Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

2,237 result(s)

  • 2,226.

    Part 2, 2021 Vol. 2 ([2021] 2 SCR 291-570) - 2021-07-23

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Civil Code of Québec. Civil Resolution Tribunal Act, S.B.C. 2012, c. 25, ss. 2, 118, 133.   [...]  In the instant case, since suspending the declaration of invalidity would not perpetuate interference with any right guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the most determinative principle is that of respect for the distinct institutional roles of the courts and the legislatures (paras. 97 and 126-31).   [...]  As Beetz J. wrote in OPSEU v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 2, unlike in a case involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Le juge en chef 397 gouvernement qu[e] [la Constitution] vise à mettre en œuvre » ainsi que de « la façon dont les dispo-sitions constitutionnelles sont censées interagir les

  • 2,227.

    Part 1, 2020 Vol. 2 ([2020] 2 SCR 3-281) - 2020-06-26

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In addition, s. 515 of the Criminal Code codifies the ladder principle, which requires that the form of release and the conditions of release imposed on an accused be no more onerous than necessary to address the risks listed in s. 515(10).   [...]  Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 7, 11(e). Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19.   [...]  Most accused are not held in custody between the date of the charge and the time of trial because the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 (“Code”), and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”) typically require that accused be released on what is known as “bail”. 1 Accused who are not released from custody by

  • 2,228.

    Part 1, 2019 Vol. 1 ([2019] 1 SCR 3-299) - 2019-01-31

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 1, 3, 33. Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29, s. 3. 13 Citée par le juge Rowe Distinction d’avec l’arrêt : Harper c. Canada (Pro­ cureur général), 2004 CSC 33, [2004] 1 R.C.S. 827; ar-rêt examiné : Reference re Yukon Election Residency Requirements (1986), 1 Y.R. 23; arrêts   [...]  28 FRANK v. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) C. Justification Analysis [36] Section 1 of the Charter provides: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guar- antees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.   [...]  This appeal requires us to consider the constitutionality of those restric- tions — specifically, whether the prohibition on long- term non- resident voting is a reasonable limit on the appellants’ democratic right to vote under s. 3 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, or whether s. 3 requires that all citizens,

  • 2,229.

    Part 2, 2019 Vol. 4 ([2019] 4 S.C.R. 335-651) - 2019-12-13

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 9, 10(b). Charter of human rights and freedoms, CQLR, c. C-12, ss. 24, 29, 49 para. 1.   [...]  division of legislative powers or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”) (see R. v. Wiley, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 263, at p. 279; Kokesch, at pp. 33-34).   [...]  In that case, the Court held that universities do not form part of “government” within the meaning of s. 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The following comment at pp. 272-74, adjusted for context, is applicable to the pension boards:

  • 2,230.

    SCR | RCS [2008] vol 3 - 2008-12-11

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 24(1). Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, ss. 686(1)(a)(ii), (b)(iii), (2)(b).   [...]  III. The Crown's Failure to Disclose [24] With respect to the fresh evidence not availa-ble to the defence at trial due to the Crown's failure to disclose, a new trial is the appropriate remedy under s. 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms if the accused can show that his right to make full answer and   [...]  rules against multiple convictions and against collateral attack; the pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict; and s. 11(h) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [84] [105] [149] It is well established in the civil context that three preconditions must be met for issue estoppel to be successfully invoked.

  • 2,231.

    SCR | RCS [1983] vol 1 - 1983-12-15

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    [ 1983] 1 R.C.S. WESTENDORP C. LA REINE result, counsel for the appellant abandoned the challenge under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What, therefore, is left for determination by this Court is whether the challenged by-law s. 6.1(1) is outside the powers assigned to the Province, invad-ing federal   [...]  It should be mentioned that, at the time of the trial, the appeal, and above all, the decision of this Court to authorize the appeal, Canada did not yet have the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The coming into force of the Charter now greatly diminishes the importance this appeal had at the time, namely that it   [...]  Criminal law — Prostitution — Municipal by-law — Street control — Prostitution banned from streets — Whether or not by-law ultra vires as invasion of federal criminal law powers — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 — The Munic-ipal Government Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 246, s. 152(1)(a) — The Street By-law, City of

  • 2,232.

    Part 3, 2021 Vol. 2 ([2021] 2 SCR 571-844) - 2021-09-24

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 2(b). Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C-25.01, art. 349.   [...]  Indeed, it is critical to upholding the responsibility all courts have to manage their records in accordance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the proper administration of justice. As ancillary court openness issues have no bearing on the judgments on the merits, there was no reason for the Court of

  • 2,233.

    Part 3, 2019 Vol. 1 ([2019] 1 S.C.R. i-xlix 573-843) - 2019-02-28

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    S.C. 2000, c. 9 s. 11(d) ................................................. 3 s. 222 .................................................... 3 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s. 1 ........................................................ 3, 484 s. 3 ........................................................ 3, 484 s. 7  [...]   right to vote in federal elec- tions to Canadian citizens residing abroad for five consecutive years or more — Attorney General of Canada conceding in- fringement of right to vote — Whether infringement jus- tified — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 1, 3 — Canada Elections Act, S.C. 2000, c. 9, ss. 11(d), 222.

  • 2,234.

    Part 3, 2019 Vol. 4 ([2019] 4 SCR i-lxi 653-960) - 2019-12-20

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 1. Canadian Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-19, s. 5(3).   [...]  However, it is important to draw a distinction between cases in which it is alleged that the effect of the administrative decision being reviewed is to unjustifiably limit rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (as was the case in Doré) and those in which the issue on review is whether a provision of the

  • 2,235.

    Part 2, 2021 Vol. 1 ([2021] 1 SCR 175-520) - 2021-03-25

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, preamble, s. 5. Carbon Tax Act, S.B.C. 2008, c. 40, s. 84.   [...]  It is also expressly recognized in the preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.”

  • 2,236.

    Part 3, 2020 Vol. 2 ([2020] 2 SCR i-lxi 587-849) - 2020-09-18

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    C Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s. 11(b) ..................................................

  • 2,237.

    SCR | RCS [1982] vol 2 - 1982-12-31

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    III—The position of the parties Before coming to the submissions made by the parties, it should be said at the outset that the g Attorney General of Canada conceded that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms con-tained in the Constitution Act, 1982 affects the legislative competence of all the provinces includ-h ing   [...]  The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms C is not identical to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms referred to in the First Reference and the procedure for amending the Constitution of Canada differs substantially from the amending d procedure also referred to in the First Reference.