Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
4,176.
Clergue v. Vivian & Co. - (1909) 41 SCR 607 - 1909-04-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
On this branch of the case we rely on Laird v. Pim[3]; Moor v. Roberts[4]; Dart (7 ed.), page 999; Sugden on Vendors (14 ed.), pages 239-40, and note; Poole v. Hill[5]; East London Union v. Metropolitan Railway Co.[6]; Pordage v. Cole[7]; Dunlop v. Grote[8]; Thomas and Beatty v. Ross[9]; McArthur v. Winslow[10]; Williams
-
4,177.
Equity Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson - (1909) 41 SCR 491 - 1909-04-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
Before its adoption in Ontario in 1876 it had received a like construction in the NewYork Courts, Williams v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co.[23], in 1874, and I respectfully agree in the statement of the Chief Justice of Ontario in the present case that [...] A similar view was expressed by Vaughan-Williams L.J., in Southwark Union v. City of London Union[27]. [...] But the decisions in Williams v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co.[41]; Putnam v. Commonwealth Ins. Co.[42]; Mayor of New York v. Hamilton Fire Ins. Co.[43]; Hynds v. Schenectady County Mut. Ins. Co.[44]; Springfield Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Wade[45], and other American cases are not susceptible of this explanation.
-
4,178.
Porter v. Purdy - (1909) 41 SCR 471 - 1909-04-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Louage
valued by two indifferent persons, one to be chosen by each party, which two parties, in case of disagreement, shall choose a third, the appraisement of whom, or any two of whom, shall be conclusive, as to the value of such buildings and improvements; at which time it shall be in the option of the said Charles William K. [...] Nudell v. Williams[5] is in the same direction. The observations by eminent judges in Hamlyn & Co. v. Wood & Co.[6] to the effect that cases upon other contracts are of little service stand good, yet the authorities largely got together in the argument of that case, and on the same subject of necessary implication [...] whom, or any two of them, shall be conclusive as to the value of such buildings and improvements; at which time it shall be in the option of the said Charles William K. Cunard, his heirs and assigns, to pay to the said Anne Cunard, her executors, administrators and assigns, such appraised value, or to continue the lease of
-
4,179.
Stuart v. Bank of Montreal - (1909) 41 SCR 516 - 1909-04-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit de la famille
I might well adopt and apply the language used in relation to a more extended view of the nature of authority by Sir William Markby, in his book on “Elements of Law,” par. 99: [...] In Re North-Western Rubber Co. and Hiittenbach & Co.[79] Vaughan-Williams L.J., referring to Hutcheson & Co. v. Eaton & Son[80], said: [...] Other recent instances may be found in the following cases: In re Coles and Ravenshear[81]; In re Russian Petroleum and Liquid Fuel Co.[82]; Fear v. Morgan[83]; In re Stucley[84]; Fitzroy v. Cave[85]; Williams v. Hunt[86], and In re Ambler; Woodhead v. Ambler[87].
-
4,180.
Peterborough West Election Case (Stratton v. Burnham) - (1909) 41 SCR 410 - 1909-03-29
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
"I, William Henry Moore, of the City of Peterborough in the County of Peterborough, solicitor, make oath and say: [...] Solicitor for the respondent: William H. Moore. [1] 38 Can. S.C.R. 207.
-
4,181.
Faulkner v. City of Ottawa - (1909) 41 SCR 190 - 1909-02-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
Examples of the rigid application of the principle will be found in Williams v. Corporation of Raleigh[3], and in East Freemantle Corporation v. Annois[4].
-
4,182.
Province of Ontario v. Dominion of Canada - (1909) 42 SCR 1 - 1909-02-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
As illustrating that to some extent I want to refer to a case, Williams v. Howarth[18]. [...] That is a no more extraordinary result I submit than that which took place in the case of Williams v. Howarth[23], about the soldier.
-
4,183.
Vaughan v. Eastern Townships Bank - (1909) 41 SCR 286 - 1909-02-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
William H Covert (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1908: October 6, 7; 1909: February 12. [...] That being so when the pre-emption was surrendered to the Crown the water right passed with it without any express act or mention; see Williams on Real Property (ed. 1892), p. 391, and authorities there cited.
-
4,184.
Ponton v. City of Winnipeg - (1909) 41 SCR 366 - 1909-01-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Action
William Nisbet Ponton (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The City of Winnipeg (Defendant) Respondent.
-
4,185.
Grimsby Park Co. v. Irving - (1908) 41 SCR 35 - 1908-12-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
William H. Irving (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1908: November 12; 1908: December 15.
-
4,186.
Rhodes v. Perusse - (1908) 41 SCR 264 - 1908-12-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
the public highway or cove road, in rear toward the north-west by a reserved road or street on one side to the south-west by lot number three sold to the said William Simpson and on the other side to the north-east by a lane or passage of the width of twenty feet between the property above described and that of Benjamin [...] Bounded in front, towards the south-east by the public highway or cove road, in rear towards the north-west by a reserved road or street on one side to the south-west by lot number three sold to the said William Simpson and on the other side to the north-east by a lane or passage of the width of twenty feet between the
-
4,187.
The Bank of Ottawa v. Hood - (1908) 42 SCR 231 - 1908-12-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
be forwarded to William Hood & Son in payment of their work." This arrangement having been assented to by Brewder & McNaughton, the bank wrote to the respondent in regard to drawing the moneys in Montreal, referred to the correspondence with Brewder & McNaughton and enclosed a copy of their letter assenting to
-
4,188.
