Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
3,126.
Canada Trust Company v. Lloyd et al. - [1968] SCR 300 - 1968-02-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Tribunaux
citing Cherry v. Boultbee[6] and Courtnay v. Williams[7]. The contribution which the representatives of the three directors who improperly withdrew the moneys must be the amounts taken by each of them with interest thereon at 5 per cent per annum, not compounded, from December 6, 1921.
-
3,127.
Brown & Root Ltd. v. Chimo Shipping Ltd. - [1967] SCR 642 - 1967-06-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit maritime
Transport
Mr. William Nye, the appellant’s agent in Newfoundland, had not been notified by Mr. Gordon Lindsay that there was any necessity to reduce the weight of the crane before loading and he says that when he asked the ship’s master, Captain Anderson, about the capacity of the ship’s derrick he told him that there would be no
-
3,128.
Carleton (County of) v. Ottawa (City) - [1965] SCR 663 - 1965-05-25
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
That class of case was discussed by Vaughan Williams L.J. in Bonner v. Tottenham and Edmonton Permanent Investment Building Society, [1899] 1 Q.B. 161, where Moule v. Garrett, L.R. 7 Ex. 101, was distinguished.
-
3,129.
Springman v. The Queen - [1964] SCR 267 - 1964-03-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
and Vaughan Williams J. said at pp. 112-3: The magistrate was of opinion that primâ facie a carriage on wheels was not a wooden structure or erection within the meaning of the section.
-
3,130.
Hepting et al. v. Schaaf et al. - [1964] SCR 100 - 1963-12-16
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
Evidence of William Johner who acted upon the purchase by the defendant Anthony Schaaf on the premises at 1306 Horace Street, Regina, and who agreed with counsel for the defence in cross-examination:
-
3,131.
Canadian Utilities Ltd. et al. v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue - [1964] SCR 57 - 1963-10-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
In the case of In re Smith v. Hogan Ltd.3, this Court set aside an order of Cannon J. refusing an application for special leave to appeal from a judgment in bankruptcy proceedings pronounced by the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of New Brunswick but the reasons of the Court expressly approve the decision in Williams
-
3,132.
Rister et al. v. Haubrich - [1958] SCR 665 - 1958-10-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
Edwin Rister, William F. Jacobs, Oscar Walters and Isaac Bjerstedt (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
3,133.
Mason v. Freedman - [1958] SCR 483 - 1958-06-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
In Skinner v. Ainsworth[7], the order in Wilson v. Williams[8] was followed and instead of allowing an abatement, the remedy of payment into court as security was adopted.
-
3,134.
Mizinski v. Robillard and McLaughlin - [1957] SCR 351 - 1957-04-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
William Mizinski (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Wilbert Robillard and Jack McLaughlin (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,135.
Canning v. The King - [1937] SCR 421 - 1937-06-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
Solicitor for the appellant: William J. Murdock. Solicitor for the respondent: Gordon S. Wismer.
-
3,136.
New Regina Trading Co. v. The Canadian Credit Men's Trust Assn. - [1934] SCR 47 - 1933-12-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Faillite et insolvabilité
E. K. Williams K.C. for the appellant. F. L. Bastedo K.C. for the respondent.
-
3,137.
Lady Davis v. The Royal Trust Co. Et al. - [1932] SCR 203 - 1932-03-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
The Right Honourable Lord Shaughnessy (William James Shaughnessy), of the city and district of Montreal, Alexander M. Reaper, of the city and district of Montreal, and Lady Davis (Dame Eleanor Curran), of the city and district of Montreal, widow of the late Sir Mortimer Barnet Davis, Knight, all three in their quality of
-
3,138.
Ryan v. Charlesworth - [1930] SCR 427 - 1930-04-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
The extent to which the doctrine that his debt was extinguished was carried is further illustrated by the cases collected in Williams on Executors, vol. ii, p. 1180, which shew that an executor, having assets sufficient and properly applicable to pay a debt due to him from his testator, could not sue the testator’s heir nor
-
3,139.
Houghton Land Corporation v. Rural Municipality of Richot - [1927] SCR 485 - 1927-06-17
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit fiscal
E. K. Williams K.C. and E. F. Newcombe for the appellant. D. H. Laird K.C. for the respondent municipality.
-
3,140.
Livesley v. Horst Co. - [1924] SCR 605 - 1924-11-11
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
The principle upon which such judgments are enforced by the English courts, as stated by Blackburn J. delivering the judgments of the Court of Queen's Bench in Godard v. Gray[19]; and in Schibsby v. Westenholz[20],— following the judgments of Parke B., in Russell v. Smyth[21], and Williams v. Jones[22]—is that the judgment
-
3,141.
Hood v. Caldwell - [1923] SCR 488 - 1923-05-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Action
In In re Wragge[4] Vaughan Williams L.J. points out that in such circumstances the court will not limit itself to the question whether or not there is “no consideration whatever,” but with regard either to the whole of the consideration or to any part of it will give effect to its conclusion that the whole or the part is a
-
3,142.
Northern Alberta Natural Gas Development Co. v. Alberta (Attorney-General) - (1920) 61 SCR 213 - 1920-12-17
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
The principle of the decision in Fort William [Page 221] Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. v. Property Owners [2] seems to be in point.
-
3,143.
Lecomte v. O'Grady - (1918) 57 SCR 563 - 1918-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
E. K. Williams for the respondent. Davies J.—I concur with Mr. Justice Anglin.
-
3,144.
District of North Vancouver v. Tracy - (1903) 34 SCR 132 - 1903-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
Solicitors for the appellant: McPhillips & Williams. Solicitors for the respondent: Davis, Marshall & Macneill.
-
3,145.
Small v. Thompson - (1897) 28 SCR 219 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
See also Williams v. Balfour[15]. Aylesworth Q.C. for the respondent.—The uncontradicted testimony shows that respondent’s purchase of the property was upon the express condition and stipulation that she was not to assume or become liable for the mortgage thereon, but that Sinclair alone was to be liable for the mortgage
-
3,146.
Warner v. Don - (1896) 26 SCR 388 - 1896-06-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
It was decided in 1856 by Lord Hatherly when V. C. Sir William Page Wood that if an instrument which conveys an interest in land conveys also machinery
-
3,147.
Wilson v. Land Security Co. - (1896) 26 SCR 149 - 1896-03-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
William D. Wilson (Defendant) Appellant; and The Land Security Company (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
3,148.
Law v. Hansen - (1895) 25 SCR 69 - 1895-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Action
William Law and Others (Defendants) Appellant And Gustav Conrad Hansen (Plaintiff)
-
3,149.
Parks v. Cahoon - (1894) 23 SCR 92 - 1894-02-20
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
"On the 7th October, 1881, Benjamin Cahoon conveyed the locus by deed to "William Smith (the father of the plaintiff), who by deed dated the 29th September, 1882, conveyed the same to the plaintiff, the consideration being natural love and affection, and $50, which amount the plaintiff proves that she paid in cash out
-
3,150.
Wallace v. Bossom - (1878) 2 SCR 488 - 1878-06-03
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Faillite et insolvabilité
Present—Sir William Buell Richards, Knt., C. J., and Ritchie, Strong, Taschereau, Fournier and Henry, J. J.