Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
2,226.
Beatty v. North-West Transportation Co. - (1886) 12 SCR 598 - 1886-04-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
William Beatty, Johned Ward Rose, Robert Laird and John D. Beatty (Defendants) Respondents. [...] In Williams v. Page[50], Sir John Romilly said, in treating a director as a trustee: “The trust is no doubt a peculiar one.” In [...] At this meeting of the 7th February, the defendant James Hughes Beaty, William Beatty, Rose and Laird were elected directors of the company, and at a meeting of those directors, subse-
-
2,227.
Carey v. Toronto (City) - (1886) 14 SCR 172 - 1886-04-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Alexander MacDonell, The Corporation of the City of Toronto, William Henry Bennett and James Arthur Bennett (Defendants) Respondents.
-
2,228.
Starrs v. Cosgrave Brewing and Malting Company of Toronto - (1886) 12 SCR 571 - 1886-04-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
In that case the plaintiff and one William Chapman entered into partnership, by deed, with one Potts. [...] In consideration of this trust he and the defendant bound themselves by a bond of guarantee to the plaintiff and the said William Chapman, for the observance by Potts of the covenants in the partnership deed, and also that Potts, during
-
2,229.
Walmsley v. Griffith - (1886) 13 SCR 434 - 1886-04-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Kate Griffith, Carrie L. Griffith, George Wright, Philip J. Slater, J Hornbrook, W. J. McCormack, John Donogh, William Badenach, Walter H. Blight, Robert Dodds and A. G. Allison (Defendants)
-
2,230.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Vogel - (1886) 11 SCR 612 - 1886-03-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
[26] 10 H.L. Cas. 473, per Blackburn J. and Williams J. [27] 26 U.C.R. 479, at p. 486.
-
2,231.
Faulds v. Harper - (1886) 11 SCR 639 - 1886-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Elijah Washington Faulds, William Martin Faulds, James Linda Faulds, Wesley Bell Faulds and Matilda Elizabeth Faulds (Plaintiffs) Appellants; [...] In Randall v. Errington[19], Sir William Grant states the principle very distinctly as follows: [...] William Faulds died 1st July, 1858, in possession of the mortgaged premises, intestate, leaving his widow, Matilda, who is still living, and six children.
-
2,232.
Western Assurance Co. v. Doull - (1886) 12 SCR 446 - 1886-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
John Doull, William Miller, Francis H. Doull, William M. Doull, And Vincenzo J. Gibson (Plaintiffs)
-
2,233.
Canada Publishing Co. v. Gage - (1885) 11 SCR 306 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
William James Gage (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1885: March 24, 26; 1885: November 16.
-
2,234.
Chapman v. Rand - (1885) 11 SCR 312 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Robert A. Chapman and William J. Robinson Appellants And Silas W. Rand
-
2,235.
Kelly v. Imperial Loan & Investment Co. - (1885) 11 SCR 516 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William Kelly (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Imperial Loan and Investment Company of Canada (Limited) and William Damer (Defendants) Respondents. [...] And whereas default being made in payment of the moneys due under the said mortgage from said William Kelly to the Imperial Loan and Investment Company, the said Imperial Loan and Investment Company exhibited their bill of complaint in the Court of Chancery for Ontario, and thereafter by an order of the said court made in
-
2,236.
Long v. Hancock - (1885) 12 SCR 532 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William D. Long and George H. Bisby (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Edward H. Hancock, J.B. Fairgrieve and John Hallam (Defendants) Respondents.
-
2,237.
O'Sullivan v. Harty - (1885) 11 SCR 322 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William Harty and Charles W. Weldon (Defendants) Respondents; and By order of Revivor. [...] William Harty and Charles W. Weldon (Defendants) Respondents. 1885: May 21; 1885: November 16.
-
2,238.
St. Lawrence & Ottawa Railway Co. v. Lett - (1885) 11 SCR 422 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
William Pitman Lett (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1885: May 20; 1885: November 16. [...] GWYNNE J.—This is an action brought by William P. Lett as administrator of his deceased wife, who was killed by a collision on the defendants’ railway, to recover damages from the defendants under the provisions of chapter 128 of the Revised Statutes of Ontario.
-
2,239.
The Queen v. Dunn - (1885) 11 SCR 385 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William Dunn (Suppliant) Respondent 1885: May; 1885: Nov. 16. Present—Sir W. J. Ritchie C.J., and Fournier, Henry, Taschereau and Gwynne JJ.
-
2,240.
