Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,476.
Chisholm v. Chisholm - (1908) 40 SCR 115 - 1908-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
William Chisholm (Defendant) Appellant; and Evelyn Chisholm (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
1,477.
Manitoba Free Press Co. v. Nagy - (1907) 39 SCR 340 - 1907-11-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The case of Williams v. Stephenson[16] is directly in point. There, as here, the evidence was insufficient to enable the trial judge to ascertain the damages, he guessed at the amount and this court allowed the appeal and refused to grant a new trial.
-
1,478.
Montreal Water & Power Co. v. Davie - (1904) 35 SCR 255 - 1904-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Beaudin K.C. and W. J. White K.C. for the appellants cited arts. 275, 548 C.P.Q. ; art: 356 C. C. ; The Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Roy ([1]) ; Molleur v. Dougall ([2]) ; Lusignan v. Sauvageau ([3]) ; Bellay v. Guay ([4]) ; Archbald v. Delisle ([5]) ; Drysdale v. Degas ([6]) ; Williams v. Stephenson ([7]) ; Cogh/in v.
-
1,479.
Clark v. City of Vancouver - (1904) 35 SCR 121 - 1904-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
William C. Clark (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The City of Vancouver (Defendant) Respondent.
-
1,480.
The Queen v. Yule et al. - (1899) 30 SCR 24 - 1899-10-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Andrew Yule and Others (Suppliants) Respondents 1899: Oct. 3, 4; 1899: Oct. 24
-
1,481.
News Printing Co. of Toronto v. Macrae - (1896) 26 SCR 695 - 1896-10-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Upon the application of the above named defendants, upon hearing read the affidavit of William Henry Irving, the affidavit of Hubert H. Macrae and the exhibits therein referred to, and the defendants’ counsel undertaking to get the appeal down for the October sittings of the Supreme Court if the rules or practice of the
-
1,482.
Fortier v. Lambe - (1895) 25 SCR 422 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, ÈS QUALITÉ (PLAINTIFF) Respondent. 1894: Oct 3; 1894: Oct 4; 1895: Mar 11
-
1,483.
Moodie v. Jones - (1891) 19 SCR 266 - 1891-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
" Considérant que la propriété en question a été ven° due à William "W. Proud pour le bénéfice du défendeur et d'autres personnes dont les dits J. C. Hamilton et Thomas C. Jones ne faisaient point parties et que si le montant payé par le dit J. C. Hamilton a été employé à payer partie du prix de la vente à Proud, il a été
-
1,484.
Venner v. Sun Life Ins. Co. - (1890) 17 SCR 394 - 1890-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
WILLIAM VENNER Appellant ; AND SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
-
1,485.
Farmer v. Living Stone - (1880) 5 SCR 221 - 1880-06-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
William Guy Living-Stone Respondent. 1880: May 12; 1880: June 10.
-
1,486.
R. v. Lemky - [1996] 1 SCR 757 - 1996-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William F. Ehrcke, for the respondent. //McLachlin J.// The judgment of Lamer C.J. and La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. was delivered by
-
1,487.
R. v. Collins; R. v. Pelfrey - [1995] 2 SCR 1104 - 1995-07-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William David Pelfrey Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
-
1,488.
Caron v. Canada (Employment and Immigration Commission) - [1991] 1 SCR 48 - 1991-01-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Arseneault, William Bourque, Hugues Lévesque, Gérard Ouellet, Alfred Noël, Robert‑A. Butland, Carmel Leblanc,
-
1,489.
C.C.R. Fishing Ltd. v. British Reserve Insurance Co. - [1990] 1 SCR 814 - 1990-04-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Peter D. Lowry and J. William Perrett, for the appellants. Christopher Harvey and Stephen C. Best, for the respondents.
-
1,490.
Sacchetti v. Lockheimer - [1988] 1 SCR 1049 - 1988-05-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Property law
Marler, William deMontmollin. The Law of Real Property. Completed and arranged by George C. Marler.
-
1,491.
R. v. Manninen - [1987] 1 SCR 1233 - 1987-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Evidence
Solicitor for the respondent: William S. Hechter, Toronto.
-
1,492.
Guy v. Trizec Equities Ltd. et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 756 - 1979-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Keith E. Eaton, Q.C., and A. William Moreira, for the appellant. David R. Chipman, Q.C., for the respondents.
-
1,493.
Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York v. General Structures Inc. - [1977] 2 SCR 1098 - 1976-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William Harold Booth (Defendant) Mis en cause. 1975: December 5; 1976: October 5.
-
1,494.
Trudeau v. Cochrane - [1977] 2 SCR 55 - 1976-01-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William Adrien Trudeau (Defendant) Appellant; and Edward Grant Cochrane (Plaintiff) Respondent;
-
1,495.
Bell v. Attorney General for Prince Edward Island - [1975] 1 SCR 25 - 1973-11-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervenant, the Attorney General for Alberta.
-
1,496.
Wilson et al. v. Rowswell - [1970] SCR 865 - 1970-04-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
In the interesting case of Chaplin v. Hicks[2], Vaughan Williams L.J. said at p. 791:
-
1,497.
Patterson v. R. - [1970] SCR 409 - 1970-01-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Culliton J.A., in so deciding, quoted and accepted the judgment of Williams C.J.Q.B., in R. v. Schellenberg[9], where the learned Chief Justice said at p. 134:
-
1,498.
Eid v. Dumas / Hatherly v. Dumas - [1969] SCR 668 - 1969-05-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
I think it proper to point out also that in the same case the majority of the Court adopted the following passages from Mr. Glanville Williams’ work Joint Torts and Contributory Negligence (1951), at p. 308:
-
1,499.
John Burrows Limited v. Subsurface Surveys Limited et al. - [1968] SCR 607 - 1968-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
William L. Hoyt, for the plaintiff, appellant. E. Neil McKelvey, Q.C., and J. Ian M. Whitcomb, for the defendants, respondents.
-
1,500.
Parkinson et al. v. Reid - [1966] SCR 162 - 1966-01-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
William Gray Dingwall, for the defendants, appellants. W.B. Williston, Q.C., and John Sopinka, for the plaintiff, respondent.