Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
551.
Brule v. Plummer - [1979] 2 SCR 343 - 1979-01-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Solicitors for the appellants: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondents: Wentzell, Gautreau & Roine, Ottawa.
-
552.
Bradburn v. Wentworth Arms Hotel - [1979] 1 SCR 846 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and G.G. Paliare, for the appellants. Claude Thomson, Q.C., and Gavin MacKenzie, for the respondents. [...] Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondents: Campbell, Godfrey & Lewtas, Toronto.
-
553.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Sherman et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 883 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitors for Robert A. Lalonde: Cameron, Brewing & Scott, Toronto.
-
554.
Cherneskey v. Armadale Publishers Ltd. - [1979] 1 SCR 1067 - 1978-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
It is to be noted also that Scott L.J. limited his opinion to cases where there was "an absence of special [...] In the course of his judgment, Scott L.J. made some significant comments on the publication of letters by newspapers, pp. 318-20: [...] Understood in this way, Scott L.J's statement fits well with his other comments as well as previous authority.
-
555.
Herman et al. v. Deputy Attorney General (Canada) - [1979] 1 SCR 729 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
606; St. Hilaire v. Lambert (1909), 42 S.C.R. 264; Godson v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto (1890), 18 S.C.R. 36; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Hernandez, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 228; Re Sproule (1886), 12 S.C.R. 140; R. v. Northumberland Ferries Ltd., [1945] S.C.R. 458; Scott v. Vardy, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 293 referred to.] [...] The two cases are Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Humberto Pagan Hernandez[5] and Scott v. Vardy[6]. [...] Scott v. Vardy, supra, was also a decision under the Extradition Act. There one of the questions was whether the magistrate, a provincial appointee, who took depositions under the Act was, like the Judge in the Hernandez case, amenable to the reviewing authority of the Federal Court of Appeal as a persona designata.
-
556.
Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Police Commissioners - [1979] 1 SCR 311 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Ian Scott, Q.C., for the appellant. P.D. Amey, for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Waterous, Holden, Kellock & Kent, Brantford.
-
557.
Saskatoon (City of) v. Smith-Roles Ltd. - [1978] 2 SCR 1121 - 1978-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
The Master of the Rolls, Sir Wilfred Greene, stated (and in this Scott L.J. agreed) that these were not “two separate and independent rights” but combined to represent the compensation receivable upon the taking, (Horn v. Sunderland Corporation, supra, at p. 486). [...] Concurring with the Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Scott, after finding that compensation for disturbance is merely an element in the price of land, went on to conclude that the expropriatee upon being compensated on the basis of fair market value for the highest and best use became ineligible to receive compensation for
-
558.
R. v. Olan et al. - [1978] 2 SCR 1175 - 1978-05-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Cox and Paton v. The Queen, [1963] S.C.R. 500; R. v. Lemire, [1965] S.C.R. 174; R. v. Renard (1974), 17 C.C.C. (2d) 355; Scott v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, [1975] A.C. 819; R. v. Sinclair, [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1246; R. v. Allsop (1976), 64 Cr. App. R. 29; R. v. Smith, [1963] 1 C.C.C. 68; Welham v. D.P.P., [1960] 1 All [...] In Scott v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner[3], the House of Lords held that in the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud, deceit is not a necessary ingredient, although in a great many cases the fraud may have been perpetrated by deceit. [...] We see nothing in Lord Diplock’s speech [in Scott] to suggest a different view.
-
559.
Martin et al. v. R. - [1978] 2 SCR 511 - 1978-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
H. Lorne Morphy, Q.C., Charles F. Scott and Marilyn L. Pilkington, for the appellants Simard and Desjardins.
-
560.
Rathwell v. Rathwell - [1978] 2 SCR 436 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
from contract and tort, in which the court subjects "a person holding title to property . . , to an equitable duty to convey it to another on the ground that he would be unjustly enriched if he were permitted to retain it"; Murdoch v. Murdoch at p. 455, per Laskin J., citing Scott, Law of Trusts (3d), Vol. 5, at p. 3215. [...] As expressed by Professor Scott in an article entitled "Constructive Trusts" (1955), 71 L.Q.Rev. 39 at p. 41:
-
561.
Reference re Agricultural Products Marketing - [1978] 2 SCR 1198 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
François Lemieux and Scott McLean, for the Canadian Egg Marketing Agency.
-
562.
Adricon Ltée v. East Angus (Town of) - [1978] 1 SCR 1107 - 1977-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Municipal law
Solicitors for the respondent: Desmarais, Scott & Rivard, Sherbrooke.
-
563.
Wilby v. Minister of Manpower and Immigration et al. - [1978] 1 SCR 490 - 1977-10-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: G.W. Ainslie, Ottawa.
-
564.
Senstad v. Makus - [1978] 2 SCR 44 - 1977-09-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
In Choma v. Chmelyk[3], which arose out of an agreement for sale of land to which the wife had not consented, Scott J. (as he then was) held that s. 3 of the Act made the agreement null and void only in so far as it affected the wife’s dower interest. [...] This amendment confirmed as law the view expressed by Scott J. in Choma.