Town of Portland v. Griffiths - (1885) 11 SCR 333 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
So in the General Steam Navigation Co. v. Morrison[21] Williams J. asks:
-
2,241.
Mackenzie v. Champion - (1885) 12 SCR 649 - 1885-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William L Mackenzie and Arthur B. Lee (Plaintiffs) Appellants And
-
2,242.
Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. Axford - (1885) 13 SCR 294 - 1885-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Frederic J. Axford, William Smith, and Henry Zinck (Defendants) Respondents [...] By the patent or grant of the Township of Cornwallis in 1764, four hundred acres of land were declared to be set aside for school purposes; and by a subsequent grant in 1790, the said lot of four hundred acres was granted to William Twining, rector, and John Burbidge and Benjamin Belcher wardens, of the church of St. John, [...] premises hereby granted unto the said William Twining, rector of the said Church of St. John, and John Burbidge and Benjamin Belcher, wardens thereof, during their continuances in the said offices respectively, and to the rector and wardens of said Church of St. John for the time being, in special trust to and for the use
-
2,243.
Jones v. Kinney - (1885) 11 SCR 708 - 1885-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Campbell v. Barrie[2]; Allan v. Clarkson[3]; Ex parte Winder in re Winstanley[4]; Ex parte Wilkinson in re Berry[5]; Bittlestone v. Cooke[6]; and Bills v. Smith[7]; and Williams on Bankruptcy[8]; and McWhirter v. Thorne[9].
-
2,244.
McAllister v. Forsyth - (1885) 12 SCR 1 - 1885-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Eliza McAllister, Charles Grant Barnstead and William Ackhurst (Plaintiffs) [...] the county of Halifax, merchant, of the first part; and Eliza McAllister of the same place, widow, Charles Grant Barnstead, of the same place, gentleman, and William Ackhurst, of the same place, merchant, of the second part, after reciting indebtedness of first party to the second party, the party of the first part agreed
-
2,245.
McCall v. Wolff - (1885) 13 SCR 130 - 1885-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Dougald McCall and William Blackley (Plaintiffs) Appellants And Richard Wolff, Frederic Wray, S. F. McKinnon, W. C. Proctor, the Bank of Montreal.
-
2,246.
O'Sullivan v. Harty - (1885) 13 SCR 431 - 1885-03-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
William Harty and Charles W. Weldon Defendants (By Order of Revivor) [...] William Harty and Charles W. Weldon (Defendants) Respondents Present—Sir W. J. Ritchie C.J. and Strong, Fournier, Henry and Taschereau JJ.
-
2,247.
The Merchants' Bank of Halifax v. Gillespie - (1885) 10 SCR 312 - 1885-03-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
An agreement dated the 13th day of March, 1874, and made between Charles William Siemens, of the one part, and Edward Faulcknor Tremayne, of the other part, for the grant of a license or right to use, free of royalty, the patent process of the said Charles William Siemens, for the production of iron and steel, and their [...] Dans les conclusions de son jugement Sir William Ritchie, C. J., s'exprime de manière à ne laisser aucun doute sur cette question.
-
2,248.
Sovereign Fire Ins. Co. v. Peters - (1886) 12 SCR 33 - 1885-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
That the said plaintiff and the said John Peters and Thomas F. Sutherland, or William Peters, junior, at the time of making said chattel mortgage or said trust deed, had not, nor had any of them, read over the conditions of said policy, and none of said parties intended to commit a breach of any of the conditions of said
-
2,249.
Rose v. Peterkin - (1885) 13 SCR 677 - 1885-01-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Sir William [Page 705] Grant, M.R., in Wyatt v. Barwell[10]; Lord Romilly, M.R. in Ford v. White[11]; Longfield J. in re Rorke[12]; Lord Alvanley M.R. in Jolland v. Stainbridge[13]; Lord Brougham in Mill v. Hill[14]; Bramwell L.J. in Greaves y. Tofield[15].
-
2,250.
Soulanges Election Case - (1885) 10 SCR 652 - 1885-01-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Je soussigné, agent dûment autorisé de James William Bain, écuyer, l'un des candidats à la présente élection, objecte au vote de Charles Châles, fils, de St. Zotique, électeur apparaissant à la liste électorale de l'arrondissement No. 8, et qui s'est présenté pour voter sous le numéro huit du cahier de votation du Poll No. [...] I, the undersigned, duly authorized agent of James William Bain, Esq., one of the candidates at the present election, object to the vote of of elector appearing on the electoral list of district No. and who has come to vote under No. of the voters' list of the electoral district No. and for reasons in support of this