Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,501.
Montreal Trust Company v. Minister of National Revenue - [1962] SCR 570 - 1962-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Locke J.:—The agreement entered into between Trans Empire Oils Ltd. and William Ford on an unspecified date in February 1952, recited that the company was the lessee from the Crown of the petroleum and natural gas rights in Section 31, Township 50, Range 21, West of the Fourth Meridian.
-
1,502.
Van Alstyne v. Ruck et al. - [1957] SCR 142 - 1957-01-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
In and prior to the year 1943 one William Turcotte was the owner of the west half of lot 32 in concession 2 of the township of Pittsburgh in the county of Frontenac.
-
1,503.
Kirkland v. The Queen - [1957] SCR 3 - 1956-12-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The defence called William Dineen, a nephew of the appellant, who testified that the latter had helped the mother of the witness in the operation of the booth at Belle Ewart; that the appellant had tried to get employment at the Canadian National Exhibition in August 1952 but could not do so as he was not a union member;
-
1,504.
Gaunt and Watts v. The Queen - [1953] 1 SCR 505 - 1953-04-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Henry Watt And William Gaunt Appellants; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
-
1,505.
Harvey v. Perry - [1953] 1 SCR 233 - 1953-03-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William Landon Harvey (Defendant) Appellant; and Arthur Cyril Perry (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
1,506.
MacLeod v. Roe - [1947] SCR 420 - 1947-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William A. Magark, who has had considerable experience in and around roller skating rinks and who, on the night in question, was floor manager for the appellant, so testified, and his evidence was uncontradicted.
-
1,507.
Boxenbaum v. Wise - [1944] SCR 292 - 1944-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Sir William Meredith, speaking on behalf of the Ontario Court of Appeal, in Maitland v. McKenzie[2], with reference to a similar Ontario enactment, stated as to this point at page 510:
-
1,508.
Greenbank v. The National Supply Co. - [1944] SCR 59 - 1943-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
In accordance with the writer's telephone conversation with you as of to-day, I am enclosing a financial statement taken off October 2nd, as of July 31st, 1937, by William Ireland, chartered accountant of Pacalta well.
-
1,509.
Edmonton (City) v. W. W. Sales Ltd. - [1942] SCR 467 - 1942-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
About three o'clock on the afternoon of January 13th, 1940, S. P. Wilson, who was president and manager of the defendant company, ordered Roy A. Eckstrom, one of the defendant's employees, to take with him another employee, William Fleming, and to go to the basement of the Sheldon block, and there clean up these premises
-
1,510.
In Re West Estate - [1942] SCR 120 - 1942-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
to my sister Emma Melissa Carr; one residuary portion to be paid to Annie West, widow of Edward Charles West of Campbell-ford, Ontario; one residuary portion to be paid to Martha Emily West, widow of Samuel John West, late of Campbellford aforesaid; and one residuary portion to be paid to William Newton Redner, son of my
-
1,511.
Home Oil Distributors Ltd. et al. v. Attorney-General of British Columbia et al. - [1940] SCR 444 - 1940-04-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Kerwin J.—The plaintiffs (appellants) brought action against the Attorney-General of British Columbia, Coal and Petroleum Control Board, and Dr. William Alexander Carrothers (the sole member of the Board), for a declaration that the Coal and Petroleum Products Control Board Act of British Columbia (chapter 8 of the statutes
-
1,512.
Peggy Sage Inc. v. Siegel Kahn Co. of Canada - [1935] SCR 539 - 1935-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
William Arbuckle says that the dominant feature of the trade-mark is “Peggy” and that the people usually ask for “Peggy Sage” and at odd times “Peggy.”
-
1,513.
Bertrand et al. v. Warré et al. - [1932] SCR 364 - 1932-02-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
All questions affecting the judgment can therefore be discussed by the parties and may now be considered (A. R. Williams Machinery Co. Ltd. v. Moore[2]).
-
1,514.
Queen City, SS. v. The King / Sunrise, SS. v. The King / Tillie M., SS. v. The King - [1931] SCR 387 - 1931-04-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsFishery
In The Eleanor4, Sir William Scott enunciated the principle which, in our opinion, applies to the weaknesses of the vessels as above set out.
-
1,515.
Lefebvre v. Major - [1930] SCR 252 - 1930-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Henri Major and William Major, Representing Themselves and All Other Nephews and Nieces of said Deceased, and Marie Felicite Lefebvre (Defendants) Respondents.
-
1,516.
California Prune & Apricot Growers, Inc. v. Baird and Peters - [1926] SCR 208 - 1925-12-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
It is not disputed that Mr. William S. Clawson was the agent of Sainsbury Bros, at Saint John.
-
1,517.
Warner Quinlan Asphalt Co. v. The King - [1924] SCR 236 - 1924-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Gaston Williams v. The King[4]. Newcombe K.C. and J. Philip Bill for the respondent.
-
1,518.
County of Hastings v. Clinton - [1924] SCR 195 - 1923-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Williams on Municipal Liability, pp. 190-194. In other words, a corporation is bound to erect barriers or railings where a dangerous place is in such close proximity to the travelled part of the highway as to make travelling upon it unsafe, whether by day or by night, in sunshine or storm.
-
1,519.
Morin v. Hammond Lumber Co. - [1923] SCR 140 - 1922-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Stevens K.C. for the respondent referred to Fitzgerald v. Dressier[3], Williams v. Leper[4].
-
1,520.
Guardian Realty Co. v. John Stark & Co. - (1922) 64 SCR 207 - 1922-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
This is the view expressed by the learned author of Gray on Perpetuities, 1915, pages 203-204, and by the learned author of Williams on Vendors and Purchasers in an elaborate discussion of the subject in 42 Solicitors Journal, at page 630.
-
1,521.
Melukhova v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co. - (1922) 63 SCR 511 - 1922-03-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
During the proceedings, and before the filing of a plea, the company was placed in liquidation and William J. Henderson was appointed its liquidator.
-
1,522.
Attorney-General for British Columbia and the Minister of Lands v. Brooks-Bidlake and Whitall, Ltd. - (1922) 63 SCR 466 - 1922-02-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
I think that what I have said is supported by the ratio decidendi of the Judicial Committee in Grand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co. v. Fort William Land Investment Co.[10].
-
1,523.
Alberta Rolling Mills Co. v. Christie - (1919) 58 SCR 208 - 1919-02-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
William J. Christie (Plaintiff) Respondent 1918: October 16, 17; 1919: February 4.
-
1,524.
Schell v. McCallum & Vannatter - (1918) 57 SCR 15 - 1918-06-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Solicitors for the appellants: Carrothers & Williams. Solicitor for the respondents: G. H. Yule.
-
1,525.
Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. Pszenicnzy - (1916) 54 SCR 36 - 1916-10-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Williams, L.J., at page 13. The limitation applies only to actions brought in respect of injuries caused directly, and not indirectly, by the construction or operation of the road, and is not intended to apply to suits founded upon injuries to civil rights unconnected with railway legislation in its true sense.