The King v. Desrosiers - (1908) 41 SCR 71 - 1908-12-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
See Viscount Canterbury v. The Queen[4], in which it was sought to make the late Queen liable upon a petition of right for a wrong done by a servant of William IV., and it was objected, first, that the Queen was not the personal representative of the late King, and, secondly, that if she was, the case was within the rule
-
4,189.
Blaine v. Jamieson - (1908) 41 SCR 25 - 1908-11-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
William Jamieson Respondent. 1908: November 24. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Girouard, Davies, Idington and Duff JJ.
-
4,190.
Ponton v. City of Winnipeg - (1908) 41 SCR 18 - 1908-10-27
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
William Nisbet Ponton (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The City of Winnipeg (Defendant), Respondent.
-
4,191.
Emperor of Russia v. Proskouriakoff - (1908) 42 SCR 226 - 1908-10-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Tribunaux
See Williams v. Leonard[4], per Strong C.J., at page 410; and Green v. George[5], decided by this court on the 13th of November, 1907.
-
4,192.
Beatty v. Mathewson - (1908) 40 SCR 557 - 1908-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
Isabella Eliza Beatty, John D. Beatty and The William Beatty Estate (Defendants) Appellants; [...] William Mathewson (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1908: June 4; 1908: October 6. [...] The appellants, who are trustees under the will of one William Beatty, justify under a deed of conveyance dated 15th September, 1881, made between the respondents and Beatty.
-
4,193.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 40 - 1908-10-06
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaWILLIAM JOHN DAVEY, CARRYING ON BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME RESPONDENTS. AND STYLE OF ELDER, DEMP- . [...] Fr. Rec. 1898, 1, 331; The "Scarsdale" (4) , and in the same case on appeal (5) , per Vaughan Williams L.J., at page 257, per Sterling L.J., at page 258, and in another report (6), per Vaughan Williams L.J., at page 33, referring to the "Sailors' Word Book." [...] VOL. XL.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 115 WILLIAM CHISHOLM (DEFENDANT) . .
-
4,194.
McGarvey v. McNally - (1908) 40 SCR 489 - 1908-06-30
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
William McNally, Ês Qualitê (Defendant) Respondent. 1908: June 10, 11; 1908: June 30. [...] "Mathieu J.—The plaintiff inscribed in review, from a judgment of the Superior Court (Fortin J.), rendered at Montreal 24th October, 1905, maintaining the pleas of the defendant, William McNally ês qualité, and dismissing her action, with costs. [...] The same direction is expressly given later: 'As to the balance or remainder of my estate, I give and bequeath the enjoyment and usufruct thereof to my daughter, Annie McGarvey, wife of William McNally,
-
4,195.
Goold v. Gillies - (1908) 40 SCR 437 - 1908-06-16
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
Solicitor for the respondent: William S. Gray. [1] 55 Ind. 205. [2] 12 Ont. App. R. 50; 13 Can. S.C.R. 1.
-
4,196.
Chisholm v. Chisholm - (1908) 40 SCR 115 - 1908-03-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit de la famille
William Chisholm (Defendant) Appellant; and Evelyn Chisholm (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
4,197.
Inverness Railway & Coal Co. v. Jones et al. - (1908) 40 SCR 45 - 1908-03-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
Sir Alfred Lewis Jones and William John Davey, Carrying on Business Under The Name and Style of Elder, Dempster & Co. (Defendants) Respondents. [...] Fr. Rec. 1898, 1, 331; The "Scarsdale"[6], and in the same case on appeal[7], per Vaughan Williams L.J., at page 257, per Sterling L.J., at page 258, and in another report[8], per Vaughan Williams L.J., at page 33, referring to the "Sailors' Word Book." [...] The orders therefor in each case were given by one Harling, the agent, at said port, of the William Peterson, Limited.
-
4,198.
Montreal Transportation Co. v. New Ontario S.S. Co. - (1908) 40 SCR 160 - 1908-03-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
Williams & Bruce Ad. Prac., 3 ed., p. 369; Secretary of State for India v. Hewitt[10]. [...] In the following year (1883), in the case of "The Eugenie", Mr. Justice Butt is said, in a note to Williams & Bruce, Admiralty Practice (3 ed.), at page 368, [...] Then, although the captain stated he had made a protest at Fort William and notice to produce it had been given, no protest was produced.
-
4,199.
Rioux v. Saint Lawrence Terminal Co. - (1908) 40 SCR 98 - 1908-03-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
We also rely upon the decisions in Williams v. Châteauvert[7]; McCormick v. Simpson[8]; Cadrain v. Theberge[9]; and Breakey v. Bilodeau[10]. [...] I have not overlooked the reference to Williams v. Chàteauvert[13], upon which the trial judge relies, but I cannot see what bearing that case could have on the question at issue here.
-
4,200.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 39 - 1908-02-18
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaSolicitor- for the respondents : William F. O'Connor. 202 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. %XXI%. 1907 WILLIAM THOMAS NORTON 1 *May 20. [...] 236. SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XXXIX. 1907 WILLIAM HENRY SINCLAIR APPELLANT; *June 6. [...] Solicitor for the respondent: William D. Carter. ) VOL. XXXIX.] SUPREME COURT ' OF CANADA: 311 WILLIAM H. LOGAN (DEFENDANT) ...APPELLANT 1907 *Oct. 3, 4.