Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
201.
Walker v. Foster - (1900) 30 SCR 299 - 1900-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
[16] 13 Allen, (Mass.) 43. [17] 4 DeG. & S. 517. [18] 26 Beav. 261.
-
202.
Sénésac v. The Central Vermont Ry. Co. - (1896) 26 SCR 641 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Arpin v. The Queen (1); Schwersenski v. Vineberg (2); Gravel v. Martin (3); Canada Central Railway Co. v. Murray (4) ; Allen v. Quebec Warehouse Co. (5).
-
203.
Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Scalera - 2000 SCC 24 - [2000] 1 SCR 551 - 2000-05-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Torts
In Allen M. Linden, ed., Studies in Canadian Tort Law. Toronto: Butterworths, 1968. [...] Linden, Allen M. Canadian Tort Law, 6th ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1997. [...] Linden, Allen M., and Lewis N. Klar. Canadian Tort Law: Cases, Notes and Materials, 10th ed.
-
204.
O'Brien v. Procureur Général de la Province de Québec - [1961] SCR 184 - 1960-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Allen O'Brien (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Le Procureur Général de la Province de Québec (Defendant) Respondent.
-
205.
Lemoine v. City of Montreal / Allan v. City of Montreal - (1894) 23 SCR 390 - 1894-05-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
Lemoine v. City of Montreal; Allen v. City of Montreal, (1894) 23 SCR 390
-
206.
R. v. K.G.K. - 2020 SCC 7 - [2020] 1 SCR 364 - 2020-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
238; R. v. Lamacchia, 2012 ONSC 2583, 258 C.R.R. (2d) 370; Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, 2013 SCC 30, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 357; R. v. Teskey, 2007 SCC 25, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 267; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Allen (1996), 92 O.A.C. 345; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880. [...] Reasonableness under s. 11(b) has always accounted for the reality that “[n]o case is an island to be treated as if it were the only case with a legitimate demand on court resources” (R. v. Allen (1996), 92 O.A.C. 345, at para. 27).
-
207.
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Quebec (Attorney General) - 2004 SCC 39 - [2004] 2 SCR 185 - 2004-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Inc. v. Regina (City) Board of Police Commissioners, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 360, 2000 SCC 14; Allen v. Alberta, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 128, 2003 SCC 13; St. Anne Nackawic Pulp & Paper Co. v. Canadian Paper Workers Union, Local 219, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 704; Gendron v. Supply and Services Union of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, [...] Inc. v. Regina (City) Board of Police Commissioners, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 360, 2000 SCC 14; Allen v. Alberta, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 128, 2003 SCC 13.
-
208.
McKenzie v. Huybers - [1929] SCR 38 - 1928-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Russell Mckenzie and Allen McKenzie Appellants; and William Huybers and The Sheriff of The County of Halifax Respondents.
-
209.
Higgins v. Comox Logging & Ry. Co. - [1927] SCR 359 - 1927-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
I may refer to the evidence given by one of the appellants' witnesses, whose testimony impressed the learned trial judge, Allen Brady.
-
210.
Stuart v. Mott - (1894) 23 SCR 384 - 1894-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
[2] 11 Allen (Mass.) 361. [3] 45 N.H. 323. [4] 8 N.H. 129. [5] 26 Ind. 415.
-
211.
The Nova Scotia Marine Ins. Co. v. Stevenson - (1894) 23 SCR 137 - 1894-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Allen v. Quebec Warehouse Company[4]; Arpin v. The Queen[5]. On the merits the learned Counsel cited Lyon v. Stadacona Insurance Co.[6]; Connecticut Insurance Co. v. Luchs[7]; De Wolf v. New York Firemen Insurance Co.[8]; Gandy v. Adelaide Marine Insurance Co.[9].
-
212.
Cumming v. Land Banking and Loan Company - (1893) 22 SCR 246 - 1893-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
[10] 3 Allen (Mass.), 217. [11] 1 Ph. 717. [12] 13 Gr. 40. [13] 12 App. Cas. 617.
