Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
376.
Cameron v. Church of Christ, Scientist - (1918) 57 SCR 298 - 1918-10-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
The uplifting of humanity is a benevolent but not a charitable purpose; James v. Allen[11].
-
377.
Western Canada Power Co. v. Bergklint - (1916) 54 SCR 285 - 1916-12-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The preparation of the hill from time to time was not a "system" defects in which would entail liability: Allen v. New Gas Co.[2].
-
378.
Tweedie v. The King - (1915) 52 SCR 197 - 1915-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Rogers v. Allen[30]; Attorney-General v. Emerson[31]. The reference in the lease of 1818 to the fact that an adjacent part of the foreshore was then occupied by a boom held by Francis Peabody, Esq., is significant in this connection.
-
379.
British Columbia Electric Railway Co. v. Crompton - (1910) 43 SCR 1 - 1910-02-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
ton, Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway Co.[2], and more recently by Riddell J. in Allen v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co[3].
-
380.
Bank of Montreal v. The King - (1907) 38 SCR 258 - 1907-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
In 1871, Mr. Justice Allen, speaking for the Court of Appeals of New York, in the National Park Bank v. Ninth National Bank[22], reviewed the whole jurisprudence:
-
381.
Manitoba Assurance Co. v. Whitla / Whitla v. Royal Insurance Co. - (1903) 34 SCR 191 - 1903-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
[12] 4 Allen (Mass.) 217. [13] 6 Cush. (Mass.) 342. [14] 2 Watts & Sargeant (Penn.) 506 at p. 544.
-
382.
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral v. Aga - 2021 SCC 22 - [2021] 1 SCR 868 - 2021-05-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Solicitors for the intervener the British Columbia Humanist Association: Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel, Vancouver.
-
383.
Bell Canada v. Canadian Telephone Employees Association - 2003 SCC 36 - [2003] 1 SCR 884 - 2003-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Solicitors for the intervener the Public Service Alliance of Canada: Raven, Allen, Cameron & Ballantyne, Ottawa.
-
384.
Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan - 2003 SCC 20 - [2003] 1 SCR 247 - 2003-04-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Solicitors for the respondent: Allen Dixon Smith Townsend, Fredericton.
-
385.
Canada v. Antosko - [1994] 2 SCR 312 - 1994-05-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the appellants: Mockler, Allen & Dixon, Fredericton. Solicitor for the respondent: John C. Tait, Ottawa.
-
386.
R. v. Gosset - [1993] 3 SCR 76 - 1993-09-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen Gosset Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Gosset
-
387.
Holt v. Telford - [1987] 2 SCR 193 - 1987-09-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
At page 90 Allen J.A. stated: Rule 95 contains provision enabling the court to direct a counterclaim to be excluded or tried separately if it cannot be conveniently disposed of in the same action.
-
388.
Winnipeg Teachers’ Association v. Winnipeg School Division No. 1. - [1976] 2 SCR 695 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
F.D. Allen, Q.C. and R.T. Willis, for the defendant, appellant. H.B. Parker and J.L. Condra, for the plaintiff, respondent.
-
389.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Therien - [1960] SCR 265 - 1960-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
As it was said by Lord Dunedin in Sorrell v. Smith[15], in summarizing what had been decided in Mogul Steamship Company v. M'Gregor[16], Allen v. Flood[17] and Quinn v. Leathem[18], even though the dominating motive in a certain course of action may be the furtherance of your own business or your own interests, you are not
-
390.
The Municipality of the City and County of Saint-John et al. v. Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation et al. - [1958] SCR 263 - 1958-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Taxation
(11 Allen) 157. 20 (1812), 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116. 21 (1880), 5 P.D. 197.
-
391.
Orchard v. Tunney - [1957] SCR 436 - 1957-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
We have examples which are clear in legal features, such as marriage, but the difficulty of bringing them under a general conception or principle is demonstrated in the comprehensive exposition given the subject by Dr. Carleton K. Allen in (1930), 46 L.Q.R. 277.
-
392.
F.W. Pirie Company Ltd. v. Canadian National Ry. Co. and Simmons - [1943] SCR 275 - 1943-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Solicitor for the respondent, Canadian National Railway Company: T. J. Allen.
-
393.
British & Foreign Bible Society v. Tupper - (1905) 37 SCR 100 - 1905-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
In Allen v. McPherson[12] all the distinguished jurists who there delivered judgments, but especially Lord Lyndhurst, at page 209, and Lord Campbell, at page 233, expressed themselves in terms which leave no doubt that the ecclesiastical courts formerly could and the Court of Probate can now admit part of an instrument to
-
394.
Peoples Bank of Halifax v. Estey - (1904) 34 SCR 429 - 1904-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
[9] 11 Allen (Mass.) 349. [10] L. R. 10 C. P. 354. [11] 15 East 37.
-
395.
Pacaud v. The Queen - (1899) 29 SCR 637 - 1899-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil law
; Mogul Steamship Co. v. McGregor Gow & Co ([1]) ; Allen v. Flood ([2]) ; Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik v. Schott, Segner & Co. ([3]) ; The Queen v. Dunn ([4]), at page 402; Canada Central Railway Co. v. The Queen ([5]) ; Clarke v. Eckroyd ([6]) ; Hereford Railway Co. v. Tue Queen ([7]).
-
396.
The Queen v. Chesley - (1888) 16 SCR 306 - 1888-03-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
Ungley v. Ungley[3]; Gray v. Turnbull[4]; Allen v. Quebec Warehouse Co.[5]; Metropolitan Railway Co. v. Wright[6]; Webster v. Friedeberg[7].
-
397.
White v. Nelles - (1885) 11 SCR 587 - 1885-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
[24] 3 Allen N.B. 489. [25] 4 M. & S. 347. [26] Doe Johnson v. Baytup, 3 A. & E. 188.
-
398.
Clark v. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co. - (1879) 4 SCR 192 - 1879-12-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
"That the said Supreme Court subsequently granted a rule nisi, calling on the plaintiff to show cause why a non-suit should not be entered, and after argument and time having been taken to consider, the judgment of the Court was delivered by Allen, C. J., (the other Judges concurring in such judgment, but giving no reasons
-
399.
Ferguson v. Ferguson - (1878) 2 SCR 497 - 1878-06-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Thompson v. Beasley[14]; Jarman on Wills[15]; Allen v. Markle[16]. [Page 503]
-
400.
1688782 Ontario Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc. - 2020 SCC 35 - [2020] 3 SCR 504 - 2020-11-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsLinden, Allen M., et al. Canadian Tort Law, 11th ed., Toronto: LexisNexis, 2018. [...] Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 10th ed.