Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
1,526.
Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. Diplock - (1916) 53 SCR 376 - 1916-05-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
In the same case Lord Shaw of Dumferline had pointedly withheld his assent to the pronouncements of Darling J. and Vaughan-Williams L.J., in the lower courts, as to immunity for injuries caused to mere trespassers.
-
1,527.
Evangeline Fruit Co. v. Provincial Fire Ins. Co. of Canada - (1915) 51 SCR 474 - 1915-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Moir v. Williams[14]. Neither do I think that the policy is avoided because of non-disclosure of the proximity of this supply of gasoline to the building under the condition requiring communication by the insured of all circumstances material to the risk.
-
1,528.
Campbell Ford, Lake Ontario and Western Rway. Co. v. Massie - (1914) 50 SCR 409 - 1914-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
Justice Williams in the case of Re Hammond and Waterton[13], at p. 809.
-
1,529.
Bentley v. Nasmith - (1912) 46 SCR 477 - 1912-03-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsSecurities
And especially so as he has failed to contradict or explain the evidence of Williams, who tells of the respondent saying some one had given a tip or hint.
-
1,530.
McMullin v. Nova Scotia Steel & Coal Co. - (1907) 39 SCR 593 - 1907-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Then, if they desired to rely upon the qualifying words, which Williams L.J. added to his concurrence with the other members of the appeal court in the judgment of Groves v. Wimborne[7], they would stand in a position at any rate to urge the application of the doctrine so qualified to the special facts proved.
-
1,531.
St. Ann's Election Case (Gallery v. Darlington) - (1906) 37 SCR 563 - 1906-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
WILLIAM DARLINGTON AND OTHERS (PETITIONERS) Respondents. 1906: Oct 2; 1906: Oct 3; 1906: Oct 11
-
1,532.
McIsaac v. Beaton - (1905) 37 SCR 143 - 1905-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Williams on Executors (10 ed.) 1315 et seq. The direction, if a charge, only charges the real estate when the personal property is insufficient to pay the debts.
-
1,533.
Miller v. Robertson - (1904) 35 SCR 80 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
I will sell at public auction in front of the Telegraph Office in Bathurst, on Saturday, January 27th, at eleven o'clock a.m., the water lot owned by the late William End fronting on Water Street, in five lots forty feet each in breadth.
-
1,534.
North American Life Assurance Co. v. Elson - (1903) 33 SCR 383 - 1903-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
By the terms of the application the contract commenced from the delivery of the policy and the policy was sent by the appellant's letter dated 27th September, 1894, to William McBride at Winnipeg, agent of the appellant, for delivery to Elson in British Columbia.
-
1,535.
Kent v. Ellis - (1900) 31 SCR 110 - 1900-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
This court will not interfere with a decision such as is now appealed from as it is upon a mere question of procedure; Dawson v. Union Bank[13]; Gladwin v. Cummings[14]; Ferrier v. Trépannier[15]; Scammell v. James[16]; Williams v. Leonard & Sons[17].
-
1,536.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Anderson - (1898) 28 SCR 541 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
On the 8th of February, 1895, one William McKenzie purchased from the railway company a return-ticket from the Village of Ailsa Craig, a station on the main line of the Grand Trunk Railway, to the City of London.
-
1,537.
Powell v. Watters - (1897) 28 SCR 133 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
WILLIAM F. POWELL (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And THOMAS J WATTERS (PLAINTIFF)
-
1,538.
Niagara District Fruit Growers Stock Co. v. Walker - (1896) 26 SCR 629 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
But I do think that the contract of suretyship is, as expressed by Lord Westbury in Williams v. Bayley12, one which “should be based upon the free and voluntary agency of the individual who enters into it.”
-
1,539.
The Queen v. Moss - (1896) 26 SCR 322 - 1896-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Crown is barred by the Nullum Tempus Act, 9 Greo. 3 ch. 16 (Imp.) Reg. v. McCormick[13]; Reg: v. Williams[14]; Attorney General v. The Midland Railway Co.[15].
-
1,540.
Trent Valley Woollen Manufacturing Co. v. Oelrichs & Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 682 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Solicitors for the appellants: Clute & William. Solicitors for the respondents: McCarthy, Osler, Hoskin & Creelman.
-
1,541.
Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick - (1893) 23 SCR 277 - 1893-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
McLeod Q.C. and Palmer Q.C. for the appellant, referred to Williams v. The Colonial Bank[3]; Barton v. London and North-western Railway Co.[4]; Jones v. Broad hurst[5].
-
1,542.
The Great Eastern Railway v. Lambe - (1892) 21 SCR 431 - 1892-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, èsqual. (PLAINTIFF) Respondent. 1892: Oct 10; 1892 Nov 2
-
1,543.
Collins v. Cunningham / Cunningham v. Drysdale - (1892) 21 SCR 139 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
On the 9th of August, 1888, Mr. Justice Townshend made an order that William McGribbon and David McGibbon, who were mortgage incumbrancers claiming as such under mortgages made by the heirs of Bernard O'Neil, or by some of them, should have leave to enter an appearance and becomes parties defendant in the action.
-
1,544.
Stanstead Election Case (Rider v. Snow) - (1891) 20 SCR 12 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Solicitor for respondent : William White. [1] 8 Can. S. C. R. 169.
-
1,545.
Wheeler v. Black - (1887) 14 SCR 242 - 1887-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
WILLIAM W.WHEELER, et al Appellant And JOHN BLACK et al., Respondent.
-
1,546.
Long v. Hancock - (1885) 12 SCR 532 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William D. Long and George H. Bisby (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Edward H. Hancock, J.B. Fairgrieve and John Hallam (Defendants) Respondents.
-
1,547.
Mackenzie v. Champion - (1885) 12 SCR 649 - 1885-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William L Mackenzie and Arthur B. Lee (Plaintiffs) Appellants And
-
1,548.
Sovereign Fire Ins. Co. v. Peters - (1886) 12 SCR 33 - 1885-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
That the said plaintiff and the said John Peters and Thomas F. Sutherland, or William Peters, junior, at the time of making said chattel mortgage or said trust deed, had not, nor had any of them, read over the conditions of said policy, and none of said parties intended to commit a breach of any of the conditions of said
-
1,549.
Jonas v. Gilbert - (1881) 5 SCR 356 - 1881-02-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
William Sandall, as Chamberlain of the City of Saint John, New Brunswick, made a complaint to Humphrey T. Gilbert, the Police Magistrate of the City of Saint John, that Henri Jonas, who was not a free citizen of the said City or a registered freeman, or paying rates or taxes in the said City, did, at the City of Saint John,
-
1,550.
R. v. Friesen - 2020 SCC 9 - [2020] 1 SCR 424 - 2020-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
2009 ONCA 133, 95 O.R. (3d) 173; R. v. Sanatkar (1981), 64 C.C.C. (2d) 325; R. v. Bergeron, 2013 QCCA 7; R. v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368; R. v. Régnier, 2018 QCCA 306; R. v. Vautour, 2016 BCCA 497; R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295; R. v. Vokey, 2000 NFCA 14, 186 Nfld. [...] For instance, the British Columbia Court of Appeal has set a range for sexual interference of one to three years and has suggested that only in “rare circumstances” would a sentence above three years be justified (R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295, at para. 71 (CanLII)). [...] The British Columbia Court of Appeal appears to have done this by setting a range of two to six years for “sexual assault involving intercourse” in cases involving child victims while setting a range of one to three years for sexual interference (see Scofield, at para. 59; Williams, at para. 71).