-
213.
Canadian Admiral Corporation v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue - [1959] SCR 832 - 1959-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the Canadian Electrical, Manufacturers Association: Hume, Martin & Allen, Toronto.
-
214.
Shook v. Munro et al. - [1948] SCR 539 - 1948-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
The parties did not intend to have their rights determined outside of the ordinary jurisdiction of the court; Pickard v. Allen and Dewar[10].
-
215.
In re Estate of J.W. Drummond, Deceased / Benn v. Hawthorne et al. - [1932] SCR 73 - 1931-06-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
N.W. Rowell K.C., A.W. Marquis K.C. and J.B. Allen for the respondents the executors of the J.H. Benn Estate.
-
216.
Wallace et al. v. Hesslein et al. - (1898) 29 SCR 171 - 1898-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Cunard v. Irvine[6]; Smith v. McKenzie[7]; Freeman v. Allen[8]. The defendants were tenants at will to plaintiffs and cannot dispute their title.
-
217.
City of St. John v. MacDonald - (1886) 14 SCR 1 - 1886-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Solicitor for appellants: I. Allen Jack. Solicitor for respondent: C. L. Richards.
-
218.
R. v. Basque - 2023 SCC 18 - 2023-06-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen, Carleton Kemp. Law in the Making, special ed. New York: Legal Classics Library, 1992. [...] This recalls the principle stated by Professor C. K. Allen: “. . . the Courts will not, if they can help it, allow any enactment to overrule existing Common Law by inference merely”, but “[i]t is quite otherwise when the provision of the statute is express, or when there is a general clear intention to change the law” (Law
-
219.
Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise - 2004 SCC 68 - [2004] 3 SCR 461 - 2004-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Commercial law
Allen, William T., Jack B. Jacobs and Leo E. Strine, Jr. “Function Over Form: A Reassessment of Standards of Review in Delaware Corporation Law” (2001), 26 Del. J. Corp. [...] 66 In order for a plaintiff to succeed in challenging a business decision he or she has to establish that the directors acted (i) in breach of the duty of care and (ii) in a way that caused injury to the plaintiff: W. T. Allen, J. B. Jacobs and L. E. Strine, Jr., “Function Over Form: A Reassessment of Standards of Review in
-
220.
R. v. Downey - [1992] 2 SCR 10 - 1992-05-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, aff'g (1983), 40 O.R. (2d) 660; Re Boyle and The Queen (1983), 5 C.C.C. (3d) 193; R. v. Whyte, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 3; County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979); R. v. Grilo (1991), 64 C.C.C. (3d) 53. [...] The leading case would appear to be County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979).
-
221.
R. v. Oakes - [1986] 1 SCR 103 - 1986-02-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
(1983), 41 O.R. (2d) 713; Tot v. United States, 319 U.S. 463 (1943); Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 (1969); County Court of Ulster County, New York v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979); In Re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970); Pfunders Case (Austria v. Italy) (1963), 6 Yearbook E.C.H.R. 740; X against the United Kingdom, [...] 53. The United States Supreme Court did answer this question in County Court of Ulster County, New York v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979).
-
222.
Clarke v. Baillie - (1911) 45 SCR 50 - 1911-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsSecurities
Conmee v. Securities Holding Co.[19], at pages 609, 613; Rothschild v. Allen[20]. [...] Douglas v. Carpenter[47]; Strickland v. Magoun[48]; Rothschild v. Allen[49].
-
223.
The King v. Schmidt - [1948] SCR 333 - 1948-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
H.W. Allen for the respondent. The judgment of the Chief Justice and of Kerwin J. was delivered by
-
224.
Gach v. The King - [1943] SCR 250 - 1943-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitor for the respondent: John Allen. [1] [1914] A. C. 599, at 609.
-
225.
Larson v. Boyd - (1919) 58 SCR 275 - 1919-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Allen v. The King[6]; Loughead v. Collingwood & Co.[7]; Hyndman v. Stephens[8].