Recherche avancée

Syntaxe: "", OU, ET, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(AAAA ou AAAA-MM ou AAAA-MM-JJ)
Trier par : Pertinence Date

2,515 résultat(s)

  • 1,576.

    Bonnie v. Aero Tool Works Ltd. - [1952] 1 SCR 495 - 1952-02-05

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Mandat

    & Scott (Southgate) Ltd. v. Oxlade[14]; Bennett, Walden & Co. v. Wood[15]; Spottiswoode v. Doreen Appliances Ltd.[16]; McLean v. Ellio[17]; Chambers v. Smart[18]; Gladstone v. Catena[19].

  • 1,577.

    Knight Sugar Co. v. Webster - [1930] SCR 518 - 1930-02-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    (Re Scott and Alvarez's Contract (1)). Appeal allowed with costs. [1] (1929) 24 Alta.

  • 1,578.

    The Custodian v. Passavant - [1928] SCR 242 - 1928-04-24

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit civil

    transaction where there were not mutual accounts.” Story on Equity, 3rd Ed., pp. 33, 40, 191; Scott v. Surman[7]; and there are many later authorities.

  • 1,579.

    Singer v. Singer - (1916) 52 SCR 447 - 1916-02-01

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Successions

    But there are, no doubt, other authorities in which the contrary has been held, e.g., Scott v. Key[16]; Woods v. Woods[17]; Longmore v. Elcum[18].

  • 1,580.

    The King v. Trudel - (1914) 49 SCR 501 - 1914-03-02

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Expropriation

    I do not think that such evidence can be taken into consideration in the face of that given by Tessier, Scott and others.

  • 1,581.

    Cunard v. The King - (1910) 43 SCR 88 - 1910-02-22

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Expropriation

    [9] 4 M. & Gr. 995; 5 Scott N.R. 689. [10] 7 Moo. P.C. 77. [11] 9 Can. S.C.R. 239.

  • 1,582.

    City of Hamilton v. Hamilton Distillery Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 239 - 1907-02-19

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Appel

    Solicitors for the respondents, Hamilton Brewing Association: J.J. Scott.

  • 1,583.

    Brophy v. North American Life Assurance Co. - (1902) 32 SCR 261 - 1902-05-06

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    See also Lowry v. Bourdieu[21]; Palyart v. Leckie[22]; Paterson v. Powell[23]; Sykes v. Beadon[24]; Begbie v. The Phosphate Sewage Co.[25]; Scott v. Brown[26].

  • 1,584.

    Harris v. Robinson - (1892) 21 SCR 390 - 1892-10-10

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    As to waiver see Salisbury v. Hatcher[5] and Hoggart v. Scott[6]. Plaintiff was entitled to reasonable notice of rescission.

  • 1,585.

    Barton v. McMillan - (1892) 20 SCR 404 - 1892-04-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    Moss Q.C. for the appellants cited James v. Smith[1]; Nobel’s Explosives Co. v. Jones, Scott & Co.[2]

  • 1,586.

    Renvoi relatif à la rémunération des juges de la Cour provinciale de l’Île‑du‑Prince‑Édouard; Renvoi relatif à l'indépendance et à l'impartialité des juges de la Cour provinciale de l’Île‑du‑Prince‑Édouard; R. c. Campbell; R. c. Ekmecic; R. c. Wickman; Manitoba Prov. Judges Assn. c. Manitoba (Justice) - [1998] 1 RCS 3 - 1998-02-10

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Tribunaux

    D. O. Sabey, c.r., et Scott H. D. Bower, pour l’intervenante l’Alberta Provincial Judges’ Association.

  • 1,587.

    R. c. Terry - [1996] 2 RCS 207 - 1996-05-30

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit constitutionnel
    Preuve

    Robert Scott Terry Appelant c. Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée et Le procureur général du Canada Intervenant

  • 1,588.

    Bulletin du 1er mars 1996 - 1996-03-01

    Bulletins

    Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. Ivan G. Whitehall, Q.C. and Kimberley Prost, for the intervener the A.G. of Canada.

  • 1,589.

    R. c. Lachance - [1990] 2 RCS 1490 - 1990-11-22

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit constitutionnel
    Droit criminel

    Jeff Casey et Scott Hutchison, pour l'intimée. //Le juge Sopinka//

  • 1,590.

    Costello et Dickhoff c. Ville de Calgary - [1983] 1 RCS 14 - 1983-01-25

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit municipal

    Procureur de l’intimée: B.E. Scott, Calgary.

  • 1,591.

    Adricon Ltée c. East Angus (Ville d’) - [1978] 1 RCS 1107 - 1977-12-20

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Appel
    Droit municipal

    Procureurs de l’intimée: Desmarais, Scott & Rivard, Sherbrooke. [1] [1976] C.A. 399.

  • 1,592.

    Ministre du Revenu national c. Consolidated Holding Co. - [1974] RCS 419 - 1971-12-20

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit fiscal

    Procureurs de l’intimée: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.

  • 1,593.

    Phillips et al. c. Samilo et al. - [1972] RCS 201 - 1971-06-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Mandat

    Procureurs des défendeurs, appelants, Victoria Phillips et Kenneth Meredith: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.

  • 1,594.

    Welbridge Holdings Ltd. c. Greater Winnipeg - [1971] RCS 957 - 1970-12-17

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit municipal

    A. S. Dewar, c.r., et R. J. Scott, pour la dé­fenderesse, intimée. Le jugement de la Cour a été rendu par

  • 1,595.

    Kloepfer Wholesale Hardware v. Roy - [1952] 2 SCR 465 - 1952-06-30

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Vente

    F.A. Brewin Q.C. and R. Scott for the respondent. The facts of this case make it abundantly clear that the respondent upon the appellant’s announced intention to repudiate the contract, did not elect to treat the contract as at an end, and sue for damages, but did elect to treat the contract as binding and at once invoked

  • 1,596.

    Leduc v. La Banque d'Hochelaga - [1926] SCR 76 - 1925-12-10

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Institutions financières

    [15] [1837] 4 Scott 50. [16] M.L.R. 3 Q.B. 232. [17] Q.R. 21 K.B. 302.

  • 1,597.

    Riordon Co. v. Danforth Co. - [1923] SCR 319 - 1923-04-03

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Action

    Duff J.—In the fall of 1921 the appellant company became financially embarrassed; and on the 11th October of the same year the company requested Mr. Scott, an authorized trustee in bankruptcy, to call a meeting of its creditors to enable it to submit a proposal for an extension of credit, the proposal being that credit

  • 1,598.

    Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Department of Public Works of Ontario - (1919) 58 SCR 189 - 1919-02-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Législation

    In this order the Chief Commissioner, Sir Henry L. Drayton K.C. and the Assistant Commissioner, Mr. D'Arcy Scott, concurred, while Mr. Commissioner S. J. McLean dissented.

  • 1,599.

    Canadian Northwestern Railway Co. v. Moore - (1916) 53 SCR 519 - 1916-06-24

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Transport

    ANGLIN. J.—I agree with the view of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta, stated by Mr. Justice Scott, that the provisions of section 10 of the Alberta "Evidence Act" were violated on the arbitration under review.

  • 1,600.

    Continental Oil Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1916) 52 SCR 605 - 1916-02-01

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Preuve

    IDINGTON J.—I so entirely agree herein with the opinion of Chief Justice Harvey, concurred in by Mr. Justice Scott in the court of appeal, that perhaps I should say no more than express my adoption thereof.