Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
3,476.
Maytag et al. v. Rural Municipality of Hanover et al. - [1932] SCR 298 - 1932-02-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
One is that laid down by Vaughan Williams, L.J., in Groves v. Lord Wimborne[5], where his Lordship says:—
-
3,477.
Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of New York v. Vandepitte - [1932] SCR 22 - 1931-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
A word upon Williams v. Baltic Insurance Association of London[4]. There the action was brought by the named insured; and ratification by the beneficiary before the accident occurred brought the case within the scope of Lord Campbell's judgment in Waters' case[5].
-
3,478.
Easterbrook v. The King - [1931] SCR 210 - 1930-12-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]État
Solicitor for the respondent: William C. McCarthy. [1] [1926] Ex. C.R. 28.
-
3,479.
Murray v. Delta Copper Co. - [1926] SCR 144 - 1925-11-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
William F. Murray and others (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and The Delta Copper Company Ltd. and others (Defendants) Respondents
-
3,480.
Orpen v. Roberts - [1925] SCR 364 - 1925-02-03
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
Solicitor for other respondents: William Johnston. [1] 26 Ont. W.N. 401.
-
3,481.
Royal Bank of Canada v. The King - (1921) 62 SCR 313 - 1921-06-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]État
The Royal Bank of Canada, Trustee for Sir Herbert Holt, George Underwood and Estate of the Late Sir William C. Van Horne (Defendant) Appellant;
-
3,482.
Montreal Dry Docks and Ship Repairing Co. v. Halifax Shipyards - (1920) 60 SCR 359 - 1920-05-04
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
The learned trial judge (Drysdale J.) allowed the intervenor's claim for priority in respect of expenditure incurred before the arrest—properly no doubt, recognizing and protecting its common law possessory lien therefor; Williams v. Allsup,[3]; 26 Hals.
-
3,483.
Grace v. Kuebler and Brunner - (1917) 56 SCR 1 - 1917-10-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
In merely making their payments, they were not persons subsequently dealing with it to whom registration in the interval would be notice; Gilleland v. Wadsworth[11]; Williams v. Sorrell[12].
-
3,484.
Rosborough v. Trustees of St. Andrew's Church - (1917) 55 SCR 360 - 1917-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
See also Smith's Equity Jurisprudence in the chapter on Election at page 137 and following pages, and Williams on Executors, 10th ed., page 1030.
-
3,485.
North-West Theatre Co. v. MacKinnon - (1916) 52 SCR 588 - 1916-02-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
A casual consideration of the reference thereto in Williams on Executors (10 ed.) page 1389, especially note (m), seems to indicate that the executor would not, unless entering and holding possession, incur personal liability.
-
3,486.
Bell v. Grand Trunk Rway. Co. - (1913) 48 SCR 561 - 1913-12-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Preuve
Although as a general rule where a plaintiff relies upon the breach by the defendant of a statutory provision which imposes a duty, but contains an exception, he must allege and shew that the defendant is not within the exception, Spieres v. Parker[12], at page 145; Williams v. The East India Co.[13]; Dwarris on Statutes
-
3,487.
Newberry v. Langan - (1912) 47 SCR 114 - 1912-10-29
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
John F. Langan, William B. Ryan and Harry P. Simpson (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
3,488.
Toronto Ry. Co. v. Toms - (1911) 44 SCR 268 - 1911-04-03
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
William Toms (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1911: March 23; 1911: April 3.
-
3,489.
The King v. St. Catharines Hydraulic Co. - (1910) 43 SCR 595 - 1910-11-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Louage
See Lewis v. Stephenson[1]; Nudell v. Williams[2]; Sears v. City of St. John[3].
-
3,490.
In re Richard - (1907) 38 SCR 394 - 1907-03-21
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
We held in the case of Williams v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.[3], that no appeal would lie to us from a refusal of a single judge to give leave to appeal.
-
3,491.
Hewson v. Ontario Power Co. - (1905) 36 SCR 596 - 1905-10-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
William Hewson (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Ontario Power Company of Niagara Falls (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,492.
King's (N.S.) Election Case (Parker v. Borden) - (1905) 36 SCR 520 - 1905-10-03
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
William F. Parker (Petitioner) Appellant And Sir Frederick W. Borden (Respondent)
-
3,493.
Hastings v. Le Roi No. 2, Ltd. - (1903) 34 SCR 177 - 1903-11-30
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
Smith v. Baker[15], at page 362, per Herschell L. J. ; Grant v. Acadia Coal Co. [16] ; Murphy v. Philips[17]; Clarke v. Holmes[18] , per Cockburn C. J. ; Williams v.
-
3,494.
Asbestos & Asbestic Co. v. Durand - (1900) 30 SCR 285 - 1900-04-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
It appears from the evidence of "Williams the superintendent of the mine, that the daily average use was about four boxes and that the course of business was that a person specially entrusted with the duty would, in the morning and again at noon, carry two of the boxes from the magazine to the hoisting engine room, were
-
3,495.
Murray v. Jenkins - (1898) 28 SCR 565 - 1898-06-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
We contend that the memorandum in writing is insufficient under the statute of frauds; Williams v. Jordan[10]; Agnew, Statute of Frauds, p. 258.
-
3,496.
In re Central Bank of Canada - (1897) 28 SCR 192 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
the present Chief Justice, Sir William Meredith, then solicitor of the liquidators in the liquidation matter; that it was revised by the learned Chancellor, and so revised was introduced into Parliament and passed, and that the Master in Ordinary, before whom the proceedings in liquidation were conducted, had urged the
-
3,497.
Winnipeg Election Case / Macdonald Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 201 - 1897-03-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
Edwy William Snider (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: Feb 17; 1897: Mar 24.
-
3,498.
Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association v. Bradt - (1895) 25 SCR 154 - 1895-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
Application of B. Barnes of the Township of West Williams to the Dominion Grange, Mutual Fire Insurance Association, for insurance against loss or damage by fire or lightning to the amount of $1,500 for four years from the 13th January, 1891, on the following property:
-
3,499.
Fairchild v. Ferguson - (1892) 21 SCR 484 - 1892-12-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
In Lindus v. Bradwell ([27]) a bill had been drawn on William Bradwell, and it was accepted by his wife in her own name, "Mary Bradwell."
-
3,500.
Quirt v. The Queen - (1891) 19 SCR 510 - 1891-11-16
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
Reg. v. Williams[17]; The Queen v. Guinness[18]. [Page 514] The mention of lands held in trust for the Indians does not exclude other trusts.