Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
2,026.
R. v. Yumnu - 2012 SCC 73 - [2012] 3 SCR 777 - 2012-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William S. Challis and Stephen McCammon, for the intervener the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
-
2,027.
Juman v. Doucette - 2008 SCC 8 - [2008] 1 SCR 157 - 2008-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Stevenson, William A., and Jean E. Côté. Civil Procedure Encyclopedia, vol. 2.
-
2,028.
Winters v. Legal Services Society - [1999] 3 SCR 160 - 1999-09-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Professor Jackson writes at p. 64, “Dostoevsky is a surer guide than Glanville Williams in understanding what it is that we do, in the name of the criminal law, when we send men to the solitary‑confinement cells”.
-
2,029.
R. v. Mohan - [1994] 2 SCR 9 - 1994-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
By William James Byrne and Andrew Dewar Gibb. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1928.
-
2,030.
Brissette Estate v. Westbury Life Insurance Co.; Brissette Estate v. Crown Life Insurance Co. - [1992] 3 SCR 87 - 1992-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
By Austin Wakeman Scott and William Franklin Fratcher. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1989.
-
2,031.
Just v. British Columbia - [1989] 2 SCR 1228 - 1989-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William A. Pearce and Harvey M. Groberman, for the respondent. //Cory J.//
-
2,032.
R. v. Vaillancourt - [1987] 2 SCR 636 - 1987-12-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Hawkins, William. Pleas of the Crown, vol. 1, 1716. Hooper, Anthony.
-
2,033.
R. v. Wigglesworth - [1987] 2 SCR 541 - 1987-11-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Craies, William Feilden. Craies on Statute Law, 7th ed. by S.G.G. Edgar.
-
2,034.
Phoenix Assurance v. Bird Construction - [1984] 2 SCR 199 - 1984-09-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
While it is difficult if not impossible to assign to each of the three words “request,” “privity” and “consent” a meaning which will not to some extent overlap that of either of the others, after carefully reading all the authorities cited I accept as settled law the view enunciated in Graham v. Williams, 8 O.R. 478; 9 O.R.
-
2,035.
Skogman v. The Queen - [1984] 2 SCR 93 - 1984-07-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Prerogative writs
See Williams J. in Hodgkinson v. Fernie (1857), 3 C.B. (N.S.) 189. During this same epoch, there developed a parallel procedure by way of application to a court of general jurisdiction for the judicial control of non-statutory tribunals and emanations of the state which did not have the attributes of an inferior court.
-
2,036.
Schneider v. The Queen - [1982] 2 SCR 112 - 1982-08-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., and Inge Otto, for the intervener the Attorney General for Alberta.
-
2,037.
Swietlinski v. R. - [1980] 2 SCR 956 - 1980-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Comm. 198; and the words of Glanville Williams, Textbook of Criminal Law (1978), at p. 204:
-
2,038.
Simpsons-Sears Ltd. v. Provincial Secretary (N.B.) et al. - [1978] 2 SCR 869 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Solicitor for the Attorney General for Alberta: William Henkel, Edmonton.
-
2,039.
Northern Electric Co. Ltd. v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co. - [1977] 2 SCR 762 - 1976-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Priorities and hypothecs
While it is difficult if not impossible to assign to each of the three words “request”, “privity” and “consent” a meaning which will not to some extent overlap that of either of the others, after carefully reading all the authorities cited I accept as settled law the view enunciated in Graham v. Williams, 8 O.R. 478; 9 O.R.
-
2,040.
Paton v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 341 - 1968-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
For instance, when an enactment deals with a right of appeal, the situations affected are future cases only, pending cases are not taken in: Taylor v. The Queen[11]; William v. Irvine[12]; Hyde v. Lindsay[13]; Flemming v. Atkinson[14]; Ville de Jacques-Cartier v. Lamarre[15].
-
2,041.
Benjamins v. Chartered Trust Co. - [1965] SCR 251 - 1965-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
This section has been interpreted as applying only “in so far as the will comprises dispositions of real and personal estate” (see Hawkins on Wills, 2nd ed., p. 22, Re Karch[8], per Middleton J. at 511 and 512, In Re Chapman, Perkins v. Chapman[9], per Vaughan Williams L.J. at 435), and it is contended that the second
-
2,042.
Canadian Exploration Limited v. Rotter - [1961] SCR 15 - 1960-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsPublic utilities
an opinion in which Williams, Willes and Keating JJ. concurred. The reference to this case in the 25th edition of Prideaux's Precedents in Conveyancing at p. 183 reads:
-
2,043.
Henry Birks & Sons (Montreal) Ltd. v. City of Montreal - [1955] SCR 799 - 1955-10-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
XV; (1833) 3 et 4 William IV cap. XLII), cette législation―dont cette loi d'avant la Réforme (1448) 27 Hen. VI cap.
-
2,044.
Wilson v. Minister of National Revenue - [1955] SCR 352 - 1955-04-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Mr. Justice Williams, in referring to the Egerton-Warburton case, supra, after stating that the payments to Just Brothers were of a capital nature, continued at p. 279:
-
2,045.
McGonegal et al. v. Gray et al. - [1952] 2 SCR 274 - 1952-06-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsEducation law
McDowall v. Great Western Ry. Co.[30]; Corby v. Foster[31]; Yachuk v. Blais[32]; Kelly v. Barton[33]; Williams v. Eady[34].
-
2,046.
Welstead v. Brown - [1952] 1 SCR 3 - 1951-10-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
In the same case Lord MacDermott states: “The evidence must no doubt be fair and satisfy beyond a mere balance of probabilities, and conclusive in the sense that it will satisfy what Lord Stowell, when Sir William Scott, described in Loveden v. Loveden[23], as “the guarded discretion of a reasonable and just man.”
-
2,047.
Bagg v. Minister of National Revenue - [1949] SCR 574 - 1949-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
The answers to both depend upon what the Company did and the evidence of William Edward Johnson makes that matter clear.
-
2,048.
Hoefle v. Bongard & Company - [1945] SCR 360 - 1945-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
But so far as the circumstances permit, they are to be the ground of conclusions of probability: Williams v. Peel River Land and Mineral Company Ltd.[5] The case is analogous to that of a breach of covenant to re-deliver shares and prima facie the defendants are held to have prevented the shares from remaining the property
-
2,049.
Dominion Glass Co. Ltd. v. The Ship Anglo Indian and Her Owners - [1944] SCR 409 - 1944-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
The point, he continues, was arguable but what had turned the scale in the earlier Court of Appeal case was that to come to the result opposite to that of the decision would be, as Vaughan Williams L.J., put it
-
2,050.
Workmen's Compensation Board v. Theed - [1940] SCR 553 - 1940-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
In fact, as Lord Justice Atkin in Williams v. Guest[51], he had already said:—