Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
351.
Lewkowicz v. Korzewich - [1956] SCR 170 - 1955-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
The second marriage need not be shown to have been such as to constitute a valid marriage but for the first; Reg. v. Brierly[17] at 537; Reg. v. Allen[18]; R. v. Robinson[19].
-
352.
Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact Section 498A of the Criminal Code - [1936] SCR 363 - 1936-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
J. Allen K.C. for the Attorney-General of Manitoba. W. S. Gray K.C. for the Attorney-General of Alberta.
-
353.
Veronneau v. The King - (1916) 54 SCR 7 - 1916-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Rex v. Willmont[19] ; Allen, v. The King[20]. To hold, as was apparently held by one learned judge in the Hayes Case[21], at page 118, that, because the appellant was subsequently convicted by a petit jury at the trial, to which he was compelled to proceed upon the rejection of his motion to quash, it cannot be said that he
-
354.
Graves v The King - (1913) 47 SCR 568 - 1913-02-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen v. The King[14]. Newcombe K.C. for the Attorney-General of Nova Scotia discussed the evidence in regard to the res gestœ, and referred to 1 Hawk.
-
355.
Grand Trunk Rway. Co. v. McKay - (1903) 34 SCR 81 - 1903-12-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
I adopt the language of Allen J. in Weber v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.[8]
-
356.
Walsh v. Trebilcock - (1894) 23 SCR 695 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
This is shown by the case of Allen v. Hearn[11]. It may also be within the prohibition contained in section 131 of the Election Act, although that section, as I had occasion to point out in the North Perth Election Case[12], has a much wider scope and is not confined to aleatory contracts like wagers.
-
357.
Williams v. The City of Portland - (1891) 19 SCR 159 - 1891-05-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Solicitor for respondents: I. Allen Jack. [1] 4 Q. B. D. 375. [2] 12 Q. B. 439.
-
358.
Gore District Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Samo - (1878) 2 SCR 411 - 1878-06-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
[37] 5 Allen N.B.R. 246. [38] 46 Maine 394, (1859.)
-
359.
City of Fredericton v. The Queen - (1880) 3 SCR 505 - 1880-04-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
In Michaelmas Term, 1879, the Court, consisting of the Chief Justice Allen and Judges Weldon, Fisher, Wetmore, and Palmer, gave judgment, holding The Canada Temperance Act, 1878, void, as being ultra vires of the Parliament of Canada; Palmer, J., dissenting[1]. [...] Chief Justice Allen in the Court below says: "had this Act prohibited the sale of liquor, instead of merely restricting and regulating it, I should have had no doubt about the power of Parliament to pass such an Act."
-
360.
Design Services Ltd. v. Canada - 2008 SCC 22 - [2008] 1 SCR 737 - 2008-05-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 8th ed. Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006.
-
361.
Swinamer v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) - [1994] 1 SCR 445 - 1994-03-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
He assigned a foreman, Gerald Allen, and a survey technician to survey the roads in the district to assess the extent of the problem.
-
362.
Harrison v. Carswell - [1976] 2 SCR 200 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
(1972), pp. 49-90; and Allen, Law in the Making, 7th ed. (1964), pp. 302-11.)
-
363.
Avon v. R. - [1971] SCR 650 - 1971-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
”. I note that as early as in Allen v. [Page 668] The King[18], Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J., in reasons expressly concurred in by Duff J., as he then was, said at pp. 339 and 340:
-
364.
The Queen v. Neil - [1957] SCR 685 - 1957-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Had the matter been one for determination by a jury it would be my opinion that the improper admission of this evidence would have necessitated a rehearing for the reasons stated by Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. in Allen v. The King 1, and by Lord Herschell L.C. in Makin et ux. v. The Attorney-General for New South Wales 2.
-
365.
English and Laing v. Richmond et al. - [1956] SCR 383 - 1956-03-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Solicitors for the appellants: Allen, Weekes & Lawson. Solicitors for the respondents: Fennell, McLean & Seed.
-
366.
Ingersoll Telephone Co. v. Bell Telephone Co. of Canada - (1916) 53 SCR 583 - 1916-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
See, too, Brown and Allen on Compensation (2 ed.), p. 97, and authorities cited by both authors.
-
367.
Belanger v. Montreal Water and Power Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 356 - 1914-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The principle of this arrêt was applied in Allen & Curry Manufacturing Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.[16], to a contract not
-
368.
Hamelin v. Bannerman - (1901) 31 SCR 534 - 1901-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Co. v. Allen ([10]); Breakey v. Carter ([11]); Bazinet v. Gadoury ([12]); Demers v. Germain ([13]); 2 Demolombe " Contract " No. 4.
-
369.
City of New Westminster v. Brighouse - (1892) 20 SCR 520 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The case of The Corporation of Birmingham v. Allen[29] was decided after the publication of the first edition of Mr. Goddard's treatise from which I have quoted those passages, which are not materially altered in the later editions.
-
370.
R. v. Safarzadeh‑Markhali - 2016 SCC 14 - [2016] 1 SCR 180 - 2016-04-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Greg J. Allen and Kenneth K. Leung, for the intervener the West Coast Prison Justice Society.
-
371.
Williams v. Canada - [1992] 1 SCR 877 - 1992-04-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Taxation
Solicitors for the appellant: Snarch & Allen, Vancouver. Solicitor for the respondent: The Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa.
-
372.
Zacks v. Zacks - [1973] SCR 891 - 1973-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Family law
Allen J.A., who delivered the majority decision, said that “the silence of the decree nisi on the subject of maintenance bars further proceedings in this action for that relief”.
-
373.
O'Grady v. Sparling - [1960] SCR 804 - 1960-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
(ii) It has been decided by this Court, notably in Provincial Secretary of P.E.I. v. Egan18 and in O'Brien v. Allen19, that the field of regulation of highway traffic within a province is wholly provincial.
-
374.
The Queen v. Snider - [1954] SCR 479 - 1954-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
...Now, before discussing the case of Allen v. Flood and what was decided therein, there are two observations of a general character which I wish to make, and one is to repeat what I have very often said before, that every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved, or assumed to be proved, since the
-
375.
The King v. Dominion of Canada Postage Stamp Vending Co. Ltd. - [1930] SCR 500 - 1930-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
See also British Actors Film Co. v. Glover[11]; King v. David Allen & Sons Bill Posting, Limited[12]; McManus v. Cooke[13]; Wilson v. Tavener[14]; Lowe v. Adams[15]; James Jones & Sons v. Tankerville[16].