-
565.
Dechow v. R. - [1978] 1 SCR 951 - 1977-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The articles alleged to be obscene in this case, and so found by Judge Scott on the trial de novo, may comprehensively be called sex devices or sex stimulators. [...] Judge Scott divided the articles into two groups and found those in one group obscene and those in the second group not obscene. [...] What appears to be new in Judge Scott’s decision was the application of the test to a charge of distribution which did not involve a “publication”.
-
566.
Foundation of Canada Engineering Corp. Ltd. v. Canadian Indemnity Co. et al. - [1978] 1 SCR 84 - 1977-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
R.J. Scott and M.T. Green, for the plaintiff, appellant. G. Jewers, Q.C., and K.D. Klein, for the defendants, respondents.
-
567.
Nepean Carleton Developments v. Hope et al. - [1978] 1 SCR 427 - 1976-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Scott Munro Hope and Ruth Hope (Defendants) and Dulmage Boyd Kirkland & Murphy (Third Party) Respondents. [...] The other issues in these appeals, common to both agreements, need be considered therefore only in relation to the Scott Hope agreement. [...] It becomes unnecessary to do so in respect of the Scott Hope agreement since the purchase is to be completed under the direction in these reasons.
-
568.
Boulet v. The Queen - [1978] 1 SCR 332 - 1976-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
They crossed the Quebec City bridge and went toward the Hotel St-Henri in Scott together, in Lamothe’s and Quirion’s cars; they stopped a couple of miles from the hotel. [...] He followed them, for no particular reason, on September 18, and with them he met Bilodeau, whom he did not know, near the Hotel St-Henri in Scott. [...] Lord Russell C.J., referring to, and adopting the Scott case, supra, said (Regina v. Erdheim, (1896) 2 Q.B., 260 at 267, 18 Cox C.C. 355):
-
569.
Re: Anti-Inflation Act - [1976] 2 SCR 373 - 1976-07-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Ian Scott, Q.C., S. T. Goudge and C. G. Paliare, for the Ontario Public Service Employees' Union and the Canadian Union of Public Employees and Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1230. [...] Solicitors for the Ontario Public Service Employees' Union, for the Canadian Union of Public Employees and for the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 1230: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
570.
Doyle v. R. - [1977] 1 SCR 597 - 1976-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
(5) On April 1, 1974, the appellant appeared before another magistrate named Clement Scott, and on this occasion for the first time the charges were read to him in open court whereafter the Crown at once applied for a further adjournment until August 1st. [...] It is to be noted that between December 8, 1973 when the appellant was arrested, and April 1, 1974, when he appeared before Magistrate Clement Scott, no steps whatever appear to have been taken by the Crown to comply with the requirements of Part XV or XVI of the Criminal Code. [...] I am accordingly of the opinion that Magistrate Scott exceeded his power when he adjourned the case on April 1st and that jurisdiction over the person of the accused was accordingly lost and that the recognizance entered into by the appellant before Magistrate O’Neill on December 11, 1973, is thereby voided.
-
571.
Di Iorio v. Warden of the Montreal Jail - [1978] 1 SCR 152 - 1976-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Such legislation trenches upon the rule expressed in the maxim nemo tenetur seipsum accusare which has been described (by Coleridge J. in R. v. Scott, 169 E.R. 909) as "a maxim of our law as settled, as important and as wise as almost any other in it."
-
572.
Minister of Revenue (Ontario) v. McCreath - [1977] 1 SCR 2 - 1976-02-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
James Scott McCreath, Michelle A. McCreath, Martin R. McCreath, Ralph Scott McCreath, Paul C. McCreath and Annie Franceschini (Defendants) Respondents.
-
573.
Vardy v. Scott et al. - [1977] 1 SCR 293 - 1976-02-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Criminal law
Prerogative writs
Vardy v. Scott et al., Vardy c. Scott et al., [1977] 1 SCR 293, [1977] 1 RCS 293 [...] Vardy v. Scott et al., [1977] 1 S.C.R. 293 Date: 1976-02-25 Oliver L. Vardy Appellant; [...] The respondent magistrate, Clement Scott, ruled that counsel [Page 299]
-
574.
Liquor Control Commission of Manitoba v. Carling O’Keefe Ltd. et al. - [1977] 1 SCR 99 - 1976-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
R.J. Scott, C.G. Labman and M.S. Rusen, for the respondents, Carling O’Keefe Ltd., Labatt’s Manitoba Brewery, Kiewel-Pelissier Breweries Ltd. and Molson’s Brewery Manitoba Ltd.
-
575.
Hodgins v. Hydro-Electric Commission of Nepean - [1976] 2 SCR 501 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
This finding is based upon the evidence given at trial by Mr. Runions and also by Mr. William L. Scott, a professional engineer and the manager of the Ontario Electrical League. [...] Mr. Scott testified that had he been called upon to perform the task requested from Mr. Runions he would have made the same calculation and arrived at the same result. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent: Bell, Baker, Thompson, Oyen & Webber, Ottawa.