper publisher's intention to publish information concerning the operation of government, see, e.g., State ex rel.
-
832.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Dalton Cartage Co. - [1982] 1 SCR 164 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William P. Somers, Q.C., for the respondent Dalton Cartage Company Limited.
-
833.
Korponay v. Attorney General of Canada - [1982] 1 SCR 41 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
entitled to ask that the trial and the guilty verdict returned by an irregularly empanelled jury be annulled; it is not necessary for him to prove a prejudice; there is a 'préjudice de droit'; as to this no doubt exists: R. v. Churton (1919), 31 C.C.C. 188; Henry Williams (1925), 19 Cr. App. R. 67; R. v. Page, [1965] Crim.
-
834.
Langille et al. v. Toronto-Dominion Bank - [1982] 1 SCR 34 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Solicitor for the respondent: William L. MacInnes, Halifax.
-
835.
Minister of Finance of New Brunswick et al. v. Simpsons-Sears Ltd. - [1982] 1 SCR 144 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., and Nolan D. Steed, for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta: William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
836.
Glover v. Bell Canada - [1981] 2 SCR 563 - 1981-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
William D. Dunlop and Susan J. Serena, for the appellant. David G. Lawrence, for the respondent.
-
837.
Glover v. Minister of National Revenue - [1981] 2 SCR 561 - 1981-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
William D. Dunlop and Susan J. Serena, for the appellant. L.R. Olsson, Q.C., and Ian S. MacGregor, for the respondent.
-
838.
Lindal v. Lindal - [1981] 2 SCR 629 - 1981-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Brian William Lindal (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Kenneth Daniel Lindal (Defendant) Respondent.
-
839.
Minister of Justice (Can.) v. Borowski - [1981] 2 SCR 575 - 1981-12-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta: William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
840.
Attorney General of Quebec v. Lechasseur et al. - [1981] 2 SCR 253 - 1981-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta.
-
841.
Oliver et al. v. The Queen - [1981] 2 SCR 240 - 1981-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Criminal law
Scott Douglas Oliver, Kirt Harold Oliver and William Henderson Appellants; [...] P.G. Lister, for the appellant William Henderson. J.A. Scollin, Q.C., and S.R. Fainstein, for the respondent. [...] Solicitor for the appellant William Henderson: Philip G. Lister, Edmonton.
-
842.
Solicitor General of Canada, et al. v. Royal Commission (Health Records) - [1981] 2 SCR 494 - 1981-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta: William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
843.
Lee v. Attorney General of Canada - [1981] 2 SCR 90 - 1981-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
William Hobson, Q.C., and John Haig, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
844.
R. v. Clement - [1981] 2 SCR 468 - 1981-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
John William Wallace Clement (Accused) Respondent. 1981: June 21; 1981: October 6. [...] William W. Morton, Q.C., for the appellant. Len Fishman, for the respondent.
-
845.
Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution - [1981] 1 SCR 753 - 1981-09-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Ross W. Paisley, Q.C., and William Henkel, Q. C., for the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] As Sir William Jowitt said, and quoted earlier, we must [Page 789] operate the old machinery perhaps one more time. [...] Solicitors for the Attorney General for Alberta: Ross W. Painsley and William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
846.
Myers v. Peel County Board of Education - [1981] 2 SCR 21 - 1981-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Thornton et al. v. Board of School Trustees of School District No. 57 (Prince George) et al., [1976] 5 W.W.R. 240 (B.C.C.A.); Williams v. Eady (1893), 10 T.L.R. 41; McKay et al. v. The Board of the Govan School Unit No. 29 of Saskatchewan et al., [1968] S.C.R. 589; Dziwenka et al. v. Her Majesty The Queen in right of [...] The standard of care to be exercised by school authorities in providing for the supervision and protection of students for whom they are responsible is that of the careful or prudent parent, described in Williams v. Eady[3].
-
847.
Seneca College v. Bhadauria - [1981] 2 SCR 181 - 1981-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
What we have here, if the Court of Appeal is correct in its conclusion, is a species of an economic tort, new in its instance and founded, even if indirectly, on a statute enacted in an area outside a fully recognized area of common law duty: see Williams, “The Effect of Penal Legislation in the Law of Tort” (1960), 23 Mod.
-
848.
Attorney General of Alberta et al. v. Putnam et al. - [1981] 2 SCR 267 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
R.W. Paisley, Q.C., and William Henkel, Q.C., for the appellants. M.G. Stevens Guille, for the respondents. [...] Solicitors for the appellants: R.W. Paisley and William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
849.
Re Residential Tenancies Act - [1981] 1 SCR 714 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William J. Atkinson, Henri Brun and Jean-François Jobin, for the intervener the Attorney General of Quebec. [...] William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General of Alberta.
-
850.
Thériault v. The Queen - [1981] 1 SCR 336 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
As Sir William Brett M.R. said in Abrath v. North Eastern Ry Co[2]. at p. 453, “It is no misdirection not to tell the jury everything which might have been told them”.