Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
876.
Irving Oil Ltd. et al. v. Provincial Secretary of New Brunswick - [1980] 1 SCR 787 - 1980-03-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
E. Neil McKelvey, Q.C., and William B. Goss, for the appellants. Richard C. Speight and David M. Norman, Q.C., for the respondent.
-
877.
Luckett v. The Queen - [1980] 1 SCR 1140 - 1980-01-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William Eric Luckett Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. [...] A.M. Stewart and William Smart, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by [...] It is not in dispute that common assault is not included in the offence as charged in the count which reads: Indictment: William Eric Luckett stands charged:
-
878.
Cooper v. R. - [1980] 1 SCR 1149 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Indeed, Glanville Williams (Textbook of Criminal Law at p. 592) says that the phrase is no longer in medical use.
-
879.
Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House - [1980] 1 SCR 54 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the Attorney General of Alberta. James A. Nesbitt, Q.C., for the Attorney General of Newfoundland. [...] Solicitors for the Attorney General of Alberta: Ross Paisley and William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
880.
Solosky v. The Queen - [1980] 1 SCR 821 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William (Billy) Solosky (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. [...] 4. Pursuant to section 6 paragraph (b) [s. 7(b), as amended,] of Directive No. 219, John Dowsett, Director of Millhaven Institution has ordered that William (Billy) Solosky's mail be opened and read. [...] 5. William (Billy) Solosky's mail is being read because it is John Dowsett's opinion that William (Billy) Solosky's conduct, activities and attitude cause him to believe that attention should be paid to his incoming and outgoing correspondence.
-
881.
Att. Gen. of Quebec v. Blaikie et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 1016 - 1979-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
David Wood and William Aaron, for the respondent Henri Wilfrid Laurier.
-
882.
R. v. Riddle - [1980] 1 SCR 380 - 1979-10-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William James Riddle Respondent. 1979: February 28; 1979: October 2.
-
883.
Cloutier v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 709 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
App. R. 184; Bussières v. Regem (1931), 53 Que. K.B. 16; R. v. Stewart, [1932] S.C.R. 612; Canada Sugar Refining Co. v. Reg., [1898] A.C. 735; Morin v. The Queen (1890), 18 S.C.R. 407; R. v. Ward (1972), 22 C.R.N.S. 153; R. v. Churton (1919), 31 C.C.C. 188; Henry Williams (1925), 19 Cr. App. R. 67; R. v. Page, [1965] Crim. [...] The accused, who is erroneously denied a peremptory challenge, is entitled to ask that the trial and the guilty verdict returned by an irregularly empanelled jury be annulled; it is not necessary for him to prove a prejudice; there is a "préjudice de droit"; as to this no doubt exists: R. v. Churton[10], Henry Williams [...] Proof of the motive for a crime is generally admitted as circumstantial evidence: in his Textbook of Criminal Law, Glanville Williams writes at p. 56:
-
884.
Douglas Aircraft Co. of Canada v. McConnell - [1980] 1 SCR 245 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
The fifth member of that committee, one William Hill, was the subject of another arbitration and I will refer to this later. [...] The first grievance, that of Mr. William Hill, was heard by another arbitrator who reduced the penalty of discharge imposed by the appellant employer to a suspension of four weeks together with an order for reinstatement.
-
885.
McFall v. The Queen - [1980] 1 SCR 321 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Professor Glanville Williams has commented on the practice of joint trials: [...] (Glanville Williams, Proof of Guilt, (3rd ed.) 1968, p. 249) The relaxation referred to is of course the admissibility in the joint trial of all statements of all accused.
-
886.
Northern Telecom v. Communications Workers - [1980] 1 SCR 115 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William S. Tyndale, Q.C., and Robert Monette, for the appellant. Aubrey E. Golden and Maurice Green, for the respondent, Communications Workers of Canada,
-
887.
Volvo Canada Ltd. v. U.A.W., Local 720 - [1980] 1 SCR 178 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Error of law on the face of the award was accepted, with regret, as a ground of challenge but held to be established in Hodgkinson v. Fernie[20], at p. 202 C.B. (N.S.), at p. 717 E.R., per Williams J. This enlarged scope of review was accepted by this Court in John A. McRae & Co. v. Lemay[21], but in that case the
-
888.
Duplisea v. T. Eaton Life Assurance Co. - [1980] 1 SCR 144 - 1979-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William Goss, for the respondent. [Page 146] The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
889.
Guy v. Trizec Equities Ltd. et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 756 - 1979-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Keith E. Eaton, Q.C., and A. William Moreira, for the appellant. David R. Chipman, Q.C., for the respondents.
-
890.
Lewis v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 821 - 1979-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Glanville Williams in his Criminal Law, The General Part (2nd ed., 1961) distinguishes between these meanings: [...] It is this second sense, according to Williams, which is employed in criminal law: [...] In the case at bar, the parties have employed the notion of "motive" in the second of Williams' senses.
-
891.
Stoneham and Tewkesbury v. Ouellet - [1979] 2 SCR 172 - 1979-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Estates
WILLIAM SYDNEY JOHN WRIGHT of the Village of Stoneham, Province of Quebec, Farmer.
-
892.
R. v. Prue - [1979] 2 SCR 547 - 1979-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William James Prue Respondent. Her Majesty The Queen Appellant; and
-
893.
McLoughlin v. Kutasy - [1979] 2 SCR 311 - 1979-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Dr. William Kutasy (Defendant) Respondent. 1978: November 8, 9; 1979: March 20.
-
894.
Guimond v. The Queen - [1979] 1 SCR 960 - 1979-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
here, it would be my opinion that the case would be governed by the qualifying clause above‐quoted: see Williams, Textbook on Criminal Law (1978), at pp. 361-2.
-
895.
Papalia v. R. - [1979] 2 SCR 256 - 1979-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
It is stated by Lord Esher, M.R. in Lucas v. Williams & Sons, (1892) 2 Q.B. at 116:—
-
896.
Horvath v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 376 - 1979-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
[Ibrahim v. R., supra; Boudreau v. R., [1949] S.C.R. 262; R. v. Fitton, supra; R. v. Isequilla, supra; Naniseni v. R., [1971] N.Z.L.R. 269; R. v. Smith, [1959] 2 Q.B. 35; McDermott v. R., (1948), 76 C.L.R. 501; Martin Priestley (note), 51 Cr. App. R. 1; Sparks v. R., [1964] A.C. 964; R. v. Williams (1968), 52 Cr. App. R. [...] In R. v. Williams[24] the accused had made two written statements, the first on June 7 and the second, confirming the first, on July 18.
-
897.
N.C.C. et al. v. Pugliese et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 104 - 1979-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Torts
William J. Simpson, for the appellant Dibco Underground Ltd. James I. Minnes, for the appellant H.Q. Golder & Associates Limited.
-
898.
Bradburn v. Wentworth Arms Hotel - [1979] 1 SCR 846 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
William Bradburn, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Local 197 of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
899.
Construction Montcalm Inc. v. Min. Wage Com. - [1979] 1 SCR 754 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William N. Lawton, for the intervenor, the Attorney General of Saskatchewan. [...] Solicitor for the Attorney General of Alberta: William Henkel, Edmonton. [...] Solicitor for the Attorney General of Saskatchewan: William N. Lawton, Regina.
-
900.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Sherman et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 883 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Eric Williams, for Donald MacLeod, trustee. Morris Kirtzer, for the lienholder.